Talk:Desegregation in the United States Marine Corps

Black Marines were in combat in WW II

Nice article, but it stops short and leaves the impression that Black Marines did not serve in combat zones, but they did, see this and google something like "black marine wwii". BarkingMoon (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Yup, absolutely, I'm working on expanding the article by perhaps 20,000-30,000 bytes more, so of course combat will be covered. Binksternet (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Cool. BarkingMoon (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Undue tag

Absent discussion by RightCowLeftCoast who tagged the article with the edit summary of "does not encompass all minorities", I will begin the discussion of the indicated problem.

Basically, Asians, Amerindians and white Hispanics all had an easier time joining the Marines than blacks did. I will bring those other minorities into the discussion, but the meat of the story is the African-American contribution.

Asians join the American military in very small proportion to the general population. This has always been true and is still true today.

Native American Indians were first brought into the Marines as special code talkers, distributed widely in small groups, a total of about 400 soldiers in WWII. They did not form whole battalions. Today they join the Marines in very small numbers.

White Hispanics have had little trouble in the Marines. Notable individuals have earned top medals since 1899. I am having a very difficult time finding out about specifically non-white Hispanics in the Marines; the sources are not many if they are out there at all.

At any rate, I will be making the article reflect all the non-white minorities. Binksternet (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Excellent move in the right direction. BarkingMoon (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

This article is filling in nicely. Keep up the good work. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Phillip Johnston

I don't think he was Native American. It says his dad was a missionary and he learned Navajo from Navajo kids. It seems he was a white guy who happened to live among Native Americans.BarkingMoon (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

1948 to 1960

Marines do not guard the Capitol. Soldiers do. (It makes one wonder if Airmen guard the Supreme Court, but I digress.) Paul, in Saudi (talk) 03:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Desegregation in the United States Marine Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110515094045/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq61-2.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq61-2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Desegregation in the United States Marine Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721231626/http://pvmsec.info/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1723 to http://pvmsec.info/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1723
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305180406/http://www.marines.mil/news/publications/Documents/Blacks%20in%20the%20Marine%20Corps%20%20PCN%2019000306200_1.pdf to http://www.marines.mil/news/publications/Documents/Blacks%20in%20the%20Marine%20Corps%20%20PCN%2019000306200_1.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130063434/http://www.chcp.org/memorialday.html to http://www.chcp.org/memorialday.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

WEIGHT issues

This is way too soft 1949-1981. I'm picking "New Wave" as a terminal point due to archival openings and the transformation of post-Carter United States into a new order of economic and social relationships. This isn't a problem with the use of existing resources, but rather a problem with editors not having sought out and used post 1949 fixated resources adequately. The article moves from considered military personnel history into institutional boasting. We can do better than what the USMC or its supporters thought about itself in the 1950s 1960s and 1970s. Both post-archival scholarship, and engaged pre-archival scholarship ought to exist on this topic: desegregation was not one order, but a process of transformation of the USMC from an image of the United States belief about itself as a segregated white nation, to an image of the United States belief about itself in terms of contemporary political constructions of raciality and service.

This is ***not*** meant to criticise existing editors work on the article, but rather, as someone who really sought to get his teeth into 1948-1979, the meat for me was absent. Please. I want to read the similar high quality content 1948-1979 as exists 178x-1979.

As a brief, the article could do with observing raciality in British North American recruitment of marines and equivalents, and the organisation of underground naval oriented revolutionary paramilitary prior to the formation of the Continental Marines: the prehistory of raciality in what would become the coastal and trading communities which supplied UK marines and revolutionary undergrounds. 08:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)