Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/10

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 10th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Solanki Kantibhai J. (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, empty file page. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Solanki Kantibhai J. (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, empty file page. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file name chosen when uploading which doesn't correspond to the brand RoboFemme (talk) 07:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. @RoboFemme: You can request files to be renamed, see Commons:File renaming. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not Lomandra filiformis, as filiformis does not have a spinose flowerhead Hrose.nswdpi (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Tagged {{Fact disputed}}. --Achim55 (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie nieaktualne Mariusz G (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia 由紀奈 (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la qualité du fichier est mauvaise Clm-369 (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Fromi logo corporate.png. --Achim55 (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry User12385 (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader indicates "permission granted", but link is to an unrelated Twitter conversation, and the YouTube video itself has no indication of being freely licensed. Huntster (t @ c) 10:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted due to speedy tag placed by uploader. Huntster (t @ c) 19:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not offical picture Ainglesprieto (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily deleted as this has been published before elsewhere. Such cases require written permissions through our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore User12385 (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. Fictional/fantasy logo, OOS. --Achim55 (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my copyrighted image of my daughter Janaki Kallidai, used without permission. The poster has unlawfully claimed this to be his/her own work which is incorrect. This image has been stolen from my Facebook page 2404:4408:8A17:B200:C4D1:49C7:61BB:7179 22:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a ccopyrighted image of my daughter owned by me and taken withour permission from my facebook page. The poster illegally claims this to be her/his own work. Sri Kallidai (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{copyvio|1=Accidental upload}} Rim sim (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file/CV of non-contributor. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, very obviously out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it twice by mistake, sorry (duplicate of: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Memoriale_Municipio_8.jpg ) Ivanbranco (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I regret the upload AlexanderMWinkler (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvais nom Santos9 (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvais nom Santos9 (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvais nom Santos9 (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvais nom Santos9 (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a screenshot from anime "Chainsaw Man" or a meme from this anime Bradipo Lento (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadeem021 (talk · contribs)

edit

Commons is neither your personal free web host nor the right place to promote your business.

Achim55 (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. It's all just self-promotion that is inappropriate for Commons. 13:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia CKDDVC (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 17:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't want to publish this Gawx.gaming (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you play with your dick instead of playing with Commons, sockpuppeteer? 200.39.139.3 21:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, many replacements at category:Halothane. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 00:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Nv8200p (talk) 23:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture of an Israeli director and actor, and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (in Hebrew). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. A VRTS release appears to be necessary. Not worrying about the absence of EXIF because of the Hebrew note which Google translates to "This file was provided by Roi Segev", and that's what makes this file depend on a VRT release. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol Avemundi (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete EXIF suggests that the file has been copied from Facebook. A search revealed this where the image was posted on 22 August 2016. The file was subsequently uploaded here on 31 August 2016. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 02:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although intercourse is in scope, this image is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copied from Run With It video and it isn't licensed for ree use. Puppe100 (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raw-text bio, out of scope. Achim55 (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirInfinity0000 (talk · contribs)

edit

Uploaded by account now blocked on enwiki for making fantasy shooting pages. No educational value; doubtful of the own work claim too.

Anarchyte (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: poor quality, low resolution selfie of a subject of which the project has many better examples Headlock0225 (talk) 08:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: poor quality, low resolution selfie of a subject of which the project has many better examples Headlock0225 (talk) 08:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: poor quality, low resolution selfie of a subject of which the project has many better examples Headlock0225 (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope: poor quality, low resolution selfie of a subject of which the project has many better examples Headlock0225 (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One can clearly see in the source link the copyright watermark [1]. We have no further information on when this painting was "published" and there is no indication this was produced by the federal government, so there is no proof it is in the public domain. - Indy beetle (talk) 10:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Infrogmation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (photo by Kanizaj Marija) M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found online at least a year before the upload, https://tineye.com/search/40ee32252df7cbd0de4cc9ff6aba8d0d8397060f?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1. Low-resolution, no evidence of own work. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hussein Ali Al-Asi (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. Only uploaded for use on a now-deleted self-promotional page on Arabic Wikipedia.

