Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 September 2024
8 September 2024
Deletion requests on 7 September 2024

September 7

[edit]

Chaos Space Marine toys

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request - Per COM:TOYS -Di (they-them) (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the photos should not be removed because the toys shown in the images were specifically designed with the intention that users would paint, photograph, and share the results of their artistic work. The manufacturer of the figures actively encourages sharing adaptations of their models and does not oppose the public display of their photos on the Internet. While the removal of these photos may be motivated by good intentions, it seems to me to be a hasty and unnecessary action in this particular case. Krzem Anonim (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We've had cases like these multiple times, very many photographs of Warhammer toys have been deleted from Commons after many discussions. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but Games Workshop (GW) itself, on its website in the Terms & Conditions of Use section, states in point 2 that "GW grants the user (“you”) the non-exclusive right to use the Authorised Intellectual Property for broadcasting, publishing and other media-related activities, such as news articles, press releases, commentary and opinion pieces, blogs, product announcements, and other similar informational and descriptive purposes, in printed or electronic form." In light of this declaration, I believe that removing photos just because they fall under the definition of toys is an unnecessary depletion of Wikimedia Commons' resources. This decision seems to be driven by the desire to comply with the law, but in a situation where no one would feel wronged, as the manufacturer itself clearly allows the publishing of content related to their products. Krzem Anonim (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has already been discussed. The community consensus is that Commons cannot host photos of Games Workshop toys. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Warhammer 40,000 and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:GamesWorkshop. It's also important to note that the message you quoted says non-exclusive right and does not make any mention of commercial use. If GW really wanted people to use their property for commercial purposes, they would have no issue with, say, bootleg minis or other derivative works. This is not the case as GW is quite litigious, they once sued an author for using the words "Space Marine" in a book title even though it wasn't even about WH40K. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skibidi Toilet.svg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative Work of copyrighted Skibidi Toilet Material. Di (they-them) (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It resembles this image. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This illustration depicts a head coming out of a toilet, which is a generic and non-copyrightable concept. Specific executions of ideas can be copyrighted, but the concept itself cannot. This illustration is not derivative of any specific screenshot or work. See COM:FANART. There is no copyright in an allusion, a name, or a commonplace pre-existing element (IE, heads and toilets). Di (they-them) (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the head resembles the most common head in the videos. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Facial features are not copyrightable. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thus can the likenesses of Fictional Characters, like Solid Snake and Lara Croft be copyrightable? The face of this toilet clearly resembles a face from the Garry's Mod game, which is obviously copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is your argument now? You are obviously not familiar with copyright assesments at all in most of your deletion nominations. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since the likenesses of photorealistic characters like Lara Croft and Solid Snake are the result of creative effort by the developers, I think they can be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, this head doesn't actually resemble any pre-existing skibidi toilet other than the basic idea. So  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, facial features are not copyrightable, as I said. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is reaction to Grandmaster Huon. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per the above eloquent explanation. --RAN (talk) 17:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, withdrawn by the person who tagged it as copyvio (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sacco and Vanzetti mural at Syracuse University (Ben Shahn).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Prime Minister, Billy Hughes and Neville Chamberlain future prime minister of The United Kingdom.jpg

[edit]

Watermark credit "MyHeritage", unlikely to be uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We need paired examples of the MyHeritage software output at various times, you can see how it has already improved since V1.0 first implemented. Same with other AI retouched imagery, we need Dall-E V1 onward. --RAN (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Universiti Malaya Horizontal Color.png

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please state what website that contain this same picture. This horizontal logo was obtained officially from UM 2024 official brand toolkit and the author is owned by the university which already stated in the details during upload. MikeRoffe143 (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of where it is taken from, it is still copyrighted. The brand toolkit seems to have limited access which should not be assumed that it is free to use to public. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 00:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PD-Malaysia has been added. 2001:E68:544E:82F6:4DCC:7509:7AB5:635B 03:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to w:University of Malaya, in among the joint authors, last death was w:Ungku Abdul Aziz in year of 2020. The symbol shall only enter public domain at year of 2070. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Universiti Malaya (UM).png

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Malaysia has been added. 2001:E68:544E:82F6:4DCC:7509:7AB5:635B 03:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya (UM).png

