|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: A Test Environment for Kafka Applications |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +In [Testing Event Driven Systems](https://www.confluent.io/blog/testing-event-driven-systems), |
| 7 | +I introduced the test-machine and included a simple example for |
| 8 | +demonstration purposes. I made the claim that however your system is |
| 9 | +implemented, as long as its input and output can be represented in |
| 10 | +Kafka, the test-machine would be an effective tool for testing it. Now |
| 11 | +we’ve had some time to put that claim to the...ahem test, I thought |
| 12 | +it might be interesting to explore some actual use-cases in a bit more |
| 13 | +detail. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Having spent a year or so of using the test-machine, I can now say |
| 16 | +with increased confidence that it is an effective tool for |
| 17 | +testing a variety of Kafka based systems. However with the benefit of |
| 18 | +experience, I'd add that you might want to define your own domain |
| 19 | +specific layer of helper functions on top so that your tests may bear |
| 20 | +some resemblance to the discussion that happens in your sprint |
| 21 | +planning meetings. The raw events represent a layer beneath what we |
| 22 | +typically discuss with product owners. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Hopefully the use-cases described in this forthcoming mini-series |
| 25 | +will help clarify this concept and get you thinking about |
| 26 | +how you might be able to apply the test-machine to solve your own |
| 27 | +testing problems. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Before getting into the actual use-cases though, let’s get a test environment |
| 30 | +setup so we can quickly run experiments locally without having to deploy |
| 31 | +our code to a shared testing environment. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +## Service Composition |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +For each of these tests, we’ll be using docker-compose to setup the |
| 36 | +test environment. There are other ways of providing a test-environment |
| 37 | +but the nice thing about docker-compose is that when things go awry |
| 38 | +you can blow away all test state and start again with a clean |
| 39 | +environment. This makes the process of acquiring a test-environment |
| 40 | +*repeatable*, and at least after the first time you do it, pretty |
| 41 | +fast. On my machine, `docker-compose down && docker-compose up -d` |
| 42 | +doesn’t usually take more than 5-10 seconds or so. If you have not |
| 43 | +used the confluent images before, it might take a while to download |
| 44 | +the images if you're not on the end of a fat internet pipe. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +Ideally you should be able to run your tests against a |
| 47 | +test-environment with existing data. Your tests should create all the |
| 48 | +data they need themselves and ignore any data that has been already |
| 49 | +entered so acquiring a fresh test environment is not something you |
| 50 | +should be doing for each test-run. Sometimes while developing a test, |
| 51 | +it can help avoid confusing behavior to have a completely clean environment |
| 52 | +but I wouldn't consider the test to be complete until it can be run |
| 53 | +against a test environment with old data. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Below is a base docker-compose file containing the core services from |
| 56 | +Confluent that will be required to run these tests. Depending on what’s being |
| 57 | +tested, we will need additional services to fully exercise the system |
| 58 | +under test. The configuration choices are made with a view to minimizing |
| 59 | +the memory required by the collection of services. This is tailored |
| 60 | +for the use-case of running small tests on a local laptop that |
| 61 | +typically has zoom, firefox and chrome all clamoring for their share |
| 62 | +of RAM. It is not intended for production workloads. |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +{% highlight yaml %} |
| 65 | +version: '3' |
| 66 | +services: |
| 67 | + zookeeper: |
| 68 | + image: confluentinc/cp-zookeeper:5.1.0 |
| 69 | + expose: |
| 70 | + - "2181" |
| 71 | + ports: |
| 72 | + - "2181:2181" |
| 73 | + environment: |
| 74 | + KAFKA_OPTS: '-Xms256m -Xmx256m' |
| 75 | + ZOOKEEPER_CLIENT_PORT: 2181 |
| 76 | + ZOOKEEPER_TICK_TIME: 2000 |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | + broker: |
| 79 | + image: confluentinc/cp-kafka:5.1.0 |
| 80 | + depends_on: |
| 81 | + - zookeeper |
| 82 | + expose: |
| 83 | + - "9092" |
| 84 | + ports: |
| 85 | + - "9092:9092" |
| 86 | + - "19092:19092" |
| 87 | + environment: |
| 88 | + KAFKA_BROKER_ID: 1 |
| 89 | + KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER_CONNECT: 'zookeeper:2181' |
| 90 | + KAFKA_LISTENER_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_MAP: PLAINTEXT:PLAINTEXT,PLAINTEXT_HOST:PLAINTEXT |
| 91 | + KAFKA_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://broker:9092,PLAINTEXT_HOST://localhost:19092 |
