Skip to main content

Adaptation of Autonomic Electronic Institutions Through Norms and Institutional Agents

  • Conference paper
Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII (ESAW 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4457))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

Electronic institutions (EIs) have been proposed as a means of regulating open agent societies. EIs define the rules of the game in agent societies by fixing what agents are permitted and forbidden to do and under what circumstances. And yet, there is the need for EIs to adapt their regulations to comply with their goals despite coping with varying populations of self-interested external agents. In this paper we focus on the extension of EIs with autonomic capabilities to allow them to yield a dynamical answer to changing circumstances through norm adaptation and changes in institutional agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmott, S.: Agentlink Roadmap. Agenlink.org (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer 36, 41–50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. IIIA PhD Monography, vol. 19 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 1, 275–306 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. North, D.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economics Perfomance. Cambridge U. P., Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 191–204 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Etzioni, A.: Modern Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing action and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17, 301–321 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: KR 2004. Proc. of Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Whistler (CA) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Q.: A Simulation Laboratory for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. PhD thesis, MIT (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luke, S., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Panait, L., Sullivan, K.: Mason: A new multi-agent simulation toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SwarmFest Workshop, vol. 8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gâteau, B., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Moiseinst: An organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In: EUMAS 2005. 3rd European Workshop on Multiagent Systems, Brussels, Belgium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. López-Sánchez, M., Noria, X., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Gilbert, N.: Multi-agent based simulation of news digital markets. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications 2, 7–14 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.: Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios. Electronic Commerce Research, 2006 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chipperfield, A., Fleming, P.: The matlab genetic algorithm toolbox. IEE Colloquium Applied Control Techniques Using MATLAB, pp. 10–14 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Excelente-Toledo, C.B., Jennings, N.R.: The dynamic selection of coordination mechanisms. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 9, 55–85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Using the \(\mathcal{M}\)oise+ for a cooperative framework of mas reorganisation. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gasser, L., Ishida, T.: A dynamic organizational architecture for adaptive problem solving. In: Proc. of AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, pp. 185–190 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ishida, T., Yokoo, M.: Organization self-design of distributed production systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 4, 123–134 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horling, B., Benyo, B., Lesser, V.: Using Self-Diagnosis to Adapt Organizational Structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 529–536 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1–15 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. López-López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: AAMAS 2002, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitoussi, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Choosing social laws for multi-agent systems: Minimality and simplicity. Artificial Intelligence 119, 61–101 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sierra, C., Sabater, J., Agustí-Cullell, J., García, P.: Integrating evolutionary computing and the sadde methodology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoogendoorn, M.: Adaptation of organizational models for multi-agent systems based on max flow networks. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Stanford, California, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dresner, K., Stone, P.: Multiagent traffic management: An improved intersection control mechanism. In: The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 471–477. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Doniec, A., Espié, S., Mandiau, R., Piechowiak, S.: Dealing with multi-agent coordination by anticipation: Application to the traffic simulation at junctions. In: EUMAS, pp. 478–479 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Camurri, M., Mamei, M., Zambonelli, F.: Urban traffic control with co-fields. In: Proc. of E4MAS Workshop at AAMAS 2006, pp. 11–25 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Montana, D.J., Czerwinski, S.: Evolving control laws for a network of traffic signals. In: Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, Stanford University, CA, USA, pp. 333–338. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gregory M. P. O’Hare Alessandro Ricci Michael J. O’Grady Oğuz Dikenelli

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. (2007). Adaptation of Autonomic Electronic Institutions Through Norms and Institutional Agents. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII. ESAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75522-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75524-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics