Commons:Valued image candidates/Basel: Paulus Church: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
←Created page with '<noinclude>=== {{subst:SUBPAGENAME}} === {{VIC</noinclude><includeonly>{{VIC-thumb</includeonly> |subpage={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}} |image=Basel - Pauluskirche1.jp...'
 
m promotion
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
|nominator=[[User:Taxiarchos228|Wladyslaw]] ([[User talk:Taxiarchos228|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]])
|nominator=[[User:Taxiarchos228|Wladyslaw]] ([[User talk:Taxiarchos228|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]])
|scope=[[:Category:Pauluskirche (Basel)|Pauluskirche (Basel)]], exterior
|scope=[[:Category:Pauluskirche (Basel)|Pauluskirche (Basel)]], exterior
|orientation=landscape <!-- change to portrait or panorama if relevant -->
|orientation=landscape
|status=promoted
|usedin=<!-- List of links to usages on Wikimedia project content pages (optional) -->
|status=nominated <!-- Change to supported, opposed or discussed as appropriate when adding reviews -->
|reason=<!-- Reason for nominating (optional) -->
|reason=<!-- Reason for nominating (optional) -->
|review={{s}} all criteria met --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 06:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|review=<!-- Itemized list of review comments. -->
*{{o}} Please add gallery. [[User:Wetenschatje|<font color="black">พ.</font>]][[User talk:Wetenschatje|<font color="black">s.</font>]] 23:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
What gallery? There is no such [[Commons:Valued image criteria|criteria]], your own ideas are not basis for evaluation. --[[User:Taxiarchos228|Wladyslaw]] ([[User talk:Taxiarchos228|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 15:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
::Do NOT change my votes. I'll ask you only once! [[User:Wetenschatje|<font color="black">พ.</font>]][[User talk:Wetenschatje|<font color="black">s.</font>]] 20:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
:Agree with Taxiarchos228. The vote of ws is unvalid IMO, because of wrongly based. Please don't vote on purpose to "make a point". Rules are rules, and if you disagree, make a proposition on the appropriate page and try to obtain consensus.--[[User:Jebulon|Jebulon]] ([[User talk:Jebulon|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*{{s}} A gallery is not a requisitive. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 07:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
:*IMO, this vote is only a compensation against the vote of Wetenschatje, and does not strictly concern the picture. Both behaviours are destroying the VI project and I think we must stop this.--[[User:Jebulon|Jebulon]] ([[User talk:Jebulon|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
<div style="margin:1em 0; padding:.8em 1em; border:1px dashed #2f6fab; background:#f9f9f9; line-height:2.1ex; color:#000; overflow:auto; white-space:auto">
<tt>Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =><br />{{#ifexpr:2>1|promoted|}}{{#ifexpr:2=1|undecided|}}{{#ifexpr:2<1|declined|}}. [[User:George Chernilevsky|<font color="darkgreen">George Chernilevsky</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:George Chernilevsky|talk]]</span></small></sup></b> 21:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)</tt></div>
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:33, 26 January 2012

Basel: Paulus Church

promoted
Image
Nominated by Wladyslaw (talk) on 2012-01-19 21:20 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pauluskirche (Basel), exterior
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What gallery? There is no such criteria, your own ideas are not basis for evaluation. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT change my votes. I'll ask you only once! พ.s. 20:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Taxiarchos228. The vote of ws is unvalid IMO, because of wrongly based. Please don't vote on purpose to "make a point". Rules are rules, and if you disagree, make a proposition on the appropriate page and try to obtain consensus.--Jebulon (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • IMO, this vote is only a compensation against the vote of Wetenschatje, and does not strictly concern the picture. Both behaviours are destroying the VI project and I think we must stop this.--Jebulon (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 21:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Basel:_Paulus_Church&oldid=66064690"