User talk:Junnn11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Junnn11!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
I highly appreciate for your well-made or highly accurate life restorations and diagrams on prehistoric arthropods such as basal chelicerates, megacheirans, dinocaridids, pycognids, synziphosurines, xiphosurans, chasmataspidids, eurypterids, arachnids, dinocaridids, lobopodians, and more. Thank you so much for all of these arthropod images, and keep all of your good work! TheRealLTG (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice art

[edit]

Hi, I just noticed your great artwork, so I wondered if you would post them for review at the paleoart review page[1]? That would also make them more visible so people can add them to articles. FunkMonk (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the mention! Next time I'll try to post my new work on the review page. --Junnn11 (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
I love how your arthropod illustrations are both cute and scientifically accurate at the same time! Your style is always recognizable. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with such amazing illustrations! W4Vdragon (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:19970626 Tachypleus gigas.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:19970626 Tachypleus gigas.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

admirable

[edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
👍🦐 -G (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How Fascinating !

[edit]
Curious Palaeophiid Award
Your palaeoart, arthropod diagrams and overall reconstructions are simply amazing ! Congratulations on such a precise, informative and expansive body of work ! Very impressive and inspiring :) Horus-Horakhty (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you..

[edit]

for your great work here. I am speechless.. --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 08:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
love the reconstructions XanderK09 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cambroraster

[edit]

I think Cambroraster should have ventral,not dorsal setal blades as in the original description another Wikipedian told me this so I’m not sure though. Zhenghecaris (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to keep it dorsal until detailed examination on this interpretation is available for itself like Stanleycaris. It's worth to note the same team suggest the ventral position is generic, if not, applied to all radiodonts (the Anomalocaris model supervised by the same team also has ventral setal blades), which is still premature given how the dorsal position is widely accepted, and unambiguously evident in Aegirocassis. Junnn11 (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Zhenghecaris (talk) 15:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes

[edit]

I think you should draw more accurate eyes , arthropods don’t have eyeballs,they have compound eyes. Zhenghecaris (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The black dot was tend to be rectina or pseudopupil. The fine ommatidia shouldn't be recognizable in the resolution I used, just like how we look at a typical compound eye in real life (unless the lenses were huge relative to the eye/very few in number like the schizochroal eye of some trilobites, which is not the case in the arthropods I work on so far). Junnn11 (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a pretty rude thing to say to someone who has put hours and hours of their own time to create free and accurate life restorations of prehistoric animals. I for one greatly appreciate the work Junn has put into his life restorations. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]