Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brasilia Cathedral DSC 4638.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2015 at 23:02:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created and uploaded by Marcosnardon - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose, nope, ginormous distortion, too many people to be a FP, the main angel should be brighter. -- RTA 12:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree. And their are problems with resolution as well. The building, though, is really nice, so it should be possible to find better photos of it. --Tremonist (talk) 12:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info Croped and enlighted.
- Support Something like this become more interesting. --Mile (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support A little bit noisy at top, but not so much as to ruin this interesting image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support @PetarM: Thanks! But a question: I think it might be more interesting if you did not cut the center of the dome. Please, can you do this? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done --Mile (talk) 21:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @PetarM: More. I suggest no cutting at the top. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done, thanks again. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose --It doesn't show what (or how, if you prefer) this building is really. Much more than that! Sting (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Info Sting that's is not the purpose of FP but VI (Valued Image) nominee. Details of something are often better looking and hence more interesting to become Feautered Photo. --Mile (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think it has the same idea as this one. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Don't worry Mile, my vote isn't about the value of the image, but about this image reducing the building to... well, almost nothing. Sorry to be harsh but it deserves much better. Sting (talk) 22:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment @ArionEstar: maybe, but the composition is clearly poorer, and while the Roman church leads to introspection, the modern Brazilian one, with its vitrals, needs to breathe. Sting (talk) 22:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think it has the same idea as this one. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Lmbuga (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I will nominate the edited version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Obsuser (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)