Wikimedia Commons

Einsamer Schütze

Joined 2 December 2006
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Yann in topic Copyright status: File:Passage grave Gökhem 94-1 (Frälsegården).webp

Ukranenland

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Einsamer Schütze, schön, dass du vor vier Jahren so viele Bilder vom Ukranenland (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukranenland) hochgeladen hast. Leider sind die mittlerweile veraltet und es wäre schön, wenn du diese entfernen könntest. Für Details oder die Angaben welche Bilder entfernt werden sollen, kannst du dich gerne bei mir melden. Viele Grüße — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mors certa (talk • contribs) 13:24, 09 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Aber sonst gehts gut? --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ich würde Ihnen sehr gerne die Gründe etc erklären? Wäre eine Kontaktaufnahme außerhalb dieser Seite möglich? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mors certa (talk • contribs) 14:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wenn du neue Bilder hochladen möchtest, kannst du das gerne machen, ohne dass alte Bilder gelöscht werden müssen. Du kannst mir aber gern über die Werkzeugleiste auf der linken Seite eine E-Mail zukommen lassen, wenn du dein Problem ausführlicher schildern möchtest. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Habe jetzt eine Mail mit Erklärungen geschrieben ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mors certa (talk • contribs) 19:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Schade, dass keine Antwort kommt. Es geht hierbei doch lediglich um einzelne Bilder. Warum kann man sich nicht einigen? Das Museum würde im Anschluss auch zügig neue Bilder hoch laden... Ich verstehe die Sturheit nicht... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mors certa (talk • contribs) 13:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image:Haackestraße_2_Merseburg.JPG

edit

Hallo, Einsamer Schütze, unsere Familie erbittet die Entfernung des Bildes "Haackestr. 2". Der betreffende Stolperstein befindet sich an der abseitigen Straßenecke und rechtfertigt nicht, dass das Wohnhaus, etwa 30 m weiter entfernt, und mit Adressenbezeichnung, genannt wird. V.a. da dieses Bild unter GNU-Lizenz weiter verwendet werden darf. Wir wissen, dass in der BRD keine rechtliche Handhabe gegen das Veröffentlichen von Bildern von Gebäuden existiert. Wir appellieren an Ihre Einsicht, und erinnern an das Beispiel von GoogleMaps, welches Hausbesitzern die Möglichkeit eröffnet hat, gegen die Veröffentlichung von Hausansichten vorzugehen. Gerne sende ich Ihnen ein Alternativ-Bild zu, was an Stelle des veröffentlichen Fotos treten kann. Das Bild unseres Hauses bitte ich unverzüglich zu entfernen. Herzlichen Dank, Ihr Wiki-Kollege Emblaem.

Image:Statue-of-Hemiun.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 23:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Einsamer Schütze, Bedauerlich, dass auf dem Foto das Bild der Statue durch einen unruhigen Hintergrund (dunkles Rechteck und Schatten einer Vitrine) gestört wird. --84.130.199.131 22:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Catacombs_of_Paris_03.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image:Ankhmara_Giza.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Ankhmara_Giza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lokal_Profil 15:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Robert_II_of_France.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert_II_of_France.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO2 21:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Philipp_von_Schwaben_1200_small.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Philipp_von_Schwaben_1200_small.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 22:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Dahschur Sattelite Pyramid 02.JPG

edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Excellent work !

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Einsamer ;o)

You have done an excellent work with your pics of the Hildesheim egyptian collection and your pics are very fine. This collection is amazing and very few pics of it are online on the web or here on Commons.

If you need any help about i'll be very happy to. By the way, i put some new category on some of your pics. Feel free to correct it if there is any problem with. Thank you for this work! A brother in work Neithsabes 14:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Einsamer Schütze!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Sultan Suleiman II.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sultan Suleiman II.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sultan Suleiman II.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Dölauer Heide Grabhügel 27 24.JPG

edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

deine bilder vom fotoflug cuxhaven

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hallo einsamer schütze, es wäre schön, wenn du dich hier: [1] an der disk beteiligen würdest bzw. deine bilder noch etwas ausführlicher mit fakten beschriften würdest. dontworry (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Großsteingräber

