User talk:Ratekreel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Hulged)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Ratekreel's talk page!

Thank you for stopping by my talk page! Before posting, please take a moment to review the following:

  • Need administrator help? Visit the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard to contact administrators directly.
  • Kindly reply on the same page where the discussion began for continuity.
  • I appreciate constructive feedback. Don’t hesitate to let me know if I’ve made a mistake.
  • Please remain polite and respectful. Always sign your posts using ~~~~.

Archives: 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

link=Commons:
link=Commons:

New batch to review

[edit]

Hello @Ratekreel, Thank you for reviewing the last time. I am back with a new batch of my uploads under GODL-India for you to review.

Reviewed

Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 15:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaan Sengupta, my end-semester exams are approaching, which limits the time I dedicate to Commons. However, I will make an effort to review as my schedule permits. Ratekreel (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ratekreel no worries. Do it per your comfort. There is no hurry. Also my best wishes for your exams. May you get the desired grades. ShaanSenguptaTalk 05:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ratekreel, I just read COM:FOP India. But I couldn't understand much. Can you explain me if the paintings in the images nominated by you are violation under FoP in India. In short, is there no FoP in India? Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 03:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shaan Sengupta, there is FoP in India, but it applies only to 3D works such as architecture, sculptures, and similar artistic creations, as provided under Section 52(1)(t) of the Copyright Act, 1957. This exception applies only if these 3D works are permanently located in a public place. 2D works, such as paintings, are not covered under this section.
That said, my nomination for the deletion of your uploads is not based on a FoP violation but rather because they contain copyrighted paintings. These paintings are protected under Section 13(1)(a) of the Act and would require permission for use. Ratekreel (talk) 08:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thank you so much for the explanation. DR might take time. If you feel ok, I can nominate them under G7 for SD. Uploader request. It will get it deleted much quicker. ShaanSenguptaTalk 08:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's not necessary and it requires a DR anyway. Ratekreel (talk) 17:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 01:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The batch which was left the last time too.

Reviewed

Thank you in advance. ShaanSenguptaTalk 15:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaan Sengupta, done! Some of the files were already reviewed by C1K98V and rest were reviewed by me. Ratekreel (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Ratekreel. It looks like some are still left in the list above that I gave first. The ones reviewed are hidden under collapsible template. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 06:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ratekreel will you be doing the files left above. ShaanSenguptaTalk 15:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shaan Sengupta, I missed your earlier message. I'll try to review but may leave some to others. Ratekreel (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amartya Sen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]