Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/25

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 25th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged with {{PD-textlogo}} and {{PD-shape}}, but the design is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality, even in Brazil. xplicit 00:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I tagged this file for speedy deletion as "COM:CSD#G4 Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Summer Olympics Logo.png." and was reverted by @Benzoyl. Converting to DR at the request of that user on my user talk page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Summer Olympics Logo.png. --VIGNERON (talk) 11:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I tagged this file for speedy deletion as "This file appears to be DW of work over TOO in the source country, and to satisfy COM:CSD#G4 Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Summer Olympics Logo.png." and was reverted by @Benzoyl. Converting to DR at the request of that user on my user talk page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Summer Olympics Logo.png. --VIGNERON (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (and he's not the uploader). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photographer איל יצהר. -- Geagea (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (and he's not the uploader). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photographer איל יצהר. -- Geagea (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (and he's not the uploader). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photographer חורחה נובומינסקי. -- Geagea (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload, request deletion by uploader RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Speedy delete. @RightCowLeftCoast: In future you can tag duplicates for deletion using {{Duplicate}}. --bjh21 (talk) 10:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload, request deletion by uploader RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload, request deletion by uploader RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild spiegelt nicht unser Berufsbild wider. Um junge Leute positiv auf unser Berufsbild aufmerksam zu machen, möchten wir gerne zeitgemäße Bilder hier darstellen 93.239.16.32 09:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake source, fake licence review. jdx Re: 18:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The person on this picture is about 40 years old. So this photo could have been taken about 1871. The photographer may have been 30 years old. In 1948 he would have been 107 years old. Because of this the author died most probably before 1948. Waterborough (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
40 years old? Could be 70 as well, hard to say from this picture or drawing. Jcb (talk) 14:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but this is nonsense. On this picture Emili Teza has got full brown hair and no pronounced facial wrinkles. And look at that picture: Here you can see 69 years old Emilio Teza with a grey beard and a bald head. Waterborough (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is convincing. If you would have added this link to your previous post, I would have responded differently of course. Jcb (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for keeping the picture. In my opinion it was obviously, that this person was about 40 years old. Waterborough (talk) 20:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

issues with copyright ErtonKashta (talk) 15:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

issues with copyright ErtonKashta (talk) 15:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No persons of enyclopaedic relevance pictured. COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED Zenwort (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:15, 25 Oktober 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:JSC Volga logo.jpg --Krdbot 07:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shock image used for vandalism on w:Yugoslav torpedo boat T5 (today's featured article) PrimeHunter (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ymblanter at 16:04, 25 Oktober 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) --Krdbot 07:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional ad for non-notable corp; Commons not a web hosting website Renata3 (talk) 17:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:07, 25 Oktober 2018 UTC: Adverts not allowed - --Krdbot 07:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this as a test but would like to remove it now Bcp67 (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:06, 26 Oktober 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Sealle at 22:17, 26 Oktober 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) --Krdbot 01:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

procedural error Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:18, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image Essentum (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected by User:Túrelio. --JuTa 03:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinofast (talk · contribs)

edit

Different findings from the Internet, uploads seems to have promotional causes. But there's absolutely no evidence, that the uploader holdas any right here. The Youtube vids don't have a free license named, even not the website. Uploader seems not willing to give the needed informations but still upload images. We should delete them because of the promotional background and the lack of an educational use also as because of the probably copyvios.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is just a test upload Kongqiboy (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is just a test upload Kongqiboy (talk) 01:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autopromoción Aitorembe (talk) 06:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 06:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is only half a picture, not well uploaded JopkeB (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikasjson (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is only half a picture, probably not uploaded well JopkeB (talk) 07:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross-wiki spamming, possible copyright violation. SA 13 Bro (talk) 08:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be self-promotion, Spanish Wikipedia page and Wikidata items were all deleted Nikki (talk) 10:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete photo JopkeB (talk) 11:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete photo JopkeB (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete photo JopkeB (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncomplete photo JopkeB (talk) 11:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncomplete photo JopkeB (talk) 12:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? E4024 (talk) 14:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be in non-video format if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 15:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcomm28 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chaunceybrisco (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of out of COM:SCOPE artist, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 17:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 18:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks OoS to me. E4024 (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilon Saalik Green (talk · contribs)

edit

Commons is no private photo album, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 19:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 20:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by InduSoft (talk · contribs)

edit

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paola.Garcia.Rod (talk · contribs)

edit

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeaFMNZ (talk · contribs)

edit

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autopromoción Aitorembe (talk) 21:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pabluskino (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope; not a promotional photo repository.

TJH2018talk 16:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pabluskino (talk · contribs)

edit

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

adding re-created content:

--Achim (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MI FOTO ES DEMASIADO PRIVADA MADALI CARRASCO YV (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LA FOTO ES PRIVADA MADALI CARRASCO YV (talk) 00:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ES MI PRIVACIDAD MADALI CARRASCO YV (talk) 00:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, many better analogs, no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE Sneeuwschaap (talk) 01:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, many better analogs, no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE Sneeuwschaap (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, as well as File:Waldo Bernal.jpg, File:Natalio Morales.jpg, File:Fernando Sattori.jpg, File:Víctor Hugo Cárdenas.jpg, File:Julio Garrett Ayllón.jpg, and File:Luis Ossio.jpg, all being claimed as the author's own work, are very, very likely not the author's own work. They also uploaded another image taken in the 1870s as their own work, which I marked as a copyright violation. These images, as we are unaware of their source and author, should be deleted. Vermont (talk) 01:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is found all over the Internet. Dubious own work as well - this image is probably a stock image or an image taken by Canon. Hiàn (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - it's not "own work" as stated. Picture is form Refik Tekin as stated in german description. Mirer (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page of the uploader.[2] --Mirer (talk) 02:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really: Is WikiMedia intended for this kind of drawings? JopkeB (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really: Is WikiMedia intended for this kind of drawings? JopkeB (talk) 06:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really: Is WikiMedia intended for this kind of drawings? JopkeB (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Previously published (a year before upload here) at http://nyc.cdosummit.com/2017Speakers and also appears on the subject's Twitter page. No evidence that this is the uploader's own work. He is a suspected undeclared paid editor on En WP. No EXIF data.. Voceditenore (talk) 06:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of these files listed below appear to be created by its own uploader.

Most of these files are clear-cut copyvios (grabbed from the web somewhere, e.g "Av. Oscar Flores..jpg" is downloaded from Facebook [3]), and have low/web quality resolution. Other files are non-free logos (meeting above the threshold of originality, such as Escudo del equipo de Delicias..png) and an improperly uploaded file (File:Pelícanos en el río San Pedro..jpg). See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.

theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass-deleted alluploads of the user. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, watermarks, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; highly unlikely that these are his work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once again, questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once again: likely fraudulent authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history. Several of these files are blatant out-of-process recreations of previously deleted copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:500px photo (227054631).jpeg

edit

PD mark is not a valid license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicocvenancio: Hey Chico, weren't PD mark images supposed to have been all excluded from the 500px tool?-- Darwin Ahoy! 09:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not look like to be the file of the uploader himself Marvin Lou (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sibsamaneh (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of project scope, promotional material.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused personal picture George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes watermark Fixertool (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hundertm (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vidhi1792 (talk · contribs)

edit

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vidhi1792 (talk · contribs)

edit

Likely copyright violations. All are tagged as "own work", yet they include an image from a film trailer and numerous historical images about 40 years old; since the uploader said they're a music student under the subject of the images, it's highly unlikely that they'd have taken photos of him 40 years ago when the subject himself was still studying music. Some might well be own work, but it's impossible to tell which, if any, and the precautionary principle holds.

Huon (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Borissoler (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annet Bergen (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BoxeurDesRues (talk · contribs)

edit

Advertisement and non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wbrlee (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete there is no freedom of panorama exception in Italy per COM:FOP#Italy Ww2censor (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE low res, no educational value. Zenwort (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep usage of life jackets in ghana.--Sanandros (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE low res, no educational value Zenwort (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep usage of life jackets in ghana.--Sanandros (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: This is for sure not the right place for to promote one's career. Achim (talk) 17:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and also: File:Itexpert.jpg

--Achim (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody reply me: I have the full rights to propose these image and logo. I took them myself with the scanner of my pc, and they are public, because they are on the catalogue of the company, they are on facebook and they are on bicycle magazines. Why are you going on in asking for deleting???

Can somebody reply me?? I sent an email and no-one replied me! Thank you. Quite fed up with this situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jollys88 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-simple logo. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(author requested deletion): not useful, can be replaced by File:Weizenkorn zh.png 靖天子 (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(author requested deletion): this was a test upload long time ago. does not contain relevant information. 靖天子 (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sivarajanpunnala (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoseph76 (talk · contribs)

edit

Official photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoseph76 (talk · contribs)

edit

The images with "own work" are unlikely to be own works. And we can not verify the licenses on the files where there is a source (direct links to .jpg). Unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yoseph76 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work. Pictures of non notable people.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ceenterts (talk · contribs)

edit

Same junk spammer as Werley (entertainer) (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log who is blocked on English wikipedia. Some files are used on other wikis, as I guess nobody as detected the spam there.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No persons of enyclopaedic relevance pictured. COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED Zenwort (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the image title says COM:SELFIE Zenwort (talk) 20:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, the photo clearly shows Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 Photo Expeditions in Ghana...
Nothing more to add. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No persons of enyclopaedic relevance pictured. COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED Zenwort (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No persons of enyclopaedic relevance pictured. COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED Zenwort (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image. No persons or event of enyclopaedic relevance pictured. COM:NOTUSED Zenwort (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are not Wikipedia, encyclopedic or not is not important.
We can use to illustrate people of Kumasi, daily cloths, ...
Absurd nomination. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo of a book but no source is provided about the copyright of the book (that, according to the design of the picture, seems to be a modern book) Civitas13 (talk) 20:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo of a book but no source is provided about the copyright of the book (that, according to the design of the picture, seems to be a modern book) Civitas13 (talk) 20:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo of a book but no source is provided about the copyright of the book (that, according to the design of the picture, seems to be a modern book) Civitas13 (talk) 20:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melvinx44 rules (talk · contribs)

edit

Clearly not "own work": multiple cameras, no EXIF data, inconsistent quality/sizes, but most incriminating: many different watermark logos!

P199 (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This user keeps on uploading images that are obviously not "own work". I urgently suggest to check this user's complete uploads. Many more images must be deleted! -- Ies (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melvinx44 rules (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dchubabria (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC) Hi , I'm new on wikipedia. Unfortunately, I don't know how to upload other works. This photos I received from Tskaltubo tourism center with this text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dchubabria (talk • contribs) 07:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Isaac (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roncaly (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudeharout (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kasperklatsche (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lugarat (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umedaminami (talk · contribs)

edit

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Super junior debut.jpg. This Flickr account is committing license laundering and uploads originating from the account should be deleted under the precautionary principle.

xplicit 23:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yaelbotser (talk · contribs)

edit

non-notable individual, no evidence of permission.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked photo from 1945 probably taken from here http://cefalunews.org/2017/01/09/la-guardia-alla-frontiera-breve-storia-di-un-corpo-dimenticato/ very unlikely to be their own work Domdeparis (talk) 09:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the copyright status of the image? Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can gather is that on the US this photo taken after 1923 is copyrighted and in Italy it is copyrighted if the author died less than 70 years ago (1948) [4]. I don't know what the case is for photos where the author is unknown. The source that the file creator took the photo from claims the it comes from the collection of a chap named Diego Bodies. Whatever the copyright status the mere fact of taking this photo and claiming this is their own work (and on numerous other photos) is copyright infringement (at least according to WP:OWN WORK on ENWP). Domdeparis (talk) 07:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here http://guerrecontro.altervista.org/blog/wp-content/gallery/la-resistenza-italiana/resistenza-19.jpg Domdeparis (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from here https://picclick.it/Porta-Littoria-La-Thuile-192111142306.html not own work Domdeparis (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked not own work Domdeparis (talk) 09:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work but taken from here https://wikimaginot.eu/_documents/2016-06/_wiki_photos_redim/63-1465382175.jpg Domdeparis (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo dating from 1945 no metadata editor has downloaded multiple photos claiming they are their own work Domdeparis (talk) 10:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD photo. Ruthven (msg) 11:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

says he took the photo last summer...doubtful Domdeparis (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the date is indicated as 1945 in the description. PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work. Image found elsewhere notably here http://www.studiovezzoli.com/Uploads/Photos/Ultima%20battaglia%20Alpi%205%20locandina.jpg included in a film dating from 2010 Domdeparis (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Yann (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Yann (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo dating from 1945 unlikely to be thier own work editor has history of downloading photos from elsewhere and claiming they are their own work Domdeparis (talk) 10:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work found here http://www.bellariafilmfestival.org/film/211/roberto-cena-e-fabio-canepa-lultima-battaglia-delle-alpi.html Domdeparis (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work found here http://divisionemonterosa.blogspot.com/ Domdeparis (talk) 10:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked photo from 1945 unlikely to be their own work Domdeparis (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo taken from here http://www.generals.dk/general/Doyen/Paul-Andr%C3%A9/France.html Domdeparis (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). Since the uploader claims to be the author, the question whether we trust him or not, particularly in view of the small size and the lack of information. — Racconish💬 11:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page displaying is CC-BY-NC. Thyj (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate: File:The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi meeting the crew of INSV Tarini which successfully circumnavigated the globe, in New Delhi on May 23, 2018. The Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral Sunil Lanba is also seen (3).JPG|3=Sarvatra —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 15:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1998. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1998. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And others from Category:Saints Cyril and Methodius monument in Mukacheve.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2000. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1989. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1989. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2002. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:49, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re-uploaded.  Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1991. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an advertisment board which supported to build a Shinkansen station near Shizuoka International Airport, in Shizuoka Station, Japan, and is likely to be created after 2009, as Shizuoka International Airport was built in 2009. Due to the fact that Japanese works except architecture does not enjoy FOP, the file is therefore likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wojak

edit

First three images were uploaded by myself. Upon further research it does seem to pass the Commons:Threshold of originality. Pretty similar to en:Pepe the Frog, which is copyrighted in the United States, in terms of originality. According to Commons:Anonymous works it should be copyrighted until at least 2061. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken at the beginning of the seminar Responding to Peterson: An Intervention in Lieu of a Debate last weekend, held under the aegis of the critical theory club New Symbolization Project at Boise State. AFAIK this was the first sustained academic response to the Jordan Peterson phenomenon. While I volunteered throughout, I myself am neither a BSU student nor a member of the member of the NSP, and I had no part in the Baudrillardian spectacle of a simulacrum of an audience. That said, this Leftist usage of a right-wing meme nicely illustrates its evolution, and I have seen no substantial reason whatsoever presented as to why it should be deleted. Correct me if I'm wrong. Kencf0618 (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kencf0618: You are wrong. None of that social commentary has anything to do with whether this is a free or a non-free copyrighted work. OP here appears to be correct, that the "guy" or whatever it is would be an anonymous work and therefore the copyright would extend according to the publication date. GMGtalk 16:08, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete GMGtalk 16:08, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4 Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020 Summer Olympics Logo.png.'I am the opposite deletion. "Olympics Logo" and "Paralympics Emblem (logo)" are different things. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)' was on the talk page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per previous discussions linked above (including those of the Olympics logos, because both are styled similarly by the same author with presumably the same level of originality). --whym (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a previous upload with higher quality at File:ArticulatedBullock.jpg. --ghouston (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this image is less cropped. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Alexis Jazz. --whym (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate exists on Commons Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Where is this duplicate you speaketh of? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 18:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not shown to be a duplicate. --whym (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user claims copyright violations as his own. Yann (talk) 08:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Older version is found elsewher on the web. --Mhhossein talk 07:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work copyvio from here https://liguriaponente.wordpress.com/2016/06/ Domdeparis (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Yann (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this. Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this. Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per uploader's request. --Mhhossein talk 07:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this. Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this. Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this. Massive errors in my Lightroom export--need deletion vs. new version. Prburley (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 07:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author. Too new to be able to use {{PD-old-assumed}}. US license is not valid (not pre-1923) Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ronhjones  ,

Could you help me to considere if one (or more) of the following arguments is (are) able to maintain that picture as a commons file.

