Commons:特色图片评选
特色图片评选 欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片,每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。 这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。 关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选。 |
|
规范[edit]
提名[edit]如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作: 1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。
推荐操作:请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。 可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“ 注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]光暗度[edit]在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。 色彩度[edit]在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。 |
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 13:15:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
- Info Walking path underneath the Hell Gate Bridge on Randall's Island (New York). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 11:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Aerial view of the Vexier Chapel in Reifenberg. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 11:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:009 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 10:38:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for composition, details, colors, and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 10:12:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Morocco
- Info Main courtyard of Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 10:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 04:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info Emmeline Pankhurst, oil on canvas by Georgina Agnes Brackenbury. Created by National Portrait Gallery - uploaded by Madame Tatillonne - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bottom, left and top of the painting missing. High ISO, low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 13:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC).
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 03:23:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class : Ostracoda (Ostracods)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support - could use a bit of a right crop — Rhododendrites talk | 12:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Pictures of the Sun by ESA Solar Orbiter
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 21:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
The Sun in UV light of 17.4 nanometres, taken by Solar Orbiter's Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUI) instrument, assembled from multiple images taken on 22 March 2023.
-
A magnetogram of the Sun that shows the line-of-sight direction of the magnetic field on the Sun's disc, measured by the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023.
-
The velocity map of the Sun that shows the line-of-sight speed and direction of movement of material at the Sun's visible surface, measured by the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023.
-
The Sun Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023, at a wavelength of 617 nanometres.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Stars
- Info Created by ESA & NASA/Solar Orbiter/EUI Team, Image processing by Emil Kraaikamp (ROB) - uploaded by Artem.G - nominated by David Osipov -- David Osipov (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose I think some of these pictures are great but I don't see how they represent a valid or complete set. They are just unconnected pictures of the Sun by the same spacecraft, there is no governing theme for how they make sense together and complement each other. You should nominate the best ones separately and let us review them. Cmao20 (talk) 03:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I understand your viewpoint. Let me try to explain a bit better why I see it as a complete set. It's like, when we look at the Sun, we shouldn't just see a bright ball of light. We need to see all its sides, like with a cube, to truly grasp it. The magnetogram, the velocity map, the UV picture—they all reveal a different face of the Sun, helping us understand its power and complexity.
- Looking at the Sun in only one wavelength is like seeing a single face of a Rubik's Cube. Each face shows a different color arrangement, but only by observing all sides do you understand the puzzle's complete pattern. Similarly, different wavelengths reveal unique aspects of the Sun, and only together do they provide a comprehensive view. Showing just one picture is like showing just one square of a cube - it doesn't represent the whole picture.
- I think representing the Sun in its full complexity needs more than just one image. The rules, while important, shouldn't limit our ability to represent complex subjects like the Sun fully. David Osipov (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Invalid set and poor quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment According to the European Space Agency, The PHI images are the highest-resolution full views of the Sun's visible surface to date, including maps of the Sun's messy magnetic field and movement on the surface.(European Space Agency. (2024, November 20). New full Sun views show sunspots, fields and restless plasma.) So I just can't comprehend how you could comment on their poor quality. They are literally the highest-res pics of the Sun to date with 92.16 Megapixels res, composed of a stitched mosaic of 25 pics each, taken with a space quality lenses. --David Osipov (talk) 08:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Stitching issues. And this one also from ESA has 196 Megapixels with stitching issues too. But the main problem here is the set, which does not fit the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Info Hacker news thread on the pics --David Osipov (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 19:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by Олександр Воропаєв - uploaded by Олександр Воропаєв - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Transfiguration Cathedral in Odesa. On July 23, 2023, the cathedral was severely damaged by a Russian missile attack. This is UNESCO World Heritage site in Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sad and high quality, I think it's a bit of a shame that we have the distracting shadowy figure of the second workman in the doorway, but not enough of a drawback not to support. Cmao20 (talk) 03:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Due to its high documentary value, the picture is worthy of promotion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 16:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Corvidae (Crows, Jays and Magpies)
- Info created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful bird, good posture, composition and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Bubulcus
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crazy eye :) --Rbrechko (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 06:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
- Info S-charl, bridge over the fast-flowing mountain stream Clemgia, a tributary of the Inn. The autumn colours are at their peak at S-Charl in Switzerland (altitude 1810 metres).
