Commons:License review/Requests: Difference between revisions
archived 1 request |
NoFWDaddress (talk | contribs) m →Taiwania Justo: promoted |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<!-- ADD YOUR REQUEST AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. REMOVE {{no RFP}} IF PRESENT, NOTHING ELSE. --> |
<!-- ADD YOUR REQUEST AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. REMOVE {{no RFP}} IF PRESENT, NOTHING ELSE. --> |
||
{{frh}} |
|||
=== Taiwania Justo === |
=== Taiwania Justo === |
||
* {{user14|Taiwania Justo}} ('''[[Special:UserRights/Taiwania Justo|assign permissions]]''') |
* {{user14|Taiwania Justo}} ('''[[Special:UserRights/Taiwania Justo|assign permissions]]''') |
||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
*{{s}} Competent and experienced user. [[User:Guanaco|Guanaco]] ([[User talk:Guanaco|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
*{{s}} Competent and experienced user. [[User:Guanaco|Guanaco]] ([[User talk:Guanaco|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 10:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
* {{neutral}} Further improvements wrt the understanding of "freedom of panorama" are probably needed. Strakhov ([[User talk:Strakhov|talk]]) 15:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
* {{neutral}} Further improvements wrt the understanding of "freedom of panorama" are probably needed. Strakhov ([[User talk:Strakhov|talk]]) 15:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
{{done|Promoted}}: no opposition during the last 4 days, experienced user with good knowledge in licensing. {{re|Taiwania Justo}} It would be great if you could read (again) [[COM:FOP]] and other specialized license policies like [[COM:DW]], [[COM:De minimis]] and [[COM:TOO]]. As I usually remind everybody here, there is '''no emergency''' to review files and it is better to take more time but do the job right. Also, feel free to ask questions if you have doubts. {{smile}} --[[User:AntonierCH|AntonierCH]] <sup>([[User Talk:AntonierCH|d]])</sup> 11:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{frf}} |
|||
Revision as of 11:16, 28 August 2017
(Translate) (purge this page's cache)
|
Kindly read Commons:License review and relevant pages such as Flickr files before applying for the right.
To become a reviewer, you need to be familiar with the general licensing policy of Commons and the common practices of reviewing. A reviewer is required to know which Creative Commons licenses are compatible with Wikimedia Commons and which are not, and be dedicated to license reviewing every so often and offer their assistance in clearing the backlogs. Relevant knowledge can be demonstrated by regularly participating in deletion requests or in New Files Patrolling.
Post your request below and be prepared to respond to questions. The community may voice their opinions or ask a few questions to verify your knowledge. A few days later (usually 48 hours), a reviewer or an administrator will determine the possible outcome of the request based on the input received from the community. The closing admin/reviewer will grant the right if there are no objections and add the applicant to the list of reviewers. If permissions are granted, you can add {{User reviewer}} (or one of its variants) to your user page and begin reviewing images.
Click the button to submit your request. Alternatively, copy the code below to the bottom of this page, and only replace "Reason" with the reason you are requesting this user right. Requests will be open for a minimum of two days (48 hours).
=={{subst:REVISIONUSER}}==
{{subst:LRR|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|Reason ~~~~}}
- Note for Admins/Reviewers: To close a request, please wrap the entire section excluding the section heading with {{Frh}} and {{Frf}}. If the request is successful, please leave this message
{{subst:image-reviewerWelcome}}--~~~~on the applicant's user talk page.
This is a closed request for license reviewer status. Do not make edits to it.
Taiwania Justo
- Taiwania Justo (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (assign permissions)
- Reason: Hello. I'm the OTRS members and now I frequently transferred photos from Flickr to Commons. Because of my experiences about the OTRS permissions and transfer experiences from Chinese Wikipedia to Commons, I can confirmed that I have the ability to review the license. Thanks! This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 13:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Scheduled to end: 13:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC) or later
- Comments
Question So, are you gonna review your own uploads or not ? --AntonierCH (d) 17:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot review the files I uploaded myself. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 17:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Question Are these photos okay to upload to Wikimedia Commons? 1 2 34 --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- 1:
The author's website is broken, so I cannot confirmed the author's information. Therefore, I suggest it cannot upload to Commons until the author's information is clear.It's a non-commercial photo, and it cannot upload to Commons. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC) - 2: The image was actually from here on Feb 28, 2007. Therefore, it's a copyrighted file. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- 3: According to the Google image search, this image did not appeared before 2011-08-24. In addition, according to the author's information, he is actually an photographer. Therefore, I think that it maybe can upload to Commons, but the third-party review should be applied. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:16, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- 4: It's similar with the first one, the author's website is broken. I suggest it cannot upload to Commons until the author's information is clear. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Renew: According to the archive, the author has listed the Flickr link at the right side. Therefore, I considered that this image maybe can upload to Commons. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 01:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Plus: According to the Google image research, the image was not appeared before the published date. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 05:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- For number 2, you're right, but there is also no COM:FOP in France (so it doesn't matter if the file is copyrighted, it wouldn't be allowed on Commons anyway). --AntonierCH (d) 10:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- 1:
Support Competent and experienced user. Guanaco (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Neutral Further improvements wrt the understanding of "freedom of panorama" are probably needed. Strakhov (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Promoted: no opposition during the last 4 days, experienced user with good knowledge in licensing. @Taiwania Justo: It would be great if you could read (again) COM:FOP and other specialized license policies like COM:DW, COM:De minimis and COM:TOO. As I usually remind everybody here, there is no emergency to review files and it is better to take more time but do the job right. Also, feel free to ask questions if you have doubts. 
--AntonierCH (d) 11:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)