Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2017 at 18:57:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Black Swan at SF Zoo.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Swan at SF Zoo.jpg
LivioAndronico Yes I agree with the DOF at the back is not the same as front but it does not seem to affect the overall composition and look of the picture especially in the presence of the sharp frontal area. I did select a lower DOF to blur the background a bit when shooting animals at the zoo. Thanks for your input. --Sanjay Acharya (talk) 14:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Blue color temperature and centered composition, btw distracting element on top right corner. Nice picture and lovely, however, not wow IMHO --The Photographer15:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The top right problem is gone, however, there is something with this image that does not convince me totally, for example, maybe a excessive clarity filter (white are too whites), jpg artifacts and posterization in background. --The Photographer20:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No clarity filter has been applied by me other than slight sharpening. In my opinion its just the characteristic of the bird's fur/feathers. Check out this another picture that shows similar whites are too whites. Also the artifacts probably are due to higher ISO of 500. Black Swan RWD2 --Sanjay Acharya (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info created by sanjay_ach - uploaded by sanjay_ach - nominated by Sanjay ach -- Sanjay Acharya (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Sanjay Acharya (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Nice composition but DoF isn't enought for me....the back is too worked,sorry --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Neutral Blue color temperature and centered composition, btw distracting element on top right corner. Nice picture and lovely, however, not wow IMHO --The Photographer 15:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
