Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/07: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Fer1997 (talk | contribs)
Line 216: Line 216:
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Símbolo da União Democrática Nacional.svg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Símbolo da União Democrática Nacional.svg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPD Party Congress 2019 Logo.svg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPD Party Congress 2019 Logo.svg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:5Y-NNJ.png}}

Revision as of 22:36, 7 September 2024

September 7

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete my photo for privacy and personal protection on this page. Please Mohadeseh Darabi28 (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of user page image. --Rosenzweig τ 07:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, unlike to be an own work. The same user uploaded another portrait of the same writer, now deleted, that had been taken from the web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Both pictures were personally sent to me by the writer in question, as I know him in person and asked him for copyright-free pictures. it would seem one of them happened to have copyright. How can I solve this? Mulholland.gabo (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, debés enviar un mail a permissions-commons-es@wikimedia.org con la autorización del fotógrafo para utilizar esta obra y esperar la resolución de los voluntarios que atienden esas solicitudes. Saludos, Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   20:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, current copyright law of South Korea explicitly forbids commercial uses of artistic works found in public spaces. This monument in particular was extensively discussed here, which resulted to a new fact that it is indeed unfree to use this monument in commercially-licensed media, with the copyright holder being the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (copyright transferred to them through an agreement with the sculptor). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

실질적인 용례 없이 법조문만 가져와서 '너희는 설득해봐라, 나는 듣지 않는다'라고 하는 상황을 반복해 이어가는 위키미디어 공용의 상황에 매우 큰 유감을 표합니다.--Trainholic (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trainholic Commons cannot accept non-commercial content, including recent public monuments of South Korea. That won't change, unless the non-commercial restriction forbidding sale of copies of Korean artistic works in public spaces is removed from the law (which I doubt will happen anytime soon, especially if the South Korean government holds the monopoly over commercial enjoyment of public buildings and monuments of South Korea, courtesy of copyright transfer agreements with the architects and sculptors of those works). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subst : delete3

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fake AI-generated "photo". Omphalographer (talk) 00:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for being misleading and also a copyvio, it's an aged-up AI edit of an existing photo (https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/piEAAOSwAfthyzQU/s-l1600.webp) rather than a purely original image. --Belbury (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F3 per Belbury. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 風間あやた (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (just an empty file page; the file had already been deleted by Túrelio). --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is of bad quality and so, has no use. I am the person who cropped File:Université laval.jpg and think it should be deleted WikiPhil012 (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo. Better version: File:臺大機械工程館 9526.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious to know why you think File:臺大機械工程館 9526.jpg is a better version? Its background light is just as bad compared to the image you nominated. In other words, except for there is a slight shift in the angle of the image, the rest is the same. Please check again and possibly correct your reason for the nomination for deletion.--125.230.80.164 11:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; similar enough to be redundant. --P 1 9 9   20:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple errors (wrong Atomic number for Te, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg) typo in Thallium symbol (capital T, capital I, not capital T, lower case l). Uploader not active since 2016, and not used anywhere else on Wiki. See talk page too. Ruhrfisch (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. There are enough other periodic tables that there is no reason to keep a flawed version.
Ldm1954 (talk) 02:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why keep this? 186.172.245.4 01:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of scope, lacks edu value. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 02:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - This was a transfer from enwiki in good faith, but I concur.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 02:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete garbage Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete nothing new Dronebogus (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos Space Marine toys

