User talk:NearEMPTiness

TUSC token 970e4a6a3604a4de64227b334d4ac70e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museumsbahnsteig Oberhausen - Gießpfanne und historischer Zug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 18:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear NearEMPTiness,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Dein Preisträgerfoto ist...
Platz 9

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?

Einen besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir,
Anika (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wende Dich für den Preis bitte an community@wikimedia.de. Grüße --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear NearEMPTiness,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Upcoming Articles

Who would like to contribute to articles, in which the following photographs will be used?

de:Eugen Stochdorph

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

File:De-Tübingen.ogg‎

Education? Hu? Weil man die aussprache lernen muss oder ? hä? ...Sicherlich ^talk 21:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, Ich fand keinen besseren Platz, und würde die Hauptkategorie gerne leer halten. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hmm; und sollte mal jemand auf die idee kommen sowas nutzen zu wollen findet er es wie? Das Aufräumen in ehren, aber hauptsache die hauptkat ist leer weils hübsch aussieht? ...Sicherlich ^talk 12:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leider habe ich hier noch keine Vorschläge erhalten. Willst Du eine geeignete Unterkategorie erstellen (oder notfalls die Dateien zurück in die Hauptkategorie verschieben)? Wie wird das denn in anderen Hauptkategorien von Städten gehandhabt? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wie üblich wird da niemand antworten :D - die hauptkat ist Sicherlich besser als eine Kat in der zumindest ich sowas nie suchen würde. Liegts halt in der Hauptkat; wo ist der schaden? Alternativ halt eine kat die Multimedia oder audio oder sonstwie heißt. Halt irgendwas wo ein leser es auch suchen würde?! ...Sicherlich ^talk 18:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC) okay, die meisten leser finden commons eh nicht. der link ist ja in den WP-Artikeln bestens getarnt [reply]

Bildbeschreibungen

Moin NearEMPTiness, Du darfst gerne direkt die Bildbeschreibung verändern, vielen Dank dafür. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 11:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Kommentar. Ich habe heute morgen auf einer Diskussionsseite einen Link nach TÜpedia gelegt, um Dir (und anderen) zu zeigen, dass Deine schönen Tübinger Fotos inzwischen auch auf anderen Wikis genutzt werden. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok viele Dank es freut mich sehr, schön wenn andere Wikis mein Bild verwenden können. Es macht Mut weiter zu machen, denn ein Feedback zu bekommen ist selten. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urkunde der Universität Tübingen für den Medizin-Studenten Hermann Schickhardt (1863-1895) Tübingen, 23. Mai 1883.jpg

File:Urkunde der Universität Tübingen für den Medizin-Studenten Hermann Schickhardt (1863-1895) Tübingen, 23. Mai 1883.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museumsbahnsteig Oberhausen - Gießpfanne und historischer Zug.jpg

Hallo NearEMPTiness, was auf diesem Bild ist eigentlich das "cultural heritage monument"? Vom Hauptbahnhof stehen anscheinend nur Empfangshalle und ehemaliger Wasserturm unter Denkmalschutz. Zu Bahnsteig, Lok und Gießpfanne finde ich keinerlei Hinweise. Helfe mir doch bitte. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies: Hier handelt es sich meiner Ansicht nach nicht um ein Denkmal im klassischen Sinne einer Denkmalliste, sondern um schützenswertes Kulturgut im weiteren Sinne. Falls Du es aus der Kategorie "Cultural heritage monuments in Oberhausen" herausnehmen willst, habe ich damit kein Problem. Vielleicht könnten wir ja eine neue Kategorie für nicht unter Denkmalschutz stehende Objekte schaffen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Lore Henke

Hallo NearEMPTiness, vielleicht findest du irgendwo Fotos der Tübinger Fotografin Lore Henke, aus den Jahren 1932-1939. Wenn ja, dann benachritige mich am besten per E-Mail. Das wäre eine Tätigkeit, für die ich dir dankbar wäre. --Mewa767 (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Vielen Dank für die interessante Herausforderung. Ich werde meine Augen offen halten. Meine Suche nach "Lore Eppensteiner geborene Henke" ergab leider noch nichts außer diesem Hinweis. Es würde sich sicher lohnen, den Hauptautor dieses Artikels diesbezüglich zu kontaktieren. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist nicht notwendig. Ich weiß über sie einiges, auf jeden Fall deutlich mehr als der Autor des Artikels über Stockburger. Diese Angabe, die du zitierst, stammt übrigens von mir. In meiner Bitte an dich ging es mir um ihre Fotos, sie fotografierte viele - zum Teil auch sehr bekannte - Persönlichkeiten von Tübingen und vielleicht werden ihre Fotos irgendwo, irgendwann auftauchen. Als Fotografin benutzte sie auch nach der Heirat ihren Mädchennamen Henke. Da sie erst 1986 starb, kann man die Fotos nicht ohne weiteres hochladen und deswegen bat ich dich, mich zu beanchrichtigen. --Mewa767 (talk) 17:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie Jenner photos deletion withdrawals

Am I right in assuming that your removing your deletion nomination notices from the files means you are withdrawing your deletion requests? If so, for completeness, and to avoid confusion, could you comment as much in the deletion requests themselves? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kylie Jenner for Nip + Fab.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kylie Jenner headshot.jpg. And also if you confirmed that yes, they were marked as Creative Commons Attribution on YouTube would be nice. Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry for having caused confusion. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke schön! --GRuban (talk) 02:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

need Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015 at IAA 2015

hello :) have you pics of Alfa Romeo Giulia QV 2015 at IAA 2015?? Is most important: this car is the queen of the auto show. thank you--Pava (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not (yet) have photographs of that car. Maybe I will go again to this exhibition, but I am not sure yet. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logs rafted for towing in Alaska.jpg

Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Logs rafted for towing in Alaska.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Stefan4 (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WP Chemin de fer du Prince impérial.jpg

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:WP Chemin de fer du Prince impérial.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

XenonX3 (talk) 10:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why nominated for deletion

Do you know that the files you nominated for deletion have been licensed under Bollywood Hungama templates. Why have you nominated the files for deletion. These files are not copy vios, as I have licensed them under Bollywood Hungama templates. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 06:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kunalforyou: I cannot see any Creative Commons or Public Domain template on that web site. Quite contrary, I see "Copyright © 2015 Hungama Digital Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved." at the bottom left, which might however be the copyright of the frame. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Than also nominate the Bollywood Hungama template from Commons. Let me clear you that users on Commons mostly upload images from Bollywood Hungama website. There are plenty of images on Commons from Bollywood Hungama website. I think you don't know this point. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 08:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

für die Hilfe bei den Arolsen-Klebebänden. Zum Hintergrund siehe http://archivalia.hypotheses.org/5585 Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit eine längere Pause eingelegt, will aber jetzt den Rest noch hochladen und erschließen. Dabei werde ich immer einige Dutzend (oder hunderte, vielleicht wieder einen ganzen Band) geschnittene Bilder hochladen, und dann nach und nach beschreiben und nach Künstlern und dargestellten Personen (oder wenigstens Überkategorien wie "People of Nuremberg") kategorisieren. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AndreasPraefcke: Ich habe gerade etwas über de:Georg Christoph Hönn und seine beiden Claras gefunden. Vielleicht findest Du ja sogar das Bild der ersten Gattin. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AndreasPraefcke: Insbesondere zu den Pelzmützen suchen wir noch weiter Infos. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart as well as a detailed definition of "publication" for public art.
Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.

العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Flag of the United States

Froissy Dompierre Light Railway

You did well to use my photographs. They are there for that.
Regards. Altona (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Genin Selbstbildnis.jpg

File:Robert Genin Selbstbildnis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fabriksnummer

Hallo NearEPTiness, du hast das Wort Fabriksnummer korrigiert. Es stimmt, dass man es auch ohne "s" schreiben kann", aber nur auch , denn beide Wörter sind in der deutschen Sprache korrekt und in Österreich wird üblicherweise laut Österreichischen Wörterbuch inklusive "s" geschrieben. Und es handelt sich um ein österreichisches Foto. deshalb habe ich es wieder zurückgesetzt. lg aus Österreich K@rl (talk) 20:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. Das ist wohl wie bei den Semmelnknödeln, wenn diese aus mehreren Semmeln hergestellt werden. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ungefähr ja, bei uns wird sehr häufig das sogenannte Fugen-s verwendet. --lg K@rl (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo NearEMPTiness!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Category:H._Bullock_Webster

H. Bullock Webster has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walpurgisnacht, 1990. Wernigerode, DDR (3292983821).jpg

File:Walpurgisnacht, 1990. Wernigerode, DDR (3292983821).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Chapsromes (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tübingen

Sie haben nicht in die Beschreibung des Fotos geschrieben, dass dieses Foto in Tübingen gemacht wird. Ich weiß nicht, ob dieses Foto in Tübingen gemacht wird. Sie müssen bestätigen, dass dies tatsächlich in dieser Stadt ist. --AltDampf (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, jetzt verstehe ich das. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob das Foto in Tübingen aufgenommen wurde. Daher ist die Entfernung der Kategorien okay. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bischöfliches Palais (Rottenburg)

Einige Inhalte wurden auf Commons:Löschanträge gemeldet, damit die Gemeinschaft entscheiden kann, ob sie behalten oder gelöscht werden sollen. Es wäre gut, wenn du dich an dieser Diskussion auf der Antragsseite beteiligen würdest.

Wenn du diese Seiten geschaffen hast, solltest du beachten, dass diese Anträge keineswegs bedeutet, dass deine Arbeit nicht geschätzt wird. Es bedeutet nur, dass jemand glaubt, dass es ein Problem gibt, zum Beispiel mit dem Urheberrecht oder einer Richtlinie.

Bitte denke daran, auf die Begründungen der Antragssteller zu reagieren und diesen ggf. sachlich zu widersprechen. Aussagen, die auf den Antragsteller selbst abzielen, werden das Ergebnis des Antrags nicht beeinflussen. Vielen Dank!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sorry und Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Over the Top' near Katoomba.jpg

File:'Over the Top' near Katoomba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mackpie (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trainpix

Hello ! I'm gradually looking at this.

Altona (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le chemin de fer forestier de la forêt de Barr.jpg

Hi !

Sure you've found this photo on this page but after the mention of Abreschwiller. Also looking at File:Waldbahn von Alberschweiler.jpg and comparing both, I'm nearly sure the first photo's name is misleading.

If you don't have the rights to rename it I can do it, just let me know.

Kindly, Papatt (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Papatt: Please feel free to re-name the photograph. I do not know any additional details. Sorry for having caused confusion. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's done, don't worry. Kindly, Papatt (talk) 19:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Le Train des Plantations

Le Train des Plantations You're welcome ! Altona (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for animals & plants

Hi NearEMPTiness - for these, Commons uses the scientific names for the category names, as these are universal; please don't create categories based on (often local) English names. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MPF: Thanks and sorry for having caused confusion. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suspension_bridge_over_a_fairly_wide_river,_probably_in_the_Otago_region,_circa_1926._ATLIB_299942.png

Hi, NearEMPTiness - I've managed to definitely identify a New Zealand image that I'd been puzzling over for a while (and which you thanked me for working on a couple of months back). The problem is (and the reason it kept me puzzled) that the image has somehow been flipped horizontally - possibly in the original historical photograph before it was uploaded here. Should it be flipped back to the correct way round, or should it remain as in the (pre-uploaded) photo? If it is to be flipped, can that be done with the already uploaded image, or will it need to be re-uploaded? Thanks, Grutness (talk) 04:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Grutness: I have asked an expert, as shown here. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My German is very poor, so I can't follow the discussion, but hopefully the problem's either been sorted out or is getting sorted out - thanks again! Grutness (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kawarau River suspension bridge, circa 1926 retusche b.png

@Grutness: Does this look better? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Much better - thanks! Grutness (talk) 01:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pflichtbewusster oder Schädling?

Hallo NearEMPTiness, guck dir die beiden Löschdiskussionen an:

Grüße, --Mewa767 (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umstrukturierung der Kategorien in Category:Tübingen

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

ich habe in letzter Zeit einiges an den Kategorien innerhalb der Category:Tübingen umstrukturiert. Da Du hier ebenfalls sehr aktiv bist, würde ich mich freuen, wenn Du ein bisschen gegenprüfen könntest, ob das, was ich ändere auch tatsächlich als Verbesserung beiträgt und ich nichts kaputt mache. :-)

--Dktue (talk) 16:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dktue: Die Kategorisierung in Wikimedia Commons ist ziemlich zeitaufwendig. Mir sind alle Verbesserungen willkommen. Ich finde, dass eine Kategorie mindestens drei Einträge haben sollte, oder dass zumindest zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt zu erwarten ist, dass sie drei Einträge bekommt. Das ist z.B. bei Category:Emergency services in Tübingen noch nicht der Fall, aber Rotes Kreuz und Technisches Hilfswerk sind potentielle Kandidaten, die diese Kategorie auch jetzt schon gerechtfertigen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Danke für Dein Feedback, dann werde ich nun weiter katalogisieren und umsortieren. --Dktue (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pieter Breughel d.J.Gemälde im Schloss Eggenberg bei Graz 01.jpg

Hallo NearEMPTiness - zunächst mal Frohe Weihnachten! Vielen Dank für das Hochladen des Bildes. Allerdings stammt das Bild nicht von Peter Brueghel d. J. (~1526-1569) sondern es is von Jan Brueghel dem Älteren (1568-1625). Es entstand 1597. Siehe hier eine andere Version des gleichen Bildes: File:Jan_Brueghel_The_Triumph_of_Death.jpg. Siehe auch hier www.museum-joanneum.at. Magst Du die Daten dazu noch mal prüfen und die Bildbeschreibung ggfs. aktualisieren? Viele Grüße Bullenwächter (talk) 18:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bullenwächter: Danke, ich habe das inzwischen wie von Dir vorgeschlagen verbessert. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

super - Frohes neues Jahr Bullenwächter (talk) 15:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Cargo Boat Guame pendant son dechargement a Saint-Laurent.jpg

Copyright status: File:Cargo Boat Guame pendant son dechargement a Saint-Laurent.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cargo Boat Guame pendant son dechargement a Saint-Laurent.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this has now been resolved. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All Decauville Works Numbers and Year of Construction

Hello ! Among the seven pictures you sent me, only the "Le Pouliguen" locomotive is a Decauville, the others seem to be of German construction. For your list, there is a book entitled "Decauville steam locomotives works list" by Clingan and Lanham - IRS - 1992 ; unfortunately, I do not have this book. If I find other locomotives Decauville, I will categorize them. Altona (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I am now searching for this book and two others. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you recognise any of these locomotives?

No, sorry. If it is easy enough to recognize a Decauville locomotive, it is much more difficult to give it a manufacturer's number.Altona (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Altona: Thank you very much for the quick reply, which makes me feel better. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vorlage

Hallo! In Anlehnung an die Kategorien YEAR paintings from Italy habe ich bei mehreren deutschen Gemälden Kategorien YEAR paintings from Germany angegeben und diese Kategorien mit der Vorlage Paintings from Germany by year|19?|? (in doppelten geschweiften Klammern) gebildet. Ich habe aber keine Ahnung, wie die Vorlagen gebildet werden. Könntest du das übernehmen? Oder ist das ein zu großer Aufwand? Viele Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Ich selbst habe bis heute noch keine Vorlagen geschrieben, aber ich habe gerade folgendes versucht. Ich habe oben rechts in die Box "Template:paintings from Italy by year" eingegeben. Ich habe den Text markiert und kopiert. Dann habe ich oben rechts in die Box "Template:paintings from Germany by year" eingegeben. Ich habe dort den kopierten Text eingefügt und das Wort 'Italy' manuell durch 'Germany' ersetzt. Das Ergebnis ist hier. Hat das bei dem Jahr, das Du eingegeben hast, den nötigen Effekt? Falls nicht, könntest Du Dich z.B. an die Vorlagenwerkstatt der deutschen Wikipedia wenden. Ich kenne mich diesbezüglich leider nicht genügend aus, um weiterhelfen zu können. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast doch vor gewisser Zeit die Kategorien YEAR in Tübingen, die gleich konstruiert sind, zahlreich vergeben und ich dachte, dass das dein Werk war. Auch wenn du bis gestern noch keine Vorlage geschrieben hast, hast du die Aufgabe gleich richtig gelöst. Also danke! Du könntest jetzt bei Gelegenheit diese Kategorien anwenden, z.B. für die Bilder der Professorengalerie. --Mewa767 (talk) 15:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Vielen Dank für das Feedback. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Postkarten der Gebrüder Metz

Das Haus der Geschichte BW, das die Rechte hat, gibt alle Fotos und Postkarten, die vor dem 1.1.1960 entstanden sind, frei. Deswegen habe ich bereits vor längerer Zeit eine Fülle von OTRS-Erklärungen beantragt, die erst vor kurzem bei Commons bearbeitet wurden, darunter 2, die ich absichtlich zu diesem Zweck hochgeladen habe, wie File:Café Jacob (AK Gebr. Metz 1952 TPk078).jpg. Auch mehrere Bilder, die du hochgeladen hast, sind dabei, z.B. File:Zimmereifachschule Fritz Kress in Tübingen Lustnau.jpg. Du kannst also weitere solche Bilder hochladen. Es sind noch nicht alle Bilder berücksichtig worden. In ein paar Monaten möchte ich weitere OTRS-Erklärungen besorgen. Bis dahin kommen sicher neue Bilder hinzu. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 23:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Mühe und Info. Auf TÜpedia gibt es weitere Postkarten der Gebrüder Metz. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767 and NearEMPTiness: Sehe heute erst die Diskussion. Danke für die Mühe. Wollte euch auf das im März gestartete neue Projekt c:COM:WPPC hinweisen. -- sk (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pfalzgraf von Tübingen

Hi! I changed them because they all belong to the House of Montfort, yes. Initially called of Nagold, they became better known, later, as Montfort family, because of the acquisition of the county of the same name, which may have allowed them some ascension in power in the region. However, I expect to recategorize there the members of the family who were Counts Palatine of Tubingen. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jung Typ HILAX

Recht schönen Dank für die Zusendung des Fotos.

Rainerhaufe (talk) 08:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stoney Creek Bridge (07).jpg

Hi NearEMPTiness,

das von dir hochgeladene Foto muss nach 1929 entstanden sein, da die zweiten Fachwerkbögen schon vorhanden sind. Siehe auch die von dir angegeben Beschreibung: A second set of arches was added in 1929 to handle heavier traffic. Damit passen die angegebenen Lizenzen nicht mehr und ich fürchte die Datei muss gelöscht werden. MfG--Krib (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Krib: Wenn das Photo tatsächlich das zweite Set von Bögen zeigt, stimme ich zu, dass das Foto gelöscht werden muss. Ich dachte damals wohl, da sei später noch ein weiteres Set von Bögen hinzugekommen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stoney Creek Bridge (07).jpg

File:Stoney Creek Bridge (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Krib (talk) 20:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bahnknoten Eichenberg

Du hattes vor ein paar Jahren dieses Bild (Eichenberger Waldbahn OpenStreetMap.png) hochgeladen und zeigt den nördlichen Teil des Eisenbahnknoten Eichenberg (unter anderem mit der Eichenberger Kurve). Ich kenne mich mit OpenSreetMap nicht so aus und bekomme keinen anderen Kartenausschnitt hier hochgeladen. Könntest Du den südwestlichen Teil des Bahnknoten Eichenberg (vom Bahnhof bis etwa einschließlich Schloss Arnstein) hier hochladen? Vielen Dank im Voraus.--79.214er (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@79.214er: Vielen Dank für die Anfrage. Hier gibt es inzwischen zwei Kartenausschnitte zur Auswahl:

Südwestliche Bahnhofseinfahrt Eichenberg
Eichenberg Bahnof

--NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das ging aber schnell. Sind beide verwerbar, da der Bahnhof und der Knotenpunkt zwei verschiedene Dinge dartstellen. Danke--79.214er (talk) 10:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decauville Fotografien

Moin moin! Bei Deinen Uploads must Du nochmal nachschauen:

Lizenz

Dieses Werk ist gemeinfrei, weil seine urheberrechtliche Schutzfrist abgelaufen ist. Dies gilt für das Herkunftsland des Werks und alle weiteren Staaten mit einer gesetzlichen Schutzfrist von 70 oder weniger Jahren nach dem Tod des Urhebers Der Urheber ist als unbekannt angegeben. Das schließt sich gegenseitig aus. Schaust Du mal bitte dort vorbei? Bedankt! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: Thank you for re-naming the files and for your comment regarding the licence. I subsequently changed this to {{PD-Italy}} --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. I added {{PD-1996}} to satisfy the US (c) rules. There's a template for unknown authors: {{author}} will translate into ones primary language. I added that as well. Thanks for finding these two photographs!

