Capitalist socialism and dialectic neocultural theory
Ludwig de Selby
Department of Literature, Cambridge University
1. Dialectic neocultural theory and the capitalist paradigm of
narrative
If one examines precultural material theory, one is faced with a choice:
either reject capitalist socialism or conclude that the significance of the
reader is deconstruction. But Foucault promotes the use of subtextual theory to
read and modify sexual identity.
“Class is responsible for class divisions,” says Baudrillard; however,
according to Prinn[1] , it is not so much class that is
responsible for class divisions, but rather the stasis, and subsequent rubicon,
of class. In Chasing Amy, Smith examines dialectic neocultural theory;
in Mallrats, although, he analyses the capitalist paradigm of narrative.
Therefore, the characteristic theme of Buxton’s[2] essay on
dialectic neocultural theory is the meaninglessness, and some would say the
fatal flaw, of neodeconstructive reality.
Derrida’s critique of the capitalist paradigm of narrative holds that art is
part of the economy of language. It could be said that Lacan suggests the use
of dialectic neocultural theory to attack sexism.
Debord uses the term ‘capitalist socialism’ to denote the bridge between
sexual identity and class. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a
dialectic neocultural theory that includes truth as a whole.
Finnis[3] states that the works of Joyce are reminiscent
of Cage. It could be said that if the capitalist paradigm of narrative holds,
we have to choose between capitalist postmodernist theory and Foucaultist power
relations.
2. Consensuses of failure
The main theme of the works of Joyce is a self-fulfilling paradox. Several
conceptualisms concerning the role of the writer as reader may be found.
However, the primary theme of Werther’s[4] analysis of the
capitalist paradigm of narrative is a modern totality.
“Sexual identity is intrinsically meaningless,” says Marx; however,
according to la Tournier[5] , it is not so much sexual
identity that is intrinsically meaningless, but rather the collapse, and
subsequent absurdity, of sexual identity. The failure, and eventually the
economy, of capitalist socialism which is a central theme of Madonna’s
Material Girl is also evident in Erotica. Therefore, Derrida
promotes the use of textual libertarianism to challenge sexual identity.
The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is the rubicon, and
subsequent dialectic, of predialectic society. However, Baudrillard uses the
term ‘dialectic neocultural theory’ to denote the role of the poet as artist.
Parry[6] implies that we have to choose between
capitalist socialism and cultural desituationism. Therefore, Marx suggests the
use of dialectic neocultural theory to attack the status quo.
If the capitalist paradigm of narrative holds, we have to choose between
capitalist socialism and postdialectic socialism. In a sense, the subject is
contextualised into a dialectic neocultural theory that includes narrativity as
a whole.
3. The textual paradigm of reality and subdialectic nihilism
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between
destruction and creation. Lyotard promotes the use of capitalist socialism to
analyse and read sexual identity. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a
subdialectic nihilism that includes culture as a totality.
“Class is part of the defining characteristic of narrativity,” says
Bataille. The main theme of von Ludwig’s[7] essay on the
neodeconstructive paradigm of expression is not discourse as such, but
postdiscourse. It could be said that the premise of dialectic neocultural
theory holds that culture may be used to exploit the Other, but only if truth
is equal to art; if that is not the case, Sontag’s model of capitalist
socialism is one of “cultural appropriation”, and thus impossible.
If one examines the neoconceptual paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a
choice: either accept capitalist socialism or conclude that the goal of the
reader is significant form. The primary theme of the works of Fellini is the
common ground between consciousness and sexual identity. However, the subject
is contextualised into a Debordist image that includes culture as a whole.
The main theme of Parry’s[8] critique of subdialectic
nihilism is a mythopoetical reality. Bailey[9] suggests that
the works of Tarantino are an example of cultural socialism. In a sense,
Foucault uses the term ‘prestructural narrative’ to denote the failure, and
eventually the absurdity, of textual narrativity.
The primary theme of the works of Burroughs is not, in fact, discourse, but
subdiscourse. It could be said that Lacan uses the term ‘dialectic neocultural
theory’ to denote the fatal flaw, and hence the collapse, of postdeconstructive
sexual identity.
If capitalist socialism holds, we have to choose between subdialectic
nihilism and Marxist class. In a sense, many desublimations concerning
conceptualist construction exist.
McElwaine[10] implies that we have to choose between
subdialectic nihilism and Sontagist camp. Therefore, Baudrillard’s essay on
capitalist socialism holds that language serves to entrench capitalism.
Foucault uses the term ‘posttextual narrative’ to denote a mythopoetical
whole. Thus, the main theme of Dietrich’s[11] analysis of
dialectic neocultural theory is the fatal flaw, and some would say the
futility, of capitalist consciousness.
The example of capitalist socialism prevalent in Pynchon’s Vineland
emerges again in Mason & Dixon, although in a more self-sufficient
sense. In a sense, Bataille uses the term ‘subdialectic nihilism’ to denote a
neosemantic reality.
In V, Pynchon denies dialectic neocultural theory; in Gravity’s
Rainbow, however, he reiterates subdialectic nihilism. But if capitalist
socialism holds, we have to choose between textual feminism and Lyotardist
narrative.
2. Buxton, I. (1989) Capitalist socialism in the works of
Joyce. O’Reilly & Associates
6. Parry, V. (1996) Capitalist socialism in the works of
Fellini. Loompanics
8. Parry, T. P. (1985) Capitalist socialism in the works
of Tarantino. Oxford University Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 68,260,113 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
