User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2009 3

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

6

Su-35

Hi there, did you get a response regarding Commons:Deletion requests/File:Su-35MAKS.jpg? —Ed (talk • contribs) 04:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I have added my message on Deletion requests talk page. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Remerciements

Hexaplex cichoreum.JPG
I understood that there was a mistake and I hoped that someone would help me. What is most important in this project is the meetings he takes us. Thank you for giving me a little of your time (the second). Your translator is very good, I hope the translator of Google that I use him too, because I only speak ... the French. Your Friend Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Marbled rock crab), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Satisfies all six criteria. A VI already exists for the species (File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G3.jpg), but three projects have articles for this species and I think a subscope is warranted. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Support Meet all the criteria, and in addition, a good educational material. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 07:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygrapsus marmoratus (Marbled rock crab), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Satisfies all six criteria. A VI already exists for the species (File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G3.jpg), but three projects have articles for this species and I think a subscope is warranted. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Support Meet all the criteria, and in addition, a good educational material. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 07:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 15:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev 57mm ZIS-2 2007 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for cleaning up my mess :) that was my first attempt to close a nomination. —Notyourbroom (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Always please , it is minor correction and anything especial. Other users correct my errors too. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Populus nigra (Black poplar), poplar seed tufts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Perfect. -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Support Meets all the criteria. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 16:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

14

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UAZ-469 Medical 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall quality is good, composition is plain but effective --Maurilbert 04:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Archaeodontosaurus 19:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire engine ZiL AC 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire engine ZIL-131 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 18:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cucurbita maxima 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

119

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram Be 4 6 Mirage Vinnitsa 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:57, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lada-2107 Road Police 2007 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With weak and therefore acceptable CA. --Cayambe 15:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapana Black Sea 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments beautiful colors --Archaeodontosaurus 20:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

For You, George

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Зв Вашу доброту и понимание, кототрые я нигогда не забуду, и которые помогли мне пережить сегодняшний день. С уважением! Очень спешила успеть до очередного блока --Mbz1 (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire engine ZIL-131 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. 99of9 00:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

123

VI recently promoted

Hello George,
Could you please give a little help in classifying the last Commons:Valued images/Recently promoted about living species in the relevant VI category? Thanks a lot in advance, --Myrabella (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, i have made it. Also i will sort live forms in the future. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 23:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, that's very kind of you. --Myrabella (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perca fluviatilis 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments useful topic, good picture, lack the size of the subject-- Archaeodontosaurus 10:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --High Contrast 23:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wobbler 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Mbdortmund 15:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive TEM2M-063 2006 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors and perspective --Kiban 20:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropaeolum majus 2005 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Mbz1 15:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Closed VIs

Hi. I think you have closed a batch of VI candidates too early. Undisputed candidates must stay open for at least 4 days, discussed ones for at least 7. Please wait until a message tells you that the candidate may be closed. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 12:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I'm sorry, i think about 48 hours like QI --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

It is actually the latest of 1) 48h after last vote and 2) either nomination + 4 days or nomination + 7 days, depending on the status. There is a snippet of code which activates itself at t+4d or t+7d and says something like "can be closed if last vote occured not later than...". Not a big deal here though, I think. --Eusebius (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image closure said only about 48 hours. Possible, minor correction for this page need. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I have added the information now. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

You're right, the info was only present in the promotion rules, I didn't know that. Thanks for the updates. --Eusebius (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Submarine PZS-50 Project 633RV 2008 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 12:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kommuna rescue ship 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting.--Mbz1 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kommuna rescue ship 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Mbz1 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapana Black Sea 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Salaria pavo

Hello Georg I saw the Salaria pavo. You should try to work on a black background: better sharpness and color mainly best. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Merci --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The "Moscow" cruiser.

Hello.

• You're welcome. It's been more than 13 years now that I've been dealing with military technology, more than half of my life...
• Yes, I've seen that you've said it at the nomination. Lucky you :)

Wolf (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus reticulatus 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- good and tasty Archaeodontosaurus 16:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerocomus chrysenteron 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --MattiPaavola 23:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantharellus cibarius 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --MattiPaavola 23:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantharellus cibarius 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. (BTW, is this really the same mushroom as in the previous picture? It looks completely different.) --MattiPaavola 23:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Yes, the same. Big colour variations --George Chernilevsky 07:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantharellus cibarius 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --MattiPaavola 23:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bon apetit! :-) --MattiPaavola 23:23, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Thanks! --George Chernilevsky 07:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phellinus igniarius Oak 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --MattiPaavola 23:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salaria pavo (Peacock blenny), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment File:Salaria pavo DSCF9189.jpg is a competitor: it is swimming, but with much lower resolution and without geocoding. --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Support all criteria met - Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salaria pavo (Peacock blenny), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question One of your photos in this female category is naturally the winner, but to make our job a little easier: why do you think this particular image is the most valued one of your four female photos? (E.g. File:Salaria pavo female 2009 G3.jpg shows the mouth open unlike the nominated one.) Thanks, --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info This one nominated photo has biggest resolution. The fish shows most commonly colours (variant Salaria pavo female 2009 G3.jpg has uncommon contrast yellow). And this photo good shows fin. I are srong concurent to self :) --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
    •  Support I agree with the arguments. Thanks for the explanation. --MattiPaavola (talk) 13:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phellinus igniarius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Like mentioned, this shows also the bottom. (Although, I prefer the lighting of the other pic.) --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phellinus igniarius Oak 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