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Autumn colors make this photo spectacular. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I just love when the European larch take these colors in autumn -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Giles Laurent. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Giles. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 03:37:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great composition but I think the colours are a bit oversaturated Cmao20 (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Somehow. Despite i think sky colors are more fake. But that structure make it pass and Kazakh could be more represented. --Mile (talk) 10:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive, great structure. Probably a bit overprocessed, but when comparing misc. photos from the WWW I get the impression it’s not completely unrealistic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 03:23:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Others
- Info created and uploaded by Radomianin - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the nomination, Екатерина Борисова. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I love this picture, it shows the photographer's talent to see beauty and grace in an ordinary street scene. This is the wow factor for me. The color combination is also wonderful here. Thank you for sharing this little masterpiece. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the appreciation, Екатерина Борисова. The picture was a real snapshot, we were first in a record store and then, as I recall, in a store next door, which we left with the friendly woman in red. During our walk through SF, my camera was always ready for spontaneous snapshots. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background, nothing special. Yann (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support When we want to show people walking on a city street the background will usually be busy; somehow the variety of the city must be included – if the background consists just of windows reflecting the sky or a wall we would not get the feeling that we are in the downtown. The vanishing lines of the row of cars on the left and of the buildings on the right, which converge above the centre of the picture, bring order to the composition; the woman seems to be walking towards this vanishing point, her placement slightly to the left adds tension to the composition. This placement, the bright colours of her clothing and the out-of-focus background make her stand out clearly from the background. For me, this is a good example of an intense, orderly and yet dynamic composition in the middle of the variety of a city centre. – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah I think it's great. The colours, the outfit, the sense of movement, all superb. Good street photography. Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 23:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_snow_sports
- Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop, background isnt so favourable. --Mile (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good sharpness for a pull along shot at that high resolution. --Granada (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sports photo which conveys an excellent impression of the tremendous speed of the ski jump thanks to the successful panning. The background is good, both for the panning (if the photo was taken against snow, the blue sky etc., we would not see the speed) and for the composition: the crossing diagonal lines make the composition interesting. – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing example of the panning technique. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 22:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space_exploration#Space_launch_vehicles
- Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BugWarp (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, for such photos getting the right moment is everything. Or almost everything: I wonder why Bill Ingalls (given that he is/was a professional photographer) did not pay more attention to details, both in the composition (which he could have checked calmly before the start) and in the post-processing (which is done later). We can accept the leaning verticals, but the cropped flowers at the bottom are unsatisfying (either there should be more of them in the frame or they should have been cut off completely), the CAs are obvious and (given the low resolution) quite prominent. And the whole image, which has been underexposed to preserve the highlights, should have been brightened in post-processing. Given the incredible expenditure necessary for space missions, one could expect a bit more care from the photographer, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm pretty sure this specific type of picture is taken remotely. The focal length is 16mm in full frame, it's unlikely a person would be allowed this close to a rocket launch. Chromatic aberration might have been corrected, I agree. I know what you mean about preservation of highlights and underexposure, but I think the key to this picture being "wow" are the dramatic steam clouds. To make them dramatic, you need the darker shadows within them. Even if you correct the levels to enhance the dark foreground with flowers, you might make the vapor cloud less dramatic and therefore the photo less "wow". Of course, it's possible to make a feathered selection of the grass/flowers area and correct it while preserving dramatic vapor, but I'm not sure it's allowed for journalistic type of photos from NASA. Tupungato (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 21:12:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created & uploaded by Anthony's astro - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's of course a beautiful picture at thumbnail but when looking closer at the separation between the sky and land I wonder if the background is real or if it is a photomontage of a sky photographed from another place/angle/time. The file description says the file was taken by putting a camera on a tripod and taking 30sec exposure shots and assembling them, which would mean that the background is supposed to really have been behind that foreground. But the author is the same one than this church picture that was recently delisted for having undeclared photo manipulations (fake background) and having misled votes. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Explicit abstention in line with Giles' analysis and reasoning. Personally, I'm tired of undisclosed manipulations on this forum, just recently I fell for a manipulation in my nomination of someone else's picture, which the author didn't really admit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. We shouldn't promote any more images from this user given the risk that they could be photomontages. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think we have to judge the picture and not the author. If the author shows us the original raw of this image and that he proves that it's not a photomontage, this picture (and other proven real pictures) should still be able to be promoted in my opinion -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also this one by "AstroAnthony" is clearly a fake. There might be many other manipulations by this uploader (I don't want to waste hours examining each with a magnifying glass). It is not worth risking another time-consuming delisting process after potential POTY qualification like the previous case. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, if the author could provide the RAWs I would be happy to reconsider, but I think it's fair to assume that images by this user may be photomontages, particularly if they look 'too good to be true', and to vote accordingly. Cmao20 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too good to be true. --Thi (talk) 15:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 17:02:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created by Otto Domes - uploaded by Otto Domes - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really nice. One of the few instances where black and white really works, because it focusses the eye on shapes and forms. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The moment when an arrangement of everyday tools resembles an artwork; black and white definitely helps here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas --Rbrechko (talk) 12:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful interplay of light and shadow, with good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 12:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question male? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose we are probably spoilt with crispy sharpness and detail of Lepidopteras here, this one is below the bar, the eye is blurry, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco, unfortunately this is not sharp, even though the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, very beautiful and well-composed, but just too soft (maybe the AF missed the focus?). – Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow + unsharp. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 09:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo of a charming timber-framed house in very authentic condition. The storks on the roof are a nice extra and so typical for the Alsace. – Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Stained glass with St. Andrew in Pazzi Chapel. Basilica Santa Croce in Florence, Italy.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 07:32:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
- Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per comments on your previous stained glass nomination I think these images have the contrast and saturation pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. I don't like stained glass done like this. I prefer images like this and this which I feel manage the light conditions a lot better. Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support On the one hand I prefer like Cmao20 more subtle photos of stained-glass windows (see Cmao20’s example links). On the other hand I think I remember that the two stained-glass windows in the Pazzi Chapel have indeed very saturated colours (cf. category), and we have many FPs of stained-glass windows in this more traditional style. There is a good reason for that: photographing stained glass is tricky because of the high contrast, it’s hard to protect both the pastel colours of the highlights and the very dark shadows. When we also consider the difficult circumstances (the window is high on the wall and the Chapel is often a crowded place), I think we can still call this a good and useful reproduction of the window. – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I wouldn't vote for any of the stained glass images in the 'traditional style' either. I did vote for one a bit like this in 2019 but I was very new to Commons then and didn't know much about this type of photography. I would oppose that image now. Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- That’s clear, it’s a very reasonable point of view and in no way I wanted to criticize you. I just wanted to consider the photo from my own (a bit different) point of view, also in order to offer other voters some more aspects from which they can choose when making their own judgment. I always think that some diversity of the evaluations is helpful to ensure a well-balanced discussion and assessment. – Aristeas (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 22:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light + composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support lovely composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very pleasing composition, beautiful contrast between blue hour outside and warm lighting inside. – Aristeas (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas — Rhododendrites talk | 13:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 19:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
- Info Two wood knots which resemble two eyes in the wooden fence at the north side of the plot Lembergerstrasse no. 13, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. All by – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this simple example of pareidolia along with the rich texture of the aged wood. Two fellows have told me that they particularly like this photo, so I’m going to give it a try. What do you think? – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What do I think? Mmmm. It's a knotty problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The eyes look so big that you can imagine the mouth open :) Great example of pareidolia, similar to this sad one from your archive. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support it's really cool how this resembles a pair of eyes. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 17:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
- Info A courtyard and workers’ houses below high factory chimneys in Nikiszowiec, Katowice, Poland. Between 1908 and 1918 Nikiszowiec was built for the workers of a coal mine according to the plans of the architects Emil and Georg Zillmann. Today the neighbourhood is a listed architectural monument. Created and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like very much how this photo illustrates the life in the shadow of tall factory chimneys; this effect is enforced by the contrast of the huge chimneys with the playground equipment in the middle ground, and the subdued light of the evening sun also fits in well with this impression. – Seems that during the Wikimania 2024 in Katowice two of our fellows visited this neighbourhood at the same time; Frank Schulenburg took a very similar photo and it was hard to decide between the two. In the end I have opted for Radomianin’s image because IMHO the portrait (vertical) format and the steep diagonal of the footpath ending in the bottom right corner make the composition more dynamic and emphasize the height of the chimneys better. – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When we went on the photo tour, we were just in time to catch the evening light. Personally, I like the contrast between the houses, the safe haven of the people, which is in complete contrast to the monstrous industrial architecture represented by the chimneys. I also like the lines, including the contrails, which create a kind of convergence. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I went to another of the tours to this place - I wish I had captured the atmosphere there as well as Radomianin did! --Kritzolina (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 09:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 11:00:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Aegithalidae (Long-tailed Tits)
