Skip to content

Commit 019c8d9

Browse files
[NFC] Adjust test cases numbering, test commit.
Summary: Test case test14 is missing, adjust the numbering to have a consecutive range. Also a test commit to verify commit access.
1 parent ce8795e commit 019c8d9

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-8
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-8
lines changed

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll

Lines changed: 8 additions & 8 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1024,8 +1024,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
10241024
}
10251025

10261026
; No peeling is profitable here.
1027-
define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) {
1028-
; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1(
1027+
define void @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) {
1028+
; CHECK-LABEL: @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1(
10291029
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
10301030
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0
10311031
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]]
@@ -1074,8 +1074,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
10741074
}
10751075

10761076
; No peeling is profitable here.
1077-
define void @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) {
1078-
; CHECK-LABEL: @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0(
1077+
define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) {
1078+
; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0(
10791079
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
10801080
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0
10811081
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]]
@@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
11251125

11261126
; Similar to @test7, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that
11271127
; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all.
1128-
define void @test17(i32 %k) {
1129-
; CHECK-LABEL: @test17(
1128+
define void @test16(i32 %k) {
1129+
; CHECK-LABEL: @test16(
11301130
; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph:
11311131
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
11321132
; CHECK: for.body:
@@ -1166,8 +1166,8 @@ for.end:
11661166

11671167
; Similar to @test8, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that
11681168
; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all.
1169-
define void @test18(i32 %k) {
1170-
; CHECK-LABEL: @test18(
1169+
define void @test17(i32 %k) {
1170+
; CHECK-LABEL: @test17(
11711171
; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph:
11721172
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
11731173
; CHECK: for.body:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)