Marbletan (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-focus photo. Pierre cb (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete. This is such a terribly low quality photo that it really isn't useful. We have plenty of high quality cloud pictures. Marbletan (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. File contains a photograph of unknown source/copyright status. Even if the text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for architecture in Cambodia per COM:FOP Cambodia - also likely copyvio; low res, no EXIF, overwrite of previous version by same uploader that was a blatant copyvio, all other user uploads copyvios, etc. Эlcobbola talk 16:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of COM:TOYS Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D artwork in the United States. This is a post-1978 artwork from a living artist. Would need VRT permission from Arline Fisch for this. Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal and the photo violates architect's copyright. Per en.wiki, the building was completed in 1998. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is above COM:TOO and thereby copyrightable. Unfortunately, Togo has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfpromotion of a person who teaches accountancy (her only upload) B25es (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photograph uploaded last year that the uploader wanted to delete. Abzeronow (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined towards a courtesy deletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarasadat khademalsharieh interview iran hotel espinas 2017 pic1.jpg - likely screenshot also, needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   21:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Nv8200p (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Out of scope. No description to give it an educational context. Nv8200p (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Not enough information in description to have educational value. Nv8200p (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious vandalism, used at ro:Șlepac Rareș-Mihai Gikü (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo uploaded without permission of depicted person. 77.112.185.80 20:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was taken from here. No evidence it was published before 1928 or at any point before the internet, therefore claim of expired copyright is dubious. Uploader has history of copyright violations on English Wikipedia. Indy beetle (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-old-assumed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability: 109 subscribers on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@BossTheGemini CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio; Banner of a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No licensing info; uploaded by someone with a COI Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use authorized. Contact web@azfamily.com to confirm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azfamily3tvcbs5 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license. Uploader may be the creator of the photograph *of* the poster. But the photograph *on* the poster is also protected by copyright. Bujo (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What copyright? Paetongtarn's face? Pheu Thai's logo? font face? election campaign? or others. DMS WIKI (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least the photograph of Paetongtarn. Regarding the other aspects, I am not sure. They may or may not be above the threshold of originality. But the reproduction of the photograph of Paetongtarn is sufficient to make it a copyright violation. It is not permanently displayed in public space, so it is not within the freedom of panorama. --Bujo (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No evidence of license shown per source provided. Xclusivzik (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not the correct image of peter chung 135.180.232.106 23:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Business closed Baker Rushford Publishing (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Portret van Simon van den Berg, RP-P-OB-31.664.jpg Difool (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without a educational use. Not notable musician. Advertising in description. Drakosh (talk) 07:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without a educational use. Not notable musician. Drakosh (talk) 07:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albatros016 (talk · contribs)

edit

useless test files

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Low quality. Difficult to see what the subject is. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The name is the watermark is different from the one of the uploader, Ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The name is the watermark is different from the one of the uploader, Ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose.. Low-quality personal photo. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osymandius (talk · contribs)

edit

Low-res without EXIF; these were all taken on the same day in 2016 across the world, so unlikely to be own work.

King of ♥ 17:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the above. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kpers (talk · contribs)

edit

Collections of unfree logos. Some of these might be arguably below the threshold of originality (and some might be blatant copyvios), but they are all clearly arranged in some bizarre manner which is outside of Commons project scope. There is no educational purpose here.

IronGargoyle (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promotional images - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kpers (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:NOTHOST - unused, fictitious logos related to video games--see also deleted contribs of NETCOPYVIO video game hardware press photos with certain of these logos (scam?)

Эlcobbola talk 17:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of ¿company? that doesn't appear in Google. B25es (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A usuer called K-vision uploads (its only upload) a commercial of a company called K-vision. Selfpromotion B25es (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ker je arhitekt še pod avtorsko zaporo. 95.87.161.18 10:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no metadata no permission and used for company promotion - see title file Hoyanova (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of a painted mural, and paintings aren't covered by freedom of panorama in the US. bjh21 (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by LUDOVIC PILIOUA

edit

Self-promotion. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joke file, possible copyright/privacy issues. (This is my first deletion request, and I may have overdone it by providing too much information since I don’t know how short this should be) This file is an emote used on the Twitch.tv channel of popular livestreamer xQc (Felix). It is a cropped photo of his face with the main focus being his nose, which has been made larger through editing (no part of the file says that the photo was manipulated). The file uploader, Kyper098, claims that the photo is their own work, but I strongly doubt it. It was probably another Xqc viewer or Xqc himself who cut the file from a larger image to make a Twitch emote, and it seems he was the one who added it to his own channel. The emote, called xqcN, predates the file upload date of October 2019. (It being mentioned in Nov 2018 (https://www.reddit.com/r/xqcow/comments/9x5kfs/12_part_xqcn/), and Oct 2018 (https://www.reddit.com/r/xqcow/comments/9ql87y/fixed_xqcn_now_properly_to_scale/), I believe the file should be deleted due to it not having any apparent educational value (COM:EDUSE), the subject (to my knowledge) not consenting to his likeness being uploaded here, the photo being photoshopped (yet nothing claiming that it has been), and the photo likely being uploaded with no good purpose (Kyper098, from what I could find, is an Xqc viewer (his chatting history on Xqc’s channel: https://logs.ivr.fi/?channel=xqc&username=kyper098 ) and this was their only contribution to any Wikimedia site). He typed these messages in chat on Oct 8, 2019 (the file upload date): “PepeLaugh I jUST CHANGED HUMAN NOSE ON WIKI” and “PepeLaugh HUMAN NOSE WIKI”. This proves that this was an act of vandalism.

