October 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Religion in Asia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:OR and please do not disrupt text-source integrity. JimRenge (talk) 19:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JimRenge bro Christianity is 18% Sharbel2 (talk) 19:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Religion in Asia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JimRenge Bro it's 18% not 7.2 Sharbel2 (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please consider visiting the WP:TEAHOUSE if you have any questions about editing wikipedia. JimRenge (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Religion in Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. The source doesn't even mention Christianity. Erp (talk) 04:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Asia. Please do not add unsourced changes of statistical data with misleading edit summaries. JimRenge (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Asia. You again changed figures in a pie chart without giving a source (and I checked whether the current source for the pie chart had your figures, it didn't). It is possible that you have another reliable source with the figures you want, if so you should tell us. Note I've started a discussion on the pie chart in the Religion in Asia talk page. Feel free to mention that source there. Erp (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Religion in Asia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Asia. Erp (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

October 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked for 72 hours from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You are also blocked for Edit warring. You must provide a reference to a reliable source for the 18% figure that you are trying to add. This is mandatory. You cannot try repeatedly to ram your change through. It is not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply