Bullenwächter

Learn more about this page

Hallo, Ich wollte fragen ob ich die Erlaubnis erteilt bekomme ihre Bilder und Fotos für die Gießener Zeitung(Deutschlands Erste Mitmachzeitung zu benutzen und zu veröffentlichen für eine schnelle Antwort wäre ich sehr dankbar.

Image:Stilicho.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Are you sure the images depict Stilicho? My information (from Image:Aetius.gif) say they should be Valentinian III, Galla Placidia and Flavius Aetius.--FlagUploader 22:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello FlagUploader! I am quite sure. Stilicho is confirmed by Römisch- Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz (Roman Germanic Central Museum Mainz) there I have taken the picture and by the book Wilfried Menghin: Frühgeschichte Bayerns. Stuttgart 1990 Page 32. I suppose the Image Image:Aetius.gif is wrong titeled. --Bullenwächter ↑ 23:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.--FlagUploader 17:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

File:Boy from Kayhausen X-ray.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Boy from Kayhausen X-ray.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--CactusWriter (talk) 16:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Stilicho.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. The Museo del Duomo in Monza requests to delete all museum images. After an uploader request, in order to avoid legal problems, I have deleted many pictures in Category:Museo del Duomo (Monza). There is also File:Stilicho.jpg, a photo of yours. Do you want to delete this image to avoid legal problems? Thank you--Trixt (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. There ist no need to delete this image as it shows a replica of the dyptichon made at Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum in Mainz, Germany. The image of the replica does not effect the legal rights of the Museum del Duomo in Monza. --Bullenwächter ↑ 20:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Nydam bone arrowheads.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the hint. I have added the license {self|cc-by-sa-3.0} --Bullenwächter ↑ 21:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Karl-Schlabow Willi-Schramm.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

{:Information

|Description=

English: On the left, director Dr. Karl Schlabow wearing a white lab coat and his assistant Willi Schramm on the right examining a reconstructed vessel at Textilmuseum Neumünster, Germany. Behind them a dummy wearing a reconstruction of a Nordic Bronze Age costume. The two wall charts displaying Bronze Age costumes and textile samples

Deutsch: Links auf dem Bild, Museumsdirektor Dr. Karl Schlabow im weißen Kittel und rechts Museumsassistent Willi Schramm betrachten einen rekonstruierten Behälter im Textilmuseum Neumünster. Auf dem Podest hinter ihnen, eine Puppe mit einer rekonstruierten Frauentracht der nordischen Bronzezeit. An der Wand zwei Tafeln mit Abbildungen bronzezeitlicher Kleidung und Gewebeproben.

|Source=Stadtarchiv Neumünster, Neumünster, Germany |Author=Unknown photographer of Neumünster, Germany |Date=Around 1960 |Permission={OTRS pending} |other_versions= }

Category:Neumünster Category:People of Schleswig-Holstein Category:Archaeologists from Germany

Licensing

{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}

--Bullenwächter ↑ 08:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Fetter TextReply

Files you uploaded may be deleted

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 07:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have contacted the autor Dr. van Vilsteren, but unfortunately he hase not replied yet --Bullenwächter ↑ 08:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bog body pictures

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I just want to let you know that I adjusted the brigness for the Husbäke man and the Jührdenerfeld man. Please let me know if you think they are too bright. Thank you, --Gourami Watcher (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Thank you. I think they are OK. --Bullenwächter ↑ 06:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Datei-Hamburgmuseum Puttenportrait1.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

deleetion on my request - done OK --Bullenwächter ↑ 06:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Windeby_I_reconstruction.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Windeby_I_reconstruction.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CactusWriter (talk) 16:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Terracotta German at British Museum.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Lizenz {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}} nachtetragen --Bullenwächter ↑ 00:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Mädchen_von_Dröbnitz.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mädchen_von_Dröbnitz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rendswuhren Man Ballet Pose

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo,

I changed the license on File:Rendswühren Man 1873.jpg from "own work" to "public domain" because it had been taken in 1873. I hope that is o.k. with you. Tschuss! --Gourami Watcher (talk) 23:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Its OK. --Bullenwächter (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:5 bolgár leva 1974 0002.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:5 bolgár leva 1974 0002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 17:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reply