140

Your vote on my nomination

Hello, thank you for voting on my nomination. I uploaded a new (improved IMO) version over old file. I know it is a very bad practice to do it during FPC process and I am sorry about this. May I please ask you to review the image one more time and to change your vote, if you believe my changes were bad. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guided missile cruiser Slava.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support After some consideration, I think it's really the best one. I've added some annotations. But I think you need to correct the geocode, it says camera location and points to the middle of the bay. Oh, and you might crop off a little bit of the water.Wolf (talk) 08:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

• Camera location is OK, photo was taken from a boat --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Question about featured pictures

Hi, do you know whether FPCbot takes care of speedy promotions? Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 06:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Eusebius!

In 5-th day rules: Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. I am not an administrator and i do not use any bots. I only correct tag if it is already placed by FPCbot after voting. In what there is error? I somewhere was inattentive?

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi. No error anywhere, I was just wondering whether the bot would take care of that. I'll watch how it does. I asked you because you're obviously more useds to FPC than I am. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 08:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

As far as i know, the FPCbot correctly processed quick promotions. I saw it earlier. You can ask about it the owner of bot: User talk:Daniel78 --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

No need, I was just curious, thank you. --Eusebius (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

FPCbot not made quick promotion if alternative inside nomination exist --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:27, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus reticulatus (Summer sep).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met, best in scope -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 Support Met all criteria - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 16:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 23:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rescue ship-catamaran Volkhov/Kommuna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Met all criteria. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 06:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

20

Hepatica nobilis

Дякуємо за ваш голос на Brazilianite. Я спробував захистити Hepatica nobilis Darius Baužys, Для вас, але, як він зазначив, що форма Purple є рідкісним і, отже, не представник сфери. Це було б запропонувати його à Featured picture Ми будемо голосувати за нього. З повагою -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings

With thanks for your support in 2009 and regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank You very much! And I wish You Happy holidays! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Дорогой Георгий, я желаю Вам и Вашей семье счасливого Нового Года! Мне повзло я встретила очень приятного человка. Спасибо. Я думала какую фотографию Вам подарить но не могла найти ничего лучше чем Нерби  :)--Mbz1 (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Огромное Вам спасибо! И я Вам желаю счастливых праздников! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:)

Thank you very much, you also merry Christmas and happy new year :) --Pudelek (talk) 14:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

• Merry Xmas for you and your family, George, with plenty of photographic gear in your socket! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks both --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Remerciements

Les honneurs valent, surtout, par ceux qui les donnent. Wikipedia permet de partager la connaissance et aussi de rapprocher les hommes. C’est une forme de fraternité à laquelle je suis très sensible. Merci, Georges, pour ton cadeau. Bien Amicalement …

Отличие стоит, особенно со стороны тех, кто дает. Wikipedia Могут обмениваться знаниями, а также объединять людей. Это форма братства которым я очень чувствительна. Спасибо, Джордж, за ваш дар. Бьен Amicalement ... Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry christmas and peace! Thank you for a year full of contributions and peace-making on commons!--Korall (talk) 20:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello George, thanks for your message and all the best to you and your family. Your contributions this year have been great. I wish you a healthy and productive 2010! Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо за поздравление!

Поздравляю Вас с Рождеством и наступающим Новым годом!--BezPRUzyn (talk) 15:01, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bread truck GAZ 3302 2006 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Herbythyme 17:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Hello George! Thank you for your Christmas-message. I am a little bit late, but was not online the past few days. I wish you all the best to you and your family! Have a nice time!

Till next time,
Greets, High Contrast (talk) 14:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Dear George,

I was gone for Christmas so I didn't receive your nice message until today. I sincerely wish you a great second part of the holidays and a successful new year!

Your friend & colleague, JovanCormac 09:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

VI Mi-2

Kill me, I'm so stupid... Fixed, thanks for the info. Wolf (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy new year

Thanks for the Christmas greetings! I'm too late with mine so instead I wish you all the best things for 2010! --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Happy New Year also, and I hope you enjoyed Christmas also. Thanks for the picture work, i had some problems with card readers and my pc, so I got frustrated by it and still havent uploades some fish pics. Busy mostle with some physics articles on dutch wiki.Viridiflavus (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy new year !

Thank you, George, for your message. I am still on holiday but with an internet connexion today, so I am glad to wish you a very happy new year, full of joy and great photos :-) --Myrabella (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)