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya (UM).jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya (UM).jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Walter Scheel (Order of the Seraphim).svg

[edit]

Same problem as here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of Walter Scheel (Order of Isabella the Catholic).svg GerritR (talk) 08:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UM Faculty of Medicine.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 10:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nalgonda map.jpg

[edit]

Andhra Pradesh Government website images are copyrighted Arjunaraoc (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made another version to replace the file if deleted: File:Nalgonda mandals pre 2016 numbers.png. It is based on another old map and the issue is that all the old maps may originally come from the same source. --MGA73 (talk) 08:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. While the archived website does have a copyright notice, this seems at odds with Indian law as described at {{GODL-India}}. There are US Federal Government Flickr streams which claim "all rights reserved" on their work, but we still treat them as public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Завод минеральных вод «Истису» 2 сентября 2024.jpg

[edit]

Higher quality version of the original file already exists at File:İlham Əliyev və birinci xanım Mehriban Əliyeva Kəlbəcərdə “İstisu” mineral su zavodunun açılışında iştirak ediblər (3).jpg — Golden talk 11:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't the higher quality version. It's the same file from the same source. Moreover, it was posted later than mine. Instead of adding description to my file in azeri user made nomination to deletion. Xcite (talk) 05:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK-Cabinet-Office-logo.png

[edit]

OGL does not applicable for logos, but it is protected by Crown copyright. The way of Changpian (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Logos of governments and government agencies of Taiwan

[edit]

Logos are not covered under {{PD-ROC-exempt}} or {{GWOIA}}. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:台北通TaipeiPASS.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in Taiwan. Also Taiwan's TOO is relatively low, Simple logos including calligraphy are protected by copyrights.

Wcam (talk) 13:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 2021 version of the emblem of Control Yuan and the seal of Legislative Yuan could be simple enough to be covered under {{PD-textlogo}}. Both of which don't have calligraphy included either. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 00:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept the two mentioned by Eric Liu, agree these are below TOO of Taiwan. --Ellywa (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Logos of governments and government agencies of Taiwan

[edit]

Non-free logos, per previous DR.

Larryasou (talk) 04:09, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Logos of governments and government agencies of Taiwan

[edit]

These images claim {{GWOIA}} or {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. However, as per communications from the Taiwanese government:

  • {{GWOIA}} does not apply to administration's logos (source), and
  • {{PD-ROC-exempt}} only applies to symbols or emblems that are formulated according to law (source), in which case the particular law that substantiates this claim must be specified.

These images do not meet these conditions.

Wcam (talk) 11:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Badge of the Coast Guard Administration of the Republic of China (2).jpg and File:Badge of the Coast Guard Administration of the Republic of China.jpg : The source and legal basise of the files have been updated to meet the requirements of {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. --人人生來平等 TALK 15:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:شعار مسابقة المحتوى المغربي على ويكيبيديا 2.png

[edit]

repeater Mounir Neddi (talk) 12:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Nordfriesland P8200138.JPG

[edit]

Abbildung eines Kunstwerks (Schnitzarbeit), demnach urheberrechtlich geschützt - derivative work GerritR (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Men cameltoe mooseknuckle spandex men.JPG

[edit]

duplicates of File:Wiki man cameltoe.jpg GiovanniPen (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki man cameltoe.jpg

[edit]

duplicate of File:Men cameltoe mooseknuckle spandex men.JPG GiovanniPen (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Pashalik of Yanina.webp

[edit]

Fictional flag taken from [1], as such under copyright by the creator of this design. Constantine ✍ 12:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Election posters of the Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands in North Rhine-Westphalia state election 2017

[edit]

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Election posters of the Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands in Saxony state election 2014

[edit]

Election posters are most likely not covered unter COM:FOP#Germany, as they are not permanently displayed in public places, only for the limited time frame around an election. A German High court case got a ruling against the application of the FoP in the substantially comparable case of the Wrapped Reichstag (Bundesgerichtshof, 2002, cf. Verhüllter Reichstag#Bildrechte). At least photographs of people or depictions of concise objects are best seen as copyrighted (precautionay principle). Furthermore, there is already a precedent set in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021, several files got deleted on a similar rationale in 2022.

Grand-Duc (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: all 5 CDU Saxony posters were uploaded by User:CDU Sachsen (verified account, see user page). 2003:E5:373C:E800:4C8B:A3F9:B467:C79C 23:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:V-Mann Joe Demotape Cover.webp

[edit]

possible copyvio - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBS Kids Go! logo.png

[edit]

I believe this logo is both beyond the threshold of originality and copyrighted by PBS. William Graham (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See previous deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS Kids Go! logo (2022).png. William Graham (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Clearly below US threshold of originality. The previous rationale was not about threshold, but about it allegedly being a hoax. As the image is currently in use, that scope rationale is moot. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Qraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very unlikely their own work.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yagi 2024 09 05 peak.jpg

[edit]

Missing valid source, very unlikely to be author's own work. Zzzs (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: NASA NAOAA image. --RAN (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the author, not the source. Looking at this image, it does not appear to be something that NASA nor NOAA would take since the colours don't match what the NASA's satellites (Terra, Aqua) and the NOAA satellites (NOAA-20, Suomi NPP) take and the GOES satellites do not operate in the area Yagi was at the time the picture was taken. This is likely a work from Himawari, but the source is still unknown. My best guess for the source would be ZOOM since the colours and resolution match. If that's the case, the image is copyrighted and should be deleted.
    TL:DR; not a NASA/NOAA image and likely a copyright violation. Zzzs (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:جامعة القصيم.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سامان فلاح.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files under Category:Noto-Satoyama Kaido

[edit]

per COM:DW Yasu (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preistraeger692 v-ardgalerie.jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio https://www.deutscher-radiopreis.de/radiopreis/verleihung_2024/preistraeger/Bester-Moderatorin-Gianluca-Meli-von-988-KISS-FM,bestemoderation104.html - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC5440 - Flickr - dconvertini.jpg

[edit]

This image from the City of Westminster, which has never even been properly categorised, is not fit for Wikipedia purposes. Obviously an uncontrolled bot upload. Xocolatl (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope Francis arrives at GBK for Holy mass.jpg

[edit]

Wrong upload, this img is a copy of File:Pope Francis last greeting to President Jokowi.jpg. Description and caption also wrong. Intended to upload another one. Kaliper1 (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vassily Kandinsky, 1908 - Eastern suite (Arabs III).jpg

[edit]

mirrored and low resolution version of File:V. Kandinski. East suites. Arabs III.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El salvador 1861.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by PizzaKing13 as Copyvio (Copyright) and the most recent rationale was: violation|1=COM:NETCOPYRIGHT, false own work claim, from twitter/blogspot, no proof of painting in PD

Converting to DR since the painting's copyright is the only relevant one here. Abzeronow (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demo. Calixte.jpg

[edit]

Own work. Darwin took this picture 50-60 years ago. 186.172.55.218 18:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AlexLeeCN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The tag used is {{PD-PRC-exempt}} and it is not clear to me that will cover the National Athem as it is a piece of music,not a law or judicial resolution. Also the National Anthem Law seems to forbid derivative works [2]: «There will be punishment for deliberately altering the lyrics or music of the national anthem, ...». Also the footer from the source states «All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to www.gov.cn.. Without written authorization from www.gov.cn, such content shall not be republished or used in any form.» (or course it is only applicable if the tag doesn't apply.)

Günther Frager (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(1). The release (Chinese ver.) shall be considered as delegated legislation, which will become a part of National Anthem Law . According to National Anthem Law Article 10 Subparagraph 4 "The department determined by the State Council shall organize the examination, determination and makingof the standard musical notation of the national anthem and the official recording of the national anthem, and release them on the website of the National People's Congress and the website of the Chinese Central Government", while release press has stated, "According to the National Anthem Law". Hence, the musical notation and recording are released under the law.
This relevance could be verified by the press conference, the official stated：”由于演奏曲谱的类型比较多，...，其中有的曲谱篇幅比较长，把它们都作为法律附件不现实，所以国歌法第十条规定...“ ("Since there are many types of performance scores... Some of them are so long that it's impractical to annex them all to the law, so Article 10 of the National Anthem Law states... ") . It's clear that the musical notation has the same legal effect as the annex of the law, the only difference is this time is it is delegated to the government, not the congress.
(2). Article 10 (Where the national anthem is played and sung on the occasions prescribed in Article 4 of this Law, the standard musical notation of the national anthem or the official recording of the national anthem shall be used) has stated the musical notation has legal effect and are accordant with the Copyright Law Article 5 (laws...documents of legislative, administrative or judicial nature).
(3). The limitation of usage is definitely a Non-copyright restrictions. Violating it (insulting the anthem) will only bring criminal or administrative responsibility, and is not considered relevant to the freedom usageor copyright. (BTW, from my personal view, the Chinese word 篡改 should not translate to alter. Tampering is more accurate.)
(4). The footer of the copyright statement is more like a general declaration and can be reversed with other evidence, otherwise the Constitution may be copyrightable. Best regard. --AlexLeeCN (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princeton - panoramio (54).jpg

[edit]

Depicted sculpture is likely recent and still in copyright (Henry Moore died in 1986). Unfortunately, the US has no freedom-of-panorama exception for non-buildings. So, a permission by the sculptor is required or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar problem with File:Princeton - panoramio (77).jpg (artist died in 1973).


Also:

Template:Element

[edit]

Superceded by the Wikidata Infobox. Mike Peel (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Logos

[edit]

leaf may be above TOO.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fanta logo (2018).png

[edit]

per this Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:中國時報 B-2603.jpg

[edit]

Not PD-Taiwan or PD-US. No evidence the creator has been dead 50 years. This looks like a scan of a newspaper image, which is not properly credited. It was likely copyrighted by the photographer and the newspaper. It's doubtful the deadlink source was the original publisher. Not PD in US. Licensing template in use requires a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Dual Freq (talk) 21:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo IU-LVCA.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. This is an appeal from the uploader. The logo and other variations thereof have been authorised in Commons for years without any claims, therefore putting the ability to claim them ineligible in doubt. Fer1997 (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, It looks like a smiling sun to me. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, as it is considered a variation of said logo and therefore eligible. A whole Commons category has been created for those logos. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo LCR.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal from the uploader. No claims to copyright apply to this logo, which is not registered in the applicable registry for tradermarks (Spain). It is the symbol of a defunct organisation. I believe it is therefore under the threshold of the applicable template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then change the template to reflect it, it is not a simple geometry, it is a complex interpretation of sickle and hammer. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, no-one owns the copyright anymore? What about the person who designed the logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Partido Socialista Argentina (full).svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The eligibility of this logo was discussed and settled a few years ago and it was deemed eligible. I therefore believe the logo to be under the threshold of the template and therefore not eligible for speedy deletion. Fer1997 (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the hand with the flower may not have been copyrightable, but the rose pattern to the right might be. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I personally think both the rose and the hand are too complex for pd-textlogo, but the rose is a derivative of File:Logo Partido Socialista Argentina.png, which is under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Glossar

[edit]

German language page without content, only complaining about the Editor's index being in English Prototyperspective (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly didn't intend it as a complaint. I'm a native English-speaker. I simply wanted to point anyone who looked for a German glossary to get something useful: a link to Commons' English-language glossary, and a link to the de-wiki glossary, which overlaps significantly with the vocabulary needed for Commons.
FWIW, I think it would be great if someone did a German-language glossary for Commons (my German is not strong enough), but I think the current page aims anyone looking for that in the two most useful existing directions.
That said, if you really think it is a liability rather than an asset, feel free to delete it. - Jmabel ! talk 22:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, I think that should be in the Commons:Editor's index to Commons/de page and this page could redirect to it. The glossary would via the <languages/> template. I think it's more a burden because it's not clear what it's about or that it's German-language in the two categories it's contained in. Maybe somebody else has some more info about what is best done for such cases. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblema de Unión Republicana.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any proof of your claims? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should add sourcing for source of your reproduction, and thats it. Other is obvious. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the necessary info and I have changed the licenses in order to secure compliance. Do not hesitate to indicated any other actions to be taken. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes this is good, but I am not sure about uploading those originals itself rather than links to the sources. But this file should be okay anyways. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblema del Partido Republicano Radical Socialista.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. In addition to this, a previous challenge to the eligibility of another version of this logo was settled favourably. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File should contain more information about Vector creation and source from which you created it, but as it is your reproduction of 90 years old emblemics, it should be OK and not adequate for deletion. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do we change the template to reflect this? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how this goes in terms of Spanish Copyright law. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do not change the template. We can add PD-tag for the intelectual value, but its not necessary. Primary is to include source from which Fer1997 created his reproduction and dating. If you don't know how goes copyright law you should not be nominating for deletion at all. ThecentreCZ (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Caja Rural.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo are simple enough for it to be eligible under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not adequate for deletion. PD-text and shapes. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete What? This is a complex depiction of wheat. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore I think it has "uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability" that grants it protection under COM:TOO Spain. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe the matter to be as clear as it seems. The case mentioned as reference for TOO compliance only alludes to academic legal doctrine, not to actual case law; they do not have the same value under Spanish law. There is no reference to logo design in the actual case analysed. It is not evident, from its content, what the threshold should be, and the consensus is the interpretation is ample enough for this and other logos to be eligible for PD-textlogo, PD-shape and eventually PD-trademarked protection. Therefore, I advocate we  Keep the logo. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo PSOE 2023.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. All claims of inegibility of this logo have been settled in the past as the characteristics of the logo exempt it from any copyright claims. Special care has been taken to ensure compliance with said ruling. It is therefore fully eligible under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that is above TOO is the hand with the flower, which is already public domain, so  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should not have started nomination of file already discussed in the first place. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo PSOE 1998.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo ensure it is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete complex flower shape. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep As the matter is not clear under Spanish law or legal precedent thereof and there is no trademark claim to it, I advise we  Keep the file. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When matters are unclear, the precautionary principle used on this site dictates that the file in question be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Símbolo da União Democrática Nacional.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. Not only is this logo a full reproduction as no originals exist uploadable as such, but there are no copyright claims applicable for the logo; it is not registered in the applicable trademark registry; and it belongs to a defunct political organisation with no official successor in its country. Therefore, the logo is eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof of your claim? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The organisation was dissolved by Institutional Instrument No. 2 on 27 October 1965. This meant that its legal entity was dissolved and no successor even existed which could claim the rights of the UDN. All members of the party either joined the new government-approved ARENA party or other underground organisations. In addition to this, given that almost 60 years have passed and that there is no clear legal consensus on the matter, I believe we should  Keep the file. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Web links to reliable sources for this statement? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article 18 of the Institutional Act proclaims the extinction of all existing political parties and the cancellation of their registries, which is equivalent to the extinction of their legal entity. The text is available both at the Planalto website and at Wikisource. --Fer1997 (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense,  I withdraw my nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SPD Party Congress 2019 Logo.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo make it eligible for protection under the selected template. Fer1997 (talk) 22:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the flower on the left is a complex shape. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo ONCE.svg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion by Grandmaster Huon. Appeal by the uploader. The characteristics of the logo make it eligible for PD-textlogo protection. Fer1997 (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What characteristics? This seems like a complex stick figure. It's not mere simple shapes. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The shapes are simple enough to be under the TOO in the terms of current Spanish law and case law. Provided that the current state of legal regulation and precedent is not clear enough and that the consensus is for a permissive interpretation of those terms, I argue we  Keep this and other logos as they can be deemed eligible for PD-textlogo, PD-shape and eventually PD-trademarked protection. --Fer1997 (talk) 08:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conference of Vostitsa Stamp.jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio © Kostas Klouvatos - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uvalde school surveillance.png

[edit]

Camera tracked Ramos as he came in, automatically failing PD-AUTOMATED, the license given. There is no proof that this tracking wasn't human-controlled. -Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 07:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just out of curiosity, would the rest of the video still fall under PD-AUTOMATED? The tracking only lasts for a couple seconds, and the footage before and after the tracking period has no camera movement. If so, we could simply replace this photo with a screen grab from before the tracking, depicting the shooter entering the building, or after the tracking, depicting the police response. ARandomName123 (talk) 19:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/09/07&oldid=945710125"