1 - This is an original picture by me.

2 - The subject is the front page of the "programme officiel", dated Between 1924 and 1926, of a previous theatre play created in 1921

3 - The theatre play was successfull and adapted on cinema with some of the artists of the theatre distribution

4 - We can objectively suppose a large distribution of this programme during 2 years all over France

5 - The author (producer) of the programme Oscar Dufrenne died in 1933

6 - The author of the drawing is unknown

7 - The drawing represents a theatre character Tramel created by the artist Felicien Martel who died in 1948

8 - The drawing takes less than 50% of the surface of the original document

9 - The drawing takes less than 50% of the picture

Thanks in advance

Sprekelia

PS: due to that deletion request, could you please give your opinion about the legality of the following pictures as Commons files, because they are extracts of the same theatre programm archive.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sprekelia (talk • contribs) 14:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sprekelia: It's probably best that all the files are done in this one request due to their similarity. It might be that Oscar Dufrenne held the copyright at the time - if so then it could be PD, as any copyright he held would be lost in 2004. But if Felicien Martel still held the rights to the picture, then it's 2019 before expires (not long...) - I would feel that 50% is way too much to claim de minimis. I'm not sure about the others - we need more input - I suspect this is going to be one of those cases that runs for months. Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ronhjones: Happy new year! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - it's now 2019. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Veracious (talk) 16:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Files with small resolution without metadata camera. Missing permission. minhhuy (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Innapropriate content (pornography) 172.73.7.94 21:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no evidence of permission Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Persönlichkeitsverletzung Karlheinz9394 (talk) 07:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warum soll das ihre Persönlichkeitsrechte verletzten? Öffentliches Ereignis, öffentlicher Autritt, keine herabsetzende oder irgendwie peinliche Darstellung erkennbar. --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dazu ist gerade anzumerken: in der de-Wikipedia wird schon seit gestern per Sockenpuppen-Accounts versucht das Bild zuentfernen. Siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ann-Kathrin_Vinken&action=history
Mal bitte dem Nutzer klar machen dass Wikipedia kein Wunschkonzert ist und das seine ganzen Sockenpuppen eher unseriös sind. --Natsu Dragoneel (talk) 08:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Zugegeben, man kann eine Frau auch vorteilhafter fotografieren; aber ein Fußballspiel ist nun mal kein Schönheitswettbewerb. Ich erkenne keinerlei persönlichkeitsverletzende Darstellung. Der Antragsteller hat keine Angaben gemacht, wo genau er eine Persönlichkeitsverletzung sieht. Die Veröffentlichung von Foto- und Videoaufnahmen bei Sportveranstaltungen sind zulässig, wenn durch ihre Verbreitung keine berechtigten Interessen der Darbietenden verletzt werden. ([5] --Rufus46 (talk) 10:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work found here http://sudwall.superforum.fr/t4307-la-redoute-ruine-savoie Domdeparis (talk) 10:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Larger image found on Twitter https://twitter.com/hashtag/StormSinead?src=hash Jim1138 (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is full picture version:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luis_Lauschner_(2).jpg JopkeB (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://ncw.nic.in/frmcurrentcommission.aspx, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; see licensing restrictions at http://ncw.nic.in/website-policies. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate content (pornography) 172.73.7.94 21:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Partially taken from [6] Shoy (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 01:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(author requested deletion): very low quality and potential copyright violation 靖天子 (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The quality issue doesn't warrant deletion, but I'm assuming that the uploader was unfamiliar with copyright policy when the upload was made nine years ago, and cannot recall the exact source of the image. Delete per precautionary principle. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Please delete it. Thanks!--靖天子 (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 01:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work as written in the link source. Cody escadron delta (d) 19:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 01:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing on the source suggests their images are CC licensed Domdeparis (talk) 10:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per BevinKacon. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonesrmj (talk · contribs)

edit

Although we don't see any similar results with google, all over uploads from the uploader were deleted as obvious copyvios. All these files are rather small and without EXIFS. Unlikely to be own works.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete tagged 9 more as copyvios today. all taken from the internet and claimed as own work Dudek1337 (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonesrmj (talk · contribs)

edit

None of this serial copyvio user remaining images have any meta data pattern, making it likely they're also stolen and not own work as claimed.

BevinKacon (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Files uploaded by Jonesrmj (talk · contribs)

edit

Hi, I just got the message that some of these images have been put on the deletion notice board, and since there appears to be confusion, I'll explain.

Firstly, File:Wilmington Delaware Skyline.png. I uploaded this image way back when and I didn't see a copyright logo so I assumes it would be okay to use. I have removed it from the List of Tallest Buildings in Wilmington, Delaware article just to be safe in case it was copyright because back then, I didn't know better.

Secondly, File:Comcast Innovation and Technology Center.jpg can be found on my personal Flickr account. The link is here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/146875064@N03/31512090804/in/dateposted-public/

Third, the rest of the images were taken by some fellow members on a development forum website that can be found at http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=72398 and I think it was ok to use them here so I did.

I hope this clears some confusion about these images and if these images are still not okay on wikipedia, I am very sorry and I do not want to violate any policies. Thank's for the notice and have a great day! Jonesrmj (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)jonesrmj[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; photos have varying quality, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inapproriate content (Pornography) 172.73.7.94 20:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

błędnie podano autora zdjęcia Weronika 1019 (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Would have been G7 if done properly. --Majora (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

błędnie podano autora zdjęcia Weronika 1019 (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Would have been G7 if done properly. --Majora (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

błędnie podano autora zdjęcia Weronika 1019 (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Would have been G7 if done properly. --Majora (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

błędnie podano autora zdjęcia Weronika 1019 (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{błędnie podano autora zdjęcia-NPA}} Four.mg (talk) 16:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Would have been G7 if done properly. --Majora (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since). Since the uploader claims to be the author, the rationale is not appropriate... which does not imply the image is legitimate, in view of the small size. — Racconish💬 11:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Small size, no EXIF, all other uploads were deleted, unlikely to be licensed properly. --Majora (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No inidication at the source that this picture has been licenced under CC Victor Lopes (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Majora (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 14:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo initially uploaded in a facebook page (mentioned in source). I had confirmed the permission when 1st deletion request was set for this photo.--Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The link given (https://www.facebook.com/Dupchanchia) is a generic Facebook page, it does not go to the specific image or show any permission. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Full link here. No indication it is under an acceptable license. No COM:OTRS permission either. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gostaria de renomear o mesmo arquivo Maria Cristina Rigão Iop (talk) 20:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you want to rename a file use {{Rename}}. --Majora (talk) 02:45, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon de moindre qualité Mithres Carlos (talk) 21:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not an exact duplicate of anything I can find. Use {{Duplicate}} if you want to mark duplicates next time. --Majora (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Immagine non necessaria. AndreaBolognaBenevento (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Would have been G7. Also the work appears to be a derivative of something anyways. --Majora (talk) 02:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - St Exupéry's work is still protected 'till 2032 (quite a notorious case of war prolongation to the standard 70 years after death) Esprit Fugace (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes it is in simple shape, but the cut in angle in the letter O and the specific shortening of the top of the letter P, is by design. So, it seem not qualify as lack of original threshold, also it is not the "own work" of the uploader. it belongs to the company el:Open TV. Such logo should be upload as NFC in local wiki Matthew hk (talk) 02:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the erased parts of the letters should probably be considered as made by artistic choice. //Vätte (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Since we have no information on the TOO of Greece it must be assumed that this is over that threshold. PCP delete. --Majora (talk) 20:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Potentially useful on it:Daccordi. --Majora (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality upscaled image. Claims to be taken on mid-2018, but EXIF metadata says it's a screenshot. While I couldn't trace back the image (possibly a screenshot taken from a copyrighted video?), there's this video I found ([7], look at the thumbnail) in which he has the same shirt, but is making a slightly different expression. See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. theinstantmatrix (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. PCP indeed. --Majora (talk) 04:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This enthusiast's site implies that the underlying images were done solely for the stamps, and a google search on "Victor Ambrus warrah" doesn't show anything other than the stamp itself, though I'm not sure if that is what you meant.
Forgive my ignorance, but the stamps were printed in 1982 and 2009, and I noticed that there are stamps from this commons category that are from recent decades and years. Are they special cases? Again, excuse my ignorance on the issue. Regards. Mariomassone (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Disregard previous comment. Just seen that PD stamps from past 30 years have had 16th century art. Now I understand. Delete away, and apologies for inconvenience. Mariomassone (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mariomassone: Copyright can be quite a complex topic and the stamps of themselves would likely be copyright for 70 years per section 25 of the Jersey intellectual property law. Sometimes when an underlying artwork is in the public domain, then the modern stamps copyright may be determined by the painting or artwork and not by the general copyright law of the territory. Thanks for responding. Ww2censor (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Document was created in 2002 by the Royal Academy of History in Spain. No evidence that this is under any acceptable license or that the Academy released it as such. --Majora (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NFC company logo of a TV station E channel el:Open TV Matthew hk (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There are dozens of these in Maps of Nigeria all with the same description "drawn by hand by [the uploader]". Seems pretty reasonable to believe that unless you can find proof that this is a derivative of another map. --Majora (talk) 00:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: License on file information page, {{PD-AR-Photo}}, does not apply as this is not a photo. Standard copyright is life + 70. Insufficient information to confirm proper licensing to be here. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Zanatany

edit

Most probably copyright violations, indicated as own work with dates from the 2000s (maybe the scans), but photographs from the 1950s. Photographer should now be about 90 or more (if still living, but surely he has not died more than 70 years ago). Ther is no evidence that the uploader indeed is the photographer. --Bjs (talk) 10:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


- Réponse: Ces documents proviennent de la collection personnelles de mon père René Arrieu décédé en 1982. Pour les documents suivant:

Je possède tous les droits et détiens les négatifs originaux. Ce sont des cliché privés qui ont été fait par mon père dont je suis l'héritier.

Pour le 2 autres:

Il pourrait s'agir de photo faites pendant les répétitions. Si elle provenait d'une agence de presse ou d'un photographe de plateau la mention de copyright aurait figuré au dos, or rien ne figure au dos de ces photos quant un éventuel copyright. Seules y figurent les mentions manuscrites de mon père quant aux informations relatives aux dates, titre de la pièce, distribution.... --Zanatany (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour la réponse rapide et le téléchargement des photos de la collection de son père. (J'essaie de répondre en français, mais je n'y suis pas habitué et j'ai utilisé un traducteur automatique). Il est difficile de dire à partir de votre nom d'utilisateur comment vous vous rapportez à ces images. Pour de tels cas, il existe une procédure de confirmation dans Wikimedia Commons, voir Commons:Messages type. Il est préférable d'utiliser le texte de la section "Déclaration de consentement", d'y copier les noms des fichiers et de l'envoyer à partir d'une adresse e-mail qui indique votre identité à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Veuillez excuser cet effort, mais pour Wikimedia, il est important qu'aucun droit d'auteur ne soit violé ici. Sincèrement vôtre --Bjs (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The second section above because it is doubtful that the heirs of René Arrieu would even own the copyrights to it as stated above. Deleted File:1951-12 Les 3 Mousquetaires - Serge Reggiani et René Arrieu.jpg and File:1950 Chez Pierlot 01ax.jpg because René Arrieu is in the photo. Copyright rests with the photographer so it is unlikely Arrieu was the copyright holder so the heirs claim would be invalid. Deleted the other two because of an identity issue raised by Bjs and there being no OTRS information that I can find. --Majora (talk) 23:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]