Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FS E 444R Cervo 2.jpg

File:FS E 444R Cervo 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2016 at 23:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Certainly one of the best views of the now replaced section of the Genoa-Ventimiglia railway can be found at Cervo, Italy.
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh! It's a picture of a railway. I thought it was a photo of a town with a beach... Just kidding, great as usual. :) --cart-Talk 23:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 23:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wonderful! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus 03:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 03:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent light and composition. And the first picture I ever added to Category:Taken with Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. --Code (talk) 06:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful indeed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective.--Mile (talk) 08:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support All round excellence. Charles (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support For to be a bit picky, the sky is'nt perfect (little pixelation), and there are a very few sharpening artefacts (I talk about pixel level), I know I am exaggerating, very good image. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The composition is not optimal, it needs a crop below (too much useless water). IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I didn't crop as much as you suggested, but instead also added some more sky and kept the aspect ratio. I think it's better now. --Kabelleger (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think, like Jebulon, it could have some sea removed. How about a 16:9 crop retaining all the sky and removing a little less sea than Jebulon suggests. -- Colin (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original crop was fine, too. Samsara (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 14:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 08:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles