Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2019-01-24' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-fixes

airlied · airlied · commit 7325e4bd06b0 · 2019-01-25T06:57:46.000+10:00
drm/i915 fixes for v5.0-rc4: - fix priority boost - gvt: fix destroy of shadow batch and indirect ctx Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87k1iu1a2e.fsf@intel.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
@@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static void release_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx)
 
 	i915_gem_object_unpin_map(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
 	i915_gem_object_put(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
+
+	wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj = NULL;
+	wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.shadow_va = NULL;
 }
 
 static int set_context_ppgtt_from_shadow(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload,
@@ -911,11 +914,6 @@ static void complete_current_workload(struct intel_gvt *gvt, int ring_id)
 
 	list_del_init(&workload->list);
 
-	if (!workload->status) {
-		release_shadow_batch_buffer(workload);
-		release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
-	}
-
 	if (workload->status || (vgpu->resetting_eng & ENGINE_MASK(ring_id))) {
 		/* if workload->status is not successful means HW GPU
 		 * has occurred GPU hang or something wrong with i915/GVT,
@@ -1283,6 +1281,9 @@ void intel_vgpu_destroy_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
 {
 	struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &workload->vgpu->submission;
 
+	release_shadow_batch_buffer(workload);
+	release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
+
 	if (workload->shadow_mm)
 		intel_vgpu_mm_put(workload->shadow_mm);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 */
 	if (!(prio & I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT)) {
 		prio |= I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT;
+		active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
 		list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
 			       i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
 	}
@@ -645,6 +646,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		int i;
 
 		priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
+			GEM_BUG_ON(last &&
+				   need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq)));
+
 			/*
 			 * Can we combine this request with the current port?
 			 * It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not
