Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/07
October 7
[edit]Contenido irrelevante -ifrasombiIfrasombi (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Carece de relevancia, el escudo está desactualizado -ifrasombi-Ifrasombi (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Outdated" is no reason for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:اسم علي عليه السلام.png. Unused and out of scope.
- File:(ﷺ)Name of Mohamed.png
- File:Name of Abo Lu'lu'a Ra.png
- File:محمد الباقر-Mohamed Al Baker.png
- File:موسى الكاظم (ع).png
Jonteemil (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a 1940s American photograph. Photo is likely public domain by formalities, but an actual source for this would be very helpful. Abzeronow (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment haven't done full research yet, but this is a photo of a screen. Not relevant for copyright, since it's the original that matters, but odd. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Violation Elvisisalive95 (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep I can't see anything that indicates this is not own work. Not studio quality, can't find anything elsewhere on the internet, and the uploader has a history of legitimate contribution. What makes you think it's a copyvio? PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I personally meet Brett in Springfield TN, and had a picture taken with her. This is a cropped picture from my personal gallery. GatewayPolitics (talk) 07:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I'll reconsider once proof of it being a copyright violation is provided. Kaasterly (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%AE%BF%E8%BF%81%E9%A1%B9%E7%8E%8B%E6%95%85%E9%87%8C%E8%8B%B1%E9%A3%8E%E9%98%81(2).png CHEN HEBING (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%AE%BF%E8%BF%81%E9%A1%B9%E7%8E%8B%E6%95%85%E9%87%8C%E8%8B%B1%E9%A3%8E%E9%98%81(2).png CHEN HEBING (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I object to speedy deletion and recommend to keep this logo, as it is not promotiional per se, and has been changed since then, as shown on https://www.segurossucre.fin.ec/historia/ - atthough it was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- NearEMPTiness, what's notable about the logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep indeed. I am just objecting to another user's unsubstantiated request for speedy deletion, while I am assuming good faith, because he uploaded excellent photos himself. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's great that he uploaded excellent photos, but Commons doesn't host random logos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Lack of notability" or "randomness" are no reasons for speedy deletion, and this logo has nothing to do with "rationale G10" which "includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services when it is clearly not useful for any educational purpose." @Nv8200pa: could you elaborate, please, the reason for requesting deletion of this particular logo. Do you think it hides the fact that the company appears to be in liquidation? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is a deletion request, not a speedy deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a logo is inherent advertising and self-promotion. The logo is not used in a Wikimedia project. The one-word description does not provide context by which the image can be understood. In my opinion, it is not useful for any educational purpose. Nv8200p (talk) 11:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Lack of notability" or "randomness" are no reasons for speedy deletion, and this logo has nothing to do with "rationale G10" which "includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services when it is clearly not useful for any educational purpose." @Nv8200pa: could you elaborate, please, the reason for requesting deletion of this particular logo. Do you think it hides the fact that the company appears to be in liquidation? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep indeed. I am just objecting to another user's unsubstantiated request for speedy deletion, while I am assuming good faith, because he uploaded excellent photos himself. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment This was a cross-wiki upload from eswiki, but on that date the uploader only edited Anexo:Patrocinios_de_Puma and Historia_del_uniforme_del_Barcelona_Sporting_Club (there are no deleted revisions from that date). Probably intended for es:Historia_del_uniforme_del_Barcelona_Sporting_Club but it was not used. Platonides (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Mistakenly upoaded reaster duplicate of the same vector image: File:Leocad-logo-normal.svg Appsoft4 (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Also: File:Kontrollshild Kanton Waadt.png
Not sure if this is real. Can the first digit be 0?
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
May be copyrighted TV screenshot Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE and not a chance for it to be over COM:TOO Brazil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
not a selfie as is claimed as the uplaoder is the lead singer of the band and is portrayed in this non free picture which has no photographer given and is copied from https://www.facebook.com/vivianveronique/?locale=nl_NL Hoyanova (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
accidental duplicate upload of file found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AM068.pdf&page=14 Gowhk8 (talk) 06:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Each person's face is clearly visible.
- (Delete old file) Old version needs to delete, but new version do not have any problem. Please delete old version.--Krorokeroro (talk) 06:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
not webhost — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
not webhost, source? (watermark) — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
not webhost — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Currently in use on uk:Користувач:Михайло Шевелюк, so therefore this image can be considered in COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't look like this photo was taken by Михайло Шевелюк, since she is in the photo and it doesn't look like he took a photo with a self-timer. Venzz (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Todonite as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: F1
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:UTIL object - not copyrightable. Not a photograph, so it dosen't matter if the image was made by the uploader or not. see also COM:TOO South Korea, which states "Work" refers to a creation that expresses human thoughts or feelings - not the case here. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Personal picture, useless for educational purposes Superspritz (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could be useful. Keep unless there are copyright issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
The Bulgarian Rise's logo is protected by copyright and should not be uploaded here as it is non-free logo. VilianEst2007 (talk) 07:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyrighted text. Does this letter of greetings pass the threshold of originality or not? If yes, then this is not OK to be hosted here. If no, then it can be dismissed as {{PD-text}}. But my hunch suggests it is not a text of pure facts, original information, or plain data. It is a letter that has a carefully-written prose that warrants automatic protection by its writer. COM:Derivative work issue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- May I kindly ask a one day, for I intend to visit the clinic hospital of Dr. Charlotte Chiong, regarding the photos, she may enlighten Commons or Wikipedia on this matter; if there is a doubt on the matter, I intend to use the option in my talk page - Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy reason here For more inform thank you very sincerely Valenzuela400 (talk) 08:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC).
- @Valenzuela400 if an uploader's own image already exists for some time now, like this case (since August 29, 2024, more than a month), then it is no longer eligible for speedy deletion even with the rationale (uploader's own request). You must wait for the closing administrator to decide. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Same issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charlotte Martinez Chiong6.jpg: derivative work of a letter that may possibly be under writer's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- May I kindly ask a one day, for I intend to visit the clinic hospital of Dr. Charlotte Chiong, regarding the photos, she may enlighten Commons or Wikipedia on this matter; if there is a doubt on the matter, I intend to use the option in my talk page - Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy reason here For more inform thank you very sincerely Valenzuela400 (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC).
Files uploaded by Noorezamzam (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are probably Google Streetview screenshots like another file by this uploader which I deleted. They should be deleted too per the precautionary principle.
- File:Maninagar Shree Swaminarayan Temple, Bear, DE.png
- File:Shree Ram Temple, Metuchen, NJ.jpg
- File:Maninagar Shree Swaminarayan Temple, Chesapeake near Portsmouth, VA.png
Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in the United States for artworks and sculptures: {{NoFoP-US}} Nutshinou Talk! 08:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
no permission no author obviously meant for advertising webshop in nl-wiki - copyvio from https://www.coolgift.com/nl Hoyanova (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Personalized digital country Estonia. Soon as one post interact with something like posting a image of wall internet responds like hey we know what you are doing.png
[edit]Unused file. Screenshot from Estonian newspaper called Maaleht. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer or rights holder is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia Wkentaur (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Bridges tend to be works of engineering and not architecture. There is no mention of bridges being protected works at COM:FOP Estonia, nor is there evidence in statute or case law presented here. In addition, this is a very simple bridge. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Plain civil engineering structure. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:350th airborne regiment
[edit]The source is not a continuous video stream, but a set of scanned photographs made by various unspecified people ("from the archive" of the YouTube channel owner). There is no reason to believe that all the authors of these photographs have given permission for their works to be published under a free license.
- File:Afghanistan – 350th Airbn. Rgt. awards.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 350th Airbn. Rgt. compound.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. descent.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. discharged.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 001.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. firefight 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. heli landing.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. heli takes off.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 004.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 005.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move 006.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the move.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. on the top.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – 5th CO 350th Airbn. Rgt. preparing to dispatch.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 001.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 002.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 003.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 004.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 005.jpg
- File:Afghanistan – Seized Mujahideen weaponry 006.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No clear educational value, unused, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 09:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No clear educational value, unused, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 09:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of this policy. For some reason, the Indonesian Wiktionary automatically adds any .jpg file that shares the same name as a page, whether it is fitting or not (this file is unrelated to the definition). The same issue arose in these three random nominations for example, but the files were not considered as being "in use": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaos.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yunior.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luli.jpg. Nutshinou Talk! 17:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Someone needs to fix that practice. I don't think it should be up to Commons to relieve them of the damage from it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of this policy. For some reason, the Indonesian Wiktionary automatically adds any .jpg file that shares the same name as a page, whether it is fitting or not (this file is unrelated to the definition). The same issue arose in these three random nominations for example, but the files were not considered as being "in use": Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaos.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yunior.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luli.jpg. Nutshinou Talk! 17:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This is a low quality product. Hy.Zen123.124 (talk) 09:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is is fine if I upload a high-resolution version? Peiris (talk) 04:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:BASEDONPHOTO drawing of https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/tupac-shakur-portrait-a-p.jpg without evidence of permission or free licence of the original photo. Belbury (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Seems to be derivative work of potentialy copyrighted stuff.
Gumruch (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am the only owner of these 3 works. Two of them are the self-made medals and I made the photos of them. And the third is my redrawing based on my own photo. Polyoxy (talk) 23:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
このコンテンツは、日本国著作権法第十三条によりパブリックドメインであると記載されていますが、日本国著作権法第十三条に列挙される例に該当しません。このコンテンツは日本の国家機関が発行した機関誌であり、日本の著作権法の保護を受けます。日本の国家機関の発行したものすべてが日本国著作権法第十三条によりパブリックドメインとなるわけではないことに注意してください。1998年に発行されたこのコンテンツは著作権の保護期間を満了しておらず、著作権者の許諾なくコモンズに掲載できません。削除されるべきです。 （English Translate) This content is stated to be in the public domain under Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan, but does not fall under the examples listed in Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan. This content is a journal published by a Japanese national institution and is protected by Japanese copyright law. Please note that not all publications by Japanese national institutions are in the public domain under Article 13 of the Copyright Law of Japan. This content, published in 1998, is not yet out of copyright protection and cannot be posted on Commons without the permission of the copyright holder. It should be deleted. 革命的共産趣味全ウィキ全共闘 (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP: Japanese Impeachment Court is run by Diet members, and I believe its reports are same as the Official Gudget which copyright use is restricted as a current affairs editorial (art.39). So I think may be reproduced and distributed. However, the Impeachment Court itself does not clearly state how it may be used, so I will inquire about whether it is possible to reproduce it with all work. （日本語）弾劾裁判所は主に参議院と国会議員が運営しており、その報告書は官報同様に著作権制限があるはずです（39条等）。なので複製が可能だと思いましたが、当該裁判所サイトが転載方法を明示しておりませんし、記事作成者も様々なので、念のため同所に可否を問い合せてみます。--JOT news (talk) 05:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 日本国著作権法第39条では「新聞紙又は雑誌に掲載して発行された政治上、経済上又は社会上の時事問題に関する論説（学術的な性質を有するものを除く。）は、他の新聞紙若しくは雑誌に転載し、又は放送し、有線放送し、地域限定特定入力型自動公衆送信を行い、若しくは放送同時配信等を行うことができる。」とありますが、ウィキメディア・コモンズへの掲載はこれらに該当しません。また、仮に39条が適用となるとしても、本コンテンツがパブリックドメインになるわけでもないので、著作物としての保護を受けます。ウィキメディア・コモンズが採用しているライセンスの一定の条件下での自由利用が可能になるわけではありません。日本国政府が発行している官報を例に出しておられますが、官報と本コンテンツはその趣旨や内容が全く異なります。官報は法令などの公布や公告など単なる事実の伝達に過ぎないものですが、本コンテンツは官報とは性質の異なる機関誌であり、著作物である「思想又は感情を創作的に表現したもの」に当たります。官報と本コンテンツを同列に語るのは無理があります。（English Translate）Article 39 of the Copyright Act of Japan states that "Comments on current political, economic or social issues (excluding those of an academic nature) published in newspapers or magazines may be reprinted in other newspapers or magazines, or broadcast, cable broadcast, regionally limited specific input type automatic public transmission, or simultaneous broadcast distribution, etc." However, posting on Wikimedia Commons does not fall under these. Even if Article 39 were to apply, this content would not be in the public domain and would be protected as a copyrighted work. It would not be possible to freely use it under certain conditions of the license adopted by Wikimedia Commons. You have given the example of the Official Gazette issued by the Japanese government, but the purpose and content of the Official Gazette and this content are completely different. The Official Gazette is merely a communication of facts such as the promulgation or announcement of laws and regulations, but this content is a journal of a different nature from the Official Gazette, and is a copyrighted work of "creative expression of ideas or feelings." It is unreasonable to talk about the Official Gazette and this content in the same category. 革命的共産趣味全ウィキ全共闘 (talk) 01:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
A gallery of only three free flags, with the rest of being dummy ones. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Per [1], this photo depicts a 2006 artwork by Nashville sculptor Roy W. Butler and thus is still protected by copyright. Wikicommons accepts only free-to-use media. DanielPenfield (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
The artist gave permission 191.125.170.99 12:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, he gave when he was alive. Now, my company is in close contact with his family and have the permission to use images freely, with aim to educate about artist's life. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- You have to follow the VRT instructions, and you need permission of the photographer. If the photographer was a family member than that should be mentioned in the VRT. --RAN (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
How old is the artist? 191.125.170.99 12:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The artist, Giovanni Pizzo, has died in 2022. On this image he was around 28. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Operativo R, in Rome, 1964. Carlo Carchietti, Franco di Vito, Giovanni Pizzo, Lucia di Luciano.jpg
[edit]Giovanni gave permission. How? 191.125.170.99 12:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for the confusion. His wife is still alive, my company is in close contact with his family and have the permission to use images freely, with aim to educate about artist's life. Conrad.Teller (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine, but she has to contact COM:VRT and tell them that she agrees to the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication you gave this file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep In Italy images are protected for a period of 20 years from creation, unless deemed art. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- What about U.S. copyrights? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024101510003593 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Not taken in 2024 as claimed, subject died in 2006. Suspected not own work either. MKFI (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright issue. TobiasMoMu (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- As the original uploader. We found out there might be a copyright issue with this object. We are looking into this and will re-upload when cleared. TobiasMoMu (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
•Please delete this page file•I will re-upload the new file• SekisounoAestivum (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
•Please delete all files on this error page as soon as possible and I will recreate a new page• SekisounoAestivum (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per reasonably prompt uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The source, date and author are unknown, cannot determine copyright. Thyj (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted satellite image, very unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A human has to operate the shutter for an image to be copyrighted. See monkey selfie copyright dispute and other automated camera case law. --RAN (talk) 03:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Whether the monkey selfie is copyrighted should be reconsidered, as satellite images (e.g., from NASA or JMA) cannot be owned as original works. HurricaneEdgar 03:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AvonetJaeger (talk · contribs)
[edit]{{Wrong license}}
- File:Brun stemma.jpg
- File:Soldato del 33° reggimento fanteria, brigata Livorno. Giordano Brun.jpg
- File:Concessione croce al merito di guerra a soldato 33° fanteria.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed, PD-EU-no author disclosure, 1918 images --RAN (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Source video is no longer available/has been deleted ☆ YuhakGuardian (talk) 15:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Désolé, doublon avec https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Priorit%C3%A9s_fabrication_environnement2.svg Graineahumus (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:CYPRUS 『Shiro Neko』Обг. 15:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Flags of municipalities, like Limassol's, often fall under public domain because they are considered official symbols created by government entities. In Cyprus, municipal flags are generally considered public domain. Examples: Flag of Strovolos Municipality, Flag of Nicosia Municipality, and Flag of Mesa Geitonia Municipality, Limassol. I’d assume that the Limassol Flag must be put under the same format (.svg, instead of .gif), or under a different permission license. Lomaine (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, allowed under PD-EdictGov. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
no permission from given author - see metadata "Author Andre de Molenaar" Hoyanova (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Hoyanova,
- Thank you very much for your sharp eye. I contacted our photographer (Roelof Bos) and he updated the information.
- 'Andre de Molenaar' is unknown to us both and he certainly didn't make or owns this image.
- Thanks again. All the best.
- Kind regards,
- PM Mulder PaulMMulder (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
promo, out of scope.This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as Dw no source since (dw no source since) GioviPen GP msg 16:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
promo, bad edited, minor, out of scope.
This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as Dw no source since (dw no source since) GioviPen GP msg 16:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:CSD#F3 and COM:CSD#G10 can be applied GioviPen GP msg 17:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
promo, self uploaded unrelevant photo, no description; out of scope GioviPen GP msg 16:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
schief, unscharf, zu nichts zu gebrauchen Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Not realistically useful, thus out of project scope. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused and imaginary election apportionment diagram. No educational value Malcolma (talk) 17:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This CoA seems to be a complete fabrication by the uploader. There is no evidence that there is a real connection to the state of Yemen or any group in that country. This file is not viable for use in any of the wikimedia projects. Willi P (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I created it for Yemeni Jewish users who opposed the Houthis but just in case they are not using it, I created for myself because I supported the Yemeni Jewish people SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are using the name of a massacre victim. I wonder if you asked for permission with her family. I seriously doubt that. Using the name of a deceased without their permission is a very serious violation of their personality rights and cannot be tolerated. If you did not get their permission this file should be deleted or at least renamed without her name in it. Willi P (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This is absolutely not how coats of arms work; it's also deeply inappropriate. Omphalographer (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep but rename We allow users, per COM:SCOPE, to upload a small number of personal images to the site for use in their userpages if they're active, and you're most certainly active. However, the use like this of the name of a massacre victim in the filename (and the image itself, which you have removed) is a violation of personality rights, along with being very insensitive and inappropriate, and I cannot begin to describe how much I disagree with you calling her a martyr in the edit summary for said removal. I believe the file is OK to keep, but her name must be removed. Rubýñ (Scold) 22:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kad%C4%B1&oldid=934906185#File:%C5%9EEHZADE_MAHMUD_T%C3%9CRBES%C4%B0_-_panoramio.jpg , suspicious license. there is no indicate that these writings are free licensed. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
File is not published under a CCby license, and could never be uploaded here as such Bronloos (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- See more uploads of the same user, under the same conditions. Either all can stay, or all should be deleted. Bronloos (talk) 18:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Although the image of the CD does not meet the threshold of originality, the logo of the CD does look extremely artistic, in addition to containing the logo of the Sony Music record company and a production company, therefore this image would be violating copyright and should be deleted. JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The file was also uploaded on a page by someone other than the record company, and that page does not have a CC license. I don't know if that has any influence or not, but I wanted to mention it. And as for the design, for me the design of a CD goes beyond the threshold of originality. https://www.coveralia.com/caratulas/Lali-A-Bailar-(Edicion-Limitada)-CD.php
- JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The CD's design is a solid color with text, without any artistic elements that could make it copyrighted. Lali Espósito's logo is simple enough to be below the threshold of originality, like the A Bailar logo. And all the other logos are not the main focus of the image, as such I believe they fall under de minimis. nicolas talkpage 09:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the file is the user's own work JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 20:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Most probably not own photo of a 3D object (PD itself), but a derivative (background removal and moving) of the non-free one taken from [2] (First found on Apr 24, 2008, as tineye suggests). Quick1984 (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Own photo or photographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 20:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Anatolii Gremory x BlacsWolf BlacsWolf (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Anatolii Gremory x BlacsWolf BlacsWolf (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I think the uploader intended this to be a renaming request, but I think the file should be deleted because it is of no plausible educational use. It appears to be the logo of a YouTube channel with 21 subscribers[3], a Twitch channel with 22 followers[4], and a Discord with 31 members[5]. The uploader has no significant global contributions. The only reason this doesn't qualify for CSD F10 is that it's not a photo. --bjh21 (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: not sure what this is beyond some sort of weird joke. At best it's an unattributed screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Silly subject, maybe, but not a bad picture, and I'd have to say wedgies are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
DMCA - Model not approved DMCATakeDown (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DMCA request. --Krd 06:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This file is not used anywhere (and it can't be used anywhere, it's more pornographic than educative) and it is only a badly taken pic by the author. Speedy deletion F10. Nazazaku (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's definitely not very pornographic! I feel like if we keep one, File:Man Thong Wedgie-2.jpg is the best and most useful, because it illustrates what a wedgie is. I guess I'm a weak Keep for all 3, simply because space is not at a premium, but if you find 10 more, I'll have a different view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This was made using AI and could cause copyright issues. The AI used is not even disclosed. It also serves very little purpuso as it is really ugly and there are already better illustrations of Gutenberg. Nazazaku (talk) 22:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Urseh
[edit]- File:Дівчина в національному узбецькому одязі та доппі.jpg
- File:Молодята в національних головних уборах.jpg
- File:Різновид доппі.jpg
- File:Сучасний національний одяг.jpg
- File:Чоловічий та жіночий чапан.jpg
- File:Молодята в традиційному одязі.jpg
- File:Паранджа.jpg
- File:Національна сукня.jpg
All copyvios. Taken mostly from Pinterest (e.g., Чоловічий та жіночий чапан, Дівчина в національному узбецькому одязі та доппі.jpg, etc.) and all lack EXIF data. Nataev talk 22:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Might not actually be public domain due to the image's publication in 2018, even though the invitation itself was produced in 1910. Spookyaki (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Er is niet genoemd wie de auteur van de afbeelding is en de link naar de bronpagina is dood. トトト (talk) 22:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)--トトト (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Photograph of a photograph, it is questionable whether uploader owns copyright. - Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at their talk page at enwiki, almost certainly a copyright infringement. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This is a photo of me for which I did not approve release 2603:900B:408:AF75:6068:6E85:4E5E:4050 17:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- If that is true, your grievance should be with the Marine Corps, which released the image, not with us for hosting a copy. - Jmabel ! talk 17:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please contact our Volunteer Response Team per email at info-commons@wikimedia.org to verify that this is a valid request. And we expect you also to ask for removal of the original file at https://www.dvidshub.net/image/926270/11th-marine-regiment-desert-fire-exercise where this photograph has been published by the Department of Defense. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Just please review Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 110902-N-BT887-049 Airman Logan Grady secures the tail of an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74).jpg to read and see links to all the previous similar deletion nominations of public domain US government works I know of. No valid reason to delete. Perhaps these people should not join the US military if they don't want their image and even name to be published. 23:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I am sympathetic to the subject of the image, but I don't see it as a particularly intrusive or identifying image. The image is not in use anywhere significant, so I wouldn't consider it a great loss. Technically, though, a keep. Llwyld (talk) 07:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion as per numerous precedents. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded without permission 2603:900B:400:E4E8:5020:783:47FB:93DA 16:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as before. Still available on https://www.dvidshub.net/image/926270/11th-marine-regiment-desert-fire-exercise. --Achim55 (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Disruptive nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Nominator has already been informed to contact VRT. Dmartin969 (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)