„Benutzer:Heppina/Lea Elsaesser (author)“ – Versionsunterschied

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
Heppina (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Heppina (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 85: Zeile 85:
* Streeck, W., und Elsässer, L. (2016). Monetary disunion: the domestic politics of euroland. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 23(1), 1-24. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1080287 DOI ] [https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000365681100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL Author/Publisher URL]
* Streeck, W., und Elsässer, L. (2016). Monetary disunion: the domestic politics of euroland. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 23(1), 1-24. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1080287 DOI ] [https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=fis-test-1&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000365681100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL Author/Publisher URL]


Citation on [https://scholar.google.com.tw/citations?user=fhy3qVsAAAAJ&hl=en Google Scholar]


== More information ==
== More information ==

Version vom 10. Oktober 2024, 17:51 Uhr

Achtung! Dies ist KEINE unabhängige Wikipedia-Seite, bei der jede Aussage mit Sekundärliteratur belegt wurde.!
Auf dieser Seite herrscht das blanke Chaos unbelegter Primärliteratur der ebenso chaotischen Heppina.
Falls an den Information dieser Seite weiterhin Interesse bestehen sollte, rate ich dazu,
diese Abzuspeichern, da diese Seite gelöscht wird.
Heppina behält sich vor, diese Seite noch drastisch zu verschönern.!


Lea Elsässer has been a research associate at the Institute of Political Science at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Department of Comparative Political Science, since April 2022.


About the person:

  • Since April 2022 Research assistant (postdoc) at the Institute of Political Science at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Department of Comparative Political Science


  • September 2019 to March 2022 Research assistant (postdoc) at the Chair of Comparative Political Science, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster


  • September 2019 – August 2020 Visiting scientist at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne


  • January to August 2019 Parental leave


  • November 2017 to March 2022 Research assistant at the Institute of Socioeconomics, University of Duisburg-Essen


  • March 2018 PhD at the University of Osnabrück


  • September 2016 to December 2016 Research stay at Northwestern University, Evanston, USA


  • 2014 to 2017 Visiting doctoral student at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne and doctoral fellow of the German National Academic Foundation


  • 2013 to 2014 Research assistant at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne


  • 2010 to 2013 Master’s degree M.Sc. in Economics, University of Cologne


  • 2006 to 2010 Bachelor’s degree B.Sc. in International Economics and European Studies, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen

Introduction

Lea Elsässer has succeeded in writing a highly interesting book with a clearly structured line of thought. By asking which social interests actually influence political decisions, she deals with one of the central themes of a democracy that is based on the idea of joint decisions by free and equal people.

The reasons for a systematic comparison of political systems or structures lie primarily in the representation of the unknown and the highlighting of recognized anomalies.

Thesis

Dr. Lea Elsässer was awarded [1] the Wilhelm Liebknecht Prize by the city of Giessen. Lea Elsässer has also gained great recognition [2] far beyond Europe with her numerous scientific contributions in specialist publications and books, and not only in specialist circles, which implicitly also increases her level of fame.

Egalitarian societies, from the Latin aequalitas, refer to a social group, community or society in which all members normally have equal access to all central resources and no member can permanently exercise power over others. The social status of the individual in egalitarian groups depends primarily on his abilities and his will. However, political and/or social equality only exists in theory. It means the agreement of at least two things such as objects, facts or people in at least one characteristic. This equality is a general ideal of justice, the development of which goes back more than two thousand years. Equality gained constitutional significance in 1776 in the Declaration of Independence of the United States. Along with liberty and fraternity, equality was one of the three leitmotifs of the French Revolution of 1789. It is a democratic principle that all people are equal before the law.

Outlook

In the fields of comparative political science, socioeconomics and communication science, her scientific (collaborative) work has set new standards and thus significantly expanded the boundaries of her research area.

Literature (excerpt)

contributions

  • Mathisen, R., Schakel, W., Hense, S., et al. (2023). Unequal Responsiveness and Government Partisanship in Northwest Europe. In Unequal Democracies (pp. 29-53). Cambridge University Press. DOI

Books

Journal articles

  • Elsaesser, L. (2024). Careerism and working-class decline: The role of party selectorates in explaining trends in descriptive (mis-)representation. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 89. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., Fastenrath, F., und Rehm, M. (2023). Making the rich pay? Social democracy and wealth taxation in Europe in the aftermath of the great financial crisis. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 15(2), 194-213. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., und Schäfer, A. (2023). Political Inequality in Rich Democracies. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 26, 469-487. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., und Haffert, L. (2022). Does fiscal pressure constrain policy responsiveness? Evidence from Germany. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 61(2), 374-397. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., und Schäfer, A. (2022). (N)one of us? The case for descriptive representation of the contemporary working class. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 45(6), 1361-1384. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., Hense, S., und Schäfer, A. (2021). Not just money: unequal responsiveness in egalitarian democracies. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 28(12), 1890-1908. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L. (2018). Ungleiche politische Repräsentation und sozialstaatlicher Wandel. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 64(4), 525-562. DOI
  • Elsässer, L., und Schäfer, A. (2018). The Political Representation of Women and Welfare State Restructuring. POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 59(4), 659-680. DOI Author/Publisher URL
  • Elsässer, L., Hense, S., und Schäfer, A. (2017). Government for the People? – Unequal Responsiveness of the Bundestag. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 27(2), 161-180. DOI
  • Elsässer,Lea/Armin Schäfer, 2016: Group Representation for the Working Class? Opinion Differences Among Occupational Groups in Germany. In: MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/3, 1-19. Publisher URL
  • Streeck, W., und Elsässer, L. (2016). Monetary disunion: the domestic politics of euroland. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 23(1), 1-24. DOI Author/Publisher URL

Citation on Google Scholar

More information

  1. Politische (Un-)Gleichheit und die Versprechen der Demokratie. In: bpb.de. Abgerufen am 25. Juni 2024: „Politische Gleichheit ist ein zentrales Versprechen der Demokratie. Doch politische Ungleichheit ist weit verbreitet. Wird sie die Leistungsfähigkeit modernder Demokratien gefährden? Welche Reformmaßnahmen sind sinnvoll?“
  2. Lea Elsässer ausgezeichnet. In: uni-due.de. Abgerufen am 25. Juni 2024: „Für ihre Dissertation „Wessen Stimme zählt? Soziale und politische Ungleichheit in Deutschland“ wurde Dr. Lea Elsässer von der Stadt Gießen mit dem Wilhelm-Liebknecht-Preis ausgezeichnet. Elsässer ist seit 2017 wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Sozioökonomie. Die Auszeichnung ist mit 2.500 Euro dotiert.“
  3. Politische (Un-)Gleichheit und die Versprechen der Demokratie. In: MPIfG Buch. Abgerufen am 25. Juni 2024: „8. November 2018. MPIfG Buch. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, 2018. 218 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-593-51004- (broschiert) ISBN 978-3-593-44051-4 (E-Book, PDF) » Verlagsseite. » Inhalt und Einleitung [PDF] Elsässer, Lea. Wessen Stimme zählt? Soziale und politische Ungleichheit in Deutschland.“