More info: The only use of this photo is on the French version of wikipedia, where it is used to show an example of an Xqc emote. It is only in one category on wikimedia commons (Category: Human noses), which could reasonably be expected to be used largely for scientific/educational purposes. Xqc’s nose is the subject of memes within his community, typically claiming that it is much larger than average. examples: - https://www.reddit.com/r/xqcow/comments/fc2ugv/the_sad_thing_is_xqc_couldnt_even_see_the_tiddies/ - https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=gIJ7G_dLXyQ - https://www.reddit.com/r/xqcow/comments/gsb0c6/pettheschnozer/ (Additionally, both the caption and spanish translation provided on the file tie into the meme) Tankpiggy18 (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Every other upload from this user has been a copyvio, including some bad faith uploads described as "photo I took walking around campus" which were cropped stock photos. This final remaining image is also likely a copyvio. Belbury (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyvios - clearly COM:DWa as photos of a photos (e.g., see reflection of person using phone camera in File:Saverio montingelli with the italian prime minister.pdf), and all other user uploads have been blatant copyvios of this subject. Also COM:NOTHOST, as subject's articles have been repeatedly deleted (it:Saverio Montingelli (journalist) and it:Saverio Montingelli) Эlcobbola talk 20:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsure what video this is from, but if it's from Tommy's channel as claimed then it's most likely not freely licensed Ionmars10 (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image uploaded and deleted multiple times (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21, Commons:Deletion requests/File:TommyInnit.jpg) DrawWikiped (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and misleading. The original picture of the can has been overlaid with a face in the Pepsi logo which isn't on Pepsi cans. The overlaid picture seems to be taken from File:Minimand_(martin).jpg which is also uploaded today by the same user. Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page is entirely made of anti-Kurdish content and deleted anti-Kurdish files. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment When I put the talk page through Google Translate (the detected language is Azerbaijani), it gives: "This user wants the destruction of Kurdistan and considers the existence of Kurdistan harmful." The Persian text translates to "Arabic language of Kyrgyzstan". Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, as it's clearly the user page of a VOA. I blocked them a few days ago on UgWiki for making more or less the same userpage, and they are also blocked on AzWiki and ArWiki. I've requested global locks. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete -- Parsa 2au (talk) 07:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have better alternatives in Category:Cyclobutanol. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an incorrect chemical structure of avenasterol. There is an extra methyl group on the side chain. We have File:Structure of (3β,5α,24Z)-Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol (23290-26-8).svg as a correct alternative that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure with several issues: key stereochemical information is missing throughout, bond lengths are inconsistent, and the file type is non-ideal. We have File:Madecassoside.svg as a high quality alternative that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken SVG (in cat gallery, only the letters display, not the bond-lines). Have File:Ardueng1.svg (maybe should extract just the structure from that as a more-direct replacement for this broken image). DMacks (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise:

DMacks (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've made an attempt to fix these SVGs. For some reason, on Wikipedia SVGs can look very different depending on different browser/operating system combinations. How do they all look to you now? Innerstream (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look all good now. Any lead on the specific technical detail of the files that was involved here? DMacks (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't able to identify the specific errors in the svgs that were causing the problem, so I ended up redrawing. Innerstream (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Sclareolide structure 2.png except with larger, unequal margins. This inferior equivalent is unused and redundant. Innerstream (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stephen Thaler sued the Copyright Office and it is on appeal and I think we should move this to the English Wikipedia. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/ai-art-intellectual-property-lawsuit-stephen-thaler-2242031 2603:7080:B40:A5C3:B1F9:94E2:6F57:9302 21:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Thaler has also tried unsuccessfully to gain a copyright in other countries too. The Copyright Office has made its position clear, and unless we have reason to believe the lawsuit will succeed, I don't see that as a reason for deletion. Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per a USCO Review Board decision, this work is not copyrightable. If he wins this lawsuit—which he probably won’t, just read the decision—this file (and the decision PDF) should be deleted. Just because he’s started a lawsuit doesn’t mean much, so we shouldn’t remove the file just because he’s paid to start a lawsuit. The arguments he makes in the article and brief are the same arguments he made to the Copyright Office, and the same arguments which were rejected as contrary to long-standing precedent. He analogizes intellectual property to physical property, which is just not how this works anymore, and says that there’s no case law to support the Copyright Office’s position when there most certainly is—and he knows it, too, because the Copyright Office already told him about it in the Review Board decision. I could go on about his brief, but you get the idea. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. For the time being, there is no copyright on this. If a court decides otherwise, deletion can be requested again. --Yann (talk) 23:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact Duplicate of File:Technic logo.svg Shebejeyebeb (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Article from a newspaper CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated version of File:Arduengo5.svg DMacks (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfpromotional B25es (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfpromotional B25es (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope lady 186.174.185.131 20:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vindhyaseries (talk · contribs)

edit

suspicious photos without camera metadata.

