Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/07
October 7
[edit]Carece de relevancia, el escudo está desactualizado -ifrasombi-Ifrasombi (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Outdated" is no reason for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a 1940s American photograph. Photo is likely public domain by formalities, but an actual source for this would be very helpful. Abzeronow (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment haven't done full research yet, but this is a photo of a screen. Not relevant for copyright, since it's the original that matters, but odd. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Also: File:Kontrollshild Kanton Waadt.png
Not sure if this is real. Can the first digit be 0?
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
The Bulgarian Rise's logo is protected by copyright and should not be uploaded here as it is non-free logo. VilianEst2007 (talk) 07:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyrighted text. Does this letter of greetings pass the threshold of originality or not? If yes, then this is not OK to be hosted here. If no, then it can be dismissed as {{PD-text}}. But my hunch suggests it is not a text of pure facts, original information, or plain data. It is a letter that has a carefully-written prose that warrants automatic protection by its writer. COM:Derivative work issue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- May I kindly ask a one day, for I intend to visit the clinic hospital of Dr. Charlotte Chiong, regarding the photos, she may enlighten Commons or Wikipedia on this matter; if there is a doubt on the matter, I intend to use the option in my talk page - Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy reason here For more inform thank you very sincerely Valenzuela400 (talk) 08:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC).
- @Valenzuela400 if an uploader's own image already exists for some time now, like this case (since August 29, 2024, more than a month), then it is no longer eligible for speedy deletion even with the rationale (uploader's own request). You must wait for the closing administrator to decide. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Same issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charlotte Martinez Chiong6.jpg: derivative work of a letter that may possibly be under writer's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- May I kindly ask a one day, for I intend to visit the clinic hospital of Dr. Charlotte Chiong, regarding the photos, she may enlighten Commons or Wikipedia on this matter; if there is a doubt on the matter, I intend to use the option in my talk page - Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy reason here For more inform thank you very sincerely Valenzuela400 (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC).
Unlikely own work. Seems to be derivative work of potentialy copyrighted stuff.
Gumruch (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am the only owner of these 3 works. Two of them are the self-made medals and I made the photos of them. And the third is my redrawing based on my own photo. Polyoxy (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
A gallery of only three free flags, with the rest of being dummy ones. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Per [1], this photo depicts a 2006 artwork by Nashville sculptor Roy W. Butler and thus is still protected by copyright. Wikicommons accepts only free-to-use media. DanielPenfield (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Source video is no longer available/has been deleted ☆ YuhakGuardian (talk) 15:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:CYPRUS 『Shiro Neko』Обг. 15:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Flags of municipalities, like Limassol's, often fall under public domain because they are considered official symbols created by government entities. In Cyprus, municipal flags are generally considered public domain. Examples: Flag of Strovolos Municipality, Flag of Nicosia Municipality, and Flag of Mesa Geitonia Municipality, Limassol. I’d assume that the Limassol Flag must be put under the same format (.svg, instead of .gif), or under a different permission license. Lomaine (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep, allowed under PD-EdictGov. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given author - see metadata "Author Andre de Molenaar" Hoyanova (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Hoyanova,
- Thank you very much for your sharp eye. I contacted our photographer (Roelof Bos) and he updated the information.
- 'Andre de Molenaar' is unknown to us both and he certainly didn't make or owns this image.
- Thanks again. All the best.
- Kind regards,
- PM Mulder PaulMMulder (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Are these works permanently installed? Otherwise we need permission for the displayed artwork too. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hee Sjoerd, nee dit is geen permanente installatie. De kunstwerken en de installatie zijn van ons. Moet ik dat ook aangeven?
- Alvast bedankt voor je reactie. Mvg. Paul 2001:1C01:3803:7800:95BF:8169:89AC:3D01 09:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Voor de foto en voor het weergeven van het kunstwerk zijn beide toestemming nodig. Gebruik hiervoor de Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Are these works permanently installed? Otherwise we need permission for the displayed artwork too. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This CoA seems to be a complete fabrication by the uploader. There is no evidence that there is a real connection to the state of Yemen or any group in that country. This file is not viable for use in any of the wikimedia projects. Willi P (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I created it for Yemeni Jewish users who opposed the Houthis but just in case they are not using it, I created for myself because I supported the Yemeni Jewish people SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are using the name of a massacre victim. I wonder if you asked for permission with her family. I seriously doubt that. Using the name of a deceased without their permission is a very serious violation of their personality rights and cannot be tolerated. If you did not get their permission this file should be deleted or at least renamed without her name in it. Willi P (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete. This is absolutely not how coats of arms work; it's also deeply inappropriate. Omphalographer (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep but rename We allow users, per COM:SCOPE, to upload a small number of personal images to the site for use in their userpages if they're active, and you're most certainly active. However, the use like this of the name of a massacre victim in the filename (and the image itself, which you have removed) is a violation of personality rights, along with being very insensitive and inappropriate, and I cannot begin to describe how much I disagree with you calling her a martyr in the edit summary for said removal. I believe the file is OK to keep, but her name must be removed. Rubýñ (Scold) 22:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)- Keep but rename per Rubyn Abo Yemen✉ 09:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- @SpinnerLaserzthe2nd you might also want to fix the coat of arms of yemen that is being used in the pic cus the one you're using was ironically designed by a houthi supporter Abo Yemen✉ 09:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
To sum up:
- the file name is a violation of personality rights
- the CoA used in this file seems to be a mockery made by houthi supporters; thus is not at all appropriate for supporting jews in Yemen
Delete this file asap. Willi P (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment As Abo or Rubyn said, we could keep the file and change the name and the type of coat of arms. I did not realize that the COA is made by someone who supported one of the most hated groups of all time. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Although the image of the CD does not meet the threshold of originality, the logo of the CD does look extremely artistic, in addition to containing the logo of the Sony Music record company and a production company, therefore this image would be violating copyright and should be deleted. JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The file was also uploaded on a page by someone other than the record company, and that page does not have a CC license. I don't know if that has any influence or not, but I wanted to mention it. And as for the design, for me the design of a CD goes beyond the threshold of originality. https://www.coveralia.com/caratulas/Lali-A-Bailar-(Edicion-Limitada)-CD.php
- JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The CD's design is a solid color with text, without any artistic elements that could make it copyrighted. Lali Espósito's logo is simple enough to be below the threshold of originality, like the A Bailar logo. And all the other logos are not the main focus of the image, as such I believe they fall under de minimis. nicolas talkpage 09:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the file is the user's own work JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 20:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Most probably not own photo of a 3D object (PD itself), but a derivative (background removal and moving) of the non-free one taken from [2] (First found on Apr 24, 2008, as tineye suggests). Quick1984 (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Own photo or photographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 20:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Silly subject, maybe, but not a bad picture, and I'd have to say wedgies are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere (and it can't be used anywhere, it's more pornographic than educative) and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's definitely not very pornographic! I feel like if we keep one, File:Man Thong Wedgie-2.jpg is the best and most useful, because it illustrates what a wedgie is. I guess I'm a weak Keep for all 3, simply because space is not at a premium, but if you find 10 more, I'll have a different view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Urseh
[edit]- File:Дівчина в національному узбецькому одязі та доппі.jpg
- File:Молодята в національних головних уборах.jpg
- File:Різновид доппі.jpg
- File:Сучасний національний одяг.jpg
- File:Чоловічий та жіночий чапан.jpg
- File:Молодята в традиційному одязі.jpg
- File:Паранджа.jpg
- File:Національна сукня.jpg
All copyvios. Taken mostly from Pinterest (e.g., Чоловічий та жіночий чапан, Дівчина в національному узбецькому одязі та доппі.jpg, etc.) and all lack EXIF data. Nataev talk 22:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)