Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acadiana Cane Cutters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Texas Collegiate League. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Acadiana Cane Cutters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, and WP:ORG; it's a non-professional baseball team, which has only been around for two years, and appears to have gained barely any media coverage at all (a quick Gsearch shows nothing that isn't primary or unusable for notability). Tagged as failing GNG and being an orphan since March. Also, if the article is correct, the "Pro baseball teams in Louisiana" cat is false - this is an amateur team for professional prospects, not a professional team. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:02, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There's at least coverage in the local papers, such as [1][2][3][4][5] --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Local sources don't establish notability. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no showing of notability. Neutrality^talk 19:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Texas Collegiate League. Spanneraol (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Spanneraol. Collegiate League Teams aren't notable until they've established some non-routine coverage - which this relatively new team has yet to do. Mpejkrm (talk) 05:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. Local coverage isn't enough for this. Agent Vodello^{OK, Let's Party, Darling!} 15:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.