Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/08/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
shit 89.100.113.149 07:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bad faith deletion request.--Blargh29 (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy-Kept as clear-cut troll rfd. Nominating IP was blocked for 3 days. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Duplicate with File:Roland SP-404, SP-555.jpg Shoulder-synth (talk) 01:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, next time just use {{Duplicate}}. --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Duplicate with File:Roland SP-404 (mastering).jpg Shoulder-synth (talk) 01:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, just use {{Duplicate}} next time. --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
It looks out of the scope to me. — df| 15:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. Sv1xv (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment My mistake, sorry, I should have noted ticket 3474789. Please close it. Thank you, — df| 16:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- We cannot close the DR until an OTRS volunteer confirms that is is acceptable. Most of us have no access to OTRS data. Sv1xv (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I posted a message on the OTRS noticeboard. Sorry, — df| 17:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- We cannot close the DR until an OTRS volunteer confirms that is is acceptable. Most of us have no access to OTRS data. Sv1xv (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Used in vandalism on enwp, outside of project scope. J Milburn (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Likely to be an attack image. Also this is clearly cropped from a comic, thus copyvio. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Dont need this for my notes Tekksavvy (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is not a valid rationale for deletion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy Keep -- no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
It looks out of the scope to me. — df| 15:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio. Sv1xv (talk) 16:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. otrs permission has arrived Huib talk 22:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Looks suspiciously like a screenshot from a video Tabercil (talk) 02:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by PeterSymonds: Per OTRS #2009082010057657, this isn't Steel, and is being used as part of an attack campaign on his article at enwiki (corresponding image deleted over at enwiki)
out of COM:SCOPE and as of the original description likely meant as attack image against a teacher or professor. Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope. --Blargh29 (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Not a free image. The stated source "About Magazine" is not a free source and byline is the Associated Press (also not free). This is a photo of a member of the US Army, but there is no evidence that the image was taken by an Army employee in the course of his/her duties. Image just deleted at Wikipedia under Possibly Unfree Files-Blargh29 (talk) 08:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 19#File:First_Lt._Daniel_Choi.jpg. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 10:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Supposed to be a logo, but it's not clear that this is a logo of a recognized entity. Not used in the book of this title. Not clear that it has any purpose in Wikimedia (EN aticles on "Generaltion We" have been deleted, following an AfD). Orlady (talk) 04:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope--Blargh29 (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
On the talkpage, it reads: "My research shows that Willi Glasauer is a living artist, born in 1937, so it would appear that this image of Tantalus is in copyright.", added on 12:48, 31 May 2009 by User:66.30.119.70. A quick check on google seems to support this. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation
Bad quality: cmera shaked during long exposure. There is better quality image: File:Church of Saint Casimir, Mаhiloŭ 1.JPG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
self-promotional / out of project scope --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 16:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
self-promotional / out of project scope --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, redundant to Template:Blocked, which has a better look and more translations. --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ++Lar: t/c 16:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Too many hits on TinEye for this to be "own work" - see http://tineye.com/search/bcdd08557dd88cd79644c51768f0368961086b09 Tabercil (talk) 02:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
The uploader claims this is his own work, but admits to being 15 on his Wikipedia user page, meaning in all likelihood he was not born when this photo was taken since the model retired in the 60s. Mbinebri (talk) 02:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Non-free logo, very unusual depiction of a chemical substance, not used anywhere. --Leyo 08:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Rainnnking (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Aug 19, 2009 -- 2:41 PM EDT:
I am the author/artist of the jpeg in question here -- if its "not FREE enough" for you, feel free to delete it.
I don't care.
It is available to the public as a "public domain" image on my site:
http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com
So, I don't care -- I gave it as a gift. If you don't want it on Wiki -- feel free to throw it away. As I say, it matters not to me.
Cheers, and. . .
Namaste
-- Condor 18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Rainnnking (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Commons is not a mirror for those kind of pics! --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep at least until there is an alternative --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is an alternative: File:Telaprevir.png --Leyo 14:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. as per Leyo. Yann (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Web resolution, clearly posed, greyscale, available elsewhere on the Internet- this looks like a publicity photo, and release of a publicity photo would require OTRS permission. J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission. Yann (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
source says all rights reserved Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission. Yann (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like a commercial logo; source not available, so no way to check wether it really is GFDL Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- And it's not used.Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Wrong license, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
copyright picture from [2] --Ceddyfresse (Diskussion) 17:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC) --Ceddyfresse (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Many hits on TinEye (http://tineye.com/search/34d34936073841e103357c781d5f7c11f20c3dd3); unlikely that this was entirely created by the user. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- man.. i just edited this image... it was marked to be delete to?! --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 01:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete - it was deleted befor and the uploader knows that he needs the original copyright holders permission to publish the result of his work under a free license. Editing someone else work not removes the copyright of this original creator. --Martin H. (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission. Yann (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
The fact that this is on Google images does not make it copyright-free. No reason to assume this is not copyrighted, not even 70 years old. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Do ghosts have copyright protection? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- The people creating images of ghosts have. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- But these "images" are supposed to have appeared automagically. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure they didn't. Anyway, someone must have taken a photograph of them, those would still be protected. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Wikimedia does not care about the photographer's rights according to {{PD-Art}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure they didn't. Anyway, someone must have taken a photograph of them, those would still be protected. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- But these "images" are supposed to have appeared automagically. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- The people creating images of ghosts have. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment This is demotivating for anyone who wants to help or contribute in wikipedia articles... people are afraid to post something, and in the back, these people are regarded as a vandals (irony)... But, before you delete this... Can you suggest what kind of lincense we can use here (to respect the aouthor)?!
- If the internet in general, have these rules so rigid, simply, there would be pictures on the internet ... Think about it... So SAD
- And for you, ChrisiPK... Really.. I know you don´t like me... :-D --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Copyright is not really on the side of the public, we already know that. The internet is full of images because it is full of copyright violations. However, Wikimedia Commons strives to achieve a high standard of licensing, so we do _NOT_ host images that have just been taken from the internet. This is not me not liking you, this is you lacking a basic understanding of copyright and Commons policy. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- And for you, ChrisiPK... Really.. I know you don´t like me... :-D --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- The owner of this photo (and house´s appearances of these faces), Maria Gomez Camara, is dead since 2004... Do you know who can i ask about the permission of this photo?! And please follow the exemple of this photo ... Thank you. --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. as per ChrisiPK Yann (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Likely out of project scope. Sourced to a photobucket account full of copyvios, unlikely own work and released under a free license. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also check TinEye. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Can we change the license or someone else...?! Thanks. --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 02:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. as per ChrisiPK Yann (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
source unclear. source web: "© Copyright 2009 KUKA Roboter GmbH All rights reserved", no free. see [1]shizhao (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- 'Delete no evidence uploader had authority to release image under copyleft--Blargh29 (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, copyvio. --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
no notability. the article is just deleted in ru.wiki and is not used in any other project Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Zirland: In category Unknown - August 2009; no permission
(copyright violation : no evidence that the author of the painting died before 1955; AWM claims copyright on this photograph of the painting.) --Rcbutcher (talk) 00:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Painter died in 1992[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete 1992 > 1955. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 20:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
First the uploader cites source "Geological book", then author is "Unknown" and finally in the license he/she has pointed that the uploader is the author. Obviously this is a copyright infrigement. More over the image is to be found at http://www.tuhovishta.hit.bg/ Chech Explorer (talk) 17:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 20:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Bergen borough maps
edit- File:Arna bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Arna-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Bergen boroughs.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)In 19:46, 29 January 2008 I've retexted it. Now I have drawn all contours myself. So the primary source doesn't matter any more.--Ulamm (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)- File:Bergen-boroughs-names.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bergen-boroughs.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bergenhus bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bergenhus-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bergens bydeler.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fana bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fana-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Ytrebygda bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Laksevåg-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Laksevåg bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fyllingsdalen-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fyllingsdalen bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Ytrebygda-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Årstad bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Årstad-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Åsane bydel i Bergen.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Åsane-map.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
A long time ago I uploaded the original maps of the boroughs of Bergen, Norway (the xxxx-map.png files). They have spawned a number of derivatives. The problem is that I cannot remember how I made them and, as there are few free sources for things such as Norwegian municipality and borough borders, they are likely to be derivates of some copyrighted map, and therefore copyvios. Note that the same may apply to the Oslo borough maps (e.g. this one), although I didn't make those. --Aqwis (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 12:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Uploads by MISIONARTE
edit- File:MARLON VALVERDE ES SIMÓN BOLIVAR MISIONARTE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MARLON VALVERDE PARPIGNOL MISIONARTE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MARLON VALVERDE HECHICERO MISIONARTE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MARLON VALVERDE ACTUANDO MISIONARTE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MARLON VALVERDE DE GALA MISIONARTE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Files are out of the project scope and they are highly likely copyvios. The only usage they have right now is the ilustration of a vanity/copyvio article in eswiki deleted several times (es:Marlon Valverde, now protected against recreation).
- Comment - Please close it, seems that a permission has been sent and the article has been undeleted so, for now, I prefer to close this DR. Sorry for this missunderstaning, — df| 16:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Out of project scope and hits on TinEye (http://tineye.com/search/7249cc7e169220a4665fd29cd67c4474ebc40838) are without the eye. Unlikely that this was entirely created by the user. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- If it were cropped to just the user name and ambigram, then it would be acceptable as a user page image (see Template:Userpageimage and Category:User logo), but as you pointed out, the art is probably not free (besides being surpassingly ugly!). Delete unless cropped... -- AnonMoos (talk) 02:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sure AnonMoos... because some of my rights is here... I made myself this ambigram name, by the way, this is another edited image... If the image is or not free, really i don´t know and it is not my intention to use non free images here...I´am not crazy... I post as Work by myself, yes, because i edited and made by myself the name and it requested to entire deletion... I think is better to think twice here... --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 03:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow your remarks, but the upshot at this point seems to be that File:Light2.jpg is going to be deleted, but File:Lightwarrior ambigram.jpg could be saved through some strategic cropping... AnonMoos (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission, as per ChrisiPK. Yann (talk) 17:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