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Danke für Deine Korrekturen bei Category:Großsteingrab Mechelsdorf bzw. Category:Großsteingrab Neu Gaarz 2. --Botaurus (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aufnahmejahr von File:2012-02-22-Fotoflugkurs Cuxhaven-Einsamer Schütze 141.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, der Dateiname suggeriert, dass das Bild 2012 aufgenommen wurde, die Beschreibung sagt 2013. Der Tag des Monats unterscheidet sich ebenfalls. Was ist korrekt? Ggf. sollte das Bild verschoben werden. --Marc-André Aßbrock (talk) 13:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Die Datumsangabe ist korrekt, der Dateiname leider nicht. Das Problem betrifft über 300 Fotos, bei denen ich leider erst nach dem Hochladen gemerkt habe, dass ich mich im Jahr vertan hatte. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ich habe mal ein paar Bilder in Kategorien eingeordnet. Gehe ich recht in der Annahme, dass alle Bilder der Serie in Deutschland entstanden sind? --Marc-André Aßbrock (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ja, sind alle im Großraum Cuxhaven entstanden. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Category:Großsteingräber bei Albersdorf

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Einsamer Schütze, nach welchem System sind diese Großsteingräber/Grabhügel durchgezählt? Ich frage, weil ich Bilder vom Grabhügel Kaiserberg in Albersdorf habe und nun ratlos bin, welche Nummer der haben könnte. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 11:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ies, die Zählung richtet sich nach Ernst Sprockhoffs Atlas der Megalithgräber Deutschlands. Die Gräber haben dort die laufenden Nummern 144-151, also Grab 1 = Nr. 144, Grab 2 = 145 usw. Du kannst ja mal hier [2] schauen, ob du deine Fotos mit den dort erfassten Anlagen abgleichen kannst. Allerdings solltest du auch sicher gehen, ob es sich bei deiner Anlage um ein Großsteingrab oder um einen Grabhügel handelt, das Sprockhoff-System gilt nämlich nur für Großsteingräber. Grüße --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Danke! -- Ies (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Historische Gefechtsdarstellung der Völkerschlacht bei Leipzig 2013

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I had hoped someone would photograph this great event for commons.But I did not expect so many (and excellent) images.A tribute to those who took part.Danke Notafly (talk) 11:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC) Best wishes from IrelandReply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tip zur Bildbearbeitung

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, mal ein Tip - Irfanview zur Bildbearbeitung. Hat eine Automatikfunktion, die fast alle Bilder wirklich besser macht und das ist so einfach, selbst ich kann das ;). Insbesondere Bilder aus Museen, und hier die hinter Glas, macht das Programm besser. Ich habe mal noch zwei deiner Bilder bearbeitet - beim dunklen sieht man das recht deutlich, beim anderen sind die Grüntöne viel satter (erkennt man aber nicht unbedingt auf den ersten Blick). Kannst du ja mal probieren. Ich nutze das knapp ein Jahr und habe schon 100e meiner Bilder neu hoch geladen. Auch Beschneiden und kleinere Rotationen gehen recht gut. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragments of statues of Khafra; Ägyptisches Museum der Universität Leipzig, accession number 1945.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chimu figurines, Roemer- und Pelizaeus-Museum; accession number V. 9443.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments1 person in discussion
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reserve head Hildesheim RPM 2384.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reserve head Hildesheim RPM 2158.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Group Statue of Pepi and Ra-shepses, Museum Hildesheim, accession number 17.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File source is not properly indicated: File:SAARC3.png

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SAARC3.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:SAARC3.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Ukranenland 23.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Ukranenland 23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mors certa (talk) 09:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Ukranenland 29.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Ukranenland 29.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mors certa (talk) 09:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

12 Apostel

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vielleicht sind die neuen Bilder in Category:12_Apostel_(Langenbach) für dich von Interesse.

Die neuere Urspungsgeschichte wird auf jeden Fall von dem Ortshistoriker bevorzugt. Careerfromhome (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Luftbilder Großsteingräber Altmark

