Abstract
Atlases are one of the most complex geovisualization environments as they are very information-rich. Within these environments, a well-designed user interface is essential to explore the variety of atlas maps and media. Involving technology-affine digital natives in the interface design process seems self-evident to provide appealing and intuitively usable atlases in the future. In our study, we presented secondary school students (n = 110, age 14–15 years) with five graphical user interface (GUI) mock-ups varying in layout density and tool arrangement. Each alternative design embodies a GUI concept inspired by an existing Web atlas or a popular website. The students have completed five tasks in these atlas interfaces that represent typical use cases for thematic navigation, spatial orientation and information queries. We collected performance and preference metrics for each layout, i.e., the time to solve a task (efficiency), whether students found the correct answers (effectiveness), and their ratings of each layout for “attractiveness”. To complete the analysis, we also conducted a mouse click analysis. Results indicate that atlas interfaces with a medium layout density are strongly preferred by the tested participants, and through inferential statistics, by digital natives in general. These medium density layouts also perform significantly better; i.e., they have lower average times, lower number of clicks and a higher percentage of successfully completed tasks. Based on the interpretation of the results of this study, general and practical guidelines for future atlas user interfaces are derived.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balciunas A (2013) User-driven usability assessment of internet maps. In: Buchroithner MF (ed) Proceedings of the 26th international cartographic conference, Dresden
Bartz B (1970) Experimental use of the search task in an analysis of type legibility in cartography. Cartogr J 7(2):103–112. doi:10.1179/caj.1970.7.2.103
Bennett S et al (2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 39(5):775–786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bhowmick T et al (2008) Distributed usability evaluation of the Pennsylvania cancer atlas. Int J Health Geogr 7:36. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-36
Black A (2010) Gen Y: who they are and how they learn. Educ Horiz 88(2):92–101
Cartwright W et al (2001) Geospatial information visualization user interface issues. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 28(1):45–60. doi:10.1559/152304001782173961
Cody MJ et al (1999) Silver surfers: training and evaluating internet use among older adult learners. Commun Educ 48(4):269–286. doi:10.1080/03634529909379178
Çöltekin A (2002) An analysis of VRML-based 3D interfaces for online GISs: current limitations and solutions. Finnish J Surveying Sci 20(1/2):80–91
Çöltekin A et al (2009) Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: a case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 36(1):5–17. doi:10.1559/152304009787340197
Eastman JR (1977) Map complexity: an information approach. M.Sc. thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON
Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) Side-effects of the E-society: the causes of information overload and possible countermeasures. In: Isaías P, Kommers P, McPherson M (eds) Proceedings of IADIS international conference e-society, vol II, Ávila. IADIS Press, pp 1119–1124
Fuhrmann S, Pike W (2005) User-centered design of collaborative geovisualization tools. In: Dykes J, MacEahren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring geovisualization. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 591–609
Galitz WO (2007) The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, Indianapolis
Häberling C, Hurni L (2013) The web-based “Swiss World Atlas Interactive”: first evaluation of user experiences in modern geography education. In: Buchroithner MF (ed) Proceedings of the 26th international cartographic conference, Dresden
Hegarty M et al (2009) Naïve cartography: how intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 44(3):171–186. doi:10.3138/carto.44.3.171
Holtzblatt K et al (2009) Driving user centered design into IT organizations. In: CHI ’09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Boston, 4–9 April 2009. ACM, New York, pp 2727–2730
Howard DL, MacEachren AM (1996) Interface design for geographic visualization: tools for representing reliability. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 2(23):59–77. doi:10.1559/152304096782562109
Kramers ER (2008) Interaction with maps on the internet – a user centred design approach for the atlas of Canada. Cartogr J 45(2):98–107. doi:10.1179/174327708X305094
MacEachren AM, Kraak MJ (2001) Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 28(1):3–12. doi:10.1559/152304001782173970
MacEachren AM et al (1997) Visualizing spatial relationships among health, environmental, and demographic statistics: interface design issues. In: Ottoson L (ed) Proceedings of the 18th international cartographic conference, Stockholm. Gävle Offset, Gävle, pp 880–887
MacEachren AM et al (2008) Design and implementation of a model, web-based, GIS-enabled cancer atlas. Cartogr J 45(4):246–260. doi:10.1179/174327708X347755
Nielsen J (1999) Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. New Riders, Indianapolis
Nielsen J, Budiu R (2012) Mobile usability. New Riders, Indianapolis
Nivala AM et al (2007) Usability methods’ familiarity among map application developers. Int J Hum Comput Stud 6(9):784–795. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.04.002
O’Dea E et al (2011) Coastal web atlas features. In: Wright DJ et al (eds) Coastal informatics: web atlas design and implementation. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 12–32
Olson JM (1979) Cognitive cartographic experimentation. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 16(1):34–44. doi:10.3138/R342-258H-5K6N-4351
Özerdem E et al (2013) Evaluating the suitability of Web 2.0 technologies for online atlas access interfaces. In: Buchroithner MF (ed) Proceedings of the 26th international cartographic conference, Dresden
Palfrey J, Gasser U (2011) Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New York
Polys NF et al (2007) Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information-rich virtual environments. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 18(1):19–38. doi:10.1002/cav.159
Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. Horizon 9(5):1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
Ruff J (2002) Information overload: causes, symptoms and solutions. Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://lila.pz.harvard.edu/_upload/lib/InfoOverloadBrief.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2012
Shneiderman B (1996) The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Spencer Sipple R (ed) Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages, Boulder. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 336–343
Tamir D et al (2008) An effort and time based measure of usability. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software quality, international conference on software engineering, Leipzig, 10–18 May 2008. ACM, New York, pp 47–52
Thompson P (2013) The digital natives as learners: technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Comput Educ 65:12–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schnürer, R., Sieber, R., Çöltekin, A. (2015). The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces: A User Study with “Digital Natives”. In: Brus, J., Vondrakova, A., Vozenilek, V. (eds) Modern Trends in Cartography. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07925-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07926-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)