RZuo (talk) 15:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vindhyaseries (talk · contribs) 2

edit

Likely not own works: 3 photos with 3 different cameras.

P 1 9 9   21:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Magazine cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of File:Hellenic Gendarme Guard Duty 1950s.jpeg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 23:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of File:Hellenic Gendarme Guard Duty 1950s.jpeg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 23:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Bruno Basso In Napoli.png Jochen Burghardt (talk) 23:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, thanks! BrianDBaer (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality logo in JPG format. The image is replaced by File:Logo of Chemiepark Knapsack.svg as a high-quality vector graphic. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IXTA9839 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://irohakamon.com/kamon/kiku/juurokuuragiku.html

COM:TOO and/or PD-old? King of ♥ 01:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ウェブサイト「家紋のいろは」からコピーされたことは明らかです。虚偽の作者情報を伴ってアップロードされました。
This file was obviously copied from website "家紋のいろは". It was initially uploaded with false information (source and author). IXTA9839 (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:十六裏菊.jpgAmazon.co.jpにRifnetが出品した商品画像を加工(モノクロ化、トリミング)したものであることが明らかです。
File:十六裏菊.jpg was obviously Rifnet's product image on Amazon.co.jp turned to black-and-white and trimmed.--IXTA9839 (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, false license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work requires that original image be either free or De minimis. Original is logo of KVMV and likely exceeds COM:TOO. BigrTex (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA license on the gallery page A1Cafel (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This pic was taken from the home page, and it have nothing to do with the gallery where pics are released under CC-BY-NC-SA licence. --Zio27 14:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of claimed free license at source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). 1936 Soviet photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ 06:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: False license, no rasoning why it would be free licensed for some other reason offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the original uploader of this file. I have uploaded a higher resolution scan of this image as a new file, please delete this file as it is a poorer quality upload, the better quality file is at the following URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fresco_of_Guru_Hargobind_with_Sikh_musicians.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D ThethPunjabi (talk) 07:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; old file name redirected to larger one. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is apparently a screenshot taken from a video interview by Simafekr which is not freely licensed. Mehr News Agency is not the creator of this work so its license does not apply to this file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (Foto FPÖ Landtagsclub) M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not offical picture Ainglesprieto (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not official / old picture Ainglesprieto (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is not a valid reason for deletion, this picture is in use in multiple Wikipedia articles (example: de:Giulio Superti-Furga). --AFBorchert (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep And even if it was not in use, there is no reason to delete a photo just because it is old. --Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:UA, copyrights of two-dimensional representation of copyrighted 3D objects belong to the owners/designers. These photos either show just the trophy/trophies, are used to represent the Vince Lombardi Trophy on Wikipedia, or are artistic representations of the trophy/trophies.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the talk page of the enWiki bio of Zerubia it is claimed that this photo is copyrighted. Note that the uploader is iindeffed on enWiki for socking. Randykitty (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes: I'm a friend of JZ ans this picture was put on her wikipedia page (fr) without her consent. TTetLS (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unencyclopedic photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep A photo of people dressed up for a folk festival in Melitopol seems interesting and potentially useful to me, and it doesn't have to be encyclopedic, as this is not Wikipedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol from https://www.diocesimessina.it/mons-antonino-raspanti-nuovo-presidente-della-cesi/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Nipponese Dog Calvero LTA 173.12.56.169 13:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is not a reason to delete anything. Depicted person is notable. The photo is properly licensed and has complete EXIF. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 18:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo 100.35.73.190 03:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep en:Peter Huang is still notable. Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep (revised) only if cropped as proposed by Taivo, which I've done here for this discussion. The Chinese-wiki article is here zh:黃文雄 (人權活動家). JGHowes talk - 13:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See also related DR's:

the infomration just on the person could be useful. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   17:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Special:Diff/731504130 Kadı Message 18:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Peter Huang and Jason Lin 2018-03-25.jpg Kadı Message 18:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i leaved that company and i want remove my Avatar about there. Please help me. Cengi7 (talk) 18:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook fufu 186.174.185.131 20:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyviol from Facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook beans 186.174.185.131 20:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyviol from Facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asogirdor (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asogirdor (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Japan, photos of art works situated in public locations in Japan cannot be uploaded to Commons. (Tarō Okamoto died in 1996.)

