User:A.Savin/Archive/2017/1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img05 Hemitragus jemlahicus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent focus, main object is very sharp --Michielverbeek 23:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Powder Tower img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joalpe 23:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficiently shows the details of the building and its architecture. --WClarke 04:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Old Town Square img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img10 chairlift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img04 Elephas maximus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice.--Famberhorst 16:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img6 LineB Andel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow LeninskyPr 2nd Hospital 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --Ermell 10:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Vozdvizhenka18 manor 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Smetana Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Powder Tower img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Troja Bridge img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Will promote it but not sure 100%. Some buildigns are leaning (e.g. the buildings in the top right are leaning in a bit) but cannot see a clear pattern --Poco a poco 16:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img16 Spheniscus humboldti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Lusatian Seminary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img09 Balaeniceps rex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Church of Saint Francis of Assisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 tram at Andel img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Old Town Square img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Manes Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img2 LineC Vltavska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Hotel Opera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the crop is too tight. Do you think you could fix this, would it be possible? --Basotxerri 18:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment I had to take the picture very close to the building and with the shortest possible focal length. Unfortunately, no wider crop available; but the tower is still entirely captured. --A.Savin 23:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC) I'm not 100% convinced by this image, maybe it's also because of this extreme wide angle. Perhaps you could remove the CA of the streetlight on the right and please check for CAs on the tower, too, and I promote this image. --Basotxerri 16:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks,  Done. --A.Savin 18:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC) OK now. --Basotxerri 16:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img08 Leptoptilos crumeniferus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Kings Court Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Great angle of view to this interesting monument. Very nice colors, resolution and exposure control. --Slaunger 23:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Stefanik Observatory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Mezibranska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img1 LineC Florenc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Old Town Square img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I generally enjoy your Prague photos. You had excellent shooting conditions here it seems. --Slaunger 20:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Petrin Funicular.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 21:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Troja Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Powder Tower img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You should have tried to shot this bridge without people on it :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 City Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img13 Pelecanus philippensis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img02 Vanellus miles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 tram at Andel img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Powder Tower img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img01 Xerus inauris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower PANO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, light exposure is well done. --Michielverbeek 07:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 09:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img14 flamingos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img11 chairlift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img4 LineC IPPavlova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Одинаковые изображения

Приветствую. Подскажите, я не очень понимаю, я наткнулся на упертого админа, или я сам не прав. Разгребаю одну категорию, там оказалось много дубликатов картин. Ну, условно первое изображение картины залили году этак в 2005-2006, соответственно кошмарного качества, а затем лет через 5 уже другой пользователь загружал изображение этой же картины, но уже в приемлемом качестве. Получается есть 2-3 файла. На кой черт нам 2-3 изображения одной и той же картины, только в разном качестве? Одного, наилучшего не достаточно?

• Примеры:
• 1. c:File:Vasnetsov Vsehsvyatsky Most.jpg, c:File:Москва.jpg - плохое качество, c:File:Vsehsvyatsky stone bridge. End of XVII century Moscow.jpg - приемлемое качество. В первых двух я ставил шаблон duplicate, но c:User:Wdwd убирал с быстрого удаления, и просто проставляет в каждом файле other versions.
• 2. Тоже самое здесь: c:File:Ryabushkin 17centMoscow.JPG и c:File:Andrei_Ryabushkin_-_Seventeenth-Century_Moscow_Street_on_a_Public_Holiday_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg. Ну зачем нужно первое изображение? Тут опять c:User:Wdwd убрал с быстрого удаления, под предлогом "Not an exact or scaled-down duplicate", в итоге я выставил на удалении уже через обычный гаджет. --Stolbovsky (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Ну, я бы тоже удалил старые. Они худшего качества и нигде не используются. Если бы вы сразу мне сказали — удвлил бы по-быстрому. Я не знаю, почему коллега отказался удалять. Как известно, админы у нас разные, с самой разной степенью адекватности. Что теперь делать? Выставьте на регулярное удаление, а если вдруг и там откажут — сообщите мне, попробую оспорить. --A.Savin 21:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Да обычно просто проблем нет, там даже из части подобных изображений с таким шаблоном другой админ удалил, но этот второй день занимается такой ерундой. Любят же помойку развести некоторые.--Stolbovsky (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Но кстати, пока еще осталось вот это, можете удалить: c:File:Kuinji Vid Na-Moskvu s Vorobyevyh gor.jpg --Stolbovsky (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img07 Platalea ajaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC) Yes, good quality. Just curious: What are the white things? -- Ikan Kekek 18:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Now that you asked, I'm also curious. By now, I didn't pay much attention to it. It's most likely some reflections, but I don't know of what exactly. --A.Savin 19:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Powder Tower img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 18:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img3 LineC Pankrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 18:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Посмотрите

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%A7%D1%91%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%93.%D0%90.,_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%8E%D0%B7%D0%B0.JPG ***File:Могила Чёрного Г.А., героя Советского Союза.JPG Если не в теме, поступайте как долг велит. С ув., --Алексей Павлов 1 (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img12 Acinonyx jubatus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Powder Tower from Republic Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Certovka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img15 Neophron percnopterus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img06 Hemitragus jemlahicus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Old Town Hall Tower img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Petrinska Tower img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Wenceslas Square img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 tram at Florenc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Zoo img03 Elephas maximus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 view from Lesser Town Tower of Charles Bridge img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Troja Bridge img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 View from Lesser Town Nicholas Church img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- DerFussi 18:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prague 07-2016 Metro img5 LineB Andel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 18:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC) A.Savin: I find this photo mesmerizing, so this goes on my list of possible FP nominations. For me, a bit more sharpening or denoising is inessential, but you might play with that to help your chances at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 23:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Overcategorization

Overcategorization is only temporary. I didn't finish my work with QI categories. Probably you didn't see, but I also created lots of QI categories of provinces and cities and I'm moving images there. Unfortunately I'm working alone, so that process will take a long time. When I finish, there will be no problem mentioned by you.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague 07-2016 Charles Bridge John of Nepomuk statue img1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img14 Finikoudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is high enough for Q1, but why didn't you wait till bus in background drove away? --Michielverbeek 06:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment Because, there were cars behind the bus. :) --A.Savin 12:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img20 Tuzla Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img22 StGeorge Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img24 Kamares Aqueduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img28 Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img01 Larnaca Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img06 Sourp Stepanos Armenian Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img33 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img38 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rjcastillo 14:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img32 Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Charlesjsharp 15:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img03 Forest station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img08 Pieridis Museum of Antiquities.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img26 Larnaca Marina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img30 View from City Royal Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img11 Omeriye Hammam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 12:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img14 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 13:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img16 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img05 cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img33 AtatuerkSquare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Фотография здания Ростелекома

Добрый день!

Не могу разобраться как добавить к изображению другое описание. Дело в том, что здание Ростелекома на 1-й Тверской-Ямской уже год как продано, персонал переехал на Гончарную улицу и в бизнес-центр в Румянцево. Речь об этом файле: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rostelekom.jpg Anton Koshevoy (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 16:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img01 NBG building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img20 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and an interesting view. --Tsui 02:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img27 Dervish Pasha Mansion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Although the wires ruins the image but there isn´t way to avoid them --Ezarate 01:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img24 Haydar Pasha Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img17 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img28 Cyprus Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, I think it would be a good idea for you to distinguish your file descriptions from one another, as you are depicting different things at the archaeological site. -- Ikan Kekek 02:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img21 StGeorge Kontos Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img05 Kyriazis Medical Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img12 Armenian Genocide Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img30 Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Info

[1], [2], nur falls du es noch nicht mitbekommen haben solltest. Nur noch Bekloppte da. --smial 16:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Ich beobachte das MB soweit möglich schon, aber betreffend "Diderot-Klub" (Erfindung des indef-gesperrten Politclowns und Sockenspielers Simplicius) ist mir das Beobachten dann doch zu viel der Ehre. Gut zu wissen. --A.Savin 17:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Man will diesen Scheiß eigentlich gar nicht lesen, aber ich wurde mit der Nase drauf gestoßen. --smial 23:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposal

Hallo! Ich habe deine Abstimmung bei der Geschichte mit "Photographs taken on". Kurz, aber du hast recht. Da wird viel Zeit und manuelle Arbeit investiert, aber entscheidend ist es nicht. Nur der Stil ist verbesserungswürdig. Derart große Änderungen fängt man nicht ohne Abstimmung an. Mittlerweile stelle ich derartige Energieverschwendung an etlichen Stellen, meist allerdings fragwürdige Sortierschlüssel. Meist bringe ich meinem Bot dann auch diesen unwichtigen Kram bei, um vielleicht halbwegs eine Konsistenz zu halten. Manuell wäre mir die Zeit zu schade. Ich verstehe nicht, warum im obigen Fall die Länderkategorien kurz nach bereits weitreichender Einführung wieder abgeschafft werden sollen. Soll doch jeder glücklich werden so wie es ist. Ich bezweifle allerdings, dass der User, der die Löscherei angefangen hat, diese auch zu Ende bringt. Irgendwann wird er merken, wieviel Aufwand es ist und mittendrin aufhören. Und Ärger wird's eh geben, denn es gibt auch die Leute, die die Kategorien mit Vehemenz anlegen. Hin und her. Aber eigentlich wollte ich dir mal sagen, dass ich deine Bilder und deinen Sachverstand sehr schätze. Mit manchen Benutzern in Konflikt zu geraten, ist gar nicht schwer. In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia schon gar nicht. Der harte Kurs, den einige dort fahren, ist dem Projekt alles andere als zuträglich. Ich habe schon neue Autoren quasi an die Hand genommen, weil sie nach einem neuen Beitrag gefolgt von einem schroffen, unfreundlichen Löschantrag total frustriert waren. Das ist eher destruktiv als konstruktiv. Vom Umgangston an etlichen Stellen will ich gar nicht reden. Glücklicherweise kenne ich aber auch sehr nette Leute, einige sogar persönlich. Die Idee des freien Wissens schätze ich sehr. So, nun erst mal Ende der kurzen Ansprache. Grüße aus dem Münsterland! --XRay ^talk 17:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

XRay, danke. Was mich an der Aktion stört, ist, dass es auf der einen Seite Category:Media needing categories gibt mit einem siebenstelligen Backlog (man rede nur von *komplett* unkategorisierten Dateien) und keinen juckts, auf der anderen Seite habe ich dann durch solcherlei Edits Überkategorisierung in meinen Fotos. Die Herrschaften, die dieses "Germany photographs taken on..."-Kram hinzufügen, sollten sich definitiv eine andere Spielwiese suchen. --A.Savin 18:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Die von dir zitierten Edits sind genau solche, die mich in manueller Form irritieren. Das ist auch genau der Kram, den mein Bot für meine Bilder übernimmt, dem lieben Frieden willen. Und es gibt noch andere, ähnlich gelagerte. Und mit dem Backlog (und anderen Baustellen, ich sag nur Flickr und Panoramio) hast du völlig recht. Mir fehlt oft die Zeit, aber schade um die Zeit, die verwendet wird, um Kategorien nach Datum oder Uhrzeit oder lokalen Straßennamen zu sortieren und nicht zu bemerken, dass diese gut gemeinte Ordnung für Außenstehende nur chaotisch wirkt. Ich hoffe ja auf eine grundlegende Reform der Kategorien mit der Einführung der strukturierten Daten. Bis dahin üben wir vielleicht lieber Gelassenheit. --XRay ^talk 18:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img02 StLazarus Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img27 Finikoudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, probably soft for FP but very good for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 12:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img07 phone booth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img37 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent IMO. Good FP candidate? Not sure, maybe. I would probably vote for it and just might nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 12:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img10 CTO building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img35 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good take on something not usually considered photogenic --Daniel Case 21:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:February 2017 in Austria

Hi! Hoffe es ist in Ordnung, wenn ich hier deutsch schreibe. Nur kurz wegen der Bilder der Category:Österreichischer Filmpreis 2017, die ich zusätzlich noch als Einzelbilder jeweils der Category:February 2017 in Austria zugeordnet hatte. Vom System der Kategorisierungen her finde ich es auch logisch, nur die Kategorie des Event, nicht auch die einzelnen Fotos dieser Monatskategorie zuzuordnen - insofern habe ich auch überhaupt kein Problem damit, dass Du das so gemacht hast. In den Erläuterungen der Kat. steht allerdings "Fotos sollten direkt dieser Kategorie zugeteilt werden und nicht in Unterkategorien." Das scheint mit der Funktionsweise des Cat-Scan zu tun zu haben, deshalb hielt ich mich bislang auch daran. Weißt Du, ob Cat-Scan (inzwischen?) mit Unterkategorien umgehen kann? Ich habe mich noch nie damit befasst und möchte jenen, die ihn nutzen, die Arbeit nicht unnötig erschweren. --Tsui (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tsui: Nein. Weiß ich leider nicht. Ich hatte das Datum gemäß COM:OVERCAT entfernt. --A.Savin 12:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img06 cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img23 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img04 Faneromeni Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img09 Old Ottoman Bank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof could have been sharper, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img11 Municipal Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img31 Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img02 city wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img08 Famagusta Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img15 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nicosia 01-2017 img20 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nicosia 01-2017 img20 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img03 city walls DeMezzo Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img12 city walls ravelin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img10 Carmelite Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dramatic with the bright light on the ruins and the nimbus clouds in the background! Good for QI and perhaps a possible FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 09:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img21 StGeorge of the Greeks Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img28 sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Deutsche Wikipedia

Ich kann zurzeit nicht auf deutscher WP schreiben, der Single-User-Login liegt nämlich abermals am Boden und es wird beim Versuch des Abspeicherns ausschließlich eine "Sitzungsdaten verloren"-Meldung angezeigt. Ich muss notgedrungen hier schreiben:

Gulaschkanone99 Bitte stelle den IP-Beitrag wieder her. Der war von mir, da ich aus o.a. Gründen nicht eingeloggt schreiben kann.

Werner von Basil Bitte um Entsperrung der IP, denn es liegt kein valider Sperrgrund, solange mein Account nicht gesperrt ist.

--A.Savin 17:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Done. --Gulaschkanone99 (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Die IP habe ich entsperrt. Grüße --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

phab:T154903 und phab:T151770 und es ist ein Witz das es noch nicht behoben ist. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img04 city walls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img09 city walls Pulacazaro Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img16 view of the walled city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img07 Armenian Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img18 Lala Mustafa Pasha Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img01 Osman Fazil Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 04:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img27 city walls Arsenal Bastion and Canbulat Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img19 Franciscan Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and quite striking. -- Ikan Kekek 04:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img01 Paralimni StGeorge Old Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality, except that there are a couple of very light dust spots a bit to the left of the upper reaches of the big evergreen tree. -- Ikan Kekek 17:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img05 Deryneia All Saints Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img07 Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img11 Agia Napa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Uploads by MaslakovAS

Hello Alexander, I've come across a number of files uploaded by MaslakovAS. These look like rank insignia of Soviet Ministry of Railways personnel, so I just wanted to ask you for confirmation. If so, I think we can now create a Category:Ministry of Railways (Soviet Union). De728631 (talk) 13:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, МПС is Ministry of rail transport. --A.Savin 16:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img02 city walls Martinengo Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img17 city walls Diocare Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img09 StJohn the Apostle Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img13 Larnaca District Administration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img16 StJoseph Convent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective well done and quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img19 Tuzla Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 19:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img34 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Famagusta 01-2017 img10 Carmelite Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Famagusta 01-2017 img10 Carmelite Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img15 Finikoudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img29 Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 02:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img17 Archaeological Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and lest someone should say this photo isn't sharp enough: In this light, that's how things look. I've noticed that with my naked eye. So in my opinion, the degree of sharpness is an accurate representation of what the human eye sees. -- Ikan Kekek 02:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenzollern 10-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 02:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img03 Liberty Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img12 Omeriye Hammam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img21 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img25 Lusignan House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:AdminCon2017

Hallo A. Savin. Alle Fotos, die Du aus der Kategorie entfernt hast, wurden während der Admincon aufgenommen, von Leuten, die nur wegen der Admincon in Salzburg waren. Warum hast du sie aus der Kategorie entfernt? --Gereon K. (talk) 23:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

@Gereon K.: Weil diese Fotos ansonsten keinerlei Bezug zur AdminCom haben und z.B. bestimmte Gebäude oder Stolpersteine zeigen. --A.Savin 03:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Hallo A.Savin,
du hattest einige Bilder mittels Cat a lot aus der Category:AdminCon2017 entfernt. Ich möchte dich bitten dies wieder rückgängig zu machen. Diese Bilder sind im Rahmen der Teilnahme an der AdminCon entstanden, zu den Bildern gehört es auch diese thematisch mit der AdminCon zu verbinden... d.h. dazu gehören auch die Kategorien Category:AdminCon, Category:Wikimedia meetups in Austria, Category:Events in Salzburg, Category:2017 events in Austria, Category:Supported by Wikimedia Österreich. Es mag dir sicherlich freigestellt sein hierzu eine passenede Unterkategorie zu erstellen aber die Bilder aus diesem Zusammenhang zu entfernen geht gar nicht! LG --1971markus ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 01:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@1971markus: Ich arbeite seit ~10 Jahren tagtäglich mit Kategorien auf Commons und ich bin hinsichtlich des vorgenannten Sachverhalts einer anderen Meinung. Tut mir Leid. --A.Savin 02:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Schade, es sind noch einige weitere Bilder im Rahmen der AdminCon entstanden die ich hochladen wollte... u.a. die Stolpersteine von Stefan Zweig und Max Reinhardt... Schade, lad ich halt auf flickr hoch! --1971markus ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 09:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Dass eine Kategorie als Selbstzweck dient um irgendwas hochzuladen, ist mir neu. Aber gut, ich kann damit leben. --A.Savin 15:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Tja, ohne die AdminCon sind die Bilder halt nicht entstanden...--1971markus ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 17:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img04 aqueduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and quite interesting how this segment of aqueduct is just standing there with buildings behind it. -- Ikan Kekek 16:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img07 cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img22 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and very picturesque. -- Ikan Kekek 16:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img26 school building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 16:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img29 Kyrenia Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img23 StGeorge Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img25 Kamares Aqueduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larnaca 01-2017 img36 LCA Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again you make this space look interesting --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but almost looks like another planet --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img13 Omeriye Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img19 View from Shacolas Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img31 View from City Royal Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img32 AtatuerkSquare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img11 StAnne Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img20 street in the walled city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img22 StGeorge of the Greeks Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img24 city walls Sea Gate Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img30 Victory Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img01 Castle exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img05 Castle yard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img08 Castle tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img04 view from castle bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img12 Old Lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

С форума

• Вы правы, википедии больше известны людям, частным лицам. А вот викисклад больше известен корпоративным клиентам, которым нужны иллюстрации для газет, журналов, отчётов, календарей, плакатов и телепередач. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img06 Carmelite Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img13 city walls ravelin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img15 StPeter and Paul Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very fine grain but very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img25 StGeorge of the Latins Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img26 city walls Othello Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe the best of the 5. For FP, I don't love the right crop, but I think it might be featured if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img02 Paralimni StGeorge Metropolitan Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img03 Paralimni StDemetrius Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 15:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img08 Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img09 Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img12 Agia Napa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 15:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prague 07-2016 Metro img5 LineB Andel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague 07-2016 Metro img5 LineB Andel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img02 Castle exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice QI. --Selbymay 11:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img03 Castle Byzantine chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img07 Castle bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good & nice. --Selbymay 11:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img10 Ottoman fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img13 StMichael Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img05 city walls DeMezzo Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img08 Armenian Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img14 Lala Mustafa Pasha Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img23 StGeorge of the Greeks Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Famagusta 01-2017 img29 sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img06 Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FamagustaDistrict 01-2017 img10 Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight noise, but difficult conditions, good enough for QI. --Peulle 15:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img09 Castle exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img11 Castle exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicosia 01-2017 img10 Archbishops Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img05 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--ArildV 22:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img07 Kebir Great Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img15 Castle interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img18 Marina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Просьба

Александр, здравствуйте. Можно небольшую просьбу? Могли бы Вы сбросить на почту две эти фотографии

• File:BLOGアルバム.JPG
• File:BLOGプロフィール.JPG

Почта pamyat собака list.ru Спасибо. --Алый Король (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img04 StCatherine Catholic Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction - vertical lineas at the right are not straight (see the note). --Halavar 14:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)  Done. --A.Savin 15:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 16:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img06 Kebir Great Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img11 Archbishops residence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img10 TheOval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Was für ein Gerüst! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img22 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is a bit noisy but within the limits, I think. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img01 Olympic Residence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality but perspective is over-corrected, leaning outwards.--ArildV 22:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment ArildV: Thanks for reviewing, but pls. take a closer look: the left wall is in fact not straight. --A.Savin 22:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you, I understand now that some lines in the Olympic towers is not straight (my mistake!). But some of the other houses have a small outward leaning. Please see notes.--ArildV 23:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I really doubt it's worth correction. Most verticals are perfectly vertical and I've no desire to distort it. --A.Savin 13:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC) Not a big problem imo.--ArildV 20:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img03 Pattichion Municipal Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img09 sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img12 Sourp Kevork Armenian Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img20 Marina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img02 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img04 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img05 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img06 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img10 Limassol Salt Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img11 Akrotiri village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img03 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice.--Famberhorst 16:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img05 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrenia 01-2017 img06 view from castle bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img08 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice portrait. A bit of a looser crop around the tail would have been nice, but still QI --Crisco 1492 01:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img09 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img08 Koprulu Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img13 Agia Napa Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img21 Castle exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img24 StPantaleon Hospital Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img03 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could be sharper ... --XRay 07:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akrotiri 01-2017 img07 StNicholas of the Cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 06:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img17 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Personnally, I don't like these extreme wide angles but I understand that these normally are accepted. Besides the unavoidable distortion, there's no error so it's OK for me. --Basotxerri 10:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Вопрос про источники

Здравствуйте, A.Savin. У меня возник вопрос по поводу файла File:Legality of polygamy.svg - 92slim отменил мои правки, указав, что они не подтверждены источниками. Правильно ли он сделал, и если да, то куда эти источники надо вставлять? Раммон (talk) 09:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Я бы на вашем месте указал источник в описании правки. --A.Savin 13:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img01 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img04 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img07 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img08 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful. -- Johann Jaritz 15:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img12 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Apocalyptic and excellent. -- Johann Jaritz 15:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img02 Olympic Residence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img14 Kebir Great Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img16 Castle interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limassol 01-2017 img19 Marina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img02 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img06 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img10 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img09 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episkopi 01-2017 img11 Kourion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is art! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Episkopi 01-2017 img11 Kourion.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Episkopi 01-2017 img11 Kourion.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Dust spot

Thanks for promoting File:Heermance Farmhouse, Red Hook, NY.jpg at QIC. Just so you know, I looked at it again. I didn't find a dust spot on the left, but there was one on the right near the chimney on that side, so I took care of it. Was that the one you saw? Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes. Sorry, I meant the right chimney, but the spot was slightly to the left of it (to the north-west, if you want). --A.Savin 18:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons_talk:Quality_images_candidates#Same_or_very_similar_pictures

Mir geht es nicht darum, bei diesem speziellen Bild nun unbedingt ein QI zu erreichen. Deine Kritik verstehe ich durchaus. Die Bilder sind quasi identisch, das stimmt. Ich habe die zwei Fotos aus Versehen gemacht und bei der RAW-Entwicklung versucht, sie etwas anders zu machen, ich weiß selbst nicht, welches mir besser gefällt. Die Regeln bei QIC sind wohl momentan so, daß so etwas zugelassen ist. Aber vielleicht ist es wirklich besser, das zu ändern? Ich weiß es nicht. Zwei verschiedene HDR-Arbeiten eines identischen Fotos? Ein Crop kann ein Bild stark in der Aussage verändern? Laß es uns diskutieren.

Dein Kontra ist berechtigt. --Ralf Roleček 21:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladimir Khotinenko MoscowRT 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive portrait. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img06 Belokamennaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img15 Baltiyskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, sharp enough, a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 16:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img13 Koptevo station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img16 Avtozavodskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img05 Sokolinaya Gora station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro Fonvizinskaya 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love it. I'd like your opinion on a possible FP nomination, -- Ikan Kekek 01:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img09 Kutuzovskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igor Dodon MoscowTass 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img04 Krymskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro Frunzenskaya 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TrehprudnyLane8 residential building 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Shakhovskoy House 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Of course the building is beautiful, but the icy road reflecting the sky is an added special element. -- Ikan Kekek 02:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro P-Razumovskaya new hall 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 02:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img01 Ugreshskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Nice long depth of field. -- Ikan Kekek 02:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img10 Shelepiha station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 02:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro Botanichesky Sad south 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img07 Belokamennaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TaganskayaSq Kolesnikov House 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI in spite of slight CCW tilt --Poco a poco 14:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow SpiridonovkaStreet Morozova Palace 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img11 Zorge station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img12 Panfilovskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok, sharpness could be besser, slight red CA but overall acceptable I believe --Poco a poco 14:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img03 Verkhnie Kotly station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img08 Belokamennaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img14 Baltiyskaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img17 train interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro Butyrskaya 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosMetro Avtozavodskaya 01-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MCC 01-2017 img02 Entuziastov station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA on tracks and gantries at left. Daniel Case 03:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I already gave an effort to remove the part of CA the software could not remove. Could you place a note where exactly you see CA, --A.Savin 13:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC) I have now ... take a look. Daniel Case 05:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)  Done. --A.Savin 02:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Лучше Daniel Case 05:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)