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Markus Krall

Hallo, das Bild: Dr. Markus Krall (links) liest 'Wann kommt der Crash' auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2019.jpg , würde ich gerne zuschneiden und dann hochladen bzw kann ich es dir auch zuschicken. Wäre das ok für dich? Ich will dann das neue Bild in seinen Artikel einbinden. lg --A.M.A. (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.M.A.: Beides ist ok für mich. Du kannst außerdem mit dem Crop Tool jederzeit Bildausschnitte erstellen, wobei (wie hier gezeigt) alle wichtigen Informationen automatisch lizenzkonform übertragen werden. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey cool, danke dir und du hast es exakt so gemacht, wie ich es mir vorstellte! Das mit dem Crop Tool kenne ich noch nicht, schaue ich mir mal an. lg --A.M.A. (talk) 08:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Counts of Montfort

Hi! Have you seen already the english page of the Counts of Montfort? May I use that system of a single numbering in Commons categories? What do you think? Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhmrodrigues: Unfortunately, there are too many red links for assessing, whether this system could work. I think, we need to wait, until most of these aristocrats get blue links based on reliable references, before we re-categorise them on Wikimedia Commons. It is actually much easier to see, what is wrong, than to find a solution for what is right. The en:Counts of Montfort#Table of rulers has no references at all and a bold disclaimer in the "Note" above the table. I do not think, that this list is practical at all, but it could be discussed on the relevant portal. We do not need to invent a new numbering style on Wikipedia, which hasn't been published in the scientific literature! Please tell me: Where does all this information come from? Do you have any reliable sources, which you could add using <ref>...</ref> line by line? Anything else would be rushed and would cause too many conflicts with Wikidata, the German Wikipedia, VIAF and GND. I think you need to slow down, please, and come-up with an internationally acceptable concept. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! I've used some of this sources. For the counts until the 16th century: Counts of Montfort ; For the order of counts, I based here: Counts of Montfort (see page 94); And, I don't know why, but this genealogy site and this one calls the supposedly Anton II (d.1706) as "Johann Anton I". Sorry for the poor quality of the sources, but even German Wikipedia didn't have a full family tree of Montfort family... But, in your defense, I think I found a clue here regarding the "mysterious" missing Anton I. I don't understand German, but in the note 1) of page 192 I think I've read something like "the three brothers John, Wolfgang and Anton, Counts of Montfort in 3 September 1592", which means that there was a co-rulership between the three. There were three counts, George Wolfgang and John, who co-ruled 1573-1619. Anton I may be this fourth missing brother. Problem solved!!! I'll change it. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 22:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhmrodrigues: I did a little excercise by adding some German links temporarliy into the left column of your table. I noted that the date of death is relatively undisputed. Therefore, I propose to categorise for instance Anton I (= de:Anton II. von Montfort) temporarily as Category:Anton, Count of Montfort, died 1733-12-17, until the conflicting numbers have been resolved. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: 1) Thank you for your edits! But the Anton problem is resolved! I found Anton I! Go to the page of the counts of Montfort! I'll go right now change the Commons catgeories regarding the Antons, at least for the three first of them. Regarding Anton IV, if he co-ruled with his brother Franz Xavier, it could be easier to recall him Anton IV. Co-ruling was something common in the Montfort family, but should we apply to this case? Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: 2) Hi! It's me again. I thought that, if the problem for Antons was a simple less known co-ruler, maybe there's the solution for the other problems such as Ulrich VII. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: 3) Hi! Solved the Ulrich problem. It was, in fact, the lacking of two co-rulerships that wasn't making the right count, but now it's right!! By the way, Bulgarian Wikipedia has many articles on the members of te House of Montfort. You should take a look... I'll link the German page of Rudolf II. von Montfort to give you fast access. Just navigate through the blue links in the Фамилия (familia) section.Mhmrodrigues (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhmrodrigues: Thank you for your work and for the comments. I made some changes to the list, but feel free to revert these. There is still a Henry challenge. Unfortunately, I could not find anything on the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Could you provide a link, please? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these links and good luck with your research. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! So, I've been researching and there's some problems on your "german numberings" in Henry and John's cases. 1) Henry (died 1408) may actually be the third Henry of the family, because there were only two more Henrys before him: Henry, Bishop of Cur (died 1272) and Henry, Canon at Cur (died 1307). However, I noticed that, in spite of beloging to two consecutive generations, the first is usually styled Heinrich I. and the second as Heinrich III. Confusing, right? With no Heinrich II, weird... 2) I don't know if Count John (died 1686) is supposed to be called Johann VI. or Johann VIII., as I've seen his name styled both ways. It's more easy to call him VI (I missed one John, who probably co-ruled with William V (died 1439)) than VIII. However, I spotted another John, who died in 1512 and was canon at Salzburg. I think we shouldn't include this one, because he had a brother Wolfgang, who was also a canon. We would have to include another Wolfgang too, so Wolfgang I (from Rothenfels) would become II and so on. 3) In conclusion, I need your help: first, to decide if John (died 1686) is John VI or John VIII; second, to understand the Henry problem, a.k.a. the reason for a gap in german numbering. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think this can easily be resolved: If the German number is higher than that shown in your table, stick to the German number. If the number is lower, then omitt the number and use the date of death to disambiguate. I was told by a wise Thai: "You should never challenge traditions." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Problem of the Henrys solved. I think this is the true Heinrich III. Heinrich I (bishop), Heinrich II (canon), Heinrich III (this one) and then the Heinrich IV (died 1408). Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Hi, again! For the John problem, and because I didn't find more Johns to reach the German numbers, I found this solution. Please see the page of the Counts of Montfort. 23:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhmrodrigues: I see that you are making good progress. However, I still recommend that you do not invent any new numbers at all, but stick to the German numbers or stick to numbers that are used in reliable (i.e. printed) references. I am currently collating a large list of de:Decauville#Decauville-Lokomotiven. Unfortunately the original list of serial numbers was destroyed in a fire during the war, but there is no dispute about using a generally accepted numbering system, although this is not chronological at all and initially very confusing. I predict that you would cause more harm, and loose credibility, by renumbering any of the counts, and that the new numbers would finally not be accepted by any historians. Apart from that it is one of Wikipedias undisputed principles, only to present information on Wikipeda that is backed by reliable soures. Other forums or a private web site have other rules, and if at all, a new numbering system should be presented and discussed there, and not on Wikipeda. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John VI (VIII)^[12]: In this case, I would stick to the (higher) German number, and (possibly) explain in an footnote or an article or in the right column of the table that numbers VI and YII cannot be traced. Then, someone else can try to trace them, or will understand that there is an anomality. Renumbering would let the reader think, the case was resolved.
John V (VI)^[8]: I would stick to the higher number.
John IV (II)^[6]: This case is more tricky, because the new number is higher than the German number. Even so, the new number is more confusing than helpful.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! Have you seen the page of the counts of Montfort? Mhmrodrigues (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A dubious picture

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! Now that we reached an agreement, at least in the Counts of Montfort, I'm doubting who this is. The description says it is Count Johann II of Montfort-Rothenfels. Is he the one who died in 1529 or the one who died in 1547? As the painting is from 1523, one may say it is the one who died in 1529, but, as I've shown you, the one who was known as John II was the one who died in 1547, who may already be an young adult in 1523 (as he was probably born c.1490) Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Counts of Werdenberg

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! I've opened a new section for the counts of Werdenberg. Have you looked to the table I've edited there? Mhmrodrigues (talk) 22:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhmrodrigues: This family is very interesting, indeed. The obvious questions are now, who will find more pictures, and who will tackle the Pfalzgrafen von Tübingen? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graf von Werdenberg
Agnes Gräfin von Werdenberg-Trochtelfingen, um 1441
Ferdinand Graf van Werdenberg

@NearEMPTiness: Hi! Didn't the family die out in the male line in the 16th century? Why are there 17th century portraits? They probably aren't from Werdenberg family...Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: See this link. It's a family tree of the Montforts, with portraits. Do you want better? I know it's free, because I've seen some few details already on Commons. The problem is that I don't know where to find a big format of this, because it would be very useful to make a detail for each person in the tree... Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 21:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:內灣火車加水站 Water Tower for Steam Locomotives at Neiwan Station - panoramio.jpg

I have noticed your edits to File:內灣火車加水站 Water Tower for Steam Locomotives at Neiwan Station - panoramio.jpg. Why did you change it back to "Category:Water towers in China"?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kai3952: Sorry, I made a mistake, indeed. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zwei Bilder falsch beschriftet (erl.)

Hi, diese beiden von dir hochgeladenen Bilder

sind falsch beschriftet. Sie mögen 1909 im Rahmen der Hamburger Südsee-Expedition entstanden sein, dann aber nicht in Palau, wo sich das Paar 1906 aufhielt und danach nicht mehr. Kannst du dem mal nachgehen und die Bilder umbenennen? Ich habe es bisher nur bei der Bildbeschreibung der Dame gemacht und weiß auch nicht, wieso aus einer ursprünglich korrekten Beschreibung "Südsee-Expedion 1909" das "auf den Palau-Inseln" wurde. Ist das vielleicht dir passiert? Grüße, --Aalfons (talk) 04:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aalfons: Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da die Fotos laut Exif-Daten mit meiner SONY aufgenommen wurden, nehme ich an, dass ich sie bei einer Ausstellung im Tübinger Schloss aufgenommen habe. Ich vermute, dass sie dort entweder falsch beschriftet waren oder ich beim Abschreiben der Bildunterschrift einen Fehler gemacht habe. Ich weiß aber nicht, ob der Ort (Palau Inseln) falsch ist oder das Datum (1909). Glaubst Du, dass das Datum richtig ist? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

agrrr... wahrscheinlich ist doch alles richtig. Die beiden waren auch als Südsee-Expediteure 1909/10 noch einmal auf Palau, habe ich gerade gelesen. Also wohl falscher Alarm. Entschuldige bitte! --Aalfons (talk) 06:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Richtigstellung. Kein Problem.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test weight cars category

I see that you're responsible for the Test weight cars category. Is there any chance this could be added as a subcategory of Rail service vehicles? ----DanTD (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DanTD: Thank you for this proposal. It was very easy to implement: I clicked onto the red link and typed [[Category:Rail service vehicles]] into the box. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you can oblige. Now I'm starting to wonder if there are any additional categories for it. ----DanTD (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fanny Pregizer, 26 Jahre alt, später verheiratete Schüle, Foto Andersen & Klemm, Stuttgart, 1894 (ca. 10,4 x 6,2cm).jpg

Hallo NearEMPTiness. Woher weißt du, dass das Foto von 1894 ist? Aus dem dem Buch Von der maskierten Schlittenfahrt zum Hof-Photographen. Die Photographie und Stuttgart 1839-1900 ergibt sich, dass Th. Andersen seit 1896 in Stuttgart tätig war – zunächst allein, doch im gleichen Jahr ist er in eine Gesellschaft mit Klemm eingegangen. Danach hätte das Foto also frühestens Ende 1896 entstanden sein können. --Mewa767 (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Ich nehme an, dass die Namem, die Daten und das Alter handschriftlich auf der Rückseite oder in einem Photoalbum vermerkt waren. Ich bin nicht mit der Familie verwandt und habe nur abgeschrieben, was auf eBay stand. Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, war Ivo Lavevetti der Auktionator. Leider kann ich Dir diesbezüglich nicht weiterhelfen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe auch: https://www.tuepedia.de/wiki/Fanny_Pregizer --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto stammt aber nicht von eBay, sondern von Delcampe - die Datei ist falsch beschrieben. Was für eine Rolle dabei Ivo Lavetti gespielt habe soll, ist für mich unverständlich. Seltsam finde ich deinen Satz: „Leider kann ich Dir diesbezüglich nicht weiterhelfen.“ – Dies ist nicht meine Angelegenheit, obwohl ich mich mit der Frage an dich gewandt habe, sondern von uns allen. Es geht darum, dass die Bildbeschreibungen bzw. Dateinamen die Wirklichkeit nicht verfälschen. Und in diesem Fall passen die Informationen am Bild nicht zu denen, die ich aus einem Buch habe. --Mewa767 (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Lieber Mewa767. Es tut mir sehr leid, dass Du Dich mal wieder über mich wundern musst. Beim genaueren Betrachten des Dokuments fällt mir auf, dass es von Dr Kiefner und nicht von Ivo Lavetti angeboten wurde. Ob Dr. Kiefner eBay zur Vermarktung seines Fotos verwendet hat, weiß ich nicht mehr. Möglicherweise ist mir da ein Fehler unterlaufen, da ich normalerweise einen Link zur Fundstelle eintrage. Ich habe leider den Link zum Original nicht abgespeichert. Daher kann ich leider nicht überprüfen, ob der Fehler bei mir, bei Dr. Kiefner, beim Autor des von Dir zitierten Buchs, oder sogar bei Dir liegt, der (durchaus zurecht) annimmt, dass vor der Gesellschaftsgründung keine derartigen Logos verwendet wurden. Wenn Dir Dein Buch vertrauenswürdig erscheint, darfst Du das gerne ändern, indem Du Dein Buch zitierst. Ich habe ähnliche Fälle allerdings schon mit anderen Wikipedianern besprochen, die sich erst weit aus dem Fenster lehnten, aber schließlich kleinlaut zurückrudern mussten. Ich bin mir sicher, dass ich in diesem Fall keine Geschichtsfälschung durchführen wollte, kann aber nicht ausschließen, dass es sich um einen Tippfehler handelt. Ich habe in der Tat schon öfter Tippfehler gemacht. Da ich keinen Zugriff auf Dein Buch habe, werde ich selbst keine Änderungen durchführen, habe aber nichts dagegen, wenn Du die Daten nach Deinem besten Wissen korrigierst. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Schau bitte mal kurz ins Fotografenwiki: "Theodor Andersen betrieb von 1885–1894 zusammen mit seinem Partner Wilhelm Klemm (1860-1929) ein Fotoatelier in Stuttgart. Das Atelier firmierte unter „Andersen & Klemm“ und befand sich in der Charlottenstraße 8. Am 29. Oktober 1891 erhielten beide Fotografen den Hoffotografentitel." Danach wäre das Foto wohl zwischen 1891 und 1894 entstanden. Ich vermute, der Autor Deines Buches hat sich um 10 Jahre vertan oder vertippt. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Siehe bitte auch "Stuttgart | Anderssen & Klemm | Fotografen | 29. Oktober 1891". --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright? Beschriftetes Foto aus einem Buch

Hallo NearEMPTiness, ich habe eine Frage die ich dort gestellt habe. Kannst du dir das mal ansehen, wenn du Zeit hast? Danke und lg --A.M.A. (talk) 21:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Krass! Tausend Dank! Hab jetzt einen SLA erstellt. Danke nochmal! lg --A.M.A. (Diskussion) 10:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Cropping historical photographs - Wady Hanein, Palestine

Hi, It's normal to crop historical photos, leaving the original in place and uploading the new, suffixed with cropped.

In this particular case the museum artefact has black with it. It's a judgement call really; something off e-bay with unwanted junk is good for cropping or even a picture with a frame, but something like a photo that has lain in archives for 103 years isn't. Not to mention that with cropping comes a certain amount of degradation; cropping is a filter.

Now if your cropping to insert it into an article on Wikipedia that's fine, as long as your aware in some cases the original with imperfections can have an intrinsic value, highlighting arduous travail or condition etc.

Also as the original is intact on wikimedia allows it to be inspected by researchers. That's how a museum would handle it. Broichmore (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments and advice. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Inn, Spofforth

Thank you for your interest in this subject and starting the page. I shall see what i CAN CONTRIBUTE.

Thanks --Mtaylor848 (talk) 00:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mtaylor848: I am very interested in narrow gauge railways, and regularly search for new photographs about this topic on Wikimedia Commons using the key word "railway". I was very much impressed by the photos that you have taken and uploaded onto Wikimedia Commons, and thus I thought some of them should be used on Wikipedia. Thus, I wrote the article en:Railway Inn, Spofforth, although I haven't ever been there. Any improvements are welcome. Please consider en:WP:NPOV, i.e. keep in mind that the style of an encyclopedia is different from that of a promotional web page or brochure. The number of photographs in the article should also relate to the amount of text, i.e. it would not be useful to add a photo of each of the rooms of the building without explaining these rooms and their function in the text. Please keep also in mind the relevance, i.e. the reader should understand from the text, why this pub is noteworthy, although there are many others, which do not have their own Wikipedia article. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Schairer?

Hallo NearEMTiness, es ist zwar nicht ein Foto von dir, aber da du dich auch mit ähnlichen Fotos befasst hast, würde ich gerne deine Meinung kennen lerenen. Die Frage steht auf der Dateidisskussionsseite File talk:JW Hornung - Erich Schairer, Königsgesellschaft Roigel (SS 1906).jpg. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 14:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright wegen einem photographiertem Foto aus einem Buch?

Hallo NearEMTiness, ich habe eine Frage wegen einem Foto. In einem Buch entdeckte ich ein Bild von Adolf Hitler, welcher mit seinem Zug durch die Ortschaft Ötisheim fährt. Das Bild entstand 1938. Ich würde das Bild gerne veröffentlichen und es dann in den Artikel Ötisheim einpflegen. Auf dem Bild würde dann auch der Kommentar des Autors (er ist nicht der Fotograf von 1938, zumindest gehe ich sehr schwer davon aus) zu lesen sein. Wenn ich darauf hinweise, dass ich das Bild aus dem Buch x habe, ist es dann rechtlich korrekt, oder doch ein copyrightklau? lg --A.M.A. (talk) 09:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A.M.A.: Ich kann mir eigentlich nicht vorstellen, dass dieses Foto unbeanstandet auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen und in der deutschen Wikipedia genutzt werden kann, obwohl man vermuten kann, dass der Fotograf den Zweiten Weltkrieg nicht überlebt hat und daher schon seit mehr als 70 Jahren verstorben ist. Nach dem Motto "Sei Mutig!" könntest Du ja mal versuchen, es z.B. mit folgendem Lizenzbaustein: {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} hochzuladen, und dann abwarten, was passiert. Generell ist es aber wichtiger, nur lizenzrechtlich unproblematische Bilder auf Wikipedia zu nutzen, als möglichst viele Bilder in die Artikel einzupflegen. Es ist auch zu überlegen, ob die Bahnfahrt Adolf Hitlers einen großen Einfluss auf die politische Gesinnung der Ötisheimer hatte, oder ob die politische Gesinnung der Ötisheimer aus dem Bild bereits ersichtlich ist.

Public domain	The copyright of this image has expired in the European Union because it was published more than 70 years ago without a public claim of authorship (anonymous or pseudonymous), and no subsequent claim of authorship was made in the 70 years following its first publication.	EU
	To use this template, the image must meet both of the following two conditions: published over 70 years ago, and the original author's actual identity was not publicly disclosed in connection with this image within 70 years following its publication. Images that lack either of these two conditions should not use this template. Reasonable evidence must be presented that the author's name (e.g., the original photographer, portrait painter) was not published with a claim of copyright in conjunction with the image within 70 years of its original publication. Works which had not entered Public Domain in their country in 1996 that were uploaded before 1 March 2012 should be marked additionally with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Note: In some countries anonymous works are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the author if the author's identity became public in any way during the original term. In Germany this applies to certain works published before July 1, 1995; see Übergangsrecht. English \| español \| français \| italiano \| македонски \| മലയാളം \| sicilianu \| slovenščina \| 中文 \| +/−

--NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Antwort. Das dachte ich mir schon, vor allem bei so einem Namen, dann lass ich es (erstmal :-)). Auf dem Schwarzweiß-Bild sieht man eigentlich nur ein paar Menschen (ohne Uniform) die eben den Gruß zeigen (unscharf abgebildet, sowie der Hintergrund) und er steht am Fenster mit erhobener Hand (scharf abgebildet, auch der Waggon). Wäre zumindest ein kleiner Anziehungspunkt für den Artikel Ötisheim. ;-). Aber erstmal kümmere ich mich um die Baudenkmäler. Danke nochmal! lg --A.M.A. (talk) 11:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthur_Koppel_-_Usorathalbahn,_Länge_60_km,_Bosnien.jpg

Hello! Can you tell my anything about the physical location of this photo? Where is it located? Does the author have more images of the location. I am personally related to the geographyical location photographed. --31.223.143.78 22:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo has been reproduced in an advertisement of Orenstein and Koppel: Advertisement. On similar occasions a lot of confusion has been caused by their sales people, who show photos with captions of another site or another location. I assume that you have seen the higher resolution photo and an English translation of the German Wikipdia article. I personally, do not know a lot about the photo or the railway. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It might be worth downloading this 38 MB book, and search for "bosn" if you are interested in (trains and) cranes in Bosnian sawmills (e.g. Bosnische Forstindustrie Doberlin, Bosnien).--NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind reply! I grew up about 500 meters far from this very location and I recognize the road track, the hills, there are still even some young tree sprouts where these tall trees are located, and there is a new house on the left. My great-grandfather probably had a chat with the man who took the photo. I am deeply touched! :) Thank you for the links as well! --31.223.143.30 21:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SS_California_(1923)

SS California (1923) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Motacilla (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proposition de vente rails Decauville et traverses de Alfred Hautienne, Technicien, Nalinnes, le 9 Janvier 1924.jpg

File:Proposition de vente rails Decauville et traverses de Alfred Hautienne, Technicien, Nalinnes, le 9 Janvier 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

L'Élan Wallon (talk) 23:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proposition de vente rails Decauville et traverses de Alfred Hautienne, Technicien, Nalinnes, le 9 Janvier 1924.jpg

File:Proposition de vente rails Decauville et traverses de Alfred Hautienne, Technicien, Nalinnes, le 9 Janvier 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

L'Élan Wallon (talk) 12:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike?

Hello NearEMPTiness,

This is just a note to assure you that my amendment to File:Building a playground in one day at Memorial Park, Port Pirie, 1918 (HTSA GN11975).jpg, which I uploaded after yours, was not made out of arrogance but of coincidence. Earlier in the day, I had decided to crop and straighten it, an, d did so -- making exactly the changes you made. But I wasn't happy about the sky, with all its scratches and blemishes. So during a long and boring teleconference that I only needed to listen to occasionally, I plodded away to remove them. Then I selected the sky to make it lighter. And when I uploaded the image, I saw yours. :-)

There are two ways for me to look at it: that my work was a waste of time, or that I filled in a teleconference doing something enjoyable. Anyway, what a coincidence! Best wishes, Simon – SCHolar44 (talk) 23:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SCHolar44: My actions were, actually, triggered after reviewing the improvements that you had made to the description of this photo, so it isn't a pure coincidence. In February 2020 a lot of photos of The History Trust of South Australia had been uploaded by a temporary account, and subsequently, I spent quite a bit of time in categorising and cropping them. I am glad that more and more people make use of them and improve them. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Löschdiskussion seit heute abgeschlossen (Entscheid: Behalten)

Hallo Kollege, Du erinnerst Dich an diese Datei, die Du retouchiert hattest. Nachdem wochenlang nichts passiert ist in der "Löschdiskussion", bat ich heute einen Admin, das Ding mal zum Abschluss zu bringen. Wie erwartet lautete seine Entscheidung auf "behalten".Commons:Deletion requests/File:Staffelsee alte Karte.jpg Gruß,--Ratzer (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rotkäppchen

Hallo! Ich habe ein selbstgemachtes Foto aus einem Museum hochgeladen. Jetzt habe ich eine Meldung dass die Lizenz fehlt. Kann ich die nachträglich eintragen? Danke im Voraus und Gruß von --Wagner67 (talk) 17:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wagner67: Wenn Du innerhalb von wenigen Tagen noch eine Lizenz einfügst, wie z.B. {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} und die erste Zeile {{User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag|month=January|day=19|year=2022}} entfernst, ist das Lizenzproblem gelöst. Ganz besonders schön wäre, wenn Du noch [[User:Wagner67|Wagner67]] in der Zeile "|Author =" angibst sowie eine passende Kategorie einträgst. Wenn es sich bei der Figur um ein urheberrechtlich geschütztes Kunstwerk handeln würde, würde diese Prozedur nicht ausreichen, aber das scheint hier nicht der Fall zu sein. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen DANK, ich habe jetzt Lizenz und Autor eingetragen, aber irgendwie finde ich die zu entfernden Zeile nicht.Wagner67 (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Aber nach dem zweiten Anlauf dann doch. Vielen Dank! Wagner67 (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logging railroad, Stimson Logging Company, Marysville, Washington, ca 1900 (HESTER 34).jpeg

Any basis for having added Category:Simpson Investment Company to this? Not saying you are wrong -- right industry, right part of the country -- but I suspect you just misread "Stimson". - Jmabel ! talk 01:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This was a reading mistake, indeed, which I have now corrected. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regnéville_(Meurthe-et-Moselle)._Le_ravin_avec_voie_étroite_Decauville.jpg

Bonjour : Cette image est mal décrite (problème d'orthographe). Le lieu est Regniéville, pas Regnéville - à vous d'agir !
De ce fait j'ai modifié la catégorie (auparavant Regnéville-sur-Mer).
Par ailleurs, le photographe Jacques Gabriel François Agié sur le site ImagesDéfense. -- Jwikip (talk) 09:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I changed the name of the photographer and requested that an administrator should change the name of the file, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Mikado Engine at Islington(GN06902).jpg

File:New Mikado Engine at Islington(GN06902).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCHolar44 (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issue

You know what i do not appreciate all of my photos i did countless trips to take around Melbourne getting removed not all of them were of bad quality the user Foozwah decided to undo the majority of my work the photos I took of Saint Bede's College Bentleigh East were to reflect the College's name change and all went and removed all of my photos same with the photo I took of St Joan of Arcs Brighton, Brighton is home not just to a Anglican Church he removed the photo of Saint Joan of Arcs I want it reinstated to the page this is the photo here

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Celco85 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping me informed. However, as far as I remember, I did not do any changes to your file. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St Joan of Arcs photo the file has not been changed but the image was removed from Brighton Victoria on wikipedia I uploaded it there to show that Brighton has more than just an Anglican Church Foozwah removed it i would like if it was added back to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celco85 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celco85: Let us proceed step by step. As a first step, I asked my German friends to adjust the contrast and stretch it a bit. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celco85: Done. Please check Wikipedia:Brighton, Victoria --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support --~Celco85Celco85 (talk)

File:Locomotive of Melbourne and Hobson's Bay Railway Company, 1854.jpg

File:Locomotive of Melbourne and Hobson's Bay Railway Company, 1854.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCHolar44 (talk) 23:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Tirésias Simon Sam during the Inauguration of the new Railway Line in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.jpg

File:President Tirésias Simon Sam during the Inauguration of the new Railway Line in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Oaurelien (talk) 10:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NS establishments in Tübingen

Hallo NearEMPTiness,
wenn ich mich nicht täusche, hattest du auch mal die Idee, eine Kategorie dieser Art zu bilden. Hier fehlt auf jeden Fall die Reichssanitätsschule, von der ich bis jetzt keine Fotos gefunden habe. Aber vielleicht hast du noch weitere Ideen. Grüße Mewa767 (talk) 00:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Das ist in der Tat eine sinnvolle Kategorie. Ganz herzlichen Dank dafür. Ich kenne noch das NS-Jungschwesternheim und ein paar weitere Fotos, bei denen ich mir aber nicht sicher bin, ob sie im Sinne von Wikimedia Commons gemeinfrei sind. Das Standortlazarett auf dem Sand und vielleicht das Schützenhaus stammen wohl auch aus der Zeit. Ich werde meine Augen bezüglich weiterer Gebäude offen halten. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Die von dir an der ersten Stelle genannte Institution ist in Commons unter dem Namen Category:NS-Jungschwesternwohnheim Tübingen vorhanden und von Anfang an in diese Kategorie integriert. An das Standortlazaret habe ich auch gedacht. Vor der Integrierung müsste ich die jetzige Kategorisierung etwas umbauen. Das Schützenheim war vor allem eine Gaststätte und die kann man nicht auf gleicher Ebene mit Institutionen vergleichen. Die von dir genannten anderen Fotos aus Tüpedia eignen sich thematisch nicht, weil sie keine Institutionen zeigen und außerdem kann man sie nicht als gemeinfrei auslegen. Aber danke für das Mitdenken. --Mewa767 (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, ich schau mal, was ich finden kann. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Version (eventuell)

Hallo -NearEMPTiness, bei dieser Abbildung habe ich als Versuch die Beleuchtung geändert und denke, dass das Bild gewonnen hat. Wenn du möchtest, könnte ich die neue Version hochladen. Falls sie dir nicht gefällt, könntest du zurücksetzen. Gerne höre ich deine Meinung.--Geyersberg (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Geyersberg: Ich stehe gerade auf der Leitung, da ich nicht weiß, um welches Bild es geht. Hast Du es verlinkt. Generell sind Verbesserungen immer willkommen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, NearEMPTiness, ich habe die geänderte Datei hochgeladen. Es handelt sich um: File:Funde der Burg Mömbris im Spiegel archäologischer Quellen, Harald Rosmanitz, 11. März 2020 07.jpg. Bei anderen Bildern wäre eine solche Veränderung auch möglich. Grüße!--Geyersberg (talk) 17:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Geyersberg: Vielen Dank. Mir gefällt die von Dir erstellte hellere Version auch besser. Meine Kamera hat auch in anderen Fällen schon etwas dunkle Bilder erzeugt, die sich vielleicht noch aufhellen lassen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen! Hast du die veränderten Bilder schon gesehen? Grüße!--Geyersberg (talk) 05:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die gute Arbeit. Die Aufhellung ist Dir sehr gut gelungen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tbanks

File:Locomotive Engineer's Arbitration Committee LCCN2014694307.tif

Hello, NearEMPTiness, was this on purpose :-) Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Thanks. I have removed the wrong category by now, which had been automatically added after choosing "Category:Arbitration committee". --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tahnk you ever so much :-) Lotje (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technische Frage

Hallo NearEMPTiness, vielleicht kannst Du weiterhelfen. Ich habe heute eine bereits existierende Datei aufgehellt und danach wieder hochgeladen. Angezeigt hier und im WP-de-Artikel wird aber immer noch die alte Version. Was muss ich tun, damit das Bild aktualisiert wird? Siehe da: File:Altarplatz Salvatorkirche Kürbitz.jpg. Grüße Lysippos (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lysippos: Auf meinem Rechner wird schon die aufgehellte Version angezeigt. Die alte Version ist noch irgendwo im Cache abgespeichert, entweder auf Deinem Rechner oder auf dem Server. Nach ein paar Tagen wird sich das Anzeigeproblem von selbst lösen: Wikipedia_Diskussion:Fotowerkstatt. Manchmal hilft es, einen anderen Browser zu verwenden. Außerdem hilft es manchmal, bei Bildern oder Wiki-Seiten "?action=purge" an den URL anzuhängen und die Seite aufzurufen. Nach Rückfrage wird der *serverseitige* Cache gelöscht. Beispiel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berlin-Friedrichsfelde,_Dorfkirche_(16).jpg?action=purge --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aaah, danke, habe verstanden und werde so verfahren. Ich konnte es mir nicht erklären. Vermutlich dann im Cache auf meinem Rechner. Schönen Abend und Dank. --Lysippos (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio Grande Southern Railway Company Locomotive No 461 with a goods train (photo by Philip Ronfor, printed and distributed by John Krause).jpg

File:Rio Grande Southern Railway Company Locomotive No 461 with a goods train (photo by Philip Ronfor, printed and distributed by John Krause).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henschel-Lok 'Lamersdorf' aus Düren von 1907.jpg

File:Henschel-Lok 'Lamersdorf' aus Düren von 1907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zamek Książ.Budynek Bramny z widocznym torowiskiem kolejki wąskotorowej.jpg

File:Zamek Książ.Budynek Bramny z widocznym torowiskiem kolejki wąskotorowej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Railway track of the Ruszki-Młodzieszyn-Kamion-Wyszogród narrow gauge railway across the bridge over the Vistula at Wyszogród, 1916-1918 (Collection M. Mistewicz).jpg

File:Railway track of the Ruszki-Młodzieszyn-Kamion-Wyszogród narrow gauge railway across the bridge over the Vistula at Wyszogród, 1916-1918 (Collection M. Mistewicz).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 08.jpg

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 04.jpg

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 01.jpg

File:Úzkokolejka Moravský Písek - Veselí nad Moravou - Tasov 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narrow gauge locomotive at the Normandy refinery in Le Havre, the first refinery of the C.F.R.jpg

File:Narrow gauge locomotive at the Normandy refinery in Le Havre, the first refinery of the C.F.R.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Uoijm77 (talk) 12:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Clodius (1644-1687) in der Gießener Professorengalerie.jpg

Moin, deine Version dieses Gemäldes entspricht der Quelle und damit vermutlich dem Original, ganz anders als die m.E. zu stark aufgehellte ältere Version. Willst du wirklich dass dein Upload gelöscht wird und die schlechtere Version bleibt? --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Danke, ich habe auf die Schnelle wohl nicht genau genug verglichen. Bitte behalten und den Vornamen umbenennen.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:750-mm-Straßenbahn der Societá Diatto in Turin beim Fliegerfest in Soesterberg, 1911.png

File:750-mm-Straßenbahn der Societá Diatto in Turin beim Fliegerfest in Soesterberg, 1911.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.191.63 18:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narrow gauge railway in front of the 'dressing station' ('verbandgebouwtje'), i.e. the Social and Spiritual Services Building (gebouw van de maatschappelijke en geestelijke dienst) at the Soesterberg airbase.jpg

File:Narrow gauge railway in front of the 'dressing station' ('verbandgebouwtje'), i.e. the Social and Spiritual Services Building (gebouw van de maatschappelijke en geestelijke dienst) at the Soesterberg airbase.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.119.34 15:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chr Barth - Drei Studenten in Coleur der Ghibellinia (Kabinett 1900er) R.jpg

Hallo S., ich du interessierst dich doch auch für (Tübinger) Studentenverbindungen. Kannst du den Zirkel einer Verbindung zuordnen? Mewa767 (talk) 04:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewa767: Ich denke, das ist der Zirkel "TCGv!" der Tübinger Landsmannschaft Ghibellinia im Coburger Convent (CC) und habe das inzwischen in die Bildbeschreibung der Rückseite eingepflegt. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank! Bis jetzt gab es keinen Zirkel der Ghibellinia in der Category:Zirkel of student fraternities in Tübingen und deswegen konnte ich ihn nicht finden. Jetzt hat sich das geändert. Ich habe nicht nur den Zirkel, sondern auch das Wappen hochgeladen. --Mewa767 (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koleje wąskotorowe Zwierzyniec-Biłgoraj (Collection of Andrzej Tajchert).jpg

File:Koleje wąskotorowe Zwierzyniec-Biłgoraj (Collection of Andrzej Tajchert).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.118.213 11:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tramway de Royan - Une petite retient 2 baladeuses dans la rampe Lessore.jpg

File:Tramway de Royan - Une petite retient 2 baladeuses dans la rampe Lessore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.103.35 11:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:O&K steam locmotive, works N° 1080, June 1903, 80 hp, 1000 mm gauge, Ct, 'Jallut über O&K Fil Brüssel' 02.jpg

File:O&K steam locmotive, works N° 1080, June 1903, 80 hp, 1000 mm gauge, Ct, 'Jallut über O&K Fil Brüssel' 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.103.35 11:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:O&K steam locmotive, works N° 1080, June 1903, 80 hp, 1000 mm gauge, Ct, 'Jallut über O&K Fil Brüssel' 02 (cropped).jpg

File:O&K steam locmotive, works N° 1080, June 1903, 80 hp, 1000 mm gauge, Ct, 'Jallut über O&K Fil Brüssel' 02 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.103.35 11:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haliç'ten Karadeniz'e gibi tren hat.jpg

File:Haliç'ten Karadeniz'e gibi tren hat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.188.90 13:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerardmer - Xonrupt. Chasseurs Alpins sur la voie du tramway - 1916.jpg

File:Gerardmer - Xonrupt. Chasseurs Alpins sur la voie du tramway - 1916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.188.90 13:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kağıthane-Kemerburgaz dekovil hattı.jpg

File:Kağıthane-Kemerburgaz dekovil hattı.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.188.90 13:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Schlucht. Voie ferrée - Automobile militaire vers Le Collet, 1916.jpg

File:La Schlucht. Voie ferrée - Automobile militaire vers Le Collet, 1916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.188.90 13:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrière Kaolin Les Echassières 01.jpg

File:Carrière Kaolin Les Echassières 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

94.254.188.90 13:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:RCF-Brigadelok 'Henriette' beim Kamp van Beverlo (französisch Camp de Beverloo),dem Truppenübungsplatz in der belgischen Stadt Leopoldsburg.jpg

File:RCF-Brigadelok 'Henriette' beim Kamp van Beverlo (französisch Camp de Beverloo),dem Truppenübungsplatz in der belgischen Stadt Leopoldsburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

95.40.153.31 14:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dūkšto–Drujos geležinkelis.jpg

File:Dūkšto–Drujos geležinkelis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.100.247 10:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decauville narrow gauge locomotive of the Tramway de Pithiviers à Toury.jpg

File:Decauville narrow gauge locomotive of the Tramway de Pithiviers à Toury.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 11:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decauville locomotives, probably N° 1566 and N°1648.jpg

File:Decauville locomotives, probably N° 1566 and N°1648.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 11:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decauville 8 tonnes type Progrès garée froide sur un chantier de l'entreprise de T.P. Vandewalle & Cie.jpg

File:Decauville 8 tonnes type Progrès garée froide sur un chantier de l'entreprise de T.P. Vandewalle & Cie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 11:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decauville locomotive of Skydra-Aridea-Orma line on a bridge.png

File:Decauville locomotive of Skydra-Aridea-Orma line on a bridge.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 11:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freshly painted Decauville locomotive on an old postcard.jpg

File:Freshly painted Decauville locomotive on an old postcard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 12:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 12:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benzol-Lokomotive mit Förderbahnwagen.jpg

File:Benzol-Lokomotive mit Förderbahnwagen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 12:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrière Kaolin Les Echassières 02.jpg

File:Carrière Kaolin Les Echassières 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.173.116.176 12:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gemeindegrenzenkarte Grenzgebiet Lkr Erding–Mühldorf–Wasserburg–Vilsbiburg

Hallo geschätzter NearEMPTiness könntest du aus folgenden Karten (siehe Gallery) eine Grenzgebietskarte erstellen, die könnte dir auch zum Erstellen von Ortsartikeln helfen, in dem du Fotos von mir verwendest. Ich Stelle mir eine Karte vor in der vom Gebiet des Landkreises Erding die heutigen Gemeinden Taufkirchen, Dorfen, St. Wolfgang, Isen und Lengdorf, vom heutigen Landkreis Landshut die (heutige) Gemeinde Velden, sowie das restliche Gebiet der (ehemaligen) Gemeinden Neufraunhofen, Wurmsham und Pauluszell, vom heutigen Landkreis Mühldorf die (heutigen) Gemeinden Buchbach, Schwindegg, Obertaufkirchen, Rattenkirchen, Kirchdorf sowie die ehemaligen Gemeinden Weidenbach, Stefanskirchen, Kronberg und Winden.

Landkreis Vilsbiburg Gemeindegrenzenkarte 1960-61.jpg Originalbild
Landkreis Mühldorf Gemeindegrenzenkarte 1960-61.jpg Originalbild
Landkreis Wasserburg am Inn Gemeindegrenzenkarte.jpg Originalbild
Landkreis Erding Alt.png Originalbild
Dorfen in Dorfen.svg Originalbild
Isen Gemarkungen.jpg Originalbild

Herzliche Grüße --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Ich hatte beim Lesen des Artikels de:Vilslern einen ähnlichen Gedanken, insbesondere für die noch zu erstellenden Artikel von denen es noch keine Fotos gibt. Vor Mitte Oktober werde ich mich kaum mit der Kartographie befassen können, so dass eine der Werkstätten vielleicht schneller zu einem Ergebnis kommen kann. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aha okay, willst du vielleicht den reinstellen, oder wärs besser wenns ich machen sollte? Wenn man/du darauf warten könnte, müsste man noch darauf hinweisen, dass Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts die Gemeinde Hubenstein in die Gemeinde Moosen/Vils eingemeindet wurde, aber die in der Karte einzutragen lohnt sich nicht, sie war noch kleiner als die ehemalige Gemeinde Stollnkirchen. Aber wenn du anderer Meinung bist, hier ist die Quelle für die Kartenbearbeitung. Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das kannst Du sicher besser und mit größeren Erfolgsaussichten als ich, auch weil ich noch nicht genau genug verstehe, welcher Bereich uns wichtig ist. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Nach anfänglichen Fehlversuchen war das mit GIMP 2.10 eigentlich gar nicht so schwer. Hoffentlich gefällt Dir dieser erste/zweite Versuch (siehe Versionsgeschichte). Ich werde aufgrund von beruflichen und privaten Verpflichtungen in den nächsten 2-3 Wochen voraussichtlich nur selten auf Wikipedia aktiv sein, aber bei diesem Projekt besteht ja prinzipiell keine Eile. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danke @NearEMPTiness das passt, die Grenzen generell vom Landkreis Wasserburg und die Grenzen innerhalb der Landkreise Mühldorf und Wasserburg etwas mehr hervorheben krieg ich selbst auch hin. Danke vielmals (ich werde dann auch noch eine Cropped-Version erstellen. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Landkreise Vilsbiburg, Mühldorf, Erding und Wasserburg um 1960.jpg

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Schwindkirchen) Langhaushauptfresko.jpg

Hallo @NearEMPTiness könntest du bitte von dem Bild eine Cropped-Version erstellen? Wenn ich mit meinem Photo Editor meine hochauflösenden Hauptkammera-Bilder bearbeite verkleinert der Editor immer die Pixelzahl auf etwa ⅝-⅔ der Größe. Ich hätte gerne das unnötige Zuviel oben und unten abgeschnitten, so dass es zu links und rechts passt. Danke schon mal im voraus, du kannst es dann gerne auch gleich im Kirchenartikel gegen die Normalversion austauschen. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Ich denke, da war jemand schneller als ich, während ich gerade beruflich viel zu tun habe:

Zwischen "Precise Mode" und "Lossless Mode" sollte bei dieser Bildgröße kein großer Unterschied sein. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @NearEMPTiness ich hatte das zwischenzeitlich schon in die Fotowerkstatt gestellt, weil du meintest dass du aus beruflichen Gründen so schnell nicht dazu kommst. Du könntest aber was anderes machen, die Artikel Penzing (Lengdorf) und Schlairdorf mit den Ortsteil-Boxen bestücken und im Penzing-Artikel die Datei File:Mühle Penzing 5 (2).jpg in die Box setzen. Danke, Gomera-b hat keine Lust, der Artikel Schlairdorf ist auch noch nicht richtig korrekturgelesen. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 14:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dampfokomotive, die O&K 1898 in Berlin baute und in einer Zuckerfabrik in Tapiau (ehemals Ostpreussen) eingesetzt wurde. Danach mehrwe Besitzer, inkl. Firma Veba AG in Zürich am Flughafen, Patrick Keller und Daniel Rutschmann.webp / PD-Switzerland-photo

Hello NearEMPTiness,

FYI you shoudln't add {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} to new imports. It's written on the license tag itself (This licence tag cannot not be used for new imports after April 1, 2020.). See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD Switzerland (Individuality) too. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 13:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I changed the licence tag by now. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not leaving redirect

Hi, it's only possible to not leave a redirect, if the file is not linked anywhere. Because it was linked at en.wikipedia, I couldn't delete the redirect. So you know that for the next time. Grtz. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Hello NearEMPTiness, Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore Team in India!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How can I Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload your photos button which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 in India. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

1st prize: 400 USD
2nd prize: 300 USD
3rd prize: 100 USD
Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, write to us on our talk page or email us.

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore Team India.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Hello NearEMPTiness,

Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team! Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How can I Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload Now Icon which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

1st prize: 400 USD
2nd prize: 300 USD
3rd prize: 100 USD
Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group here

Warm regards,

Gaurav and Issac

#WeTogether

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Unicode pseudo-italics

Be aware that the artificial italics you're using on files like File:𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒂 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒏𝒖𝒍𝒖𝒊 (𝑼.𝑰.𝑳.) 𝑩𝒊𝒙𝒂𝒅 22.jpg and categories like Category:𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒂 𝑳𝒆𝒎𝒏𝒖𝒍𝒖𝒊 𝑩𝒊𝒙𝒂𝒅 are mathematical Unicode markup rather than genuine italic text. The Commons software does not recognise these as words, so a person searching Commons for "Unitatae de Industrializare" will not be shown the content. I've requested a category rename. Belbury (talk) 13:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just noted what had happened, when it was too late. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Entgleiste Zwillings-Feldbahnlokomotive an der Ostfront des Ersten Weltkriegs, 1914-1918 (b).jpg

Copyright status: File:Entgleiste Zwillings-Feldbahnlokomotive an der Ostfront des Ersten Weltkriegs, 1914-1918 (b).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Entgleiste Zwillings-Feldbahnlokomotive an der Ostfront des Ersten Weltkriegs, 1914-1918 (b).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Entgleiste Zwillings-Feldbahnlokomotive an der Ostfront des Ersten Weltkriegs, 1914-1918 (c).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Boon Street station, unknown date.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#NearEMPTiness and copyright issues. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, you need to respond in the discussion on COM:AN and explain what is going on here, or this account is very likely to be blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 19:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luzhniki Cableway Station May 2018 (07).jpg

File:Luzhniki Cableway Station May 2018 (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MBH 19:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uncategorized empty categories

What are your thoughts on Commons_talk:Report_UncategorizedCategories_with_infobox#Empty_ones? Some 39 have your username as last editor.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 10:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Enhancing999: Please go ahead, if you want to delete them. I guess, I have created them inadvertantly. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. What happens sometimes is that people disconnect them when doing a copy-and-paste moves and don't delete or redirect them. Sometimes also actual duplicates where created.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Enhancing999: By now, I have found your list and noted that these categories were not empty but just uncategorized. I have categorized them by now, and they should be kept, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much appreciated. I updated Commons:Report_UncategorizedCategories_with_infobox and indeed, there are almost none left.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Koroki Mahuta (17346000529).jpg

File:King Koroki Mahuta (17346000529).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TheLoyalOrder (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikishootme und Listeria Botliste

Um den Überblick zu behalten und um meine Fotos wiederzufinden, benutze ich Wikishootme und Wikidata.

https://wikishootme.toolforge.org/#lat=48.51173744133355&lng=9.060716629028322&zoom=14

Alle interessanten Objekte bekommen ein Wikidataobjekt mit Koordinaten. Sie erscheinen dann in der Karte von wikishootme als rote Punkte. Sobald ich Fotos dazu habe, lege ich dann die Commonscat dazu an, mit der Infobox Wikidata. Das Wikidataobjekt bekommt ein Foto, ist dann als grüner Punkt dargestellt. So finde ich meine Fotos wieder. Die Galerien sind nur Zugabe. Wenn du also ein Foto für etwas Bestimmtes suchst, dann schau rein in Wikishootme. Wenn eines gesucht wird und es gibt keines, erzeuge ein Wikidataobjekt. Das Foto auf Wikidata wird von Google ausgewertet und erscheint dann häufig bei der Stichwortsuche.

Für die Pflege der Wikidataobjekte gibt es dann noch die Botlisten von Listeriabot. Die lege ich aber nur an, wenn ich intensiv an einer Region arbeite.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Giftzwerg_88/Botlisten

Vor allem, wenn ich eine größere Menge Objekte angelegt habe, benutze ich die Botliste. Da sehe ich dann recht schnell doppelte Objekte, fehlende Koordinaten, fehlende Fotos, fehlende Commonscats oder Beschreibungen etc. Wikidata scheint zuerst ein Overkill zu sein, aber der Nutzen für die multlinguale Infobox Wikidata auf Commons, durch die Botliste und Wikishootme wiegt das recht schnell auf. Vor allem zeigt es mir sofort, wo der wirkliche Bedarf an weiteren Fotos ist und wo man neue Commonscats braucht. Durch so ein Objekt und die Infobox Wikidata wird eine Commonskat zu einem gigantischen Informationstool. Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist ein guter Tipp, danke. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Nikolaus Neu (Herrsching) 2.jpg

File:St. Nikolaus Neu (Herrsching) 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:8108:2A9:D100:C032:C371:7345:7445 20:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Payasos de circo.jpg

File:Payasos de circo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hahn_Hi-Boy

Hahn Hi-Boy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 23:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karten-Collage

Lichtenau bei Miesbach unter Bezeichnung 'Bosch' im Urkataster um 1835-40 (oben links) auf OpenStreetMap 2024 (Mitte) und auf TK25 1937 (unten rechts)

Hallo @NearEMPTiness könntest du die 3 Karten in der Category Lichtenau (Miesbach) übereinander zusammenfügen: 1835-40 oben und 2024 unten. Diese könnte man dann als Hochkant-Datei in den dazugehörigen Artikel einfügen. Den ich zwar selbst gerne schreiben würde, leider finde ich im Netz nichts ausreichendes. Vielleicht reizen dich die Fotografien und die fertige Collage selbst tätig zu werden, du als Recherche-König. Herzliche Grüße und Dank, Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Das ist ein guter Vorschlag. Ich habe daraufhin einen Entwurf auf Grundlage der lizenzrechtlich unproblematischen OpenStreetMap Karte erstellt.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Ein Anfang ist gemacht: de:Lichtenau (Miesbach) --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kartendownload spezielle Openstreetmap

Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Ortsplan mit topographischen Höhenlinien (OpenStreetMap)

Guten Abend @NearEMPTiness kannst du den auf folgender Website https://www.dropbox.com/s/ddehjl9mix8o58v/53963003-1035-49fe-9a1e-f60f60350310.zip?dl=0 befindlichen Openstreetmap-Ortsplan von Garmisch-Partenkirchen, der mit topographischen Höhenlinien versehen ist, für Commons hochladen? Den Plan habe ich zwar vor 2/3 Tagen heruntergeladen, aber irgendwie lässt er sich über mein Tablet nicht hochladen, da er über das Hochladeformular nicht in meinen Dateien nicht auffindbar ist. Ich habe über Commons auch 2 private Kartenbearbeitungswünsche für 2 südliche mittelgebirgische Erkundungstouren geplant. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Der Plan war in einer zip-Datei verpackt, ließ sich aber problemlos entpacken und hochladen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Auf meinem Tablet hatte ich sie auch entpackt gehabt, trotzdem habe ich die Karte über das Hochladeformular nicht in meinen Dateien gefunden. Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Earl of Norbury

Category:Earl of Norbury is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.
In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.
Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Copper Family

Category:Copper Family is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.
In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.
Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kirchturm fertigstellen

Apostelkirche (Miesbach) 1.jpg Originalbild
Apostelkirche (Miesbach) 2.jpg Originalbild

Hallo @NearEMPTiness ich habe noch einen Bearbeitungswunsch zu meinem mehrtägigen Miesbach-Aufenthalt. Könntest du beim linken Bild durch eine Spiegelung des Turms vom rechten Bild ergänzen. Das erste Bild konnte ich nicht aus einer Entfernung durchführen dass wie beim anderen Bild der ganze Turm zu sehen ist. Das wäre dann das erste Bild in der Commonscat wo man soviel von der Kirche ohne Hindernisse sehen kann. Danke und Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Das ist eine interessante Aufgabenstellung, insbesondere damit die Turmuhr anschließend nicht rückwärts läuft. Ich bin bis Weihnachten nur abends, nachts und an Wochenende auf Wikipedia aktiv, so dass das wohl noch ein bisschen dauert. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Ohne Himmel und ohne die Uhren wäre es ganz einfach gewesen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen @NearEMPTiness danke ist dir recht gut gelungen, die Uhr sieht auf dem zweiten Blick etwas nachbesserungswürdig aus, aber das muss nicht sein, herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Ich habe die beiden Uhren noch einmal ausgehend von einer älteren Version in GIMP neu gespiegelt, diesmal nur innerhalb des blauen Kreises. Die kleinen Unzulänglichkeiten liegen jetzt vor allem an der Perspektive der Zeiger und weniger an der Perspektive der Ellipsen. NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Hello!

As we close the curtains on a successful Wiki Loves Folklore 2024, we'd love to hear your thoughts! Your valuable feedback will help us improve future campaigns and ensure the continued preservation of cultural heritage around the globe.

Please take a few minutes to share your experience by filling out the following feedback form.

The form will be open for submissions until November 10th, 2024, at 23:59 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time).

We appreciate your participation and support! See you in February 2025!

Sincerely,

The Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearbeitungswunsch

File:Vinzentinum Freising Gesamtansicht 1.jpg

Guten Morgen @NearEMPTiness wäre es möglich an den kleinen Ästchen eine „Teilrodung“ durchzuführen (damit vom mittleren und rechten Teil des Gebäudes etwas mehr zu sehen ist) und evtl die Kräne im Hintergrund etwas minimieren? Ricardalovesmonuments () 08:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricardalovesmonuments Zwei der drei Kräne ließen sich innerhalb von 20 min verlustfrei entfernen, aber für die Baumentlaubung fehlt mir das blattfreie Grundmaterial (oder eine gute Idee). --NearEMPTiness) 12:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eigentlich dachte ich nur die Zweigchen im Dachraum und darunter wo kein Laub mehr dran ist, das würde mir vollkommen reichen. Da erkennt man genug um die fehlenden Stellen zu füllen (glaube ich). Es hätte auch gereicht die Kräne auf ²/3 bzw ⅝- Größe zu verkleinern, damit sie den Hintergrund nicht so dominieren. Herzliche Grüße

@Ricardalovesmonuments Danke für diesen Motivationsschub. Daraufhin kam der Holzfäller und hat den mittleren Baum weggesägt und auch noch gleich den dritten Kran abgebaut. --NearEMPTiness 20:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teil 2

File:Gasthaus Erdinger Weißbräu (Erding).jpg

Guten Abend NearEMPTiness, kannst du in Kombination der beiden Versionen der Bilddatei etwas deichseln. Ich bin mit dem Foto nicht wirklich zufrieden: links ist ein Gebäudeteil zu dunkel, das überwiegende rechte Drittel ist etwas überlichtet, und links im Vordergrund ist eine Baustellen-Absperrung zu sehen. Du kannst gerne eine extra Datei erstellen, weil die Veränderung wohl etwas zu groß werden wird. Herzliche Grüße --Ricardalovesmonuments () 18:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ricardalovesmonuments Danke für die Anfrage. Nach anfänglicher Verwirrung habe ich schließlich auch das zweite Bild in der Versionsgeschichte gefunden. Mir gefällt das Laub-lose Bild eigentlich ganz gut, insbesondere wenn jemand Licht und Schatten etwas aneinander angleicht. Allerdings habe ich mit Kontrast/Helligkeit insbesondere bei Farbfotos gar keine Erfahrung. Ich empfehle daher, dass Du Dich bitte an die Fotowerkstatt wendest oder an Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:NearEMPTiness

TUSC token 970e4a6a3604a4de64227b334d4ac70e

Quality Image Promotion

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

Survey

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Upcoming Articles

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

File:De-Tübingen.ogg‎

Bildbeschreibungen

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Lore Henke

Kylie Jenner photos deletion withdrawals

need Alfa Romeo Giulia 2015 at IAA 2015

Why nominated for deletion

Danke

{{PD-US-no notice}}

Froissy Dompierre Light Railway

Fabriksnummer

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Tübingen

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Trainpix

File:Le chemin de fer forestier de la forêt de Barr.jpg

Le Train des Plantations

Categories for animals & plants

Pflichtbewusster oder Schädling?

Umstrukturierung der Kategorien in Category:Tübingen

Copyright status: File:Cargo Boat Guame pendant son dechargement a Saint-Laurent.jpg

Vorlage

Postkarten der Gebrüder Metz

Pfalzgraf von Tübingen

Jung Typ HILAX

Stoney Creek Bridge (07).jpg

Bahnknoten Eichenberg

Decauville Fotografien

Markus Krall

Counts of Montfort

A dubious picture

Counts of Werdenberg

Zwei Bilder falsch beschriftet (erl.)

Test weight cars category

Copyright? Beschriftetes Foto aus einem Buch

Cropping historical photographs - Wady Hanein, Palestine

Railway Inn, Spofforth

Erich Schairer?

Copyright wegen einem photographiertem Foto aus einem Buch?

Great minds think alike?

Löschdiskussion seit heute abgeschlossen (Entscheid: Behalten)

Rotkäppchen

Issue

Neue Version (eventuell)

Technische Frage

Notification about possible deletion

Gemeindegrenzenkarte Grenzgebiet Lkr Erding–Mühldorf–Wasserburg–Vilsbiburg

File:Dampfokomotive, die O&K 1898 in Berlin baute und in einer Zuckerfabrik in Tapiau (ehemals Ostpreussen) eingesetzt wurde. Danach mehrwe Besitzer, inkl. Firma Veba AG in Zürich am Flughafen, Patrick Keller und Daniel Rutschmann.webp / PD-Switzerland-photo

Not leaving redirect

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Use of Unicode pseudo-italics

Copyright status: File:Entgleiste Zwillings-Feldbahnlokomotive an der Ostfront des Ersten Weltkriegs, 1914-1918 (b).jpg

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

Notification about possible deletion

COM:AN

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

uncategorized empty categories

Wikishootme und Listeria Botliste

Karten-Collage

Kartendownload spezielle Openstreetmap

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Kirchturm fertigstellen

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Bearbeitungswunsch

Teil 2

Navigation menu