User talk:Kallerna/2022

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merimetsokolonia Enäjärven saaressa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freezing sea Yyteri 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frozen Enäjärvi 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyhäjärven jää 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality of the frozen lake. Detail of the distant shore is borderline --Tagooty 16:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kukkosaari Pyhäjärvi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koulukadun kenttä Tampere 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyynikin rantapolku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendahlin ranta talvella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyynikki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyynikin rantapolku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viikinsaari Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampereen Työväen Teatteri 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reichstag dome.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puuvilla 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Poco a poco 19:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki-Vantaa airport escalators 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki airport departure hall 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki airport departure hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Kallerna - do you have any location information (ideally coordinates, even if slightly inexact) for where you took File:Pyy (Tetrastes bonasia).jpg, File:Tetrastes bonasia kallerna.jpg, and File:Tetrastes bonasia.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately I can't remember the exact location, although I remember the day - I was photographing bears in Kuhmo, Finland. I added Kuhmo to the description of the images, but I think that is as exact as it gets. —kallerna (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lempäälä canal 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 17:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siilinkari Tampere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pispala Pyhäjärveltä 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 phantom objects visible --Steindy 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC) They are television antennas. --Kallerna 11:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality Lmbuga 14:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kullaa Church 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 20:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 20:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saviselkä Pyhäjärvi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Kallerna: The snow is off-white. Is that natural or WB adjustment necessary? --Tagooty 15:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC) WB is rather challenging to get right in these aerial photographs: due to air in between they are quite blue out of the camera. I have adjusted the WB already, it is IMO quite close to reality now. --Kallerna 19:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok, Good quality. --Tagooty 09:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Squaire Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbahnhof 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMHO this one is better than the previous candidate. It’s always difficult where to focus in such situations; here you have found a good solution. --Aristeas 08:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiillos Aitokiuas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi Bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avanto Päijänne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 09:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi Bridge view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phragmites australis Päijänne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere city library 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Terragio67 18:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyynikki swimming hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Terragio67 19:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Alicante 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Los Luceros 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Explanada de España Alicante 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excavator Postiguet Beach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa del Postiguet 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere Theatre 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alicante panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Alicante 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa del Postiguet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excavator Postiguet Beach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St Mary Alicante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 12:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC) The verticals seem to be ok imo? --Kallerna 14:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Ok, right now for this picture. --Hillopo2018 07:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Snow on the far right seems blown, but overall good quality for me. --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit hazy for my taste but overall good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciucaș Mountains 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The pole seems leaning to the left, is it like this also in reality? Also, what are the white spots -- was it snowing / wind blowing snow around? --Domob 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) The pole was leaning, but I actually don't know what those white spots are. It was windy and started raining. --Kallerna 17:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok thanks for the explanation, good quality for me. --Domob 04:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spring forest Yyteri 3.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagalundintie Otaniemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 12:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espoo Cultural Centre Tapiola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölön pallokenttä 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du Capitole, Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullintori 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 19:51, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arena May 2022 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fântânile București Piața Unirii 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölö tram depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valkopaadentie Vuosaari 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cité de l'espace Toulouse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)  Comment Your file description should identify the NASA object as well as the Ariane rocket. -- Ikan Kekek 20:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi Church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 18:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi Rantamakasiini Sataman Krouvi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mower Vampula 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-Neuf de Toulouse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-Neuf de Toulouse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi Church 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hahtisaaren venesatama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi Church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful photo, but it needs a perspective correction (left crop is not vertical) --Michielverbeek 19:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Better now? --Kallerna 17:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Sorry for my late reaction, it's okay now --Michielverbeek 06:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi City Hall view 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi City Hall view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinginkatu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemi City Hall view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose fields Vampula 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Riika.jpg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nokia N85 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Nokia N85 2.JPG
• File:Nokia N85.JPG
• File:PC170006.JPG

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinginkatu 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jyväskylän matkakeskus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Michael32710 13:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vääksyn kanava 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vääksyn kanava 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A pity that the traffic light is cropped but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 08:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hannulan silta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hannulan silta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hannulan silta 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tornion kaupungintalo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isohaara Power Plant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isohaara Power Plant panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle Leveäkari 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please try to improve the categorization. --XRay 03:12, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuopio aerial 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haparanda Stadshotell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedestrian and bicycle bridge Tornio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle Leveäkari 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle Leveäkari 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E8 Kemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matkusniemi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vääksyn kanava 2022 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 11:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vääksyn kanava 2022 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the image needs a CW tilt --Virtual-Pano 07:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Fixed. --Kallerna 10:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 11:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isojärvi Isojärven kansallispuisto 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Päijänne Raiskasselkä.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemin kirkko 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemin kirkko 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Karisalmi Bridge 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karisalmi Bridge 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tyrnin marjoja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 07:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matkusjoen kaivos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vehnäpelto 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 13:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kauran puintia 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurajoki Laukkaniittu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Sea caves Cape Greco 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vehnäpelto 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kauran puintia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 -kilpailuun!

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 -kilpailuun! Kilpailusarjaan osallistuvia kuvia tuli noin 800. Kilpailu jatkuu siten, että lokakuun alussa teemme koosteen kuvista tuomareille jotka valitsevat niistä Suomen sarjan parhaan, 10 kansainväliseen sarjaan lähetettävää kuvaa sekä parhaan jälleenvalokuvaparin. Suomen tulokset julkaistaan marraskuun lopulla tai joulukuun alussa.

Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 competition! About 800 photos participated in the competition series. The competition continues now that at the beginning of October, we will compile photos for the judges who will choose the best picture, ten pictures to be sent to the international series, and the best pair of re-photos. The Finnish results will be published at the end of November or early December.

--Zache (talk) 06:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rovaniemi Church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemijoki Rovaniemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ounaskoski bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jätkänkynttilä Bridge 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 13:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jätkänkynttilä Bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jätkänkynttilä Bridge 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suutarinkorva road and railway bridges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suutarinkorva road and railway bridges 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ounaskoski Rovaniemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sodankyläntie bridges over Ounasjoki 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sodankyläntie bridges over Ounasjoki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observatorio IRAM Pico Veleta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ounaskoski bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sule Pagoda Yangoon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sugar beet harvest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 18:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sioskuru 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakola Funicular 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakola Funicular 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 08:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakola Funicular 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Shame about the e-scooter, but technical quality is good enough to overlook it. --BigDom 08:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ouzobottle.JPG

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 -kilpailun Suomen tulokset

Hangon Gustavsvärnin linnoitus- ja majakkasaari 21. elokuuta 2016, Teuvo Salmenjoki

Maailman suurin valokuvauskilpailu Wiki Loves Monuments järjestettiin Suomessa ja eri puolilla maailmaa 1.9.–31.9.2022. Teemana oli tällä kertaa kestävä perintö, joka on Euroopan kulttuuriympäristöpäivien vuositeema.

Suomen-sarjan voittajaksi valittiin Teuvo Salmenjoki Hangossa sijaitsevan Gustavsvärnin linnoituksen kuvallaan, joka on otettu elokuussa 2016. Kilpailun tuomariston mielestä luonto ja ihmisen muokkaama kulttuuriperintö yhdistyvät voittajakuvassa viehättävällä tavalla. “Linnoituksen kivenlohkareet asettuvat kontrastiin luonnon muovaaman silokiven kanssa. Pilvipoudan pehmeä valo korostaa sekä maiseman että kohteen luonnetta ja antaa mahdollisuuden tarkastella sen rakenteen yksityiskohtia. Nähtävissä on selviytymistarina karun luonnon keskellä, täynnä saariston rosoista kauneutta.” Tuomaristo arvoi voittajaa valitessaan mm. Teknistä laatua, asettelu sekä, värien ja valon käyttöä.

Kansainväliseen sarjaan päässet kuvat

Alla on nähtävillä voittajakuva ja 9 muuta kansainväliseen sarjaan valittua kuvaa.

• 
  Hangon Gustavsvärnin linnoitus- ja majakkasaari 21. elokuuta 2016, Teuvo Salmenjoki
• 
  Paimion parantolan päärakennus, 13. elokuuta 2022, Mikkoau
• 
  Ilmakuva Johanneksenkirkosta Helsingistä, 22. huhtikuuta 2020, Joneikifi
• 
  Muntin silta Taivassalossa, 23. toukokuuta 2020, Jaakko.kulta
• 
  Näkymä Huvilakadulta Helsingistä, 30. heinäkuuta 2022, Marit Henriksson
• 
  Lasipalatsi ja Bio Rex elokuvateatteri Helsingissä, 24. tammikuuta 2022, Halt tone
• 
  Ankkapurhan tehtaan voimalaitoksen pato ja koski, 29. maaliskuuta 2020, Antto
• 
  Pirkkolan rintamamiestaloja Helsingissä, 10. syyskuuta 2022, Joneikifi
• 
  Kuralan Kylämäki, Turku, 14. elokuuta 2022, Mikkoau
• 
  Hammarlandin kirkko Ahvenanmaalla, 15. elokuuta 2020, Jaakko.kulta

Jälleenvalokuvaussarja

Jälleenvalokuvaussarjassa palkittiin Marit Henriksson kuvallaan Ruoholahden villoista. Se muodostaa leikkisän parin syksyisistä sadan markan villoista yhdessä Eeva Ristan 1970-luvulla ottaman kuvan kanssa.

• 
  Marit Henriksson 25. syyskuuta 2022
• 
  Rista, Eeva, Lastenkodinkatu 2-10, Lastenkodinkatu 2-10. Lapsi hyppäämässä narua Ruoholahden sadan markan villojen syksyisessä pihapiirissä. 28. lokakuuta 1975

Suomen-kilpailun voittanut kuva palkitaan 200 euron valokuvaustarvikelahjakortilla. Kymmenen parasta kuvaa palkitaan Museokortilla, ja ne etenevät kansainväliseen kilpailuun. Jälleenvalokuvaussarjan oivaltavin kuva palkitaan 100 euron valokuvaustarvikelahjakortilla ja Museokortilla.

Palkintojenjakotilaisuus pidetään Kansallismuseon Ateljee-tilassa (2 krs.) to 15.12. klo 16 alkaen. Tervetuloa! --Zache (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Lotte World day view 6.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotte World day view 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotte World day view 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seoraksan National Park panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotte World day view 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PJ view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maebong Mountain view 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. In my opinion "Mountain View" is somesthing else. Concrete is quite dominent here, not the mountains. --Milseburg 16:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Yes, this is definitely a dystopic view. There is no "mountain view" here, but a view from Maebong Mountain. --Kallerna 17:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seoraksan National Park panorama 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 08:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotte World morning view 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for making and sharing (diff link). --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maebongsan Observatory 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotte World morning view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals. --Ermell 10:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Fixed. --Kallerna 15:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)