DAJF (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


No FOP in Japan. It was created by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).

G I Chandor (talk) 03:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. These are art works by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).

G I Chandor (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. It was created by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).

G I Chandor (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Japan. This work was created in 1969 and is therefore under copyright protection.

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: work by Taro Okamoto († 1996). --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 11:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's short (1,2 seconds), but I hear someone speaking. So not "empty". --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I need to check with the browser settings again. I could not hear anything before. now I can. I am not sure what went wrong. its a Keep QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 08:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, DR was effectively withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 16:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We can find this photo at Pexels. According to our policy it is not possible to import files from Pexels. Of course that does not apply if the original creator of the file uploads the file here on Commons. But there is no hint that the uploader here on Commons is identical with the original uploader at Pexels, so the uploader cannot release this photo under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. I fear we must delete this photo, don't we? Aristeas (talk) 06:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We can find this photo at Pexels. According to our policy it is not possible to import files from Pexels. Of course that does not apply if the original creator of the file uploads the file here on Commons. But there is no hint that the uploader here on Commons is identical with the original uploader at Pexels, so the uploader cannot release this photo under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. I fear we must delete this photo, don't we? Aristeas (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je vous invite à contacter l'Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles en ce qui concerne les pochettes d'album [2]. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is on the picture and a watermark appears CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Est-ce que vous pouvez expliquer pourquoi il y a une signature sur la photo ?

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je vous invite à contacter l'Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles en ce qui concerne les pochettes d'album [3]. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no problem of copyright on this image. i am the owner ! Paolaowono (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je vous invite à contacter l'Équipe des répondeurs bénévoles en ce qui concerne les pochettes d'album [4]. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:GVT Singapore government works have a 70 year term, and this dates from 2022 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn Mistaken nomination, Wrong jurisdiction. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nipponese dog calvero Artix Kreiger (talk) 01:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, en:Peter Huang is notable. The photo is big and has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (revised): But 林浩生(Jason Lin) isn't still notable. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 12:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, we have better images of Peter Huang, especially if Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peter Huang and Jason Lin 2015-04-10.jpg is kept. See also related DR's:
 Keep, Peter Huang and Jason Lin Participated in activities against nuclear power generation, See Category:Anti-nuclear power movement. --Glay Liou (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a portrait of a user who has been Globall Banned and it's not useful to keep it and it is likely to advertise this user. A request for removal is therefore made. 維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. The status of a user being globally banned doesn't change the value of the image, we shouldn't condemn the memory of globally banned users, this isn't the Roman Empire or Ancient Egypt where we remove all mentions of people we don't like so any memories of them will disappear. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank u for participating in the discussion, but note that I have also proposed the deletion of other file he has uploaded, so please focus the discussion in one page(This).——維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{vk}] per discussion above, no valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 21:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo 100.35.73.190 03:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep en:Neil Peng is notable. The photo is big and has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (revised): But 林浩生(Jason Lin) isn't still notable. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 12:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (revised), after looking over the many images we already have of the notable subject (see Category:Neil Peng), there's really no need to keep this unused personal photo, even if cropped. See also related DR's:
JGHowes talk - 14:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a portrait of a user who has been Globall Banned and it's not useful to keep it and it is likely to advertise this user. A request for removal is therefore made. 維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr source for this is CC-BY-SA 2.0 but this file is from the 1970s from a Danish university and has the involvement of a 1989 expedition in the Philippines. Flickr account purpose is show a collection relating to the botany of the Philippines but I'm not sure if this can license this file under Creative Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by the uploader as non-free at w:en:File:Esther Shephard American folklorist.jpg. See Ticket:2023020710018378 for more background. Speedy on these grounds was previously declined, so I'm opening up a DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I worked out with Wikipedia Permissions that I should upload to English Wikipedia under a claim of fair use, which I did using the "Upload a non-free file" information. I have signed, written permission to upload the image to be used for illustrative purposes with the article Esther Shephard; however, the image provider did not want to have the image on the Commons or labeled as Creative Commons license. If this is a problem, the image can be deleted, as it's not essential, merely informational. Treesiati (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
However, the previous upload of Esther Shephard.tif *should* be deleted because that one is on the Commons (my mistake). Treesiati (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is about the file on Commons. The file on the English Wikipedia is not being nominated for deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Up until 1964 it would require registration and renewal, and up until 1989 it required registration within 5 years. I cannot find any image of this person in the registration database or the renewal database. I would say we are looking at a 60 year old person, so the image is circa 1955. I have changed the date to "circa 1955" and the license to "PD-US-not renewed", if you disagree, let me know. --RAN (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That assumes that the date of publication is 1964, which is not necessarily the same as the date of creation. If first published after 1 March 1989, for example, the copyright on the photograph would persist through at least 31 December 2047 (see: COM:HIRTLE). My understanding is that the file may not have been published until fairly recently (it's plausible that the file was kept unpublished in an archive, and I don't have evidence of any publication of the photo having occurred pre-1990), which is why I nominated it for deletion rather than assuming it was PD. If there's evidence of publication at a time where formalities mattered and where formalities were not followed, I'd be right there with you, but I don't have good evidence of publication at a time where that would have mattered. Because of this, and also particularly in light of the ticket contents, I still think this should be precautionarily deleted as lacking a both a free license and clear evidence of being in the public domain. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already by Krd. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

junk worthless Slinkyw (talk) 21:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Section 3.a.3 of CC-BY-SA 4.0, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable. Slinkyw (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This file was licensed under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication, which has no such requirement. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, with the hesitations of Ikan Kekek. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)

edit

Official portrait photos from the site of the Government of Moldova; site however didn't release them as CC0 as claimed – in fact, a site-wide "© All rights reserved" is visible in the footer.

Gikü (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)

edit

License at source is "Public Domain Mark" and not CC BY SA 4.0; also ALL PHOTOS FROM MOLDOVAN PARLIAMENT'S FLICKR SHOULD BE DELETED as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Parlamentul Republicii Moldova Flickr stream. CC TheAafi as the license reviewer of one affected file.

Gikü (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. I'm not sure how I made this error. I've reversed it. I support deletion in accordance with the nomination's rationale. In fact while reviewing I did search the parliament's name a number of times to make sure I was doing a right thing but unfortunately. I perhaps only verified the message the Flickr-review template was saying and forgot to change the license-template. Now there is so much, the source is clearly having some inaccuracies and it is difficult to believe them. As the nominator mentions elsewhere These three files, however, were made 20+ years ago, and it is unclear whether they too are Parliament's work or not.. ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editor1722 (talk · contribs)

edit

Nonsense PD rationale - the medal may be PD, but the photograph of the medal is a separate work and there is no free license at the source site. (Medals are 3D works, so Bridgeman does not apply.)

Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Logo hat den Stand 2014 und ist nicht mehr gültig. Zur Verifikation beachten Sie bitte das aktuelle Logo auf der Webseite des Unternehmens. 195.80.239.7 09:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No meta, low res, no source. Probably not uploader's own work.  Marcus Hsu  talk  17:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivhDKWQkHkOO4q7A_1ZB-hRhtwmv6K40oR_1aHgKJyPifoDNbcoz4Nif3mGTMWRPmGQgSkOZtihOZQebNskq-wBBP9Gl_1A7U3k0bO-QkriG-lZJpwUHWuGbGTRcadqMboCo3WFcU6z832bL1vkyO5JKK0cW6jzw. --Kadı Message 18:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misused license (probably to avoid quick deletion), according to the regulations the logo should be in public domain in 2038. Exist a previously deleted file: File:Logo del Liceo Franco-Costarricense.png. Taichi (talk) 04:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the logo in question is from a public institution in Costa Rica, therefore it’s copy-right protected for 25 years since it’s original publishing date, but it can be used for any non-commercial means (Law 6683) Mito0504 (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The college is administered by an NGO called "Asociación Franco-Costarricense de Enseñanza (AFCE)", also is considered a international college, the conditions of public domain applied to a government bodies, and this college doesn't fit the criteria. Taichi (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As stated on the international treaty that creates the AFCE and the college, all the things owned by the AFCE or the college are property of the Ministry of Public Education of Costa Rica. At the same time, in Costa Rica, all public colleges are considered part of the Ministry of Public Education, who has veto power over any decision of the AFCE, therefore it’s a public document, from a public institution, and the public domain conditions for government bodies apply. Mito0504 (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The PD conditions applies to «government bodies», but in your argument explains this logo is property of a institution attached to the Ministry, but isn't an institutional part of that Ministry. Your assertion is not the same in the conditions of the PD license. Taichi (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, by law all trademarks or copyrights of any public college or institution attached to the Ministry of Public Education are property and are owned by it, therefore it’s copyrights are protected for only 25 years, so this logo is in the PD since c.1993.

Mito0504 (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 14:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see source. Claimed PD, should be discussed. King of ♥ 05:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the photo in question is from a public institution in Costa Rica, therefore it’s copy-right protected for 25 years since it’s original publishing date, but it can be used for any non-commercial means — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mito0504 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is of a public building of Costa Rica, demolished in the 80’, therefore the copyright falls under the category of “State-owned art” and is protected for 25 years, therefore it has been in the public domain, at least since 2014.

Mito0504 (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm not talking about the structure per se, specifically who took the photo. That detail must be identified, you can take a photo from a public site but maybe have licensing rights for your work (aka copyright). Taichi (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The autor is unknown, but the image copyright is hold by the Ministry of Public Education, who has used it in various publications, as this one: https://es.calameo.com/read/00572555091f7c6d4e113 therefore the copyright falls under the category of “State-owned art” and is protected for 25 years, therefore it has been in the public domain, at least since 2014. (The facebook source was used because it had the highest resolution available)

22:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mito0504 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The 150 page document from 2018 that you provide says nothing about specific licensing, you cannot tacitly assume that the school yearbook with its myriad of photographs is in the public domain, if there is nothing specific no license is assumed (a copyrighted item). Taichi (talk) 00:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, after deeper research, i have discovered the original source and autor of the photo, and i made a mistake in saying that it was owned by the Ministry of Public Education. The original photo is from “The Blue Book of Costa Rica” (1916), and it was taken by Manuel Gómez Miralles. The book in question is a Government-published book to advertise Costa Rica to foreign investors, you can look at it here: http://www.sinabi.go.cr/biblioteca%20digital/libros%20completos/el%20libro%20azul%20de%20costa%20rica/El%20libro%20azul%20de%20Costa%20Rica%20parte%203.pdf on page 208. Being a Government publication, it has copyright protection for 25 years, therefore it has been in the public domain since 1941; and if we want to consider normal copyright of 70 years, it would also be in the public domain since 1986. Thanks.

Mito0504 (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Mito0504: Please, rewrite the information on the file template since neither the date nor the source is the same, it is obvious that the photo was taken in other circumstances. Taichi (talk) 07:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done.

Mito0504 (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is probably copied here and it isn't licensed for free use. Puppe100 (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moi! Ko. kuva on meidän oma Osmo's Cosmos -promokuva, kuvaaja Nestori Lönngrén. Meillä on kaikki käyttöoikeudet kuvaan. Osmokosminen (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tässä tapauksessa tiedoston tietoihin pitäisi merkitä tekijäksi Nestori Lönngrén ja kuvan lähteeksi esimerkiksi linkittämäni sivu.--Puppe100 (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs a free license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner and the person that took this photograph and I want it deleted for personal reasons that I would rather not discuss as a protection of privacy. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment On Commons since last May, too long ago for automatic deletion by uploader request without reason. No potential personality rights or other problem evident. I suggest you send an explanation email as explained in COM:VRT if there is a reason for deletion you do not wish to state publicly. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why should this newspaper-content be PD-South-Afrika? I see none of the mentioned terms met. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


  • Is it an anonymous work or pseudonymous work ... — no.
  • Is it a broadcast or sound recording ... — no.
  • Is it a cinematographic or photographic work and 50 years have passed since the date of its creation. — yes, but only for the images.
  • Is it an artistic, literary or musical work created under the direction of the state or an international organization ... — no.
  • Is it another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author). — Evidence needed.

--Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio I thought not knowing the author makes it anonymous work (point no. 1) FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But most articles/photos on the page (1st file) have an author-credit. I am not sure how the generic "Varsity News Staff" is to handle. --Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:The Mafeje Affair, Varsity Excerpt 3.jpg as the author Adrian Guelke is still alive, so that is definitely a delete. Sorry 😅, I thought images of newspapers are still considered images FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Archie Mafeje Tyler Morning Telegraph.webp. An excerpt from a Texas newspaper paraphrasing a report by the U.S.-owned Associated Press; not bound by South African copyright law and is still protected by copyright in the U.S. No comment on the other files. DigitalIceAge (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete File:The Mafeje Affair, Varsity Excerpt 4.jpg While it's PD in South Africa (50 years for anonymous works), the copyright was restored in the USA per Commons:Hirtle chart. Per Commons:Licensing, the picture has to be PD in the source country & the USA. As it has 95 years of copyright, this is not PD in the USA.
  •  Delete File:The Mafeje Affair, Varsity Excerpt 1.jpg as well. Even if both authors died in 1968 (which I have not researched), this photo would not be PD in the United States as the copyright would expire in South Africa after 1996 (50 years after death of author). Therefore, this also has a 95 year copyright in the USA.
MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When searching for this picture with TinEye, it is found at many websites, some findings dating back to 2021 or even 2017. In addition, the EXIF data mention as copyright holder “kbuntu • Fotolia”. There is no hint that the uploader here at Commons – a new user – has any relation to the original creator of this file. I fear we must delete this file, don’t we? Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional boudoir photographs loaded by a photographic studio. out of scope

Cabayi (talk) 08:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The findagrave source link does not even show this photo; there is no evidence this is the work of the federal government or otherwise PD. - Indy beetle (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It looks like the person is misidentified. The correction was probably made at Findagrave and removed. Let me see if it is of someone of the same name. The person the image is attached to died before photography of this type was available. OK, I figured him out and changed the name and loaded a hires version over the old one. --RAN (talk) 05:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) All (or most) of these are loosely based on copyrighted works (see: File:شابلن شهداء-شهید سردار سید حمیدرضا هاشمی.jpg > https://defapress.ir/files/fa/news/1401/7/12/1830269_313.jpg; File:شابلن شهداء-سردار شهید عبدالله اسکندری-۱.jpg > https://baharekavar.ir/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/82684783-71905989.jpg; Special:Diff/388147114). We need permission from the original authors or evidence must be provided to prove that the original work is in the public domain or has a Commons-compatible license.
2) As Ellin Beltz stated on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Koorosh Orooj, out of scope.

Hanooz 11:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And what about the project scope? Most or all of "شابلن"s are out of scope in my opinion. Hanooz 17:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luigiácioseeeeeee (talk · contribs)

edit

Small flag images all with higher-quality SVG versions available (they're all likely derived from SVG).

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They can be replaced on Wikipedia with the following files:
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: According to the Finnish Copyright Council (TN 2013:3) this very photo falls under "works of art" rather than just "photographs" (see COM:FINLAND#Photographs that are not works of art). Therfore Template:PD-Finland50 does not apply and the work enters public domain 70 years after the death of the photographer, in 2061. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The statements of the Council are not legally binding, and in this case, it clearly states that this particular photograph is a borderline case (“Tekijänoikeusneuvosto pitää teoskynnyksen ylittymistä kuitenkin rajatapauksena”). In reality, this is a typical press photograph that could have been taken by several professional photographers. It has therefore entered Public Domain in 2012, fifty years after creation or publication. This photograph was published in Finnish newspapers in 1961 clearly as news material, not as a work of art. Even a good-quality press photograph is still a press photograph. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- It may or may not be PD in Finland, but it has a URAA copyright in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per [6], GNN was a company to be starting activities in Feb 2017. The logo was uploaed (only upload of user) in Jul 2016. Promotional. GNN is nowhere to be found in Google B25es (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by TachibanaLouis as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: 2D art. 1974 artwork by an artist who died in 1977. Will become public domain in Japan in 2048 and in the US in 2070. Converting to DR to allow time to locally transfer to Wikipedias that allow fair use. Abzeronow (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of his own vision. User uploaded just two items, this panel in French and English B25es (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is a work of the United States Congress. As there is no real reason for U.S. government officials to be present at the launch site, this was likely taken from the video feed of the launch that was transmitted to the Loral Corporation's headquarters. So it is probably not in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of his own vision. User uploaded just two items, this panel in French and English B25es (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pentachlorphenol as Copyvio (copyvio) King of ♥ 19:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all over Facebook and other sites, but at much lower resolutions and without metadata. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small own work? 186.174.185.131 20:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

own work. small size due to to camera limitations and angle of view. still has benefits. 155.12.255.215 11:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looking at the uploader's other contributions, I think we can assume good faith, and an old phone taking the photograph sounds plausible per Ikan Kekek. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a media file as defined by COM:SCOPE - text that can be rendered as a table in wiki markup--indeed, this is merely a screenshot from a uk.wiki article Эlcobbola talk 21:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Я твою мать трахну , если ты и этот файл удалишь , ублюдок SINONWOT (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ukranian Wikipedia screenshot that could be rendered as a table as Elcobbola says. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source book was first published in 1971 see here. There is no evidence this photo was published before 1928. Uploader has history of copyright violations on English Wikipedia.- Indy beetle (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2067. If there is evidence that this was published much earlier, I could restore it sooner. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a portrait of a user who has been Globall Banned and it's not useful to keep it and it is likely to advertise this user. A request for removal is therefore made. 維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. The status of a user being globally banned doesn't change the value of the image, we shouldn't condemn the memory (Damnatio memoriae) of globally banned users, this isn't the Roman Empire or Ancient Egypt where we remove all mentions of people we don't like so any memories of them will disappear. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrecht nicht geklärt GerritR (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]