| 92 | + KAFKA_ADVERTISED_HOST_NAME: localhost |
| 93 | + KAFKA_OFFSETS_TOPIC_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 |
| 94 | + KAFKA_GROUP_INITIAL_REBALANCE_DELAY_MS: 0 |
| 95 | + KAFKA_TRANSACTION_STATE_LOG_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 |
| 96 | + KAFKA_AUTO_CREATE_TOPICS_ENABLE: "false" |
| 97 | + KAFKA_OFFSETS_TOPIC_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 |
| 98 | + KAFKA_OFFSETS_TOPIC_NUM_PARTITIONS: 1 |
| 99 | + KAFKA_OPTS: '-Xms256m -Xmx256m' |
| 100 | + KAFKA_TRANSACTION_STATE_LOG_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 |
| 101 | + KAFKA_TRANSACTION_STATE_LOG_MIN_ISR: 1 |
| 102 | + KAFKA_AUTO_OFFSET_RESET: "latest" |
| 103 | + KAFKA_ENABLE_AUTO_COMMIT: "false" |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + schema-registry: |
| 106 | + image: confluentinc/cp-schema-registry:5.1.0 |
| 107 | + depends_on: |
| 108 | + - zookeeper |
| 109 | + - broker |
| 110 | + expose: |
| 111 | + - "8081" |
| 112 | + ports: |
| 113 | + - "8081:8081" |
| 114 | + environment: |
| 115 | + KAFKA_OPTS: '-Xms256m -Xmx256m' |
| 116 | + SCHEMA_REGISTRY_HOST_NAME: schema-registry |
| 117 | + SCHEMA_REGISTRY_KAFKASTORE_CONNECTION_URL: 'zookeeper:2181' |
| 118 | +{% endhighlight %} |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +## Test Environment Healthchecks |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +It’s always a good idea to make sure the composition of services is |
| 123 | +behaving as expected before trying to write tests against |
| 124 | +them. Otherwise you might spend hours scratching your head wondering |
| 125 | +why your system isn’t working when the problem is actually |
| 126 | +mis-configuration of the test environment. |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +The most basic health-check you can do is to run `docker-compose ps`. This |
| 129 | +will show at least that the services came up without exiting |
| 130 | +immediately due to mis-configuration. In the happy case, the state of |
| 131 | +all services should be “Up”. This command also shows which ports are |
| 132 | +exposed by each service which will be important information when it comes |
| 133 | +to configuring the system under test. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +### Accessing the logs |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +When something goes wrong there is often a clue in the logs although it |
| 140 | +will take a bit of experience with them before you'll know what to look |
| 141 | +for. Familiarizing yourself with them will payoff eventually though |
| 142 | +both in “dev mode” when you’re trying to figure out why the code you’re |
| 143 | +writing doesn’t work, and also in “ops mode” when you’re trying to |
| 144 | +figure out what’s gone wrong in a deployed system. Getting access to |
| 145 | +them in the test environment described here is the same as any other |
| 146 | +docker-compose based system. The snippets below demonstrate a few of |
| 147 | +the common use-cases and the full documentation is available |
| 148 | +at [docs.docker.com](https://docs.docker.com/compose/reference/logs/) |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +{% highlight sh%} |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +# get all the logs |
| 153 | +$ docker-compose logs |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +# get just the broker logs |
| 156 | +$ docker-compose logs broker |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +# get the schema-registry logs and print more as they appear |
| 159 | +$ docker-compose logs -f schema-registry |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +{% endhighlight%} |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +### Testing Connectivity |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +Another diagnostic tool that helps when debugging connectivity |
| 166 | +issues is telnet. Experienced engineers will probably know this already |
| 167 | +but for example, to ensure that you can reach kafka from your system under |
| 168 | +test (assuming the system you're testing runs on the host OS), you can try |
| 169 | +to reach the port exposed by the docker-compose configuration. |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +{% highlight sh%} |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +telnet localhost 19092 |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +{% endhighlight %} |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +If the problem is more gnarly than basic connectivity issues, then Julia Evans' |
| 178 | +[debugging zine](https://jvns.ca/debugging-zine.pdf) contains very useful advice |
| 179 | +about debugging *any* problem you have with Linux based systems. |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +That's all for now. In the next article, I'll use this test environment |
| 182 | +together with the [test-machine](https://github.com/FundingCircle/jackdaw/blob/master/doc/test-machine.md) |
| 183 | +library to build a helper function for testing Kafka Connect JDBC Sinks. |
0 commit comments