Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalan Pengkalan Utama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jalan Pengkalan Utama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable across world. Bobherry talk 14:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be a state-level route, and state-level routes are considered to be notable for being state-level routes, per Wikipedia's remit as a gazzeteer. Sources will need to be found to pass WP:V, but these need not be online sources. Just because it's a state-level route in Malaysia does not make it "non-notable across world", see WP:BIAS/WP:CSB. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - State level routes are notable, and saying that something is "non-notable around the world" is a case of systemic bias, something Wikipedia strives to avoid. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.