- Info created by Jerzy Strzelecki - uploaded by Jerzy Strzelecki - nominated by Jerzystrzelecki -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Although I'm not sure if everything possible has been done with the denoising, I think this is a great photo! --Superbass (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely not, Superbass, I gave it a try, see here, I think that there is room for improvement here. Jerzystrzelecki you are free to offer this version as an alternative or upload it over your version if you like, whatever you like (or do nothing, that's also fine with me). --Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For now, we need here some kind of improvement, you are of course also welcome to reprocess it on your own. Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Really lovely, excellent posture and composition. But I agree with Poco a poco that the processing should be improved. A new processing from the raw image file (an ARW file in your case) would be the perfect solution (I could help you with this if you want – I have used the same camera and use the same lens). But Poco a Poco’s version (thanks!) is already a solid improvement and even ready for use for you, so it would be the easiest solution. – Aristeas (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Will support Poco's version, but not this one. Cmao20 (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 08:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus
- Info White-tailed eagle at the Bavarian Hunting Falconry Center in Tambach Castle Wildlife Park during the birds of prey flight demonstration. All by me. -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good light and subject in action perfectly frozen at high speed -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support It looks worse in thumbnail, but it is really well done. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 07:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class : Ostracoda (Ostracods)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting, and detailed information provided. --Yann (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
- Info Reformed earth church in Scuol. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-built church in imposing landscape, solid quality. – Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a white spot left of the tower --Llez (talk) 09:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support As for me it would be nice to have a little bit more space at the bottom, but anyway I like this photo. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) - Indian Wanderer Female (Right) & Male(Left) (2) WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, focus on both, and smooth homogeneous background -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Top Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp, very elegant, congrats! – Aristeas (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 01:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info Nice landscape with cool wispy clouds from an underrepresented part of the world at FPC. created by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - uploaded by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- I love these landscapes.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice contrast between the greenery and the snow. --Yann (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support splendid landscape; K is so beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Salvia and Celosia in the flower garden of the Tumuli Park at sunset in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 22:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual and sensitive composition. Great work. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Gacela de Thomson (Eudorcas thomsonii), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-23, DD 11.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 21:23:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Named after British explorer Joseph Thomson, this is the most common type of gazelle in East Africa with numbers over 200,000. It's claimed to have top speeds up to 80–90 km/h (50–55 mph), making it the fourth-fastest land animal, after the cheetah (its main predator), pronghorn, and springbok. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be more centered for my taste but good quality.--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If this was my nomination, it would have been opposed as being undercategorized. Better add Category:Eudorcas thomsonii (male)! Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of votes are just a provocation, Charles, don't bother. There is also an oppose in my second nom and I'm not really sure why. Btw, PierreSelim took care of the cat, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo of this elegant creature. – Aristeas (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Personally, I find this positioning according to the rule of thirds better than a centered solution. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The head is where it is but the body is in the center. I would call this a (successful) centered composition, with moderate lead room and margins equal to a third approximately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the further review regarding the lead room. I'm curious, would the diagonal method work here? -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure Poco holds a lot of secrets :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you may be disappointed. I know the theory but I have to say that at the end of the day I played around with the crop and chose this one because it dwas the most pleasant to me. It doesn't fullfil the rule of 2/3 or the diagonal method, though. Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent capture of an animal in the wild, with uniform background. Looking at viewer -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 20:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Man dressed as the pagan god Veles at the traditional Rękawka festival in Kraków. All by me -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm captivated by this unusual portrait. If you compare it to similar ones from the series in the category, it really is the best. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing mask portrait in good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 19:46:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info Abandoned Ford E-Series van by Gerritsen Creek in Brooklyn, New York. I like the mix between urban waste and nature at the edge of a city. I was torn which to nominate, this one or this wider view that includes a glimpse of Manhattan, but I think making the van the subject probably works best. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting branches. This derelict vehicle with graffiti has its own charm, but as FP, the unbalanced tight crop at the right, cluttered by branches interfering with the composition in the foreground, make the viewpoint awkward, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Basile Morin, sorry but I do think the branches are distracting, great subject but unsure about composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Before nominating, I uploaded a version with the branches removed, but wound up reverting as it seemed like a bit much. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For me, this is an interesting image that I would support without the branches. I took the liberty and created a proposal from the revision at 19:35 on 25 November 2024. Please see the SwissTransfer link. Modifications made: fixed retouching remnants on the top right. From the left side I cropped 300 px and made a slight level adjustment to give the sky a bit more weight. This is just a suggestion that you are welcome to use for an update if the result is acceptable for you and the community. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info This is the retouched version, with branches on the right removed, as edited by Radomianin (thanks!). I uploaded it as a separate file to allow for an alternative. Pinging other voters so far: @Basile Morin and Cmao20: — Rhododendrites talk | 14:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The image not only conveys the problem of environmental pollution, it also has an "apocalyptic aftertaste". Thank you for the alternative upload, I personally find this crop the most appealing. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support this one is much better. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support IMHO this one works perfectly. – Aristeas (talk) 11:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by Greg Henshall/FEMA, uploaded by Consequentially, nominated by Yann
- Info Greensburg, Kansas, USA, May 16, 2007. The center of town twelve days after it was hit by an F5 tornado with 200 mph (approx. 321 km/h) winds.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Someone has leant on the 'clarity' slider, sadly. I am unsure whether historical value/irreplaceability outweighs the poor photo editing. Cmao20 (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain I would even accept the clarity filtering (HDR-ization), but the whole image is somewhat greenish-yellowish tinted. After adjusting white balance, it might be good. --Tupungato (talk) 12:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Tupungato: This image can't be changed, as it is going to be featured on the English Wikipedia, but I could propose an alternative. Yann (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen
- Info Quite a common bird these days in Europe. FPs of an adult's head and of a chick. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as long as not sufficiently COM:CAT'egorized --A.Savin 16:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't you just let the one do it whose job it actually is? --A.Savin 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain the reason for the continued oppose vote A.Savin. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das behalte ich mir bei falscher und/oder unvollständiger Kategorisierung Ihrerseits auch weiter ausdrücklich vor. --A.Savin 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Google translate says this means I reserve the right to do so in the event of incorrect and/or incomplete categorization on your part. But I have no idea what is wrong now. Can ANYBODY help please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das behalte ich mir bei falscher und/oder unvollständiger Kategorisierung Ihrerseits auch weiter ausdrücklich vor. --A.Savin 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain the reason for the continued oppose vote A.Savin. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't you just let the one do it whose job it actually is? --A.Savin 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
And what is wrong?Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- Support What a lovely composition. I would also like to know what is wrong with the categories as this might help me in future nominations, it isn't clear to me what is wrong with this at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 01:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and composition. Category Ducklings added. Interesting mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping. I have replaced ducklings (=ducks; not geese) with another category. It is worth noting that the category structure of this species uses the word feral which is incorrect. Most of these geese are wild from introduced birds and are not feral. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your update and sorry for my confusion. It's the idea of "juvenile" that I wanted to introduce and I was also thinking that you would easily find the relevant subcategory. But it's a different branch and you're more than expert :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and charming family photo. – Aristeas (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Would the castle and reflection be more interesting than the foreground grass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks interesting for me, otherwise I wouldn't have nomitated this photo. But I can be wrong because it's always difficult to evaluate own work. --Rbrechko (talk) 10:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I actually really like the contrast provided by the foreground. It could be a little sharper but still very good IMO Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasant light and colors. The background only would also make a beautiful picture, horizontally -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Wooden hut fence mountains and blue sky in the green rice fields of Vang Vieng in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. Tiny isolated hut in a green environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Bukchon-ro 11-gil street with hanok houses at blue hour in Bukchon Hanok Village Seoul.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South Korea
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting but lacking that special thing to make it extraordinary IMHO --Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. It's a pretty street surrounded by authentic hanok houses in Seoul, and I was lucky that evening to find it deserted after a sunny day -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support To be honest I know what Poco means. I don't much like the fact that the road has been tarmacced over. Nevertheless, interesting enough for FP and nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 22:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, great colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition with vanishing point and nice lights at an appealing time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 21:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info Landscape in the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve in the Zakarpattia Oblast. One of my favorites from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Estolyarov - nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great landscape panorama in which, in my opinion, everything is somehow coherent and doesn't need any big words. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Foreground and background are in focus due to the very wide depth of field. Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing much to complain about. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous — Rhododendrites talk | 20:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful highland landscape with excellent light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support very nice! --PierreSelim (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Burg Thurant im Morgennebel.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 11:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info created by Rolf Kranz - uploaded by Rolf Kranz - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mystical foggy atmosphere, good candidate and deserved 4th place at WLM. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m happy to see that the creator has improved the post-processing of his photos. While some of his WLM photos in the last years suffered from unfortunate post-processing, e.g. strong oversharpening, this photo has been handled with care and taste. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Червоний корпус на заході сонця.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - uploaded by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking red facade and pink combination with the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful atmospheric light and sky. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's lovely Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Happy end :-) I checked the restoration work and find it well handled, given the difficulty.
- Photographically the focus is wrong (and the crop tight at the left), it's a shame, but this image has its own story (and yes, also own article on en-wiki). It has become an iconic photograph. We should take this into account.
- Finally, a reminder about the voting process. COM:FPC: The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations... -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral
{{s}}--Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)- I change my position since no answer has arrived to the questions below. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. Surprised this is still picking up support votes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What are these red and green stripes? The picture also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Finally no, per others. Yann (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with the reviewers that the image looks relatively colorful compared to other images of the Milky Way. So far I have no experience with this kind of photography. But as I remember from the weather reports, there were some unusual aurora observations in Germany in August this year. Maybe that influenced this photo, but I'm just guessing. @Zwiebackgesicht: I took the liberty of creating a version with less saturation, a little less noise, and more sharpening. I also applied the sRGB color profile to ensure a consistent display on most monitors. The file was saved in the slowest mode, which reduced the file size by 20 MB while maintaining the same quality. Please see the SwissTransfer link 1/2. This is just a suggestion to be helpful, if this version is an improvement for the community and for you, please feel free to use it for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is certainly a lot better, but I don't know how much of the colours here are trustworthy. It's hard to know how far the original manipulations went and thus how far they should be reversed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The contrast is still completely exagerated and inaccurate and the colors are still not real, you never get colors like that with a picture of the milky way -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to Cmao20 and Giles for your evaluations. It is difficult to adjust saturation and level values based on guesswork when the original file is not available. But I didn't want to leave it untried. I created a second version in which I reduced the brightness, contrast and saturation values significantly: SwissTransfer link 2/2. There are still a few days left until the end of the nomination period and I'm still hoping that the author will respond with his personal feedback. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The green and red colors in the sky still come out of nowhere and don't exist in reality. There's also many blue weird zones in the black zones that look like it was painted (I think they are remains of the painting brush used to darken the sky). The whites also seem a bit too illuminated. And also the black part of the sky is underexposed in my opinion (but underexposed because of the way it was edited by painting it darker and not by the way of taking the photo). I think the image has to be reworked from raw because the way it was edited to make everything else than the milky way much darker probably caused details to be lost there -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your insightful remarks, Giles. You're right, without the raw file we can't make any progress here. It's a pity that the author/nominator hasn't responded yet. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if improvements can be made in this case, I think working from the RAW file would be better. At least to see from where we start -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Giles –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dark but very nice IMHO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support After some reflection and thought, I agree with Giles' evaluation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of detail too low in the dark areas, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportIt could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huh, the version since the edits you've made appears way sharper to me. Strange that. Great candidate now Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNeutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent viewpoint but the lighting still kinda spoils it. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. --Harlock81 (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
- Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
- Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Crop is strange.--Mile (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Can you suggest an improvement please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. Its not 1st time you put almost in the middle. Negative space should be in relation with subject. --Mile (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks; I've adopted your suggestion Mile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think its better than before. --Mile (talk) 09:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)