-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Add partial overload checks #5476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Michael0x2a
merged 13 commits into
python:master
from
Michael0x2a:improve-partial-overload-checks
Aug 27, 2018
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
af2109c
Add support for partially overlapping types
Michael0x2a a7f3abe
Merge branch 'master' into improve-partial-overload-checks
Michael0x2a 13a2604
Respond to code review; WIP test of meet semantics
Michael0x2a 50c0ddd
WIP
Michael0x2a 86f0b6d
Merge branch 'master' into improve-partial-overload-checks
Michael0x2a edcab01
WIP experiment
Michael0x2a 2158cc3
Remove debug prints
Michael0x2a 5776979
WIP: Simplify checker
Michael0x2a 4a4d8cf
WIP
Michael0x2a 069ae91
Final tweaks?
Michael0x2a 7954788
Merge branch 'master' into improve-partial-overload-checks
Michael0x2a 6bcd167
Merge branch 'master' into improve-partial-overload-checks
Michael0x2a c6e3322
Add a TODO
Michael0x2a File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
Add support for partially overlapping types
This pull request adds more robust support for detecting partially overlapping types. Specifically, it detects overlaps with... 1. TypedDicts 2. Tuples 3. Unions 4. TypeVars 5. Generic types containing variations of the above. It also swaps out the code for detecting overlaps with operators and removes some associated (and now unused) code. This pull request builds on top of #5474 and #5475 -- once those two PRs are merged, I'll rebase this diff if necessary. This pull request also supercedes #5475 -- that PR contains basically the same code as these three PRs, just smushed together.
- Loading branch information
commit af2109c4d23077f18847296ce24558b3d2125703
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH I am not sure what these two tests test. Maybe add a note or somehow modify them so that it is more clear what is a potential failure?