Skip to main content

Towards Learning the Optimal Sampling Strategy for Suffix Prediction in Predictive Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2024)

Abstract

Predictive monitoring is a subfield of process mining which focuses on forecasting the evolution of an ongoing process case. A related main challenge is activity suffix prediction, the problem of predicting the sequence of future activities until a case ends. One aspect that has been neglected is the activity selection strategy during inference and its impact on the results. This paper introduces the “Deep Reinforcement Learning Predictor” (DOGE), a system which leverages Deep Reinforcement Learning to learn the ideal sampling strategy during training of the neural model. This approach not only simplifies the design of the neural network but also enhances inference speed by avoiding explorative sampling strategies. Through an extensive evaluation against established benchmarks, DOGE shows significant improvements in both performance and adaptability across diverse event log characteristics, highlighting the efficacy of reinforcement learning in predictive monitoring.

E. Rama-Maneiro—The work presented in this paper was carried out during a research stay in Sapienza Università di Roma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 70.18
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 79.11
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal, P., Gupta, A., Sindhgatta, R., Dechu, S.: Goal-oriented next best activity recommendation using reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/2205.03219 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benavoli, A., Corani, G., Demšar, J., Zaffalon, M.: Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(77), 1–36 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Branchi, S., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Massimo, D., Ricci, F., Ronzani, M.: Learning to act: a reinforcement learning approach to recommend the best next activities. In: BPM Forum (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bukhsh, Z.A., Saeed, A., Dijkman, R.M.: Processtransformer: predictive business process monitoring with transformer network. CoRR abs/2104.00721 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo, B., Ceberio, J., Lozano, J.A.: Bayesian inference for algorithm ranking analysis. In: Proceedings of GECCO, ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Camargo, M., Dumas, M., González-Rojas, O.: Learning accurate LSTM models of business processes. In: Proceedings of BPM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiorrini, A., Diamantini, C., Mircoli, A., Potena, D.: A preliminary study on the application of reinforcement learning for predictive process monitoring. In: Process Mining Workshops - ICPM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corani, G., Benavoli, A., Demsar, J., Mangili, F., Zaffalon, M.: Statistical comparison of classifiers through bayesian hierarchical modelling. Mach. Learn. 106(11), 1817–1837 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalmas, B., Baranski, F., Cortinovis, D.: Predicting process activities and timestamps with entity-embeddings neural networks. In: Cherfi, S., Perini, A., Nurcan, S. (eds.) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2021. LNBIP, vol. 415, pp. 393–408. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_26

  10. Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M., Petrucci, G., Yeshchenko, A.: An eye into the future: leveraging a-priori knowledge in predictive business process monitoring. In: Proceedings of BPM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evermann, J., Rehse, J., Fettke, P.: Predicting process behaviour using deep learning. Decis. Support Syst. 100, 129–140 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ketykó, I., Mannhardt, F., Hassani, M., van Dongen, B.F.: What averages do not tell: predicting real life processes with sequential deep learning. In: The 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maggi, F.M., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Ghidini, C.: Predictive monitoring of business processes. In: Proceedings of CAISE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mauro, N.D., Appice, A., Basile, T.M.A.: Activity prediction of business process instances with inception CNN models. In: Proceedings of AI*IA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meister, C., Wiher, G., Cotterell, R.: On decoding strategies for neural text generators. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 10, 997–1012 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raffin, A., Hill, A., Gleave, A., Kanervisto, A., Ernestus, M., Dormann, N.: Stable-baselines3: reliable reinforcement learning implementations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22(268), 1–8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rama-Maneiro, E., Monteagudo-Lago, P., Vidal, J.C., Lama, M.: Encoder-decoder model for suffix prediction in predictive monitoring. CoRR abs/2211.16106 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rama-Maneiro, E., Vidal, J.C., Lama, M.: Deep learning for predictive business process monitoring: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 16(1), 739–756 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rama-Maneiro, E., Vidal, J.C., Lama, M.: Embedding graph convolutional networks in recurrent neural networks for predictive monitoring. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 36, 1–16 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. CoRR abs/1707.06347 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, X., Ying, Y., Yang, S., Shen, H.: Remaining activity sequence prediction for ongoing process instances. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 31(11 &12), 1741–1760 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement learning: an introduction. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 9(5), 1054–1054 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tax, N., Verenich, I., Rosa, M.L., Dumas, M.: Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In: Proceedings of CAISE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taymouri, F., Rosa, M.L., Erfani, S.M.: A deep adversarial model for suffix and remaining time prediction of event sequences. In: 2021 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 522–530. SIAM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taymouri, F., Rosa, M.L., Erfani, S.M., Bozorgi, Z.D., Verenich, I.: Predictive business process monitoring via generative adversarial nets: the case of next event prediction. In: Proceedings of BPM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weinzierl, S., Dunzer, S., Zilker, S., Matzner, M.: Prescriptive business process monitoring for recommending next best actions. In: BPM Forum (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegements

This work was supported by the Consellería de Educación, Universidade e Formación Profesional (ED431G-2019/04), the ERDF acknowledging CiTIUS as part of the Galician University System, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grants PDC2021-121072-C21, PID2020-112623GB-I00). It also received funding from the EU’s Horizon 2020 program (grant No 952215) and utilized CESGA’s supercomputer facilities. Fabio Patrizi was partially funded by MUR under the PNRR MUR project PE0000013-FAIR, the ERC Advanced Grant WhiteMech (No. 834228), and the Sapienza Project MARLeN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efrén Rama-Maneiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rama-Maneiro, E., Patrizi, F., Vidal, J., Lama, M. (2024). Towards Learning the Optimal Sampling Strategy for Suffix Prediction in Predictive Monitoring. In: Guizzardi, G., Santoro, F., Mouratidis, H., Soffer, P. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14663. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61056-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61057-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics