Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Proprioceptor Models

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

  • 366 Accesses

Definition

Charles Sherrington coined the term “proprioception” to describe the sensing of the body’s own movements (Sherrington 1907). He included receptors of the vestibular apparatus as well as receptors in deep tissues such as muscles in his definition. Proprioceptive signals are an important component of feedback to the CNS for the control of posture and movement. Input to the spinal cord from proprioceptors influences the activity of muscles via reflex connections to motoneurons. It is also conveyed to structures in the brainstem, midbrain, cerebrum, and cerebellum involved in motor control. Neuromechanical models incorporating proprioceptive feedback have become increasingly influential in the understanding of the neural control of movement.

Detailed Description

In 1834, Charles Bell proposed that mammalian muscles contain sensory receptors that mediated both a “muscle sense” underlying the subconscious control of movement (Bell 1834) and the conscious sensation of position and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aimonetti JM, Hospod V, Roll JP, Ribot-Ciscar E (2007) Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements. J Physiol 580:649–658

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aimonetti JM, Roll JP, Hospod V, Ribot-Ciscar E (2012) Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans. Exp Brain Res 221:167–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JH (1974) Dynamic characteristics of Golgi tendon organs. Brain Res 67:531–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson BF, Lennerstrand G, Thoden U (1968) Response characteristics of muscle spindle endings at constant length to variations in fusimotor activation. Acta Physiol Scand 74:301–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appenteng K, Prochazka A (1984) Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats. J Physiol 353:81–92

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks RW, Stacey MJ (1988) Quantitative studies on mammalian muscle spindles and their sensory innervation. In: Hnik P, Soukup T, Vejsada R, Zelena J (eds) Mechanoreceptors: development, structure and function. Plenum, London, pp 263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker D (1974) The morphology of muscle receptors. In: Hunt CC (ed) Handbook of sensory physiol (muscle receptors). Springer, Berlin, pp 1–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker D, Ip MC, Adal MN (1962) A correlation between the receptor population of the cat's soleus muscle and the afferent fibre diameter spectrum of the nerve supplying it. In: Barker D (ed) Symposium on muscle receptors. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian HC (1888) The “muscular sense”; its nature and localisation. Brain 10:1–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell C (1834) The hand. Its mechanism and vital endowments as evincing design. William Pickering, London, p 348

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergenheim M, Johansson H, Pedersen J, Ohberg F, Sjolander P (1996) Ensemble coding of muscle stretches in afferent populations containing different types of muscle afferents. Brain Res 734:157–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IA, Roberts TDM (1953) Proprioceptive discharges from stretch receptors in the knee joint of the cat. J Physiol 122:38–58

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess PR, Clark FJ (1969) Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol 203:317–335

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bush BMH (1981) Non-impulsive stretch receptors in crustaceans. In: Roberts A, Bush BMH (eds) Neurones without impulses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli G, Farabollini F, Fontani G, Meucci M (1979) Slowly adapting receptors in cat hip joint. J Neurophysiol 42:767–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WJ, Poppele RE (1978) Small-signal analysis of response of mammalian muscle spindles with fusimotor stimulation and a comparison with large-signal responses. J Neurophysiol 41:15–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark FJ, Horch KW, Bach SM, Larson GF (1979) Contributions of cutaneous and joint receptors to static knee-position sense in man. J Neurophysiol 42:877–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark FJ, Burgess RC, Chapin JW, Lipscomb WT (1985) Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. J Neurophysiol 54:1529–1540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DF, Prochazka A (1996) Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand. J Physiol 496(Pt 3):857–871

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crago PE, Houk JC, Rymer WZ (1982) Sampling of total muscle force by tendon organs. J Neurophysiol 47:1069–1083

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe A (1968) A mechanical model of the mammalian muscle spindle. J Theor Biol 21:21–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dideriksen JL, Enoka RM, Farina D (2011) A model of the surface electromyogram in pathological tremor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:2178–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriou M, Edin BB (2008) Discharges in human muscle receptor afferents during block grasping. J Neurosci 28:12632–12642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (1992) Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin. J Neurophysiol 67:1105–1113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (2001) Cutaneous afferents provide information about knee joint movements in humans. J Physiol 531:289–297

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB (2004) Quantitative analyses of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 92:3233–3243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB, Johansson N (1995) Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J Physiol 487:243–251

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emonet-Denand F, Laporte Y, Matthews PB, Petit J (1977) On the subdivision of static and dynamic fusimotor actions on the primary ending of the cat muscle spindle. J Physiol (Lond) 268:827–861

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell WR (1980) The adequacy of stretch receptors in the cat knee joint for signalling joint angle throughout a full range of movement. J Physiol 299:85–100

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell WR, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1987) The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol 386:63–71

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Austen RB (1969) The mechanoreceptors of the costo-vertebral joints. J Physiol 202:737–753

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JE, Morgan DL, Proske U (1985) Site of impulse initiation in tendon organs of cat soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 54:1383–1395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JE, McIntyre AK, Proske U (1989) Tendon organ afferents in the knee joint nerve of the cat. Neurosci Lett 103:287–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg P, Del Prete Z (2002) Stretch sensitivity of cutaneous afferent neurons. Behav Brain Res 135:35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg P, Greenspan BJ (1977) Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. J Neurophysiol 40:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1983) A model of spindle afferent response to muscle stretch. J Neurophysiol 49:989–1006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatz K, Mombaur K, and Donelan JM (2012) Control of ankle extensor muscle activity in walking cats. J Neurophysiol 108:2785–2793

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holm W, Padeken D, Schafer SS (1981) Characteristic curves of the dynamic response of primary muscle spindle endings with and without gamma stimulation. Pflugers Arch 391:163–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horch KW, Tuckett RP, Burgess PR (1977) A key to the classification of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Investig Dermatol 69:75–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houk J, Henneman E (1967) Responses of Golgi tendon organs to active contractions of the soleus muscle of the cat. J Neurophysiol 30:466–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houk J, Simon W (1967) Responses of Golgi tendon organs to forces applied to muscle tendon. J Neurophysiol 30:1466–1481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houk JC, Singer JJ, Henneman E (1971) Adequate stimulus for tendon organs with observations on mechanics of ankle joint. J Neurophysiol 34:1051–1065

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE (1981) Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J Neurophysiol 46:143–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M (1984) The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 101:1–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Emonet-Denand F, Baumann TK (1985) Enhancement of stretch sensitivity of cat primary spindle afferents by low-rate static gamma action. In: Boyd IA, Gladden M (eds) The muscle spindle. Macmillan, London, pp 189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles JF, Stokes M, Young A (1990) Reflex actions of knee joint afferents during contraction of the human quadriceps. Clin Physiol 10:489–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jami L (1992) Golgi tendon organs in mammalian skeletal muscle: functional properties and central actions. Physiol Rev 72:623–666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JK, Rudjord T (1964) On the silent period and Golgi tendon organs of the soleus muscle of the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 62:364–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Vallbo AB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 286:283–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1991) Receptors in the knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:341–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kistemaker DA, Van Soest AJ, Wong JD, Kurtzer I, Gribble PL (2013) Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback. J Neurophysiol 109:1126–1139

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knibestol M (1975) Stimulus–response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 245:63–80

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczewski J, Prochazka A (2006) Interactive receptor model. http://www.ualberta.ca/∼aprochaz/research_spindle_intro.html

  • Lennerstrand G (1968) Position and velocity sensitivity of muscle spindles in the cat. I. Primary and secondary endings deprived of fusimotor activation. Acta Physiol Scand 73:281–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC, Crago PE (2002a) Neural and mechanical contributions to the stretch reflex: a model synthesis. Ann Biomed Eng 30:54–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC, Crago PE (2002b) Structural model of the muscle spindle. Ann Biomed Eng 30:68–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrey CR, Strzalkowski ND, Bent LR (2010) Skin sensory information from the dorsum of the foot and ankle is necessary for kinesthesia at the ankle joint. Neurosci Lett 485:6–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lund JP, Matthews B (1981) Responses of temporomandibular joint afferents recorded in the Gasserian ganglion of the rabbit to passive movements of the mandible. In: Kawamura Y (ed) Oral-facial sensory and motor functions. Quintessence, Tokyo, pp 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltenfort MG, Burke RE (2003) Spindle model responsive to mixed fusimotor inputs and testable predictions of beta feedback effects. J Neurophysiol 89:2797–2809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markin SN, Klishko AN, Shevtsova NA, Lemay MA, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA (2010) Afferent control of locomotor CPG: insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1198:21–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PB (1963) The response of De-efferented muscle spindle receptors to stretching at different velocities. J Physiol 168:660–678

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (2011) Muscle spindles: their messages and their fusimotor supply. In: Baldwin K, Edgerton VR, Wagner P (eds) Comprehensive physiology. Handbook of physiology, Exercise: regulation and integration of multiple systems. American Physiological Society, New York, Wiley, S29, pp 189–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PB, Stein RB (1969) The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J Physiol 200:723–743

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre AK, Proske U, Tracey DJ (1978) Afferent fibres from muscle receptors in the posterior nerve of the cat’s knee joint. Exp Brain Res 33:415–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mileusnic MP, Loeb GE (2006) Mathematical models of proprioceptors. II. Structure and function of the Golgi tendon organ. J Neurophysiol 96:1789–1802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mileusnic MP, Loeb GE (2009) Force estimation from ensembles of Golgi tendon organs. J Neural Eng 6:036001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mileusnic MP, Brown IE, Lan N, Loeb GE (2006) Mathematical models of proprioceptors. I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle. J Neurophysiol 96:1772–1788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL, Prochazka A, Proske U (1984) The after-effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles. J Physiol 356:465–477

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K, Ekeberg O, Buschges A (2006) Assessing sensory function in locomotor systems using neuro-mechanical simulations. Trends Neurosci 29:625–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J Neurophysiol 46:1204–1225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poppele RE, Bowman RJ (1970) Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol 33:59–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poppele RE, Terzuolo CA (1968) Myotatic reflex: its input–output relation. Science 159:743–745

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A (1996) Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In: Rowell L, Sheperd JT (eds) Handbook of physiology section 12 exercise: regulation and integration of multiple systems. American Physiological Society, New York, pp 89–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A (1999) Quantifying proprioception. Prog Brain Res 123:133–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Gorassini M (1998a) Ensemble firing of muscle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J Physiol 507(Pt 1):293–304

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Gorassini M (1998b) Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J Physiol 507:277–291

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Sorensen C (2009) Biomechanical imperatives in the neural control of locomotion. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol 153:S135–S136

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Yakovenko S (2007a) The neuromechanical tuning hypothesis. In: Cisek P, Drew T, Kalaska J (eds) Computational neuroscience: theoretical insights into brain function. Elsevier, New York, Progress in brain research 165:255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Yakovenko S (2007b) Predictive and reactive tuning of the locomotor CPG. Integr Comp Biol 47:474–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Gillard D, Bennett DJ (1997a) Implications of positive feedback in the control of movement. J Neurophysiol 77:3237–3251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Gillard D, Bennett DJ (1997b) Positive force feedback control of muscles. J Neurophysiol 77:3226–3236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Gritsenko V, Yakovenko S (2002) Sensory control of locomotion: reflexes versus higher-level control. Adv Exp Med Biol 508:357–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proske U (1981) The Golgi tendon organ. Properties of the receptor and reflex action of impulses arising from tendon organs. In: Porter R (ed) MTP international review of physiology, neurophysiology, IVth edn. MTP University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 127–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Proske U, Gregory JE (2002) Signalling properties of muscle spindles and tendon organs. Adv Exp Med Biol 508:5–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WJ, Rosenthal NP, Terzuolo CA (1971) A control model of stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 34:620–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal NP, McKean TA, Roberts WJ, Terzuolo CA (1970) Frequency analysis of stretch reflex and its main subsystems in triceps surae muscles of the cat. J Neurophysiol 33:713–749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudjord T (1970) A second order mechanical model of muscle spindle primary endings. Kybernetik 6:205–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma A, Otten E, Van Willigen JD (1991) A muscle spindle model for primary afferent firing based on a simulation of intrafusal mechanical events. J Neurophysiol 65:1297–1312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer SS (1973) The characteristic curves of the dynamic response of primary muscle spindle endings in the absence and presence of stimulation of fusimotor fibres. Brain Res 59:395–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington CS (1907) On the proprioceptive system, especially in its reflex aspects. Brain 29:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim Y, Husbands P (2012) Chaotic exploration and learning of locomotion behaviors. Neural Comput 24:2185–2222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Lan N, Loeb GE, Gordon J (2008a) Model-based sensorimotor integration for multi-joint control: development of a virtual arm model. Ann Biomed Eng 36:1033–1048

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Raphael G, Lan N, Loeb GE (2008b) Computationally efficient models of neuromuscular recruitment and mechanics. J Neural Eng 5:175–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spardy LE, Markin SN, Shevtsova NA, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA, Rubin JE (2011a) A dynamical systems analysis of afferent control in a neuromechanical model of locomotion: I. Rhythm generation. J Neural Eng 8:065003

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spardy LE, Markin SN, Shevtsova NA, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA, Rubin JE (2011b) A dynamical systems analysis of afferent control in a neuromechanical model of locomotion: II. Phase asymmetry. J Neural Eng 8:065004

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JA, Reinking RM, Stuart DG (1975) Tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: responses to active and passive forces as a function of muscle length. J Neurophysiol 38:1217–1231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stienen AH, Schouten AC, Schuurmans J, van der Helm FC (2007) Analysis of reflex modulation with a biologically realistic neural network. J Comput Neurosci 23:333–348

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A, Ellaway PH, Durbaba R, Rawlinson S (2000) Distinctive patterns of static and dynamic gamma motor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 529:825–836

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey DJ (1979) Characteristics of wrist joint receptors in the cat. Exp Brain Res 34:165–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss H (1971) Tabelle der absoluten und relativen Muskelspindelzahlen der menschlichen Skelettmuskulatur. Anat Anz 129:5562–5572

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber DJ, Stein RB, Everaert DG, Prochazka A (2007) Limb-state feedback from ensembles of simultaneously recorded dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neural Eng 4:S168–S180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber DJ, London BM, Hokanson JA, Ayers CA, Gaunt RA, Torres RR, Zaaimi B, Miller LE (2011) Limb-state information encoded by peripheral and central somatosensory neurons: implications for an afferent interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:501–513

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WJ (1981) A systems-oriented evaluation of the role of joint receptors and other afferents in position and motion sense. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 7:23–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams I, Constandinou TG (2013) Modelling muscle spindle dynamics for a proprioceptive prosthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013:1923–1926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis WD, Coggeshalll RE (1991) Sensory mechanisms of the spinal cord. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovenko S, Gritsenko V, Prochazka A (2004) Contribution of stretch reflexes to locomotor control: a modeling study. Biol Cybern 90:146–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zalkind VI (1971) Method for an adequate stimulation of receptors of the cat carpo-radialis joint. Sechenov Physiol J USSR 57:1123–1127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr EP, Stein RB (1999) What functions do reflexes serve during human locomotion? Prog Neurobiol 58:185–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Poignet P, Bo AP, Ang WT (2009) Exploring peripheral mechanism of tremor on neuromusculoskeletal model: a general simulation study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:2359–2369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zill SN, Schmitz J, Chaudhry S, Buschges A (2012) Force encoding in stick insect legs delineates a reference frame for motor control. J Neurophysiol 108:1453–1472

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Neuroscience, School of Molecular and Systems Medicine, University of Alberta, 507 HMRC, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada

    Dr. Arthur Prochazka

Authors
  1. Dr. Arthur Prochazka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Prochazka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Dieter Jaeger

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA

    Ranu Jung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Prochazka, A. (2014). Proprioceptor Models. In: Jaeger, D., Jung, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_644-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_644-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7320-6

  • eBook Packages: Living Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation