Skip to content

C++: Add boolean for explicit lambda parameter lists #19686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

IdrissRio
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@IdrissRio IdrissRio added the depends on internal PR This PR should only be merged in sync with an internal Semmle PR label Jun 6, 2025
@IdrissRio IdrissRio changed the title C++: Add flag for explicit lambda parameter lists C++: Add boolean for explicit lambda parameter lists Jun 6, 2025
@IdrissRio IdrissRio force-pushed the idrissrio/lambdaparams branch 7 times, most recently from c92ab35 to 8ef057f Compare June 10, 2025 14:40
@IdrissRio IdrissRio marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2025 08:06
@IdrissRio IdrissRio requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2025 08:06
Copy link
Contributor

@jketema jketema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments

@IdrissRio IdrissRio force-pushed the idrissrio/lambdaparams branch from df9a9b5 to 645ce5b Compare June 11, 2025 09:42
Copy link
Contributor

@jketema jketema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jketema jketema merged commit 7d8d596 into main Jun 11, 2025
13 of 16 checks passed
@jketema jketema deleted the idrissrio/lambdaparams branch June 11, 2025 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C++ depends on internal PR This PR should only be merged in sync with an internal Semmle PR documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants