Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fucoxanthin Potentiates the Bactericidal Activity of Cefotaxime Against Staphylococcus aureus

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Staphylococcus aureus against commonly used antibiotics is a major global health issue. To prevent the emergence of AMR and maintain the desired therapeutic effect, the use of drug combinations in the therapeutic management of infections can be contemplated. This approach allows for the administration of lower antibiotic dosages without compromising the desired therapeutic outcome. Despite the documented antimicrobial activity of fucoxanthin, a widely recognized marine carotenoid, there are a lack of previous reports exploring its potential to enhance the therapeutic effect of antibiotics. The current study aimed to investigate whether fucoxanthin can inhibit S. aureus including the strains resistant to methicillin and to investigate whether fucoxanthin can enhance the therapeutic effect of cefotaxime, a widely prescribed 3rd-generation cephalosporin β-lactam antibiotic known to exhibit resistance in certain cases. Synergism or additive interactions were determined using checkerboard dilution and isobologram analysis, while bactericidal activity was carried out using the time-kill kinetic assay. It is important to highlight that a synergistic bactericidal effect was observed in all strains of S. aureus when fucoxanthin was combined with cefotaxime at a specific concentration ratio. These findings suggest that fucoxanthin holds promise in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of cefotaxime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data Availability

The original datasets generated and analyzed during this study are presented in the publication.

References

  1. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E et al (2015) Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00134-14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA et al (2019) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41579-018-0147-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin-Mons S, Lorrain S, Iacobelli S et al (2021) Antibiotics prescription over three years in a French benchmarking network of 23 level 3 neonatal wards. Front Pharmacol 11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.585018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Islam T, Kubra K, Chowdhury MMH (2018) Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals in chittagong, bangladesh: a threat of nosocomial infection. J Microsc Ultrastruct 6:188. https://doi.org/10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_33_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Preeja PP, Kumar SH, Shetty V (2021) Prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from community-and hospital-associated infections: a tertiary care center study. Antibiotics 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brochmann PR, Hesketh A, Jana B et al (2018) Transcriptome analysis of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposed to cefotaxime. Sci Rep 8:16076. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-018-34191-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Angst DC, Tepekule B, Sun L et al (2021) Comparing treatment strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance in an in vitro epidemiological setting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2023467118. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2023467118/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.2023467118.SAPP.PDF

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nothias LF, Knight R, Dorrestein PC (2016) Antibiotic discovery is a walk in the park. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:14477–14479. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1618221114/ASSET/721F44C4-4FB0-4144-AD44-7C7AD2A06B44/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/PNAS.1618221114FIG01.JPEG

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wink M (2022) Current understanding of modes of action of multicomponent bioactive phytochemicals: potential for nutraceuticals and antimicrobials. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 13:337–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-FOOD-052720-100326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusmita L, Franyoto YD, Mutmainah, et al (2022) Bixa orellana L. carotenoids: Antiproliferative activity on human lung cancer, breast cancer, and cervical cancer cells in vitro. Nat Prod Res In Press:

  11. Nurcahyanti ADR, Kusmita L, Wink M (2021) Bixin and fucoxanthin sensitize human lung cancer and cervical cancer cell to cisplatin in vitro. BMC Res Notes 14:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13104-021-05866-4/FIGURES/1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eid SY, Althubiti MA, Abdallah ME, et al (2020) The carotenoid fucoxanthin can sensitize multidrug resistant cancer cells to doxorubicin via induction of apoptosis, inhibition of multidrug resistance proteins and metabolic enzymes. Phytomedicine 77:. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYMED.2020.153280

  13. Chifiriuc MC, Filip R, Constantin M et al (2022) Common themes in antimicrobial and anticancer drug resistance. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2022.960693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ming JX, Wang ZC, Huang Y et al (2021) Fucoxanthin extracted from Laminaria Japonica inhibits metastasis and enhances the sensitivity of lung cancer to Gefitinib. J Ethnopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEP.2020.113302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang W, Fu C, Lin M et al (2022) Fucoxanthin prevents breast cancer metastasis by interrupting circulating tumor cells adhesion and transendothelial migration. Front Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2022.960375/FULL

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pocha CKR, Chia WY, Chew KW et al (2022) Current advances in recovery and biorefinery of fucoxanthin from Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Algal Res 65:102735. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALGAL.2022.102735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoo KS, Ooi CW, Chew KW et al (2022) Extraction of fucoxanthin from Chaetoceros calcitrans by electropermeabilization-assisted liquid biphasic flotation system. J Chromatogr A 1668:462915. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHROMA.2022.462915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karpiński TM, Adamczak A (2019) Fucoxanthin—an antibacterial carotenoid. Antioxidants. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANTIOX8080239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jawaji A, Zilberg D, Khozin-Goldberg I (2023) Using byproduct of fucoxanthin production by Phaeodactylum tricornutum for the development of a treatment against monogenean infection in fish. J Appl Phycol 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10811-023-02990-5/FIGURES/4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology E, Diseases I (2003) Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by broth dilution. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:ix–xv. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00790.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Orhan G, Bayram A, Zer Y, Balci I (2005) Synergy tests by E test and checkerboard methods of antimicrobial combinations against Brucella melitensis. J Clin Microbiol 43:140–143. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.1.140-143.2005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang RY, Pei L, Liu Q et al (2019) Isobologram analysis: a comprehensive review of methodology and current research. Front Pharmacol 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHAR.2019.01222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Tang Y, Zhang Y et al (2015) Fucoxanthin: a promising medicinal and nutritional ingredient. Evid Based Complem Altern Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/723515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barry AL, PhDW A, Nadler MDH et al (1999) M26-A methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline this document provides procedures for determining the lethal activity of antimicrobial agents. Clin Laborat Stand Inst 19:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Vuuren S, Viljoen A (2011) Plant-based antimicrobial studies–methods and approaches to study the interaction between natural products. Planta Med 77:1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0030-1250736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okoliegbe IN, Hijazi K, Cooper K et al (2021) Antimicrobial synergy testing: Comparing the tobramycin and ceftazidime gradient diffusion methodology used in assessing synergy in cystic fibrosis-derived multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS10080967/S1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómara M, Ramón-García S (2019) The FICI paradigm: correcting flaws in antimicrobial in vitro synergy screens at their inception. Biochem Pharmacol 163:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BCP.2019.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sopirala MM, Mangino JE, Gebreyes WA et al (2010) Synergy testing by Etest, microdilution checkerboard, and time-kill methods for pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4678–4683. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00497-10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaudereto JJ, Neto LVP, Leite GC et al (2020) Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. BMC Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12866-020-01756-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SY, Kim J, Il Jeong S et al (2015) Antimicrobial effects and resistant regulation of magnolol and honokiol on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/283630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Foo SC, Yusoff FM, Ismail M et al (2017) Antioxidant capacities of fucoxanthin-producing algae as influenced by their carotenoid and phenolic contents. J Biotechnol 241:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.11.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Caturla N, Vera-Samper E, Villalaín J et al (2003) The relationship between the antioxidant and the antibacterial properties of galloylated catechins and the structure of phospholipid model membranes. Free Radic Biol Med 34:648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01366-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naqvi SAR, Nadeem S, Komal S et al (2019) Antioxidants: natural antibiotics. Antioxidants. https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.84864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dwyer DJ, Belenky PA, Yang JH et al (2014) Antibiotics induce redox-related physi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2100–E2109. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1401876111/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1401876111.SAPP.PDF

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ribeiro D, Freitas M, Silva AMS et al (2018) Antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of carotenoids and their oxidation products. Food Chem Toxicol 120:681–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FCT.2018.07.060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thanks to Enty Tjoa, MD for the valuable discussion regarding on the microorganism characteristic. Many thanks to technical staffs from the Department of Pharmacy and Department of Microbiology for the laboratory support.

Funding

This work was supported by Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ADRN contributed to conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, and writing of the original draft, JL contributed to data collection, methodology, formal analysis, and writing, revising, and reviewing of the manuscript, MW contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and writing, reviewing, and revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agustina D. R. Nurcahyanti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nurcahyanti, A.D.R., Lady, J. & Wink, M. Fucoxanthin Potentiates the Bactericidal Activity of Cefotaxime Against Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Microbiol 80, 260 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03381-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03381-2

Keywords