Talk:Sheila Kuehl
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source of the Super Bowl Sunday Myth
editProbably need to say something about the fact that Kuehl was the original source of the misinformation regarding a dramatic rise in domestic violence on Super Bowl Sunday. --TimeDog 20:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Domestic Partner?
editI there public information on Ms. Kuehl's partner? Is she in a long term relationship? 24.253.28.149 (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Looking over the interviews for her 2014 run for an LA Supervisor position they mention that she is currently single.--Wowaconia (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Problems with the article
editThis article has an excessive amount of detail, is not well organized and needs significant revisions.--JumpLike23 (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing edited here ? this article is very full of self-quotes and self-image elevating, sounding as if subject wrote her own promo & PR here.
A wikipedia MONITOR MUST review and redact all the extra superficial, not-real nor relevant details, and not let such a commercially-promoting 'piece' of non-verifiable / non-credible but a self-written [?] article appear here, Please !
Much of that personal-details-story-telling obviously HAS NO EXTERNAL REFERENCES to authenticate her spiel here. This is another of many self-serving promos mis-placed here -
that needs to be not just 'edited' but huge portions be eliminated --
except for the few facts of her actual credible positions held, & basic essence & Facts corroborated - of her actual real bio - if verifiable, ...
this is a 'story' told by subject with her many casual 'own words' included as if they were referenced by other publication's quotes ? but these are NOT
+ question her own wanting to get credit for her own political points emphasized too - huh ? and not her writing her own bio-or having collegue do it for her benefit - to dilute & then make wikipedia's reputation fail, as her 'story' here is presented. PLEASE EDIT & Monitor these fake pieces that reduce Wikipedia's overall believe-ability + valid-ity. Activistrep2again (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Activistrep2again Sept 27, 2022 4:44 PM PDT
Sheila Kuehl’s Time at Harvard Law School
editI see the summary in the article references her “year” at Harvard Law School as 1994. She graduated with me with her JD degree in the class of 1978.
I don’t know where the 1994 came from, or what it refers to, but it should be deleted. Now, I haven’t kept up with her that much, so perhaps she was a lecturer at the law school in 1994, but I don’t think so. In any event, just sticking 1994 into her biography doesn’t do anything. 😊 63.155.120.206 (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)