Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/04/28

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 28th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Not educational. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS2013042710005421 - Uploader (lost password) requests deletion, as there is personal information locked in the file.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {[done}} -mattbuck (Talk) 15:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Effectively out of Project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope Julo (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File includes some sort of a sky photo, cannot be simply put as PD-text-logo SamuelFreli (talk) 02:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text and different colors. color is no copyrighted--EEIM (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyrighted photo. Not simple geometric shapes or text. --Martin H. (talk) 11:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. –⁠moogsi (blah) 23:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload coming from the SP of a well known copyviolator SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and no valid EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly a copyvio from e.g. [1]; Google Image Search has several hits. Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Derivative work of stuffed toys of copyrighted mascots by Bandai. Vantey (talk) 09:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image of copyright-protected stuffed toys MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of pictures copyrighted by City of Yokohama. Vantey (talk) 10:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyright violation. No permission from original artist MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author doesn't want this image in Wikimedia Joaoassuncao (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation of http://www.imdb.com/media/rm257272832/nm0741048 January (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Non educational. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Used on his user page in es.wiki, this is allowed. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, at this momment the picture is in use. Must be  Keep. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: userpage photo 99of9 (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (derivative work). No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, too small for educational value, bad file name Taivo (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, the uploader's only contribution. The File:Hidamba Devi temple.JPG can be used for replacement. And, actually, there is a lot of photos about that temple. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, the uploade's only contribution. Bad file name, quite small, a lot of photos in Category:Bagpipers Taivo (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image (uploader's signature). Bad file name Taivo (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, uploader's only contribution. We have 752 images in Category:Males with hats + 545 in Category:Men with hats + subcategories. We have less than 200 photos in Category:Full beards and this is quite a good full beard, but ... Taivo (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution, bad file name Taivo (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Media includes a picture of the Earth, it cannot be simply put as "PD-text-logo" SamuelFreli (talk) 02:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok i upload other image.I was hesitating--EEIM (talk) 02:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Copyvio has been removed. Remove only the older version. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Only needs a little purge now to hide the old version. --SamuelFreli (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Old revision deleted. INeverCry 00:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality concern, Hungary Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image can be deleted from Commons, because it has been uploaded to Wikipedia in a more appropriate way: with a non-free use rationale as the official logo of Ars Ensis, Hungarian historical fencing school. So no objection to speedy deletion from Commons.
-- Ulrich von Lichtenstein (talk) 07:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope due to being unusably poor quality, even if Sargent is one of the notable people from Alabama (though without context we cannot verify this claim). Note, the self-addition on en.wp is highly unlikely to stick, see [2]. (talk) 07:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho not own work Steinsplitter (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with OP --Sphilbrick (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replacement file here ==> File:Brickwork flemish bond one brick thick.svg. Jonathanriley (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original was replaced by a completely different image, of uncertain copyright status. I did not upload it and cannot accept any responsibility for its status. Also, it would be better to delete this entry and use the original image rather than using a transferred image. Vuo (talk) 23:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just revert it to the old version? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+1. See also File:Glasbottles containing Butyllithium, Buli.jpg. --Leyo 07:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I have reverted to the older version and there is no longer any reason to delete. The new version, as Leyo notes, is available as a separate file. Ed (Edgar181) 16:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Issue resolved. Leyo 20:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of Argosy Magazine, May 1969 [3]. Is the uploader the photographer who took the photo at left, the artist who created the image at left, and the copyright holder for the cover of this magazine? If not, false source and license. Infrogmation (talk) 01:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with OP Absent highly unlikely scenario that the original photographer is providing permission, a clear copvio--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. --Martin H. (talk) 20:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a scan of a newspaper page. Jespinos (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Not educational. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no notability, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source available, no real author provided, copyright violation Kadellar (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and no valid EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo from 1963 seems to be not under a free license, per [4]. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of an actress that looks like it could be a still from one of her movies Rybec (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Same image as here, located on this site and others. Clear copyvio.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As France has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright, this photo may violate the copyright of the sculptor of the sculpture. However, it should be discussed whether this sculpture would considered as de minimis by case-law of France. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears here and sourced Ariel Bond/Michigan Daily. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transfered to frwiki. --Coyau (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background image from Google Earth, i.e. copyvio. тнояsтеn 11:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Out of project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo from 1977 seems to be not under a free license, per [5]. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The intention was to upload this file to Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons. Sorry for the mistake. This image should be deleted from here, as the image is copyrighted in its source country. I have since uploaded the same image to Wikipedia (English) where it is perfectly appropriate, since published before 1923. Coldcreation (talk) 09:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely poor quality, of no use to project (other images exist of coffe grounds which can be seen as such) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork (light art). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio ? Needs authorization from the artist/architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transfered to frwiki. --Coyau (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 12:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD photo of sculpture from some site. Shakko (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-- Shakko (talk) 11:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Non educational and useful. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs authorization from the artist. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know we does not need the authorization, because it is permanently installed “pop-art in public space” (freedom of panorama/Germany). --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 12:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. Sorry for that... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho not Own work Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with OP Absent highly unlikely scenario that the original photographer is providing permission, a clear copvio. If that is the case, they can provide OTRS, but more likely, a new contributor unaware that they cannot do this.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has many warnings on de.wp, looks suspicious to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho not own work, see http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/page-cavanaugh.aspx Steinsplitter (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sourced to Woods Family Archive, but no OTRS permission filed. Uploader's other uploads all questionable Sphilbrick (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, very replaceable. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork (light art). No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: No copyright on light. Yann (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artistic work. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 23:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork (light art). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a screenshot from a copyrighted music video. Jespinos (talk) 01:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Probably from here or here --Sphilbrick (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sole upload by throwaway account, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artworks in Japan. Vantey (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image from 1976 seems to be not under a free license, per [6].-- Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue is in USA, artist holds copyright: no freedom of panorama coverage for sculpture Brianhe (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork (light art). No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: No copyright on light. Yann (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 02:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Obvious copyvi and Out of Project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission provided Алый Король (talk) 02:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a deriviative work. There is no evidence that the underlying work is public domain, or that the copyright holder gave permission. It's not a building so it doesn't come under FOP#US. According to http://www.leehall.org/about-us.php says "Lee Hall Mansion is owned and operated by the City of Newport News, Department of Parks and Recreation, Historical Services Division." Rybec (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No licensing information on 3D artwork, no freedom of panorama in the USA. Kelly (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE, probably copyright violation Polarlys (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Fra231

edit

No evidence indicating that these photos are taken by him. Those photos are taken in different years, with no EXIF data and mainly about Javier Zanetti. --Dudek1337 (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aleksandra55 (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible copyvios or out of scope.

Jespinos (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alonsoff (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible copyvios or out of scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ehome.chiang (talk · contribs)

edit

unknown person, no description

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eva Kurilenko (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Insanebro (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JorgeFlotador (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King456500 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klaudijos (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaQueAmaAFer (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal photos. Not educational and useful.

Alan Lorenzo (talk) 03:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis best ramirez (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 02:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcnabeezy (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all: unused and bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Proffiranic (talk · contribs)

edit

Internet images, various resolutions and EXIFs, false claims of own work.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 08:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samiralicious (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandiperl (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayrafob (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TomRiderClimax (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 02:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Verdolagahv (talk · contribs)

edit

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Villia.uk (talk · contribs)

edit

school spam, strongly doubt own work claim

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wanted 7 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with OP --Sphilbrick (talk) 14:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mascots in Kanagawa

edit

No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artworks in Japan. Derivative works of statues of copyrighted mascots. --Vantey (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mascots of Kaikokuhaku Y150

edit

No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Derivative work of statues of copyrighted mascots. --Vantey (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

<"Nonsense"> Der Seraph [J.S.] ♂ JohannesSch. (DISCU/EDITS/MAIL) 12:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:NAMA Triade éleusinienne.jpg with just some minor changes in the colour balance, size identical, little added value Robby (talk) 08:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an orgainsational logo, when is the date of creation? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alma College was established in 1886. Its seal was created and initially used that same year. This being the case, the media file in question is in the public domain. Perhaps a more appropriate licensing tag would be in order.Drdpw (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

finished file here ==> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brickwork_flemish_bond_one_brick_thick.svg. Relevant WP page img links have been altered to ensure no broken WP pages Jonathanriley (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improved file here ==> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brickwork_flemish_bond_one_brick_thick.svg Jonathanriley (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i was curious of the whole upload process, this file dosn't contain anything useful Rasel160 (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license states that it is PD because the license has expired, but this is a computer-generated image. Therefore it is unlikely the author has been dead for 70 plus years. — AJDS talk 19:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This computer-generated image is a derivated work of a Coat of Arms, that most of them are in the Public domain (specifically this Coat of Arms is of w:en:Pope Pius IX when his papacy was in the XIX century). Also, File:Pio_Nono.svg is an other computer-generated image (exported to SVG using a software as Inkscape), so, your argument for this DR is ridiculous. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral It should be noted that in this case the computer work was not only in digitasation, but also in adding effect of 3D-ness of this coat of arms, which definitely didn't exist in the original to that extent. This can be seen as an act of creativity by some. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 04:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, derived from a PD-old coat of arms. Fry1989 eh? 00:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 11:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linux65

edit

All the photos uploaded by Linux65 are taked by differents cameras (see EXIF), lacked of EFIF in some others images, the user has a lot of copyvios deleted. I think COM:PRP applies here Ezarateesteban 10:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не соответствует действительности и не используется Valery Galaktionov (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не соответствует действительности Valery Galaktionov (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

не соответствует действительности Valery Galaktionov (talk) 11:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Recent architecture. No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Only partial view. Not enough details to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Needs authorization from the architect. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 11:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user. *File:Zastava CZ 999.jpg 800 × 587 *File:Crvena Zastava 99.jpg 1.110 × 737 *File:CZ 99 Compact-G.jpg 1.000 × 825 *File:NB I.N.A.T. BB 23 Pistol.jpg 660 × 524 *File:Zastava PPZ prototype.jpg 1.059 × 703 *File:CZ 999 and CZ 999 Scorpion.jpg 700 × 1.053 *File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg 900 × 518; Scan! *File:CZ 999 Skorpion with custom made grips.jpg 1.000 × 815 *File:Zastava CZ 05 Prototype.jpg 1.024 × 768; Metadata Canon PowerShot A60 *File:P88 & CZ99 & P225.jpg 1.300 × 873 *File:Zastava Master FLG.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava Master FLG K.jpg 2.048 × 1.536 *File:Zastava M21 (M).jpg 1.200 × 900 *File:Zastava M-07.jpg 1.006 × 718 *File:RASHOMON Prototip.jpg 1.000 × 750 *File:CZ 99 Partner 2011.jpg 1.024 × 680 *File:Nebojša Pavković CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 784 *File:Zastava TOP XX (2).jpg (2.000 × 1.500 *File:Zastava TOP XX.jpg 2.000 × 1.500 Pixel *File:Slobodan Milošević CZ 99.jpg 1.024 × 891 *File:Zastava CZ 999 Skorpion.jpg 1.024 × 736 *File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg 1.024 × 467; Copyviolation! *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-3.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON.jpg 1.024 × 768 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-2.jpg 1.024 × 684 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-4.jpg 2.592 × 1.944 *File:Zastava-RASHOMON-5.jpg 1.024 × 639 Avron (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User claims all uploads are his work. In two cases this is definitely wrong for File:CZ 99 in The Matrix 1999 Neo.jpg (from Movie "Matrix") or File:Zastava CZ 999 prototype (1998).jpg (low quality scan). Other photos are in unusual pattern: different sizes, different qualities, only one image has metadata. I doubt we can trust this user.


Deleted: FASTILY 10:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niki0618 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is his own work and to his user page on da wiki. --89.249.2.53 06:33, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 11:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be advertisement, not own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please be more specific about why you think the uploader did not have the authority to release the copyright of this work? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I could ask exactly opposite question :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In which case, I could answer,  Keep - pending further evidence; as a policy, we accept self-creation claims unless there is reason to doubt them, which Eugene has not (yet) provided, and which I cannot find on my own. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At least image on left could be found on numerous other sites. Thumbnail resolution is not sign of own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eugene, you're a nice guy, but you're making my wikihairs turn gray. Could you please provide a link to a few of those sites? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Google Images gadget may be very useful :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - unless uploader explains his/her relationship with the company and/or how s/he got access to this image and if s/he has the rights. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The Google Images gadget isn't very useful for a collage like this. Instead, it's better to download the image, crop out one of the images and search for that one individually. The one to the left appears in an advertisement[7] and on top of that in a much higher resolution. The colours are slightly different, but the shadows are exactly the same, so I would assume that someone just has modified one of the versions in an image editor. As it takes time to crop out the individual images, I didn't search for the other ones. No EXIF and thumbnail size usually means copyvio. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the above. Also, the file was unused. Lupo 20:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture is used without my permission, Im the only one who has the copyright for this picutre. Besides the information writen before my correction was harrasing. MujtabaMastoor (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My picture is used without my permission, Im the only one who has the copyright for this picutre. Besides the information writen before my correction was harrasing. MujtabaMastoor (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Italy, Italian stamps are copyright for 70 years, beside this image has no copyright licence tag Ww2censor (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

die "Schöpfungshöhe" ist sehr klein dargestellt und deshalb kann die Briefmarke als Bild bestehen bleiben. Die Post in Italy hatte bei dem Bild kein Copyright beinhaltet, jedenfals habe ich keins entdecken können. MfG v Elkawe (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A copyright notice is no necessary, Italian stamps are copyright for 70 year no matter the resolution. Ww2censor (talk) 21:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality Concern, Canada Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Basic geometry, aboriginal flags are generally PD,  Keep Fry1989 eh? 00:04, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the Australian Aboriginal flag is copyrighted in Australia. --84.61.186.60 16:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Australia and Canada are not the same country, nor are their TOOs the same. That flag would never have been deemed copyrightable in Canada. Your comment doesn't even have a semblance of comparison. Fry1989 eh? 18:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This image is not licensed as PD-ineligible, but as own work, which is dubious. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed lic FASTILY 23:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of featured file file:Sitta europaea wildlife 3.jpg nearly the same size (cropped a little bit and a slight change in the colour balance) Robby (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 23:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as no source (no source since). I guess it was doubted that this is realy own work by the uploader as stated. It can be found in the iinternet - see [8], but only in much lower resolution. JuTa 21:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the concern is that it was uploaded by a PR firm who may not have exclusive rights to the image –⁠moogsi (blah) 09:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John f.Lorne (talk · contribs)

edit

Modern art. I think artist permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing permission. Contact COM:OTRS FASTILY 23:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]