Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Commey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Commey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not quite passing WP:GNG Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have moved the nomination here since it was wrongly posted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Commey per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aaron_Commey&oldid=879601003 Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass WP:NPOL. Could be argued that the subject does meet WP:GNG for the Miami Herald article, but even so, that's just one event, and it's not really a notable event at that. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, WP:NPOL. SportingFlyer T·C 18:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being a non-winning candidate for mayor of a city does not constitute an WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, but this does not demonstrate any credible claim to preexisting notability for other reasons and is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to make his unsuccessful candidacy a special case over and above most other people's unsuccessful candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trounced candidates are never notable. Also, county leaders of a politcial party are not notable for such, let alone of a political party that holds no elective office in the county in question.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.