User talk:Gnom/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome to the Commons, Gnom/Archive 1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Riesi

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bitte sehr, ma forse tu sei italiano? Ciao, --mac 07:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Licenza. --mac 09:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villa del casale 6.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villa del casale 6.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villa del casale 5.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villa del casale 5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villa del casale 4.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villa del casale 4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villa del Casale 28.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villa del Casale 28.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 12:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:UnternehmenDeutschland.PNG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:UnternehmenDeutschland.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~ bayo or talk 18:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Riesi-Stemma.png

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Riesi-Stemma.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 21:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Villa del Casale 21.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello.

There is a problem with that image you uploaded. I think you have copied a wrong source from flickr.Could you please check it? -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 22:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

New source added. However, the photo is CC-BY-NC like some other photos of the mosaics I uploaded a while ago. I am unsure if it was under this license when I uploaded it (I think I checked on that, I always use the no-NC search tool on flickr!). Now it will probably have to be deleted, right? I might go ahead and ask the photographer to change the license as I have successfully done so in the past. --Gnom 15:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly It has changed the license. But now we have no way to check it, since the review has a too long delay. Please try to contact him, I also have good experiences with flickr users. I will not mark it to delete, only with "not valid license".-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 16:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Gnom!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Image:Haydn Kaiserlied Skizze.jpg is uncategorized since 15 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Gnom (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Quarterly Crossing Logo.PNG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Quarterly Crossing Logo.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 10:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Copyright status: File:ASSIST student exchange class 2013-14.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ASSIST student exchange class 2013-14.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for sending OTRS email, but what I was actually looking for was a license template (like {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} or similar). You can add it while OTRS is being processed. --Jarekt (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I thought the OTRS template was enough during the 'waiting period'. Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

All files need a license statement at all time, and OTRS is only to support the license. Thanks for adding it. --Jarekt (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gnom,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Birgit Muggenthaler2.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Birgit Muggenthaler2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Birgit Muggenthaler2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

De728631 (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Gnom. Hier noch ein oder zwei Sätze zu Erklärung: Auch wenn Frau Muggenthaler-Schmack dir das Bild zur weiteren Verwendung überlassen hat, kann letztendlich nur der Fotograf Matthias Wegener (siehe Metadaten) über die Lizenz entscheiden. Daher brauchen wir auch vom ihm eine Bestätigung. De728631 (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo De728631, danke für deinen Hinweis. Das ist wohl noch so eine Jugendsünde von mir... Ich leite die Freigabe mal in die Wege. Gruß und nochmal danke, --Gnom (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Italien und Nutzungsrechte

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Gnom, mir fiel grad wieder so was in die Hand. Wenn Du dann weiter klickst kommst Du hierhin und hierhin. Also die Teilnahme ist überhaupt nur in freigegebenen Einrichtungen möglich und dann mit den aus den Lizenzen des ersten Files ersichtlichen Einschränkungen. Spannend und kraus. Aber ich habe schon ein komisches Gefühl, wenn das für den Rest auf Commons kein Thema ist. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Oursana, danke für den Hinweis. Das ist ja echt hanebüchen. Der Zweck so eines Gesetzes erschließt sich mir überhaupt nicht ("protection of Italy’s historic and artistic heritage and its standards of dignity" - so ein Unfug). Möglicherweise geht es da einzig um Geld. Richtig und wichtig aus juristischer ist der Hinweis "unrelated to copyright regulations" - es handelt sich hier um eine eigentumsrechtliche Regelung. Man könnte die Norm in de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache aufnehmen. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Monster Mural on Gerrard Street cropped.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Monster Mural on Gerrard Street cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Studenten editieren im Wikipedia-Kontor Hamburg.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Studenten editieren im Wikipedia-Kontor Hamburg.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gnom, nimm doch diese {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}oder {{PD-user|Gnom}} Bis Donnerstag Gruß Oursana

Danke für den Hinweis - das habe ich wohl beim Upload verschlafen. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 10:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jardin japones en Ciudad de México.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jardin japones en Ciudad de México.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jardin japones en Ciudad de México.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 11:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Lizenzbeispiele

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Gnom, ich wollte Dir mal ein Beispiel für cc Lizenz eines dt Museum schicken http://www.museum-digital.de/bawue/singleimage.php?imagenr=929&inwi=1&w=1240&h=663&extern=yes, auch beim File im Wasserzeichen.

Wenn Du in der http://fotothek.spsg.de suchst, zB. Grunewald, Sanssouci, Caputh sind die Abbildungen älter als 60 Jahre haben ein Copyright Wasserzeichen, http://www.spsg.de/forschung-sammlungen/bibliothek-fotothek-archive/fotothek/, Aber jetzt gibt es ja ein GLAM LG--Oursana (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Guck mal. Sollten wir nicht was entsprechendes basteln?--Oursana (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke für die Links, Oursana! Ein entsprechender Baustein wäre vielleicht eine gute Idee. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Das ist doch schön, vor allem noch gen Ende.

i.ü. habe ich einen passenden Baustein gefunden...Es ist alles überall zerstreut...

s. a.PD-Art-copyright-notice-Tate-Britain u. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PD-Art-copyright-notice-Tate-Britain. Ich melde mich.--Oursana (talk) 02:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Escudo del Colegio San Carlos, Bogotá.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Escudo del Colegio San Carlos, Bogotá.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Kennst Du Commons:Village pump#Image change request from the Prado Museum - Request for community input

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

und Commons:Village pump#Commons admin and oversighter @Rama: from France refusing Licensed-PD-Art-tag and insisting on her copyright for merely PD-Art photographs. Und nächste Woche bin ich dabei. Danke für die mails. Herzliche Grüße--Oursana (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Oursana, die Prado-Geschichte kannte ich schon. Dass im anderen Fall ein/e Commons-User/in das Urheberrecht an Reproduktionsfotografien gemeinfreier zweidimensionaler Werke für sich in Anspruch nimmt, hatte ich noch nicht gesehen. Das ist in der Tat kurios. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 18:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

In der Tat und mich dann noch als Rechtsbrecher beschimpft. Ich war erst auch ziemlich gefrustet, dass kein Aufschrei durch die community geht. Sie sogar noch den rechtlichen Standpunkt von Commons beschimpft und das als Admin. Jetzt scheint es ja in die richtige Richtung zu laufen. Das braucht hier sonst keiner. Wenn es auf commons Wiederwahlmöglichkeiten gäbe hätte sie schon lange meine Stimme. Ein schönes Wochenende, Gruß--Oursana (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

File:GetYourGuide Logo.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:GetYourGuide Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lucasstar1 (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:User Gnom and Wendy the Weasel.JPG

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 12:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Music

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Gnom. Vielen Dank für Dein Feedback auf der Diskussionsseite des Public Domain Projekts. Hauptberuflich bin ich Musikhistoriker und nebenberuflich Personal-Manager einiger Film- und Musikschaffenden. Ich arbeite 80% als Volunteer. Wir sind seit 2011 Affiliate-Partner von Wikimedia und digitalisieren historische Tonträger aus unserer Sammlung, die nach Klärung der Rechte in die Commons hochgeladen werden. Ich bringe mich auch gerne in Fotoprojekte ein - zuletzt das Kameraprojekt in Graz - dort unter meinem privaten Nick "Namrood". Ich stehe Euch gerne zur Verfügung als Helfer/Mitorganisator sofern erwünscht. --Pdproject (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Pdproject, danke für deine Nachricht. Bitte verzeih, wenn ich ein paar doofe Fragen stelle:

Wer nimmt denn an dem Projektwochenende in Hamburg teil - der Wikipedianer Namrood oder das "offizielle" Pdproject?
Was meinst du mit "Ich arbeite 80% als Volunteer." - bist du auch bezahlt auf Wikipedia unterwegs?
Was ist ein "Affiliate-Partner von Wikimedia"? Ich höre den Begriff gerade zum ersten Mal...

Danke und Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Gnom. Fragen kostet nichts :-)

Am Projekt in Hamburg nehme ich als User:Namrood teil

Ich arbeite 80% unentgeltlich für das Public Domain Projekt (WissensWert/63 - Public Domain Projekt). Das heisst ich arbeite ohne Lohn 80%, während ich 20% arbeitslos bin.
Das Public Domain Projekt ist ein Wikimedia movement affiliate. Wir sind eine gemeinnützige Stiftung, die seit 2010 von Wikimedia finanziell unterstützt wird, da wir gemeinfreie Musik aus unserer Sammlung digitalisieren und nach der Rechteklärung in die Wikimedia Commons hochladen. Der Grundstein legte der WissensWert-Wettbewerb. Wikimedia Deutschland erhöhte die Fördersumme für die Beschaffung eines Laserplattenspielers. Dafür gingen wir einen Vertrag ein, dass wir alle von uns erstellten gemeinfreien Digitalisate unserer Sammlung den Wikimedia Commons spenden sollten. An der Wikimania 2013 in Hongkong lernten wir das Projekt "Dominio Público Sonoro Uruguay (autores.uy)" kennen. Zusammen gründeten wir im 2015 die Wikimedia Digitization User Group.

Ich habe zu danken für Dein Interesse, Gruss, --Pdproject (talk) 19:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Interessant, danke für diese Informationen! Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Sustainability Initiative

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You, sir, can have a logo :-) odder (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh wow, thanks, odder! If you're reading this, can you ping me on IRC (I'm "WikiGnom" there). Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I believe I just did! :) odder (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Templates für Wiki Loves Music

Latest comment: 7 years ago18 comments3 people in discussion

Gnom, vielleicht noch einmal in deutsch? Dann könnte ich besser versuchen, dir zu helfen.

{{Wiki Loves Music}} sieht ja schon gut aus bis auf die Kategorisierung und vor allem einen merkwürdigen und defekten Link, der wohl zu de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Cocktails gehen sollte (aha, ich sehe schon, das ist bereits in der von dir verwendeten Kopiervorlage kaputt – ich würde das einfach rausschmeißen). Soll es auch eine Katergorie für die Dateien geben? Andere Kampagen machen das, vgl. allein category: "wiki loves cocktails".
Bei den anderen Templates ist mir nicht klar, was wofür gedacht ist. Davon hängt dann auch ab, wie sie aussehen sollen. Du sagtest, als eine Vorlage soll {{PD-Nationalmuseum Stockholm}} dienen. Das ist eine Lizenzvorlage. Soll es so etwas auch für das Gewerbemuseum geben oder soll eine der üblichen Lizenzvorlagen genutzt werden? Da bist Du doch eher Experte .
Für {{Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe}} hast Du das Subtemplate {{Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe/i18n}} und eine englische Unterseite angelegt. Das funktioniert dann aber nur mit der Translate-Extension, was wiederum Übersetzungsadministratoren benötigt. Ich persönlich bin ja der Meinung, dass es dafür nicht nötig ist, aber man könnte, auch damit es dann schneller geht, einen deutschsprachigen Übersetzungsadmin ansprechen, vgl. die entsprechende Liste (in Commons am aktivsten sind meiner Ansicht nach Hedwig i.W., Steinsplitter und Srittau, Reinhard Kraasch sollte aus dewiki gut bekannt sein). Es fehlt noch mehr, aber das kann man reparieren, sieh dir Help:Autotranslate an.
Es gibt noch die Möglichkeit, eine eigene Institution-Vorlage für das Museum einzurichten, und das wäre bei einer größeren Anzahl von Dateien auch sinnvoll, vgl. Institution:Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin.

— Speravir – 19:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Speravir, danke für deine Nachricht. Leider verstehe ich kaum, wie diese Vorlagen funktionieren. Vielleicht erkläre ich am besten, was ich am Schluss haben will:

Die Vorlage Template:Wiki Loves Music, mit der ich alle Dateien kennzeichnen kann, die im Laufe des Projekts entstanden sind. Diese sind bisher alle in der Category:Wiki Loves Music zu finden. Ich habe die Vorlage und die Kategorie unabhängig voneinander eingefügt, aber wenn ich dich richtig verstehe, kann man das auch kombinieren. Die Bilder in der Kategorie kommen aus ganz unterschiedlichen Quellen.
Ein Teil der Bilder in der Kategorie Category:Wiki Loves Music stammen aus dem Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe. Sie sollten daher mit dem Template:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe gekennzeichnet sein. Es kann aber gut sein, dass das Museum zukünftig auch ganz andere Bilder spendet, die mit Musik nichts zu tun haben, so dass die Wiki Loves Music-Kategorie und die Museum-für-Kunst-und-Gewerbe-Kategorie unabhängig voneinander bestehen müssen. Fürs Erste ist geplant, dass das Museum ca. 100 Fotos von Musikinstrumenten spendet.
Schließlich möchte das Museum seine Bilder unter CC0 veröffentlichen, aber dabei auch ein paar Hinweise zur Nachnutzung geben, so wie es in Template:PD-Nationalmuseum Stockholm geschieht. Den Text dazu kann ich liefern.

Ich hoffe, es ist klar, was ich am Ende haben möchte. Kannst du mir auf dem Weg dahin etwas helfen? Danke und Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Ja, das sollte alles zu machen sein. Ich hatte peinlicherweise gar nicht bemerkt, dass schon längst Bilder hochgeladen wurden. Tatsächlich kann eine Kategorienzuordnung auch über die Vorlage erfolgen, und das wird nicht gerade selten so gemacht. — Speravir – 01:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Okay,Speravir! Ich würde mich freuen, wenn wir das in den nächsten Tagen zusammen erledigen können, damit das Museum mit dem Upload beginnen kann. Danke und Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Gnom, die Sache, ob {{Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe}} mit Extension:Translate oder nicht, hat sich erledigt. Das ist ohne mein Zutun repariert worden. Und Institution:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg gibt’s schon längst und ist ja auch prominent in Category:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe eingebunden. Ansonsten, bevor ich weitermache, ein paar andere Fragen:

Die Vorlage {{Wiki Loves Music}} hat links ein Bild, das in voller Größe sehr gut aussieht, bei dem aber meiner Ansicht nach in der geringen Vorschaugröße nicht viel zu erkennen ist. Bilder wie oder, wenn es auch hochkant sein darf, wären da besser. Man muss für die Einbettung die resultierende Höhe beachten, was ich mit den Breitenangaben hier einigermaßen getan habe.
Sollen nach Möglichkeit nur Dateien in die Kategorie Wiki Loves Music, die im Rahmen des Projektes hochgeladen wurden? 100%ig kann man sowas nie verhindern, aber man könnte auf der Kategorieseite Hinweise setzen, was getan und gelassen werden soll beispielsweise „nie Kategorie direkt setzen, nur die Vorlage benutzen“. Ich sehe auch gerade, dass andere „Wiki Loves irgendwas“-Projekte sogar Seiten direkt auf Commons angelegt haben (vgl. Suche : "wiki loves"). Stand heute gibt es 4 Dateien, die in der Kategorie stehen, aber die Vorlage nicht enhalten, davon eine von dir hochgeladene (Suche: incategory:"Wiki Loves Music" -hastemplate:"Wiki Loves Music", es wäre vielleicht gar nicht so schlecht, das später als Wartungslink in der Kategorie anzugeben). Übrigens stammt diese von dir hochgeladene Datei, Spiegelsaal aus dem Budge-Palais im Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe.png, ja vom Museum, anhand der könnten wir alles durchexerzieren, was Du willst.
Wäre ein Name „PD-Kunstgewerbemuseum Hamburg“ in Ordnung, oder muss es „PD-Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg“ sein oder gar noch was anderes? Die Stockholmer Vorlage ist ja ebenso mit Extension:Translate erstellt. Die Schwierigkeit hierbei ist, dass immer vom englischen Text für alle Übersetzungen ausgegangen wird. Wenn Du also einen anderen Lizenztext willst, müsste das auch zuerst in Englisch erstellt werden, der deutsche Text kann dann offiziell nur als Übersetzung eingetragen werden. Ich könnte aber erst einmal den Inhalt der Stockholmer Vorlage verwenden.

— Speravir – 18:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Oh, da gab’s ’nen BK. Wenn jemand vom Museum selbst das hochladen will, wäre ein eigener User mit einem aktiven Ansprechpartner im Museum sinnvoll, der auch aktiv auf Ansprachen reagiert. Bei Problemen in Commons:Forum nachfragen, bei so einigen Dingen sind andere Leute erfahrener als ich. — Speravir – 18:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Speravir, danke für deine Anmerkungen, ich antworte mal der Reihe nach:

Als Beispieldatei aus dem Museum können wir File:Zweimanualiges Cembalo Christian Zell.jpg verwenden.
Ich habe in diese Datei schon einmal die Vorlage Template:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe eingefügt. Dabei ist jedoch irgendetwas kaputt gegangen: Ich glaube, es sollte automatisch die Category:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Sammlung Online eingefügt werden, stattdessen ist da jetzt ein Rotlink, wenn ich das richtig sehe.
Außerdem habe ich als Source das Institution:Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg verlinkt. Ist das so richtig?
Die Bilddatei aus dem Template:Wiki Loves Music auf der linken Seite ist in der Tat nicht so super. Eigentlich wollte ich jemanden finden, der oder die ein Projektlogo entwerfen kann. Bis dahin muss das Foto als Platzhalter dienen. Ich werde mal versuchen, einen schönen Ausschnitt aus dem Bild zu wählen.
Ja, die Category:Wiki Loves Music sollte alle im Rahmen des Projekts hochgeladenen Dateien enthalten und auch die. Ich habe die von dir erwähnten vier Bilder gerade noch mit der Vorlage versehen, vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Der Name für die zweite, noch zu erstellende Vorlage wäre "PD-Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg". Der Text wäre dieser hier:

The Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg has published fair use recommendations when using images in the Public Domain. They are based on the Europeana Public Domain Usage Guidelines, but there is no legal liability to comply to them. We recommend the following:

When you use a public domain work please credit the author or creator.
Please also credit the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg as the provider of the digital reproduction.
When you use or modify a public domain work you should not attribute the changes to the creator or the provider of the work.

You can link to the object as a source, otherwise we recommend the following citation:

Artist/creator, title, date, Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg (Public Domain)

Schließlich: Ja, wir haben beim Museum einen konkreten Ansprechpartner, nämlich die Leiterin der Sammlung Online. Den Upload übernimmt ein Ehrenamtlicher von Code for Hamburg.

Soweit - ich hoffe, dass ich alle Punkte beantwortet habe. Vielen Dank für deine Unterstützung!! Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 19:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Ah, es wird kein institutioneller Account angelegt. Da gibt es nämlich gelegentlich Probleme, weil so etwas im Enwiki verboten ist. Wegen der Kategorie: ich habe das etwas anders gelöst, s. Special:Diff/246752366 (Update: und mich später zum Teil revidiert, weil ich nicht richtig hingesehen hatte, Special:Diff/246759213). Zusätzlich musste die Kategorie selbst auch noch einsortiert werden: Special:Diff/246752127 (links Kategorisierung, rechts Sortierung, die ich erst vergessen hatte). Übrigens galt das gleiche mit einer weiteren Kat., in die die Cembalo-Datei einsortiert ist, nämlich 1728 instrument productions. Und die Institutionsvorlage für die Quelle zu verwenden hielten schon Leute in über 14000 anderen Dateien für sinnvoll, also ja, kann man so machen. Gedacht ist es wohl eigentlich für Standort (Parameter location) oder, äähm, Institution in Informations-Vorlagen, die sie besitzen. Für die vom Museum hochgeladenen Bilder bietet sich da übrigens {{Photograph}} an. Mir war noch eine Frage wegen einer Verlinkung der Lizenzbedingungen eingefallen, aber das hat sich durch Dein letztes Posting ja von selbst erledigt. — Speravir – 22:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Super, danke, Speravir! Ich habe jetzt auch ein verkleinertes Foto in das Template:Wiki Loves Music eingefügt. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 08:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:PD-Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg ist angelegt. Jetzt heißt es warten, bis es zur Übersetzung freigegeben wurde. In der Hoffnung, dass es schneller geht, habe ich Hedwig in Washington angesprochen, aber es kann natürlich sein, dass sie ausgerechnet jetzt temporär nicht aktiv ist. Du könntest aber schon einmal die Doku kontrollieren, insbesondere, was bei |desc-en und |desc-de sowie bei |1d-en und |1d-de steht. — Speravir – 01:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Done --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Wow, vielen Dank, Hedwig in Washington und Speravir! Kann File:Zweimanualiges Cembalo Christian Zell.jpg so als Vorlage für den Upload der anderen Dateien verwendet werden? Danke und Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 09:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Ein paar Kleinigkeiten: Nimm {{photo}} (oder {{i18n/photo}}, ergibt das Gleiche) statt Photograph. Zu Instrument gibt es keine Übersetzungsvorlage, aber vermutlich ist das neutrale {{i18n/object}} sogar besser. Oder: Ich zwar schon auf {{Photograph}} hingewiesen, aber sieh dir auch {{Art Photo}} an. Zu {{PD-Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg}} hätte ich aber noch einige Fragen:

Wenn, wie Du es ja auch oben geschrieben hattest und im Cembalo-Bild zu sehen ist, alle Bilder CC0-lizenziert werden sollen, können wir die CC0-Lizenzvorlage auch integrieren. Soll sie dann wie im Beispiel als erstes erscheinen? Habe ich jetzt so vollzogen. — Speravir – 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
„fair use Empfehlungen“ kann meiner Meinung nach so nicht stehen bleiben. Reicht “Fair-Use-Empfehlungen“? Ach so, ich sehe gerade … übrigens ist jetzt auch im Deutschen der Link zur englischen Seite vorhanden, das ist eine der Schwächen der Translate-Extension: Ich könnte den deutschen Link http://sammlungonline.mkg-hamburg.de/de/nutzung auch direkt setzen, dann muss das aber später bei einer Änderung wieder genauso individuell geändert werden, und man muss das vor allem erst einmal wissen, dass dies notwendig ist. Nachtrag zur Klarstellung: Die Schwäche ist Letzteres. Ohne Erweiterung bekommt man eine Änderung in einer Sprache auch nicht so einfach mit, aber da kann man das wissen.

Kleiner Spaß am Rande: Ich hatte zuerst „Zeimauliges Cembalo“ gelesen, gestutzt und mich gefragt, wie das aussehen würde. — Speravir – 22:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Nachdem ich Deine Anfrage an der Village Pump gesehen habe und obwohl Oursana mittlerweile tatsächlich auf {{Art Photo}} umgestellt hat: Stimmt schon, eigentlich ist {{own}} für Quellenangaben gedacht, im Autorenfeld wird der Name explizit angegeben, also hier [[User:Gnom|Gnom]] oder sogar [[User:Gnom|$DeinEchterName]], das macht bspw. Dein Juristenkollege Code so. Die Fragen von oben bleibent aktuell, allerdings fiel mir wegen der Lizenz ein, dass es wohl wirklich besser ist, den Lizenzbaustein als erstes zu setzen. — Speravir – 18:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Sollte jetzt alles funktionieren. Hinweis zum Speravirschem Zweimauligen Cembalo: Das wird in Musikerkreisen Schwiegermutter genannt. *AUTSCH*

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal, Speravir und Hedwig in Washington – bitte verzeiht, dass ich erst jetzt antworte. Ich bin aber nicht ganz sicher, welche Punkte noch offen sind...

Die "Doppelvorlage" für die Lizenzierung ist wunderbar so, glaube ich.
Außerdem ist auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite des Cembalos zwischen der Museums- und der Wiki Loves Music-Vorlage noch so eine komische Lücke. Könnt ihr sehen, woran das liegt?

Sollte ich sonst noch etwas beantworten? Danke, --Gnom (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Die Lücke war dadurch verursacht, dass vor dem <noinclude> noch ein Zeilenumbruch war, nun habe ich <onlyinclude>…</onlyinclude> genommen, wie Du bemerkt hast. Ich habe mich letztens zufällig genau darüber mit dem PerfektenChaos unterhalten; sonst hätte ich sicher etwas länger benötigt, den Fehler zu finden. Ob es „Fair-Use-Empfehlungen“ heißen kann, solltest Du besser wissen. Das Problem mit dem Weblink kann eigentlich nur vom Webmaster des Museums-Website sinnvoll gelöst werden. Ein anderes unschönes Problem kannst Du auf Hedwigs Disk.-Seite verfolgen und mit der Darstellung bei dir vergleichen, siehe User talk: Hedwig in Washington#) Bitte zur Übersetzung freigeben ab meinem „’Tschulljung …“ (wird automatisch 30 Tage nach dem letzten Beitrag archiviert).

Unabhängig davon sollte nun klar sein, dass das Hochladen selbst der einfachste Teil ist, die Beschreibung und das Kategorisieren benötigen mehr Zeit. Man kann natürlich auch erst einmal einen Schub hochladen und sich dann in Ruhe dem anderen widmen. — Speravir – 17:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)