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	Hello, Bullenwächter. You have new messages at Gourami Watcher's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Gourami Watcher (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello odder! Thank you ;-)) --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:Period

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I undid your last edit to Template:Period because it was breaking the model. Also, Template:Middle Ages already exists. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh sorry for that.. May you please fix it in order to avoid any problems - Thanks --Bullenwächter (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

.VERNETZT#ZUKUNFTSCAMP" auf Kampnagel Hamburg - persönliche Einladung

Lieber Bullenwächter und alle Hamburger Wikkpedianer

wir möchten Euch gerne auf die große Eröffnungswoche auf Kampnagel aufmerksam machen und persönlich einladen teilzunehmen: vom 26. bis 30. September werden sich auf Kampnagel Experten aus den Bereichen Wissenschaft, Politik, Philosophie und natürlich Kunst zu .VERNETZT#DAS ZUKUNFSTCAMP versammeln: eine Bestandsaufnahme unserer digitalen Gesellschaft und eine Sammlung von Antworten auf die Frage: Wie wollen wir „.vernetzt#“ leben? Demokratie und Euro-Krise in Zeiten von Internet, neue Visionen digitaler Kommunikation und Gesellschaft sowie die partizipatorische und gestalterische Macht des Einzelnen – das sind nur einige von vielen Diskussionsinhalten des „Zukunftcamps“, das von uns zusammen mit der ZEIT Stiftung als großes Bürgerforum geplant ist - bis auf die Vorstellungen abends ist der Eintritt umsonst und es gibt extra Formate, an denen Zuschauer selbst Themen einbringen können. Eingeladene Experten sind u.a. Stéphane Hessel (Autor von „Empört Euch!“), Lina Ben Mhenni (tunesische Internetaktivistin), Richard Barbrook (Politikphilosoph), Alexis Tsipras (Vorsitz linkes Parteienbündnis aus Griechenland), Wolfgang Kraushaar (Hamburger Institut für Sozialforschung), Holm Friebe („Zentrale Intelligenz Agentur“), uv.m. Abends gibt es zwei besonders spannende Aufführungen zu erleben: einmal ASSASSINATE ASSANGE beruhend auf mehreren Interviews das die Regisseurin Angela Richter mit Julian Assange geführt hat sowie Hintergrundrecherchen zum „Deep“-, oder „Dark-Web“, und zweitens einen Tanzabend des Choreografen Hofesh Shechter UPRISING/THE ART OF NOT LOOKING BACK. Am Freitag, den 28.September, gibt es im Anschluss an die Aufführung von „Assassinate Assange“ ein entsprechendes Panel DARK WEB, DEEP WEB, INVISIBLE WEB das Euch vielleicht besonders interessieren könnte.

Es würde mich sehr freuen, wenn wir Dein/Euer Interesse für die Veranstaltung gewinnen konnten und Du bist herzlich eingeladen mich wegen Kartenreservierungen für die Aufführungen zu kontaktieren – darüber hinaus wäre es auch toll, wenn Du gbffls. auf diese Veranstaltung aufmerksam machen würdest- wir hoffen, in Hamburg und deutschlandweit, den Diskurs zur digitalen Gesellschaft neu anzuregen!

mehr Informationen unter: www.vernetzterleben.de und www.kampnagel.de

Caroline Spellenberg Kampnagel Internationale Kulturfabrik GmbH Jarrestraße 20 22303 Hamburg email: caroline.spellenberg@kampnagel.de Tel.: +49 40 27094960 Fax.: +49 40 27094911

Gibt es noch mehr Informationen zu den Wittenmoor Stelen?

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

...ausser die auf der File:Wittemoor_Stelen.jpg-Seite? Und was ist die Quelle für die bereits dort gegebenen Infos? Ein hochinteressantes Relikt im Bezug auf gender-theory! schöne Grüße--Thomas714 (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Thomas714. Vielen Dank für Dein Interesse. Hier einige der wichtigsten Quellen zu den beiden Stelen:

Hajo Hayen: Hölzerne Kultfiguren am Bohlenweg XLII (IP) im Wittenmoor (Gemeinde Berne, Landkreis Wesermarsch). In: Niedersächsischer Landesverein für Urgeschichte (Hrsg.): Die Kunde N.F. Nr. 22, Hildesheim 1971, ISSN 0342-0736, S. 88–123.
Thorsten Capelle: Vorrömische Eisenzeit und gallomanische Welt. In: Antropomorphe Holzidole in Mittel- und Nordeuropa (= Scripta minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 1995/96. Nr. 1). Almquist & Wiksell International, Stockholm 1995, ISBN 91-22-01705-4, S. 16-28.

