-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Closed
Description
MCP Network Permissions Test Results
Test Objective
Validate that MCP network permissions feature properly enforces domain restrictions through Squid proxy configuration, ensuring containers can only access explicitly allowed domains.
Test Configuration
- Allowed Domain:
example.com
(as specified in allowed_domains.txt) - Squid Proxy: Active network isolation container
- Test Method: Using mcp__fetch__fetch tool to attempt domain access
Test Results
✅ Allowed Domain Access (PASSED)
- URL:
https://example.com/
- Status: ✅ SUCCESS
- Response: Successfully retrieved Example Domain HTML content
- Observation: Proxy correctly allows access to whitelisted domain
❌ Blocked Domain Access Tests (PASSED - All Correctly Blocked)
1. HTTPBin API Test
- URL:
https://httpbin.org/json
- Status: ❌ BLOCKED
- Error:
Failed to fetch robots.txt https://httpbin.org/robots.txt due to a connection issue
- Observation: Network-level blocking, connection refused
2. GitHub API Test
- URL:
https://api.github.com/user
- Status: ❌ BLOCKED
- Error:
Failed to fetch robots.txt https://api.github.com/robots.txt due to a connection issue
- Observation: Network-level blocking, connection refused
3. Google Website Test
- URL:
https://www.google.com/
- Status: ❌ BLOCKED
- Error:
Failed to fetch robots.txt https://www.google.com/robots.txt due to a connection issue
- Observation: Network-level blocking, connection refused
4. Malicious Domain Test
- URL:
http://malicious-example.com/
- Status: ❌ BLOCKED
- Error:
When fetching robots.txt (http://malicious-example.com/robots.txt), received status 403 so assuming that autonomous fetching is not allowed
- Observation: HTTP 403 Forbidden response from proxy (different blocking mechanism)
Security Analysis
✅ Network Isolation Working Correctly
- Whitelist Enforcement: Only
example.com
domain is accessible - Connection-Level Blocking: Most blocked domains fail at connection level (DNS/TCP)
- HTTP-Level Blocking: Some domains receive HTTP 403 responses from proxy
- Zero Bypass: No tested domain outside the whitelist was accessible
🔒 Security Observations
- Proxy Effectiveness: Squid proxy successfully enforces domain restrictions
- Multiple Block Methods: Uses both connection refusal and HTTP 403 responses
- Container Isolation: MCP containers properly isolated from internet
- DNS Resolution: Controlled through proxy configuration
Recommendations
✅ Current Implementation Strengths
- Network isolation is working as designed
- Whitelist-only approach provides strong security posture
- Multiple blocking mechanisms provide defense in depth
- Clear error messages help with debugging
💡 Potential Enhancements
- Consider logging blocked requests for security monitoring
- Implement metrics for blocked vs allowed requests
- Add configuration validation for allowed_domains.txt format
- Consider rate limiting for allowed domains
Conclusion
✅ MCP Network Permissions feature is working correctly. All blocked domains were successfully prevented from access, while the allowed domain (example.com
) was accessible. The Squid proxy configuration effectively enforces domain restrictions at the network level, providing strong container isolation.
Test Status: PASSED - Network security controls are functioning as designed.
Test Date: 2025-08-22
Test Environment: GitHub Actions / Docker containers
Configuration Files: allowed_domains.txt
, squid.conf
, docker-compose-fetch.yml
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels