Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking the World

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Article was created by a SPA with a likely COI, see Special:Contributions/LisaGolding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No COI. Saw the need for the album article and fulfilled it. Passes WP:NALBUM. Meets criteria 1, 6, and 7 for Recordings LisaGolding (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain the regular usage of promotional language such as "the famous musician Threatin" and "an award-winning solo artist who recently rose to fame and is considered one of the most influential figures in current Rock music" in your edit summaries? Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional language not intended or used in article. I did Not view descriptive words in edit summary as being biased or even relevant to scrutiny (since it isn’t part of the article). Again, Promotional language not intended LisaGolding (talk) 22:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You made 10 edits (exactly enough to become autoconfirmed) and since then only edited articles related to Threatin. You are a single-purpose account. Ridiculously promotional language such as "one of the most influential figures in current Rock music" is not "descriptive" and is counterfactual, evidenced by the lack of any reliable sources in the articles you created about Threatin. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Hrodvarsson (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The main article of the bunch related to Threatin is likely to be deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threatin. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think that the SPA accusations for everything related to Threatin might be a little too harsh; LisaGolding might just be someone new to WP who is knowledgeable on the musician but got carried away trying to prove his notability. As for this album, per WP:EXIST there is evidence that it has been released but that is not enough for a WP article. There is an obvious lack of reliable and significant coverage. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.