Property talk:P3500
Documentation
identifier for organisations in the publishing industry supply chain
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3500#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3500#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3500#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3500#Scope, SPARQL
Type constraint: too narrow?
editI have noticed that many cities, counties, or regions are not instances of organization (Q43229): they are primarily considered as administrative territories which are not organizations. See Rankin County (Q490210) for an example. Is there a way to replace this constraint by something broader, for instance by going up in the ontology or allowing multiple types? − Pintoch (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is Ringgold really referring to the administrative territory, or the body that administers it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- The two are very often merged in Wikidata as far as I can tell… − Pintoch (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's a separate issue, and one that should be resolved, in time Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- The two are very often merged in Wikidata as far as I can tell… − Pintoch (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Home-made resolver
editI find it quite annoying not to be able to click on Ringgold ids and retrieve some metadata about them, so I've created a resolver that does that. It currently lives at http://pintoch.ulminfo.fr:8932/ and can be used like that: http://pintoch.ulminfo.fr:8932/get?ringgold_id=64901. Of course it is not an official service from Ringgold, just a small app made out of the CC0 data released by ORCID. Coverage is not perfect: some valid ringgold ids might not resolve correctly (about a few percents or so). − Pintoch (talk) 12:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Neat, but I think this would sit better on the toolserver. We have something similar there, for other IDs. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a pointer to a similar tool on the Tools Labs? I thought about putting it there but it seems quite orthogonal to Wikimedia projects. I am happy to do so if it is within the scope of the service. − Pintoch (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: belated reply, sorry. See ISNI (P213); specifically Property:P213#P1630. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: that's slightly different: it's not a resolver by itself, just something that redirects to the official resolver by fixing the formatting of the ISNIs (removing spaces). It is clearly specific to Wikimedia projects as it is designed to convert the format used on Wikidata to the one used by the official resolvers. My concern about hosting my Ringgold resolver there is that it is not specific to Wikimedia projects in any way. − Pintoch (talk) 08:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: belated reply, sorry. See ISNI (P213); specifically Property:P213#P1630. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a pointer to a similar tool on the Tools Labs? I thought about putting it there but it seems quite orthogonal to Wikimedia projects. I am happy to do so if it is within the scope of the service. − Pintoch (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)