Hi everyone 👋,

I just generated a new project using better-t-stack (awesome stack by the way!),

pnpm create better-t-stack@latest local-first-starter --frontend tanstack-start native-nativewind --backend elysia --runtime bun --database postgres --orm drizzle --api trpc --auth --addons turborepo fumadocs biome ultracite oxlint husky --examples todo --db-setup docker --web-deploy none --git --package-manager pnpm --install

and during setup, I selected all three lint/formatting addons: Biome, Ultracite and Oxlint.

Since Ultracite extends Biome and Oxlint overlaps with both, I'm wondering:

❓ My Main Questions:

1. Is there any benefit or conflict in keeping all three tools together in a monorepo or is that overkill?

2. How should I configure them to avoid rule conflicts or duplicated linting outputs?

3. Does anyone here have practical experience comparing Oxlint vs Biome (via Ultracite) in real-world CI workflows?

4. What would be a recommended strategy if I want to:

   • Use Biome + Ultracite for formatting & stylistic rules
   • Use Oxlint for fast semantic/static checks (maybe TypeScript-aware in the future)

🧠 Thoughts?

Would love to hear how others are approaching this. If you're using a similar stack or have thoughts about tool layering, CI setup, or even rule overrides, I’m all ears!

Thanks in advance 🙏
Armel