Hans G. Oberlack

Welcome to the Commons, Hans G. Oberlack!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Wappen_JanskeLazne.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 23:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

File:Siegfried Matthus 1990.jpg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Hans G. Oberlack!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Glienicke Bevölkerungsentwicklung 1875-2009.pdf was uncategorized on 4 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Hans G. Oberlack!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Bevölkerungsprognosen Hennigsdorf.pdf was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bevölkerungsprognosen Hohen Neuendorf.pdf was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bevölkerungsprognosen Birkenwerder.pdf was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bevölkerungsprognosen Oranienburg.pdf was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bevölkerungsprognosen Velten.pdf was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bevölkerungsentwicklung Löwenberger Land.pdf was uncategorized on 7 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Grafiken zur Bevölkerungsentwicklung in Wandlitz

Die Grafik 1 kann so doch nicht stimmen: Warum hat Brandenburg gesamt (gestrichelt) weniger Bevölkerung als die Gemeinde Wandlitz? Vllt. ist die Achsbeschriftung falsch und es meint Prozent? Prüfe bitte die beiden Darstellungen noch einmal. --44penguins (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo,

Brandenburg hat natürlich nicht weniger Einwohner als Wandlitz. Die gestrichelte Linie zeigt, wie sich die Bevölkerung von Wandlitz entwickelt hätte, wenn die Entwicklung analog zur Entwicklung der Bevölkerung von Brandenburg gewesen wäre. Die Linien zeigen also, dass die Wandlitzer Bevölkerung sich von 1875 bis 1930 wie die Bevölkerung Brandenburgs entwickelt hat. Von 1930 bis 1950 stieg sie stärker als der Brandenburger Durchschnitt. Von 1950 bis 1990 verlief sie dann wieder parallel zur brandenburgischen Entwicklung und seit 1990 steigt sie wieder stärker. Ich wäre für eine treffendere Bezeichnung der gepunkteten Linie dankbar. Die Alternative, eine zweite Skala einzurichten, auf der das Jahr 1875 mit 100 angesetzt wäre, erscheint mir zu unübersichtlich.

Gruß --Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Mittenwalde

Hallo,

File:Bevölkerungsentwicklung Mittenwalde.pdf und File:Bevölkerungsprognosen Mittenwalde.pdf sind unter Category:Mittenwalde einsortiert, das ist eine "disambiguation" Kategorie die leer sein sollte. Sie sollten unter die jeweilige Unterkategorie Category:Mittenwalde (Mark) oder Category:Mittenwalde (Uckermark) einsortiert werden. Ich weiss leider nicht welche die richtige ist, sonst hätte ich das getan :) --Funfood ␌ 10:23, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es korrigiert. Gruß --Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 21:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Hans G. Oberlack, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Hans G. Oberlack, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Copyright status: File:Bevölkerungsentwicklung Neu-Seeland.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bevölkerungsentwicklung Neu-Seeland.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I approve a deletion since there are various Neuseeland in Brandenburg --Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Hans G. Oberlack,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Großwoltersdorf church NW 2015.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Hans G. Oberlack,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Kirchen im Barnim

Hallo Hr.Hans G.Oberlack, im Herbst werde ich noch einige Barnimer Kirchen für ihren Wiki hochladen! Beste Grüße, Günter

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hallo (oder Guten Tag), wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Dein/Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons) Blick zum Wasserturm / Bahnhof Uhsmannsdorf, Rothenburg O.L. (DE) - selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2015 >> zum Thema „Ausblicke" verwenden. >> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu >> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2015/08/07/blick-zum-wasserturm-bahnhof-uhsmannsdorf-rothenburg-o-l-de/ Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben. Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren vom 23. Mai bis 07. September laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), dieses Mal zum Thema „Industrie". Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Agnieszka, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Roddan Legde Kirche.jpg

Aloha! Hast Du evtl. die falsche Kirche identifiziert? In der Zwischenzeit habe ich erstmal den Umbennenungsauftrag (was fuer ein Wort!) herausgenommen. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke fürs Aufpassen. Tatsächlich schreibt sich diese Kirche ohne H. Gruß --Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Ich muss ja fuer irgendetwas gut sein. LG,-- --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfkirche Gülpe 2016 S (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 15:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Kirchenportal

Hallo! So ganz verstanden habe ich nicht, warum du bei File:Heiligengrabe, Kloster Stift zum Heiligengrabe, Stiftskirche -- 2017 -- 0062.jpg und einem anderen Bild die Kategorie Category:Church portals in Brandenburg entfernt hast, aber keine Präzisierung oder sonstige Verbesserung vorgenommen hast. Ich verstehe auch nicht, warum das Portal der Stiftskirche in Heiligengrabe in Brandenburg nicht in diese Kategorie gehören sollte. Ein Rätsel, welches sich nur dadurch erklären lässt, dass du es aus Versehen gemacht hast. --XRay ^talk 04:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo,

Ich hatte bisher angenommen, dass jedes Portal nur einmal in der Category auftauchen soll. Ist dem nicht so?

Gruß --Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Dorfkirche Uetz (Uetz-Paaren) / Redundante Koordinaten

Hallo Hans G. Oberlack, diese „Wiederherstellung“ der Koordinaten-Infobox erscheint mir angesichts der bei Wikidata zur Verfügung gestellten und in der Box rechts angezeigten exakt gleichen Infomationen widersinnig. Viele Grüße, --Giorgio Michele (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hallo,

die Wikidatabox erlaubt meiner Kenntnis nach keine Skalierung, wie sie mit dem dim-Befehl in der location möglich ist. Außerdem ist der Aufruf der Koordinaten aus der Wikidatabox vom Handy wesentlich komplizierter und anstrengender als der location-Kasten. Zudem sind die Koordinaten in der Wikidata-Box nicht dezimal sondern in Grad/Minuten/Sekunden abgelegt, was wiederum in der Verarbeitung unbequemer ist.

Letztlich könnte ich mit diesem Argument auch die Erläuterungen über Ort, Gemeinde, Landkreis und Bundesland in den commons einsparen, da auch sie in Wikidata hinterlegt sind.

Die Angaben sind also nicht widersinnig, sondern redundant. Diese Redundanz halte ich aber im Interesse von Mehrwege-Navigierbarkeit und Datensicherheit für sinnvoll.

Gruß Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 22:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hallo, Ähnliches Thema zu Category:Stadtbahnstraße: ich würde mich freuen, wenn du vor dem nächsten Revert erst mal die Diskussion suchen würdest. Ein Wort des Bedauerns für absolut sinnvolle und richtige Informationen, die du vorher mit deinem Pauschal-Revert gelöscht hast, wäre auch nicht schlecht. Offenbar scheinst du dich in Hamburg besser auszukennen als ich. Ich empfinde dein Verhalten als unkollegial. —Minderbinder (talk) 05:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hans G. Oberlack,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hans G. Oberlack,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Hans G. Oberlack,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Citizen_centers_in_Germany

Category:Citizen_centers_in_Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Citizen_centers

Citizen centers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kreuzkirche Joachimsthal Altaransicht.jpg

And also:

• File:Kreuzkirche Joachimsthal Emporenblick.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fürstenberg (Havel) church 2016 altar.jpg

And also:

• File:Fürstenberg (Havel) church 2016 interior W.jpg
• File:Fürstenberg (Havel) church 2016 pulpit.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Destroyed_signal_boxes_in_Berlin

Category:Destroyed_signal_boxes_in_Berlin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 07:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für das Land Brandenburg Teil I 33.Jg. Nr. 6.pdf

Copyright status: File:Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für das Land Brandenburg Teil I 33.Jg. Nr. 6.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für das Land Brandenburg Teil I 33.Jg. Nr. 6.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

As you can easily read it is the official gazette of the German state of Brandenburg. Official gazettes in Germany are "gemeinfrei" since they are meant to reach everyone. Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Kategoriebeschreibungen

Hallo Hans G. Oberlack, ich habe eine kleine Bitte: Kannst du bei deinen sehr verdienstvollen mehrsprachigen Kategoriebeschreibungen künftig auf korrekte Leerzeichensetzung achten? Ich ärgere mich jedes Mal über solche Korrekturen, die eigentlich unnötig sind. Vielen Dank für die ansonsten sehr spannenden, fleißig erstellten Artikel und für dein Verständnis. Viele Grüße, Giorgio Michele (talk) 10:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Wolfgang Tschirschwitz

• Siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Tschirschwitz und LA-Disk.--Docmo (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Heidekrautbahn

Guten Morgen. Bei deinem Bild wäre die Ergänzung um diese Kategorie fehlerhaft. Denn der Bahnhof Wensickendorf ist bereits Teil der Heidekrautbahn und als Kategorie auch entsprechend gepflegt. Eine solche Form der Überkategorisierung sollte nach Möglichkeit bitte vermieden werden. Danke und mit freundlichen Grüßen, Lukas Beck (talk) 07:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Meldorf Dom Chorfenster.JPG

File:Meldorf Dom Chorfenster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bevölkerungsentwicklung Ahrensfelde.pdf

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The graph relies on the official figures of the statistics department of Brandenburg and Berlin. Due to the census 2011 there have been two figures for the yearend of 2011. Under Bevölkerungsentwicklung und Flächen der kreisfreien Städte, Landkreise und Gemeinden im Land Brandenburg 2011 you find that the population of Ahrensfelde on December 31st, 2011 was 13002 inhabitants. When you open Bevölkerungsentwicklung und Flächen der kreisfreien Städte, Landkreise und Gemeinden im Land Brandenburg 2012 you find that the population of Ahrensfelde started the year 2012 with 12727 inhabitants. This drop of 275 within a day was the result of the new figures that came up with the census in 2011.

This gap of nearly 2% of the population of Ahrensfelde resulted from the difference between the yearly update of the local registers and the data collection from scratch done by the census. The city of Berlin lost about 180,000 inhabitants due to the census. The single big reason were foreign students. In order to start their studies they had to register with the local authorities. But when they finished their studies and went home, they often forgot to check-out. So they stayed as sleeping members in the statistics. Only the census made evident that they weren't inhabitants of Berlin any more.

When I devised the graph I thought about just let the "figures flow". But this would have lead to steep unaccountable drops with a lot of municipalities. So I decided to have an overlap and a break in 2011. This is explicitly to show that there is a special situation. I admit that I should give a hint about this interruption of the line. Since in 2024 the figures of the 2022 census will be published with new breaks and overlaps I will include a remark in to the graphics when update it.

I feel offended by the accusation of using inaccurate data. As you have seen I only use the officially published data. I would have preferred that you contacted me in order to find out what the reasons of the graphically anomalities are. Please retire the deletion request.

Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)