Content deleted Content added
→Problems above addressed at noticeboard: new section |
→Question: I think "Avathaar" has suggested reasonable issues for discussion, now let's get to some specific suggestions for article improvement |
||
Line 72:
::::::* It's time to reinstate the indef ban. BTW, I have disabled the "helpme" template. -- [[User:BullRangifer|Brangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 01:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Avathaar&diff=296870811&oldid=296814160 This is indeed a violation of his promise]", "he's violating an agreement" <-- I do not see the "violation". Can you explain what you see as a "violation"? "he's enlisting meatpuppets now", "He shouldn't be discussing the topic of homeopathy" <-- I do not agree with either of these statements. My hope is that this page will allow for exploration of specific proposals for improving articles, including the [[Homeopathy]] article. "The use of the words he objects to have also been dealt with and this isn't the place to rehash it", "It's time to reinstate the indef ban" <-- I do not agree with either of these statements. If the topics of discussion on this page are not of interest to you, maybe you should stop reading this page. I remain interested in hearing specific suggestions for improvement of the [[Homeopathy]] article in areas such as which studies to mention, how to correctly use terms like "quackery" in the article and how to reasonably balance the desire of Wikipedia readers to learn what homeopathy is with the desire of some Wikipedians to tell readers what to think about homeopathy. --[[User:JWSchmidt|JWSchmidt]] ([[User talk:JWSchmidt|talk]]) 04:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC) --[[User:JWSchmidt|JWSchmidt]] ([[User talk:JWSchmidt|talk]]) 04:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
== Problems above addressed at noticeboard ==
| |||