User talk:Stefan Bernd
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:S-20 III.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:S-20 III.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rosenzweig δ 12:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Rangsit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Rosenzweig δ 00:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- That deletion came fast...Stefan Bernd (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Neumarkt befestigung 1675.jpg is uncategorized since 2 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dietzgen.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dietzgen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Dietzgen.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Lupo 08:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Leider weiß ich da auch nicht mehr. Bei einem Menschen, der seit 1888 tot ist, müsste es aber doch auch ein unknown tun, oder? Den ursprünglichen Uploader auf deWP habe ich kontaktiert. Gruß, Stefan Bernd (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Transfer de -> commons
[edit]Hallo Stefan,
Du hast zwei von mir in de: hochgeladene Dateien nach Commons transferiert: File:HMCutterWickham.jpg, File:HMCutterWickham_clip.jpg. Soll mir Recht sein, habe ich nichts dagegen, eher im Gegenteil. Aber dass Du die von mir unter erheblicher Mühe zusammengetragenen Informationen von der Bildbeschreibungsseite unterschlagen hast, ist mir überhaupt nicht Recht. (Es handelt sich bei der Vorlage um ein eher technisches Dokument.) Ich nehme an, der Transfer erfolgt zumindest teilautomatisch, aber dann ist offenbar die Automatik revisionsbedürftig. Ich mich habe in anderen Fällen schon öfter über die eigenartigen und unpassenden Einträge bei Urheber und Datum gewundert, das sollte man ehrlich gesagt sowieso ändern. Wie auch immer: Ich hätte gern die Daten wieder. --(de:User:Lax)92.75.92.243 13:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo Lax,
- sorry, war keine Absicht. Ich benutze den Move-to-Commons-Assistant. Grundsätzlich nimmt der eine Originalinfo immer mit und zeigt diese dann unter original an, wie bspw. hier unter Datum und Quelle. Ich weiss nicht mehr, wie der Ablauf damals war und was ich da geändert hatte (normalerweise lösche ich keine brauchbaren Informationen). Ich habe darum gebeten, dass die Bilder in meinem BNR wieder hergestellt werden, so dass ich die Versionen vergleichen kann. Danke für den Hinweis. Gruß, Stefan Bernd (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Das hatte ich ja befürchtet, dass das keine Absicht war. Im Ernst, ich habe ein wenig den Verdacht, dass da was systematisch schiefläuft. Die Informationen waren unter der Rubrik Anmerkungen im Informationsbaustein eingetragen. Im „Original upload log“ ist der Anfang noch übersetzt als „Notes=…“ zu erkennen, im Quelltext der Seite aber nicht mehr vorhanden, und ein solcher Eintrag würde, wie ich ausprobiert habe, in Commons auch gar nicht dargestellt. Wenn Du mehr weißt, könntest Du mir vielleicht zuhause Bescheid geben? Hier kriege ich es sonst vielleicht nicht mit. Danke. --92.74.85.88 22:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Diskussion wird nun zuhause weitergeführt. Stefan Bernd (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Nicolaus_von_Thaden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thaden (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ranavalona.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ranavalona.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 23:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Vita-follen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Animalparty (talk) 04:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Papst Leo XIII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |