Abstract
Electronic institutions (EIs) have been proposed as a means of regulating open agent societies. EIs define the rules of the game in agent societies by fixing what agents are permitted and forbidden to do and under what circumstances. And yet, there is the need for EIs to adapt their regulations to comply with their goals despite coping with varying populations of self-interested external agents. In this paper we focus on the extension of EIs with autonomic capabilities to allow them to yield a dynamical answer to changing circumstances through norm adaptation and changes in institutional agents.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmott, S.: Agentlink Roadmap. Agenlink.org (2005)
Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer 36, 41–50 (2003)
Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. IIIA PhD Monography, vol. 19 (2003)
Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 1, 275–306 (1998)
North, D.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economics Perfomance. Cambridge U. P., Cambridge (1990)
Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 191–204 (2005)
Etzioni, A.: Modern Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1964)
Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing action and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17, 301–321 (1993)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: KR 2004. Proc. of Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Whistler (CA) (2004)
Yang, Q.: A Simulation Laboratory for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. PhD thesis, MIT (1997)
Luke, S., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Panait, L., Sullivan, K.: Mason: A new multi-agent simulation toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SwarmFest Workshop, vol. 8 (2004)
Gâteau, B., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Moiseinst: An organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In: EUMAS 2005. 3rd European Workshop on Multiagent Systems, Brussels, Belgium (2005)
López-Sánchez, M., Noria, X., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Gilbert, N.: Multi-agent based simulation of news digital markets. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications 2, 7–14 (2005)
Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.: Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios. Electronic Commerce Research, 2006 (to appear)
Chipperfield, A., Fleming, P.: The matlab genetic algorithm toolbox. IEE Colloquium Applied Control Techniques Using MATLAB, pp. 10–14 (1995)
Excelente-Toledo, C.B., Jennings, N.R.: The dynamic selection of coordination mechanisms. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 9, 55–85 (2004)
Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Using the \(\mathcal{M}\)oise+ for a cooperative framework of mas reorganisation. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Gasser, L., Ishida, T.: A dynamic organizational architecture for adaptive problem solving. In: Proc. of AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, pp. 185–190 (1991)
Ishida, T., Yokoo, M.: Organization self-design of distributed production systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 4, 123–134 (1992)
Horling, B., Benyo, B., Lesser, V.: Using Self-Diagnosis to Adapt Organizational Structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 529–536 (2001)
Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1–15 (1999)
López-López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: AAMAS 2002, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Fitoussi, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Choosing social laws for multi-agent systems: Minimality and simplicity. Artificial Intelligence 119, 61–101 (2000)
Sierra, C., Sabater, J., Agustí-Cullell, J., García, P.: Integrating evolutionary computing and the sadde methodology (2003)
Hoogendoorn, M.: Adaptation of organizational models for multi-agent systems based on max flow networks. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Stanford, California, USA (2007)
Dresner, K., Stone, P.: Multiagent traffic management: An improved intersection control mechanism. In: The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 471–477. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Doniec, A., Espié, S., Mandiau, R., Piechowiak, S.: Dealing with multi-agent coordination by anticipation: Application to the traffic simulation at junctions. In: EUMAS, pp. 478–479 (2005)
Camurri, M., Mamei, M., Zambonelli, F.: Urban traffic control with co-fields. In: Proc. of E4MAS Workshop at AAMAS 2006, pp. 11–25 (2006)
Montana, D.J., Czerwinski, S.: Evolving control laws for a network of traffic signals. In: Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, Stanford University, CA, USA, pp. 333–338. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. (2007). Adaptation of Autonomic Electronic Institutions Through Norms and Institutional Agents. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII. ESAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75522-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75524-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)