Diese Stelen werden in zahlreichen wissenschaftlichen und populären Werken beschrieben, die beiden obigen halte ich für die wissenschaftlich fundiertesten. Es ist ein sehr faszinierender Fund, dessen Intention und Funktion nicht mehr sicher klärbar ist und zu unzähligen Interpretationsversuchen führte. --Bullenwächter (talk) 13:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bis-Striche und {{Size}}

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Bullenwächter,

bei der beginnenden Abarbeitung von Category:Unsupported object für d:Wikidata:WikiProject Visual arts bin ich auf einige von Dir eingestellte Dateien gestoßen. Vielen Dank für die guten Bilder. Da Du offensichtlich recht viel einstellst, lohnt es sich vielleicht für Künftiges darauf hinzuweisen: Benutze doch vielleicht Halbgeviertstriche als Bis-Striche, so wie hier (vgl. auch de:Bis-Strich). Vielen Dank im Voraus und für all die schönen Bilder, beste Grüße und einen guten Rutsch, --Marsupium (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ach noch etwas: Vielleicht könntest Du auch die unnötigen Fehleranzeigen, die im englischen (und wahrscheinlich auch anderen) Interfaces durch die fehlende Angabe des "prec"-Parameters von {{Size}} entstehen (vgl. [1]), vermeiden (vgl. [2]) und die Vorlage herauslöschen, wenn Du sie nicht verwendest (vgl. [3]). Vielen Dank, --Marsupium (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Danke für Deine Hinweise. Das mit den Bis-Strichen versuche ich zu vermeiden. Zum "prec"-Parameter: war mir bisher nicht aufgefallen da ich mit der deutschen Spracheinstellung arbeite und hatte diesen Parameter als Genauigkeit der genommenen Maße interprätiert. Ich kümmer mich um die Korrekturen. --Bullenwächter (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:BrunoTacke0001.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:BrunoTacke0001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

sугсго 15:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have corrected the file description. --Bullenwächter (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Jagdlappen Clemenswerth.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jagdlappen Clemenswerth.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your info. I added the licence {self|cc-by-sa-3.0} which referres to the photo. --Bullenwächter (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Meisje van Yde, Drents Museum, N1897 VI1.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Meisje van Yde, Drents Museum, N1897 VI1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Richard 10:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Huldremosekvinden DO-1232 original.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

File:Huldremosekvinden DO-1232 original.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Palnatoke (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading more of Nationalmuseet's images. Unfortunately, not all the museum's photographers have agreed to open licenses. --Palnatoke (talk) 03:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:OHM - Granaten.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Bullenwächter!

Ich freue mich immer, wenn meine Bilder verwendet werden. Könntest du mir ein Belegexemplar deiner Publikation zukommen lassen? Falls ja, lasse ich dir meine Adresse zukommen. Das Foto ist leider nur im vorliegenden Format verfügbar und auch das einzige, das ich von diesem Motiv gemacht habe. MfG Wolfgang Sauber -- Xenophon (talk) 8:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Xenophon. Die endgültige Publikation wird erst in etwa 2 Jahren folgen. Ich melde mich, wenns soweit ist. --Bullenwächter (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reiterscheibe von Pliezhausen

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reiterscheibe von Pliezhausen

Hi there! I was just wondering if there's any chance that you have a higher resolution version of this image? Its a great photo, and I just added a cropped version to the Sutton Hoo helmet page. A high resolution image, if you have one, would make it a bit easier to see the details, especially of the figure on the back of the horse. Thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear Usernameunique. Unfortunately this is the best image I have from the object as I took it with a pocet camera without tripod under difficult light conditions. Aditionally I lost the orignal image after an HDD-crash. On my next visit so the Museum a better image of the object is on top of my agenda - but this will still take some time. --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

That sounds great, thank you! There's no rush for a new image—as said, it's already a nice photograph—although of course a high resolution one would be welcomed if/when you have the time. --Usernameunique (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Otzi copper axe replica

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would I be able to use this image in a book I am writing about charcoal making, please? I would need a copyright form signing for the publishers, Crowood. Many thanks Rebecca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oakswood (talk • contribs) 14:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear Rebecca. Thank you for your message and your interest in my image. Of course you are allowed to use my image. I sent you an eMail regarding the addtibution. I hope you recevied it. Cheers --Bullenwächter (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Porsmose DO-1229.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

HI, The template used is wrong, this is not a work of art. Could you fix it please? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Hi: I changed the template. I originally reffered the artwork template to the photography, but you are right the cranium is not an artwork. --Bullenwächter (talk) 20:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Venus 4 from Kostenki RU front

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I just added your above mentioned picture to https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venusbeeldjes_van_Kostjonki. Thank you for uploading! Jürgen Eissink (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC).Reply

Thanks! Bullenwächter (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Money of India

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I have restored all money of India: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. Please use {{GODL-India}} as a dual license. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

OK thas sad Bullenwächter (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Appen

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Bullenwächter, Du hattest einige Gebäude in Appen als Kulturdenkmäler bezeichnet. In der offiziellen Denkmalliste sind selbige jedoch nicht verzeichnet. Ein Irrtum Deinerseits? Gruß in den hohen Norden --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Die Gebäude waren auf dieser [http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Landesregierung/LD/Downloads/Denkmallisten/Denkmalliste%20Pinneberg.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5 Liste verzeichnet. Die List wurde mittlerweile grundlegend überarbeitet und die meisten Gebäude sind jetzt nicht mehr gelistet. Die neuere Liste wurde aufgelegt nachdem ich die Fotos hochgeladen hatte. --Bullenwächter (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Robertshall

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Deine Mühen in allen Ehren, aber wie willst Du für ein Foto von 1920 ein OTRS-Ticket herkriegen? --Markscheider (talk) 11:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Der Benutzer der die Dateien hochgeladen hat ist Vorsitzender des Verein Bergwerk Robertshall e.V., welcher das Archiv des Bergwerks verwaltet und Inhaber der Rechte über die Archivalien ist. Bullenwächter (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ich kann mir vorstellen, daß das die Urheberrechtsspezialisten hier anders sehen. Daß er die Archivalien hütet, bedeutet nicht, daß er alle Rechte daran hält. --Markscheider (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Uhreberrecht ist auch nicht mein Steckenpferd - die Entscheidung möchte ich lieber den Fachleuren vom OTRS Team überlassen.Bullenwächter (talk) 17:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bruegel -The Triumph of Death.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bruegel -The Triumph of Death.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bruegel -The Triumph of Death.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Battery Operated Super Astronaut.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Battery Operated Super Astronaut.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DiegoAma (talk) 02:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Use of your photograph

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have used your photograph of a 16th century matchlock revolver in an answer on Worldbuilding Stack Exchange.

Thank you! Imerologul (talk) 06:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

- Thank you for the info! Bullenwächter (talk) 06:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Traditional garden dwarf

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to use your picture in a publication in the Netherlands of the Traditional German garden dwarf (garden gnome) made of clay with heavily weathered painting. Originally holding a smoking pipe, a fishing rod or a flower in his right hand. Probably manufactured in the first half of the 20th century in Gräfenrode, Thuringia, Germany.

Can you send me the name of the artist? Thank you, Regards, Dr. Sandra den Dulk, sjsdendulk@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardmannetje (talk • contribs) 10:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello - I just replied by eMail. Bullenwächter (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Dracole Wajda c 1500 - Rosenwald Collection 9433835.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Copyright status: File:Dracole Wajda c 1500 - Rosenwald Collection 9433835.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dracole Wajda c 1500 - Rosenwald Collection 9433835.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The image is Public Domain as per source. I have added the licenzse. Bullenwächter (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

honigkerzen

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

diese bienenwachskerzen mich interessiert der docht, material ? wie geflochten ? Danke fürs teilen 2A00:20:D042:CD2F:E053:C42F:764C:80FD 23:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, um welche Kerzen geht es gnau? Bullenwächter (talk) 12:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Goldener Bär trophy - DSC 1292.jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic