Commons:Deletion requests/File:جاسم السلطان.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.globalinfluence.world/en/leader/jassim-sultan/ , https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/677447256124080128/2BNwyb_Z.jpg Ankry (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Currently handled by an OTRS agent who is not a Commons admin and cannot undelete the photo himself. @Arthur Crbz: what do you suggest to do here? Ankry (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
I got a using permission from the owner of the photo directly and I already sent an e-mail template to wikipedia permissions e-mail stating that
so I would like the photo to marked safe for wikipedia use because that's actually the photo owner wish ... to bind this photo specifically with his newly created wikipedia page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar Khaled Aly (talk • contribs) 15:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Omar Khaled Aly (talk) 15:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC) Omar Khaled Aly Omar Khaled Aly (talk) 15:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC) 08/07/2018
- Omar Khaled Aly: What do you mean by "owner of the photo"? The only one who can provide valid permission is the copyright holder, which is normally the author, rather than someone happening to have a copy of the photo. "Author" means the photographer who created the photo. If you are not personally the author or copyright holder of the photo, you should not be claiming that you are the author and copyright holder and that it is your own work. Surely you did not get permission to make those claims.
- Also, on your talk page you claim that "I am not recreating a deleted content." That assertion is false, which is easily seen from the file's log. This is exactly the same photo which you previously uploaded and which was deleted. Commons:OTRS clearly explains that you should not recreate deleted content. Instead, you should have waited for the permission to be verified and (if the permission is valid) undeleted. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete I don't believe Ticket:2018070710002117 meets our current standards yet. I have serious concerns about why the uploader claimed own work and current date and why the original photo with intact EXIF metadata was not uploaded. I also question whether the photo is in our scope. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment I copied the following from the file talk page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
This File is not a copyright violation because the owner of the photo him self granted me access to use the file on wikipedia and I already send to the permission e-mail the e-mail template provided by wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar Khaled Aly (talk • contribs) 15:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Jeff Ok now I understand is that having the picture from the owner of the photo is not enough to claim I am the owner, but for recreating deleted content I just created it because during the conversation with the permissions e-mail they asked me to send them a link for the photo on wikipedia that's why I uploaded it just to send the photo not to use it, I didn't know what else I could do to fulfill the permissions e-mail request.
No what I should do to prove that the author which is the photographer (Doesn't have a copy right and the person in the photo it self is the one who owns everything) what kind of permission or upload way I should follow
Omar Khaled Aly (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Omar Khaled Aly Omar Khaled Aly (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC) 12/07/2018
- The address for the deleted photo would have been sufficient – no need to recreate it yourself outside of process.
- As for showing that the permission comes from the relevant person, they would have to provide a copy of the copyright transfer agreement or documents showing that the work is a work made for hire. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- @LX: Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Omar Khaled Aly: A link such as https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%86.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 would have been sufficient. Also, a sig with one userlink, one talklink, one time, and one date, would have been sufficient; you provided two userlinks, two talklinks, two times, and three dates. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