Reasons for deletion request - Per COM:TOYS -Di (they-them) (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the photos should not be removed because the toys shown in the images were specifically designed with the intention that users would paint, photograph, and share the results of their artistic work. The manufacturer of the figures actively encourages sharing adaptations of their models and does not oppose the public display of their photos on the Internet. While the removal of these photos may be motivated by good intentions, it seems to me to be a hasty and unnecessary action in this particular case. Krzem Anonim (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We've had cases like these multiple times, very many photographs of Warhammer toys have been deleted from Commons after many discussions. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but Games Workshop (GW) itself, on its website in the Terms & Conditions of Use section, states in point 2 that "GW grants the user (“you”) the non-exclusive right to use the Authorised Intellectual Property for broadcasting, publishing and other media-related activities, such as news articles, press releases, commentary and opinion pieces, blogs, product announcements, and other similar informational and descriptive purposes, in printed or electronic form." In light of this declaration, I believe that removing photos just because they fall under the definition of toys is an unnecessary depletion of Wikimedia Commons' resources. This decision seems to be driven by the desire to comply with the law, but in a situation where no one would feel wronged, as the manufacturer itself clearly allows the publishing of content related to their products. Krzem Anonim (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has already been discussed. The community consensus is that Commons cannot host photos of Games Workshop toys. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Warhammer 40,000 and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:GamesWorkshop. It's also important to note that the message you quoted says non-exclusive right and does not make any mention of commercial use. If GW really wanted people to use their property for commercial purposes, they would have no issue with, say, bootleg minis or other derivative works. This is not the case as GW is quite litigious, they once sued an author for using the words "Space Marine" in a book title even though it wasn't even about WH40K. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Cameroon.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative Work of copyrighted Skibidi Toilet Material. Di (they-them) (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It resembles this image. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This illustration depicts a head coming out of a toilet, which is a generic and non-copyrightable concept. Specific executions of ideas can be copyrighted, but the concept itself cannot. This illustration is not derivative of any specific screenshot or work. See COM:FANART. There is no copyright in an allusion, a name, or a commonplace pre-existing element (IE, heads and toilets). Di (they-them) (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the head resembles the most common head in the videos. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Facial features are not copyrightable. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thus can the likenesses of Fictional Characters, like Solid Snake and Lara Croft be copyrightable? The face of this toilet clearly resembles a face from the Garry's Mod game, which is obviously copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is your argument now? You are obviously not familiar with copyright assesments at all in most of your deletion nominations. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since the likenesses of photorealistic characters like Lara Croft and Solid Snake are the result of creative effort by the developers, I think they can be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, this head doesn't actually resemble any pre-existing skibidi toilet other than the basic idea. So  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, facial features are not copyrightable, as I said. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is reaction to Grandmaster Huon. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per the above eloquent explanation. --RAN (talk) 17:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, withdrawn by the person who tagged it as copyvio (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a derivative work of Disney Cinderella. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong description and title for this item EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant (only difference is the tighter crop). --P 1 9 9   20:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind collecting the nearly identical images into one DR instead? Trade (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of the incorporated image A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark credit "MyHeritage", unlikely to be uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We need paired examples of the MyHeritage software output at various times, you can see how it has already improved since V1.0 first implemented. Same with other AI retouched imagery, we need Dall-E V1 onward. --RAN (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please state what website that contain this same picture. This horizontal logo was obtained officially from UM 2024 official brand toolkit and the author is owned by the university which already stated in the details during upload. MikeRoffe143 (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of where it is taken from, it is still copyrighted. The brand toolkit seems to have limited access which should not be assumed that it is free to use to public. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 00:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PD-Malaysia has been added. 2001:E68:544E:82F6:4DCC:7509:7AB5:635B 03:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to w:University of Malaya, in among the joint authors, last death was w:Ungku Abdul Aziz in year of 2020. The symbol shall only enter public domain at year of 2070. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Malaysia has been added. 2001:E68:544E:82F6:4DCC:7509:7AB5:635B 03:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: duplicate-processed by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope + flickrwashing Astrinko (talk) 05:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake licence. Pessimist (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files created as advertisement. Astrinko (talk) 05:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For a start, this isn't the Jarrell tornado, but the Spring Valley tornado from the same outbreak (per info embedded in the NWS's URL, where I also found the photographer's name) but anyway...

The image is published on the NWS website here: https://www.weather.gov/fwd/Jarrell-Tornado-Anniversary

I reached out to the creator, who confirmed that:

  • the image was never placed in the public domain
  • their photos from the outbreak have only ever been published "by permission"
  • they refuse to license any black-and-white use

And then, even before I asked whether they would be willing to release the rights, they sent a second email to say:

"After additional investigation and consideration, my reply is now NO! Go to hell, MF!"

I think we should delete this, and urgently.


Rlandmann (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete! This is a lawsuit waiting to happen. No one who tells the Commons editor to “Go to hell” is going to release their rights. I agree that this very urgently needs to be deleted. I’m going to ping a couple administrators on this one for their take: @Jmabel @Yann @Matrix. We’d really appreciate your insight as to whether or not speedy deletion criteria is met. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve added a speedy delete tag. Which is a rare move for me. We still appreciate any response from the admins. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing the RFC linked above, the numerous DRs with back and forth arguments, no picture from NWS meets the speedy deletion criteria. Yann (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m referring to this picture in which the copyright holder cussed Rlandmann out in an email when refusing to license; and confirms that it isn’t PD. Are you sure that doesn’t meet F1 criteria? Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: given that it is obvious that even if// the photographer somehow released this into the public domain by passing a copy to the NWS (and it's not obvious to me that their passing it on had that effect) they certainly did not understand that they were doing so, I'd favor a speedy delete. I don't see a reason to keep an image that clearly was not intentionally made available. - Jmabel ! talk 20:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More precisely, given that the image is not in use, I would like to see it speedily deleted on a precautionary basis. Just so that no non-admin is deprived of any information if they want to start a UDR: the stated source is https://www.weather.gov/fwd/Jarrell-Tornado-Anniversary, the image is the first one shown at "Photos of the May 27th Tornadoes and Damage" on that page (more precisely, what is shown there is a crop, the full image is at https://www.weather.gov/images/fwd/jarrell/Spring-Valley-Lon-Curtis2.PNG). @Yann: , would you have a problem with approaching it this way? - Jmabel ! talk 20:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: If you are convinced that it requires a deletion right now, please go ahead. For me, it can wait for a full week, so that others may give their opinions. Yann (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: If you are convinced that it requires a deletion right now, please go ahead. For me, it can wait for a full week, so that others may give their opinions. Yann (talk) 22:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlandmann, Hurricane Clyde, Yann, and Matrix: I'm taking the unusual step of making a precautionary speedy deletion here. If anyone feels this should be restored: I my last remark above gives you everything you need to see the image elsewhere. If anyone wants me to go through the edit history to provide any other information that might be useful to argue an undeletion request, I'm at your service. - Jmabel ! talk 22:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immanuelle

uploader request, uploaded in error

Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 06:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all listed above. The files are black. Special:ListFiles/Immanuelle Taylor 49 (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immanuelle (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement and modern art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko no contest Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 15:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 05:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free poster Astrinko (talk) 06:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Astrinko, I'm new here and I would like to understand why a public poster, about a past event is not OK to be published.
Thank you for your help. Cyril Fressonnet (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyril Fressonnet: Wikimedia Commons only wants free content (which this is apparently not). Please read Commons:Licensing. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free poster Astrinko (talk) 06:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto con marcas. Borrar Deportepedia SL (talk) 07:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foto no autorizada. Borrar por favor. Deportepedia SL (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   20:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text (possibly quoting a poem or song lyric). Omphalographer (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parchokhalq (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictional flags and coats of arms.

Omphalographer (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per the recent village pump discussion, these are F10. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point me to that discussion? I'm curious. Omphalographer (talk) 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem as here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of Walter Scheel (Order of Isabella the Catholic).svg GerritR (talk) 08:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (?) diagram uploaded for advertisement purposes: pt:Usuário(a)_Discussão:Top_Informática Nutshinou Talk! 09:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zac Allan (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Junk. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es este Darwin Oswaldo Bernal Robles, el eccentrico hombre que pidio que le hicieran el funeral en una discoteca? 186.172.176.250 10:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENE 186.172.176.250 10:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 es la edad de inteligencia al parecer. 186.172.176.250 10:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete useless screenshot of useless Google. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 10:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, only text. --P 1 9 9   20:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Government website images are copyrighted Arjunaraoc (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made another version to replace the file if deleted: File:Nalgonda mandals pre 2016 numbers.png. It is based on another old map and the issue is that all the old maps may originally come from the same source. --MGA73 (talk) 08:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. While the archived website does have a copyright notice, this seems at odds with Indian law as described at {{GODL-India}}. There are US Federal Government Flickr streams which claim "all rights reserved" on their work, but we still treat them as public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Compleet onzinnig om deze redirect te bewaren. Industrees (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, needless redirect. --P 1 9 9   20:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status Fenikals (talk) 10:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fehleingabe HST18439 (talk) 10:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Higher quality version of the original file already exists at File:İlham Əliyev və birinci xanım Mehriban Əliyeva Kəlbəcərdə “İstisu” mineral su zavodunun açılışında iştirak ediblər (3).jpgGolden talk 11:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't the higher quality version. It's the same file from the same source. Moreover, it was posted later than mine. Instead of adding description to my file in azeri user made nomination to deletion. Xcite (talk) 05:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OGL does not applicable for logos, but it is protected by Crown copyright. The way of Changpian (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1921 German Notgeld (emergency money) bill is a work of de:Hans Kruzwicki, who died in 1971. So it is are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2042. Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload I think this violates com toys Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 11:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos are not covered under {{PD-ROC-exempt}} or {{GWOIA}}. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:台北通TaipeiPASS.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in Taiwan. Also Taiwan's TOO is relatively low, Simple logos including calligraphy are protected by copyrights.

Wcam (talk) 13:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 2021 version of the emblem of Control Yuan and the seal of Legislative Yuan could be simple enough to be covered under {{PD-textlogo}}. Both of which don't have calligraphy included either. —— Eric LiuTalk 00:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept the two mentioned by Eric Liu, agree these are below TOO of Taiwan. --Ellywa (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These images claim {{GWOIA}} or {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. However, as per communications from the Taiwanese government:

  • {{GWOIA}} does not apply to administration's logos (source), and
  • {{PD-ROC-exempt}} only applies to symbols or emblems that are formulated according to law (source), in which case the particular law that substantiates this claim must be specified.

These images do not meet these conditions.

Wcam (talk) 11:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Badge of the Coast Guard Administration of the Republic of China (2).jpg and File:Badge of the Coast Guard Administration of the Republic of China.jpg : The source and legal basise of the files have been updated to meet the requirements of {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. --人人生來平等 TALK 15:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from copyrighted website, no indication of CC license, credit: CPA Gumruch (talk) 12:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immanuelle

uploader request, uploaded in error

Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 06:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all listed above. The files are black. Special:ListFiles/Immanuelle Taylor 49 (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immanuelle (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement and modern art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko no contest Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 15:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 05:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 12:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

repeater Mounir Neddi (talk) 12:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbildung eines Kunstwerks (Schnitzarbeit), demnach urheberrechtlich geschützt - derivative work GerritR (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. The text has been copied to the description in the file of the logo. JopkeB (talk) 12:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Mars Cheung, not uploader, see EXIF shizhao (talk) 12:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates of File:Wiki man cameltoe.jpg GiovanniPen (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of File:Men cameltoe mooseknuckle spandex men.JPG GiovanniPen (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G7.Uploader requests deletion of recently created (1 day) unused content Sylhouet (talk) 12:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   20:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional flag taken from [1], as such under copyright by the creator of this design. Constantine 12:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Wahlplakat zur Landtagwahl in Bayern 2019.png has an explicit permission. 2003:E5:373C:E800:4C8B:A3F9:B467:C79C 23:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, I reverted my DR on this file and struck it from the list. Thanks for the info! Grand-Duc (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all files (ecept the one noted) were already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ahistorical/fictional design taken from [2], possibly under copyright due to the recomposition of elements, but certainly falling under COM:NOTEDU Constantine 12:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTEDU: Completely fictional map, these Albanian principalities were a) not contemporary to one another, b) their territorial extent is enormously exaggerated eastward (most of Thessaly and Macedonia). This is a nationalist fringe pipe-dream Constantine 13:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Purely fictional, invades only Greece but even the Black Sea. :-D Taylor 49 (talk) 19:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 01:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: all 5 CDU Saxony posters were uploaded by User:CDU Sachsen (verified account, see user page). 2003:E5:373C:E800:4C8B:A3F9:B467:C79C 23:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The reason I think is because this is a ai enhanced image and is not quite supported on the English wikipedia. KhantWiki (talk) 18:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm nominating this picture for deletion since it has been AI enhanced. It produces the details that weren't present on the original photo of the individual before, which literally affects the originality and authenticity. So, I request to nominate this photo for deletion with a valid reason. Thank you. KhantWiki (talk) 13:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Why are you nominating it for deletion again? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete: @Ikan Kekek I'm nominating it for deletion again because AI enhancement changes the original details, which compromises its authencity. It's important to preserve the originality of historical photos, and this version doesn't align with that standard. That's the reason for the deletion request. KhantWiki (talk) 11:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It was already AI-enhanced when it was kept a few months ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek, even if it was AI-enhanced before, the current level of enhancement further distorts the original image. This undermines its originality and authenticity, which is why I believe it should be deleted. There's no concern if this photo is deleted because the original version is preserved and kept, the original picture should always be used in place of AI upscaled versions. See MOS:HOTLINK, "AI upscaling software should generally not be used to increase the resolution or quality of an old or low-resolution image. Original historical images should always be used in place of AI upscaled versions. If an AI-upscaled image is used in an article, this fact should be noted in its caption." Thanks. KhantWiki (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drakosh Next time please use CSD F10 Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is published on the NWS website here: https://www.weather.gov/dmx/2020derecho

I reached out to the creator credited by the NWS, who confirmed that:

  • they took the photo
  • they assert rights over its use

I asked if they'd be willing to release the file under a free license, and they blocked me.

I think we should delete this, and urgently.


Rlandmann (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete! Per Rlandmann. This needs deleted ASAP as a copyright violation! Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 15:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m pinging three administrators to the discussion here. We’d appreciate insight as to whether or not speedy deletion criteria is met. @Jmabel @Yann @Matrix Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing the RFC linked above, the numerous DRs with back and forth arguments, no picture from NWS meets the speedy deletion criteria. Yann (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, one already has been. You can ask @Jmabel; the image of the EF3 tornado in Mayfield. The person who took it was a magistrate (ie. A judge) who confirmed he never released it into the PD. After five days; it was deleted. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with User:Hurricane Clyde and would support speedy delete for the same reason I stated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:1997 Jarrell tornado roping.png. - Jmabel ! talk 20:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More precisely, given that the image is not in use, I would like to see it speedily deleted on a precautionary basis. Just so that no non-admin is deprived of any information if they want to start a UDR: the stated source is https://www.weather.gov/dmx/2020derecho. The image is no longer to be found on that page (presuming it ever was), butthe identical image can be found at https://jenikirbyhistory.getarchive.net/topics/agricultural+silos+in+iowa. @Yann: , would you have a problem with approaching it this way? - Jmabel ! talk 20:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: If you are convinced that it requires a deletion right now, please go ahead. For me, it can wait for a full week, so that others may give their opinions. Yann (talk) 22:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlandmann, Hurricane Clyde, Yann, and Matrix: I'm taking the unusual step of making a precautionary speedy deletion here. If anyone feels this should be restored: I my last remark above gives you everything you need to see the image elsewhere. If anyone wants me to go through the edit history to provide any other information that might be useful to argue an undeletion request, I'm at your service. - Jmabel ! talk 22:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope.

Nutshinou Talk! 13:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Achim55 (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope.

Nutshinou Talk! 13:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not copyright free: Hélène Petter was dead in 2007 and there is no authorization of free use Daehan (talk) 13:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not copyright free: Hélène Petter was dead in 2007 and there is no authorization of free use Daehan (talk) 13:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this logo is both beyond the threshold of originality and copyrighted by PBS. William Graham (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See previous deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS Kids Go! logo (2022).png. William Graham (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Clearly below US threshold of originality. The previous rationale was not about threshold, but about it allegedly being a hoax. As the image is currently in use, that scope rationale is moot. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Modie ben (talk · contribs)

Two of these images are watermarked in-image to Didy Shots (https://www.instagram.com/didy_shots_256). Doubtful that a professional photographer who watermarks their shots like this would upload them to Commons for free use, asking them to be credited instead to the Commons username "Modie ben".

Belbury (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Qraf (talk · contribs)

Very unlikely their own work.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of https://autonews.ma/news/uniraid-alpes-2024--quand-la-passion-automobile-rime-avec-la-cause-humanitaire/10490 O Kolymbitès (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing valid source, very unlikely to be author's own work. Zzzs (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: NASA NAOAA image. --RAN (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the author, not the source. Looking at this image, it does not appear to be something that NASA nor NOAA would take since the colours don't match what the NASA's satellites (Terra, Aqua) and the NOAA satellites (NOAA-20, Suomi NPP) take and the GOES satellites do not operate in the area Yagi was at the time the picture was taken. This is likely a work from Himawari, but the source is still unknown. My best guess for the source would be ZOOM since the colours and resolution match. If that's the case, the image is copyrighted and should be deleted.
    TL:DR; not a NASA/NOAA image and likely a copyright violation. Zzzs (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not many of the files in Category:Close-up photographs of 1 human eye are from this angle so I think it's educationally useful and in scope. Jonteemil (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Jonteemil. --P 1 9 9   20:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeanne Angerie (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from anime/manga.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files under Category:Noto-Satoyama Kaido

per COM:DW Yasu (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio https://www.deutscher-radiopreis.de/radiopreis/verleihung_2024/preistraeger/Bester-Moderatorin-Gianluca-Meli-von-988-KISS-FM,bestemoderation104.html - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan メイド理世 (talk) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:虐-bronze-spring.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Low resolution images without EXIF. Notice that the user uploaded other obvious copyvios that were tagged for speedy violations.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SD: private photographs of non-notable persons. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image from the City of Westminster, which has never even been properly categorised, is not fit for Wikipedia purposes. Obviously an uncontrolled bot upload. Xocolatl (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong upload, this img is a copy of File:Pope Francis last greeting to President Jokowi.jpg. Description and caption also wrong. Intended to upload another one. Kaliper1 (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Belongs to a mass upload. None of the images have been checked for quality or categorised. The category in which it is now categorised is overflowing. Xocolatl (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, terrible angle and composition, no value over many better alternatives. --P 1 9 9   20:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Belongs to a mass upload of the uploader. None of the images have been checked for quality or categorised. The category in which it is now categorised is overflowing. Xocolatl (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: borderline usable, no direct alternative with such zoom of the tower top. --P 1 9 9   20:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a cover or a film poster, propably not own work Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Belongs to a mass upload of the uploader. None of the images have been checked for quality or categorised. The category in which it is now categorised is overflowing. Xocolatl (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment refined the category, which now is no longer overflowing. but the quality is low and all the other arguments still hold. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blurred, no value over the numerous better alternatives already in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2003:EC:5F03:A300:A1FB:525D:2C42:32EC as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsverletzung. Uploader ist nicht U.Deuschle. Genehmigung zur Verwendung der Graphik nicht ersichtlich.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The claimed source-site states "Die Panoramen, die Sie unter Nutzung der Werkzeuge auf diesen Seiten erzeugen, stehen Ihnen zur privaten Nutzung zur freien Verfuegung. Eine kommerzielle Nutzung ohne meine schriftliche Erlaubnis ist untersagt.", which forbids commercial use and thereby requires an additional permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darwin V. Vadakethalackal (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope.

Nutshinou Talk! 16:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! The Photographer (talk) 17:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! The Photographer (talk) 15:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, espero que esto pueda hacerse --The Photographer (talk) 17:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 01:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor-quality pesonal vanity photo. Outside the project scope. DAJF (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image / serves no purpose 1989 (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. According to his description, it is a personal photograph uploaded for proselytizing purposes. It has no encyclopedic value. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.  Strong support for deletion and permanent lock to the highest possible level. Repeatedly deleted and reuploaded. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da ich die Datei nicht in "Stolperstein Oberaußem Elisabeth Griese.jpg" umbenennen kann. Tessa2015 (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file renamed as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal file without encyclopedic value. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mirrored and low resolution version of File:V. Kandinski. East suites. Arabs III.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art of a copyrighted character. It will be undeleted on January 1, 2106 when BFDI enters the public domain. 2603:7000:B8F0:80D0:1ACA:AE2A:C117:273E 17:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


A tennis ball with limbs is not a original character concept to disallow any fanworks of it. Ca (talk) 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dude it's just a BFDI character. I know BFDI is copyrighted but the reason I posted it because I see an fan art of BMO from Adventure Time (copyrighted cartoon network show) on this site. And it didn't got any warning that is removed because it's a fan art of other person and it was not the author that made this fan art and no one put the file to speedy deletion or something else, so yeah. Heitor Gois (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If ya wanna see the fan art I mentioned it, there is it.
I also put my Tennis Ball fan art file to speedy deletion due to everyone arguing the file and saying that it's copyright violated. Heitor Gois (talk) 19:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay? Heitor Gois (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 05:27, September 22, 2024, by Yann (per COM:SPEEDY). --P 1 9 9   21:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI-generated images of "Wilhelminus Mumifex Piratus", a fictional mummified emperor pirate and his candy treasure. Out of COM:SCOPE as personal fiction, and only in COM:INUSE on a fake-article user page on dewiki, from a user with no other contributions.

Belbury (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a website with distinctive features, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted yoda character.

Converting to DR since the photo is free. Abzeronow (talk) 18:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clear derivative work of "Baby Yoda" from Disney's Star Wars. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not arguing that it isn't Grogu. Since it's a 2D graphical work, not covered by FoP in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete, per Abzeronow. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file was initially tagged by PizzaKing13 as Copyvio (Copyright) and the most recent rationale was: violation|1=COM:NETCOPYRIGHT, false own work claim, from twitter/blogspot, no proof of painting in PD

Converting to DR since the painting's copyright is the only relevant one here. Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACUSA and COM:FOP. See [3]. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Beloit Police Department is not part of the federal government; this image is not public domain. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want it to be publicly visible. 186.172.55.218 18:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW. --P 1 9 9   21:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work. Darwin took this picture 50-60 years ago. 186.172.55.218 18:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AlexLeeCN (talk · contribs)

The tag used is {{PD-PRC-exempt}} and it is not clear to me that will cover the National Athem as it is a piece of music,not a law or judicial resolution. Also the National Anthem Law seems to forbid derivative works [4]: «There will be punishment for deliberately altering the lyrics or music of the national anthem, ...». Also the footer from the source states «All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to www.gov.cn.. Without written authorization from www.gov.cn, such content shall not be republished or used in any form.» (or course it is only applicable if the tag doesn't apply.)

Günther Frager (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(1). The release (Chinese ver.) shall be considered as delegated legislation, which will become a part of National Anthem Law . According to National Anthem Law Article 10 Subparagraph 4 "The department determined by the State Council shall organize the examination, determination and makingof the standard musical notation of the national anthem and the official recording of the national anthem, and release them on the website of the National People's Congress and the website of the Chinese Central Government", while release press has stated, "According to the National Anthem Law". Hence, the musical notation and recording are released under the law.
This relevance could be verified by the press conference, the official stated:”由于演奏曲谱的类型比较多,...,其中有的曲谱篇幅比较长,把它们都作为法律附件不现实,所以国歌法第十条规定...“ ("Since there are many types of performance scores... Some of them are so long that it's impractical to annex them all to the law, so Article 10 of the National Anthem Law states... ") . It's clear that the musical notation has the same legal effect as the annex of the law, the only difference is this time is it is delegated to the government, not the congress.
(2). Article 10 (Where the national anthem is played and sung on the occasions prescribed in Article 4 of this Law, the standard musical notation of the national anthem or the official recording of the national anthem shall be used) has stated the musical notation has legal effect and are accordant with the Copyright Law Article 5 (laws...documents of legislative, administrative or judicial nature).
(3). The limitation of usage is definitely a Non-copyright restrictions. Violating it (insulting the anthem) will only bring criminal or administrative responsibility, and is not considered relevant to the freedom usageor copyright. (BTW, from my personal view, the Chinese word 篡改 should not translate to alter. Tampering is more accurate.)
(4). The footer of the copyright statement is more like a general declaration and can be reversed with other evidence, otherwise the Constitution may be copyrightable. Best regard. --AlexLeeCN (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational value, not in use, apparently uploaded as part of a prolonged attempt at getting a hoax article on en.wp. (see here) Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erro na data Laaari (talk) 20:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depicted sculpture is likely recent and still in copyright (Henry Moore died in 1986). Unfortunately, the US has no freedom-of-panorama exception for non-buildings. So, a permission by the sculptor is required or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar problem with File:Princeton - panoramio (77).jpg (artist died in 1973).


Also:

Superceded by the Wikidata Infobox. Mike Peel (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing which is sourced to "Wikipedia" and appears to have permission issues. Abzeronow (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per the original de.wp upload log, this started as a photograph of a drawing attached to the wall in a museum in Tulln, Austria. Signed Scheidl 97, so recent. No FOP for such an object in a museum in Autria. --Rosenzweig τ 09:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for graphic works of art in Greece per COM:FOP Greece. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Framcum (talk · contribs)

I don't know about these, but they may be a borderline TOO case.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Logos

leaf may be above TOO.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for promotional use of a non-notable company (if not fake), cf. w:de:Wiuumy Schniggendiller (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegally acquired footage 92.13.36.221 21:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Illegally acquired footage Pmpancorbo (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is strange, after 5 years, but who is this guy? 186.172.107.117 01:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep "Illegally acquired footage" is not a valid reason for deletion of a file we are hosting since 2019. How was the footage acquired and what laws were broken? --Jarekt (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the filer is talking about personality rights and consent requirement. Judging by the username, the filer might be the person depicted in the photo. So, the photo may not have been stolen from him (as he is obviously not the photographer), but it may have been taken / uploaded without his consent. Nakonana (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wait, the filer is also the uploader. Looks like uploader and depicted person are the same, but the photo is not a selfie and therefore likely a copyvio. Nakonana (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploaded image was posted without the consent of the person depicted in it. 92.13.36.221 21:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, yes I am not the person who appears in the picture or the photographer. I found this image and I uploaded it with good intentions. I thought the researcher had relevance to have their own page so I created this profile. I have done that before with other researcher and never had an issue. Please, feel free to delete the image. I'll double check better the legality next time. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was another image from the same person which was uploaded from the same account recently deleted from Wikimedia as well. This is an easy case. 92.13.36.221 21:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the uploaded didn't have the rights to upload the image and the image I snot used in any page - > delete 92.40.170.11 22:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so by those statements, the image should be  Speedy deleted as COM:COPYVIO. Nakonana (talk) 00:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this image with the person depicted or the photographer's consent. I got message asking me to delete it and I just wanted to apologise, I made this account to support the researcher. Didn't know I needed consent. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was acquired illegally, without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. Also, it is not used in any Wikipedia page so it has no relevance. 92.13.36.221 22:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Fhoto uploded without without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. --Jarekt (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per this Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew Beardsley (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused, unidentified images; possibly photomicrographs, but with no hint as to what they are since they were uploaded in 2019.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TEHb K0CM0CA (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused, unidentified TIFF image stacks of unidentified subjects, possibly some sort of photomicrographs given other uploads by this user. Unlikely to be usable given the lack of identification.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not PD-Taiwan or PD-US. No evidence the creator has been dead 50 years. This looks like a scan of a newspaper image, which is not properly credited. It was likely copyrighted by the photographer and the newspaper. It's doubtful the deadlink source was the original publisher. Not PD in US. Licensing template in use requires a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Dual Freq (talk) 21:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear license. File is tagged as {{PD-USGov}}, but this appears to be an original photo by the uploader with a description in French; that license doesn't apply. Omphalographer (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegally acquired footage 92.13.36.221 21:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Illegally acquired footage Pmpancorbo (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is strange, after 5 years, but who is this guy? 186.172.107.117 01:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep "Illegally acquired footage" is not a valid reason for deletion of a file we are hosting since 2019. How was the footage acquired and what laws were broken? --Jarekt (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the filer is talking about personality rights and consent requirement. Judging by the username, the filer might be the person depicted in the photo. So, the photo may not have been stolen from him (as he is obviously not the photographer), but it may have been taken / uploaded without his consent. Nakonana (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wait, the filer is also the uploader. Looks like uploader and depicted person are the same, but the photo is not a selfie and therefore likely a copyvio. Nakonana (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploaded image was posted without the consent of the person depicted in it. 92.13.36.221 21:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, yes I am not the person who appears in the picture or the photographer. I found this image and I uploaded it with good intentions. I thought the researcher had relevance to have their own page so I created this profile. I have done that before with other researcher and never had an issue. Please, feel free to delete the image. I'll double check better the legality next time. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was another image from the same person which was uploaded from the same account recently deleted from Wikimedia as well. This is an easy case. 92.13.36.221 21:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the uploaded didn't have the rights to upload the image and the image I snot used in any page - > delete 92.40.170.11 22:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so by those statements, the image should be  Speedy deleted as COM:COPYVIO. Nakonana (talk) 00:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this image with the person depicted or the photographer's consent. I got message asking me to delete it and I just wanted to apologise, I made this account to support the researcher. Didn't know I needed consent. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was acquired illegally, without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. Also, it is not used in any Wikipedia page so it has no relevance. 92.13.36.221 22:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Fhoto uploded without without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. --Jarekt (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. This is an appeal from the uploader. The logo and other variations thereof have been authorised in Commons for years without any claims, therefore putting the ability to claim them ineligible in doubt. Fer1997 (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, It looks like a smiling sun to me. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, as it is considered a variation of said logo and therefore eligible. A whole Commons category has been created for those logos. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal from the uploader. No claims to copyright apply to this logo, which is not registered in the applicable registry for tradermarks (Spain). It is the symbol of a defunct organisation. I believe it is therefore under the threshold of the applicable template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then change the template to reflect it, it is not a simple geometry, it is a complex interpretation of sickle and hammer. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, no-one owns the copyright anymore? What about the person who designed the logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The eligibility of this logo was discussed and settled a few years ago and it was deemed eligible. I therefore believe the logo to be under the threshold of the template and therefore not eligible for speedy deletion. Fer1997 (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the hand with the flower may not have been copyrightable, but the rose pattern to the right might be. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I personally think both the rose and the hand are too complex for pd-textlogo, but the rose is a derivative of File:Logo Partido Socialista Argentina.png, which is under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German language page without content, only complaining about the Editor's index being in English Prototyperspective (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly didn't intend it as a complaint. I'm a native English-speaker. I simply wanted to point anyone who looked for a German glossary to get something useful: a link to Commons' English-language glossary, and a link to the de-wiki glossary, which overlaps significantly with the vocabulary needed for Commons.
FWIW, I think it would be great if someone did a German-language glossary for Commons (my German is not strong enough), but I think the current page aims anyone looking for that in the two most useful existing directions.
That said, if you really think it is a liability rather than an asset, feel free to delete it. - Jmabel ! talk 22:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, I think that should be in the Commons:Editor's index to Commons/de page and this page could redirect to it. The glossary would via the <languages/> template. I think it's more a burden because it's not clear what it's about or that it's German-language in the two categories it's contained in. Maybe somebody else has some more info about what is best done for such cases. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any proof of your claims? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should add sourcing for source of your reproduction, and thats it. Other is obvious. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the necessary info and I have changed the licenses in order to secure compliance. Do not hesitate to indicated any other actions to be taken. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes this is good, but I am not sure about uploading those originals itself rather than links to the sources. But this file should be okay anyways. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegally acquired footage 92.13.36.221 21:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Illegally acquired footage Pmpancorbo (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is strange, after 5 years, but who is this guy? 186.172.107.117 01:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep "Illegally acquired footage" is not a valid reason for deletion of a file we are hosting since 2019. How was the footage acquired and what laws were broken? --Jarekt (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the filer is talking about personality rights and consent requirement. Judging by the username, the filer might be the person depicted in the photo. So, the photo may not have been stolen from him (as he is obviously not the photographer), but it may have been taken / uploaded without his consent. Nakonana (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wait, the filer is also the uploader. Looks like uploader and depicted person are the same, but the photo is not a selfie and therefore likely a copyvio. Nakonana (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploaded image was posted without the consent of the person depicted in it. 92.13.36.221 21:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, yes I am not the person who appears in the picture or the photographer. I found this image and I uploaded it with good intentions. I thought the researcher had relevance to have their own page so I created this profile. I have done that before with other researcher and never had an issue. Please, feel free to delete the image. I'll double check better the legality next time. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was another image from the same person which was uploaded from the same account recently deleted from Wikimedia as well. This is an easy case. 92.13.36.221 21:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the uploaded didn't have the rights to upload the image and the image I snot used in any page - > delete 92.40.170.11 22:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so by those statements, the image should be  Speedy deleted as COM:COPYVIO. Nakonana (talk) 00:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this image with the person depicted or the photographer's consent. I got message asking me to delete it and I just wanted to apologise, I made this account to support the researcher. Didn't know I needed consent. Pmpancorbo (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded image without appropriate rights Pmpancorbo (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image was acquired illegally, without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. Also, it is not used in any Wikipedia page so it has no relevance. 92.13.36.221 22:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Fhoto uploded without without consent by the photographer or the person appearing in it. --Jarekt (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. In addition to this, a previous challenge to the eligibility of another version of this logo was settled favourably. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File should contain more information about Vector creation and source from which you created it, but as it is your reproduction of 90 years old emblemics, it should be OK and not adequate for deletion. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do we change the template to reflect this? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how this goes in terms of Spanish Copyright law. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do not change the template. We can add PD-tag for the intelectual value, but its not necessary. Primary is to include source from which Fer1997 created his reproduction and dating. If you don't know how goes copyright law you should not be nominating for deletion at all. ThecentreCZ (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo are simple enough for it to be eligible under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not adequate for deletion. PD-text and shapes. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete What? This is a complex depiction of wheat. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore I think it has "uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability" that grants it protection under COM:TOO Spain. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe the matter to be as clear as it seems. The case mentioned as reference for TOO compliance only alludes to academic legal doctrine, not to actual case law; they do not have the same value under Spanish law. There is no reference to logo design in the actual case analysed. It is not evident, from its content, what the threshold should be, and the consensus is the interpretation is ample enough for this and other logos to be eligible for PD-textlogo, PD-shape and eventually PD-trademarked protection. Therefore, I advocate we  Keep the logo. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. All claims of inegibility of this logo have been settled in the past as the characteristics of the logo exempt it from any copyright claims. Special care has been taken to ensure compliance with said ruling. It is therefore fully eligible under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that is above TOO is the hand with the flower, which is already public domain, so  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should not have started nomination of file already discussed in the first place. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo ensure it is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete complex flower shape. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep As the matter is not clear under Spanish law or legal precedent thereof and there is no trademark claim to it, I advise we  Keep the file. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When matters are unclear, the precautionary principle used on this site dictates that the file in question be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof of your claim? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The organisation was dissolved by Institutional Instrument No. 2 on 27 October 1965. This meant that its legal entity was dissolved and no successor even existed which could claim the rights of the UDN. All members of the party either joined the new government-approved ARENA party or other underground organisations. In addition to this, given that almost 60 years have passed and that there is no clear legal consensus on the matter, I believe we should  Keep the file. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Web links to reliable sources for this statement? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article 18 of the Institutional Act proclaims the extinction of all existing political parties and the cancellation of their registries, which is equivalent to the extinction of their legal entity. The text is available both at the Planalto website and at Wikisource. --Fer1997 (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense,  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo make it eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the flower on the left is a complex shape. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "Own work" as user claims. He copied the image from this source. [5] Ivebeenhacked (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]