Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canelle Cinnamomum verum Luc Viatour.jpg

File:Canelle Cinnamomum verum Luc Viatour.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2013 at 07:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Canelle Cinnamomum verum Luc Viatour.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canelle Cinnamomum verum Luc Viatour.jpg

•  Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by Mahan -- Mahan (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mahan (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice, well-executed still-life as we'd expect, but am I seeing sharpening artefacts? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:49, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Kasir (talk) 10:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpening artifacts with a width of about 2 pixels, too much for FP imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Julian H.--Jebulon (talk) 15:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Weak support Sharpening artifacts but very nice (and useful!) image. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 00:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Species undetermined. Little care for the background. The pile in the foreground is blurred. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Same as Jacopo Werther - Averater (talk) 18:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 13:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)