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Habe 46 Bilder fertig und hochgeladen. Bitte mal Category:Fotodokumentation von Großsteingräbern in der Altmark September 2019 Aerial kontrollieren, ob ich alle richtig zugeordnet habe. Schadewohl 3 habe ich wohl doch nirgendwo drauf. --PaulT (talk) 11:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hallo @PaulT: , großartige Bilder, einige habe ich bereits in Artikeln eingebunden. Die Zuordnung der Bilder ist korrekt. Hier übrigens noch der Link zur Kostenerstattung durch WMDE. Es gilt eine Pauschale von 0,30 Euro/km. Wenn du die erstattet haben möchtest, brauchst du nur das Formular ausfüllen und WMDE die genaue Fahrtroute zukommen lassen. Grüße, --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Danke, wollen die das als normalen Brief oder reichen PDFs und ein Fahrtenbuch in Excel per E-Mail (und wer ist Deine oder unsere Ansprechperson im Projekt Ideenförderung?)? Habe übrigens angefangen, die Bilder von der Rückfahrt am Sonntag einzustellen (siehe hier). Mit den Luftbildern bin ich fertig, kommen aber in den nächsten Wochen noch ein paar bilder "von unten" dazu, u. a. von Tangermünde (da sind manche in Commons ziemlich dunkel ...). --PaulT (talk) 11:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ansprechperson ist Nicolas Rück. Wenn du alle Belege nur digital hast, reicht es wahrscheinlich, sie zusammen mit dem unterschriebenen und eingescanten Erstattungsformular per E-Mail zu schicken. Ich freu mich auf weitere Fotos. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Danke, habe es heute doch vorsichtshalber per SnailMail verschickt. --PaulT (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Danke nochmals für die Hinweise und für die Organisation der Altmark-Megalithik-Rundreise. WMDE hat mir gerade die gefahrenen Kilometer erstattet. --PaulT (talk) 08:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Neanderthal Museum 12.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Neanderthal Museum 12.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: FOP Germany does not include building interiors
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mass deletion request

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Hi,

As far I can see, you seem to have nominated all images in Category:Australopithecus afarensis models for deletion yesterday.

Next time you nominate a whole category, because of a general copyright issue with all images, or even a lot of images who all have the same problem in general, could you please start a Mass deletion request? They need to be treated as one, and I'd like to comment on the copyright status of all of them in general. But now there is no overview now of all the different DR's you created yesterday that concern the same rational. Also for the admins working through the DR's, this is way easier.

Schöne Grüße, Ciell (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ciell, it was Dunkleosteus77 who nominated all those files for speedy deletion. I just moved them all to the regular deletion request. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
No idea such a process existed. Should I redo all of them? Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
That would be nice. It's better to have a discussion before deleting such a vast number of photos. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ah, sorry about that Einsamer Schüzte.
@Dunkleosteus77: If you could, that indeed would be great. Because you do have a point, and we deleted several images of recontructions on humans in the past, but with a slightly different reasoning. I would like to link to those DR's, in support of your DR. Ciell (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've opened it Commons:Deletion requests/2020/09/07#Hominin photos violating FoP Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Danke!

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, danke dir für die nachträgliche Korrektur bei dieser und ähnlichen Dateien! Die sind mir leider beim Durchpflügen der Weißig-Kategorie nach fehlenden Zeitangaben durchgerutscht. Tut mir leid, dass du nun Mehraufwand hattest. Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 11:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Borchardt Sahure 32.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Schütze, in das Bild sind gestrichelte Linien eingezeichnet. Die machen die Anordnung der Fragmente klar, sind also gut. Sind die von Dir, oder von Borchert?

Hintergrund: Wenn ein Bild vektorisiert und dann vereinfacht wird, können Artefakte entstehen, die genau so aussehen, wie dieses Bild in starker Verkleinerung anmutet. Dieser Eindruck würde möglicherweise vermieden, wenn weitere Linien interpoliert würden, sodass der Zweck der Linien auch bei starker Verkleinerung intuitiv erfasst würde. Leider würde sich das verbieten, wenn die Linien von Borchert wären. Ich vermute, das ist leider der Fall, richtig? --Vollbracht (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ja, die Linien sind von Borchardt und nicht von mir nachbearbeitet. --Einsamer Schütze (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Großsteingrab_Bebertal_II_11

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Großsteingrab Bebertal II 11 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Cephyr~commonswiki (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kategorie Interior ... ausgetragen

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, hatte keinerlei Absicht, diese Kategorie auszutragen. Das war irgendwie ein 'webtechnischer Selbstläufer'. Schönen Sonntag, --Drekamu (talk) 11:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

NATO Enlargement

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have seen that you edited mentioned map so I am sking you to adjust two issues. 1. West Berlin wasn't part of NATO or FRG before 1990 so should be marked with marked with color for former GDR expansion; 2. Saar Protectorate was disestablished in 1957 in have become part of FRG, Saar was neither part of NATO or FRG before so it was another expansion of alliance not included in map. Aight 2009 (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Spacecrafts_in_Star_Trek

edit
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Spacecrafts in Star Trek has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 05:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Passage grave Gökhem 94-1 (Frälsegården).webp

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Passage grave Gökhem 94-1 (Frälsegården).webp. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Einsamer_Schütze&oldid=905196209"